Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Crown copyright Met Office Turbulent dispersion: Key insights of G.I.Taylor and L.F.Richardson and developments stemming from them Dave Thomson, 17 th.
Advertisements

Section 2: The Planetary Boundary Layer
Turbulent Models.  DNS – Direct Numerical Simulation ◦ Solve the equations exactly ◦ Possible with today’s supercomputers ◦ Upside – very accurate if.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Collective behaviour of large systems
Fate & Transport of Contaminants in Environmental Flows 2015.
CITES2003 Wednesday 10 th September 2003 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche ISTITUTO DI SCIENZE DELL’ATMOSFERA E DEL CLIMA(ISAC) - Turin Section Corso.
Session 2, Unit 3 Atmospheric Thermodynamics
MACRODISPERSION AND DISPERSIVE TRANSPORT BY UNSTEADY RIVER FLOW UNDER UNCERTAIN CONDITIONS M.L. Kavvas and L.Liang UCD J.Amorocho Hydraulics Laboratory.
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
Experimental Thermo and Fluid Mechanics Lab. 4. Fluid Kinematics 4.1. Velocity Field 4.2. Continuity Equation.
page 0 Prepared by Associate Prof. Dr. Mohamad Wijayanuddin Ali Chemical Engineering Department Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Module 9 Atmospheric Stability Photochemistry Dispersion Modeling.
ENAC-SSIE Laboratoire de Pollution de l'Air Model Strategies Simplify the equations Find an analytical solution Keep the equations Simplify the resolution.
0.1m 10 m 1 km Roughness Layer Surface Layer Planetary Boundary Layer Troposphere Stratosphere height The Atmospheric (or Planetary) Boundary Layer is.
Toxic Release and Dispersion Models
Momentum flux across the sea surface
高等輸送二 — 質傳 Lecture 3 Dispersion
Atmospheric turbulence Richard Perkins Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides et d’Acoustique Université de Lyon CNRS – EC Lyon – INSA Lyon – UCBL 36, avenue.
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Derivation of the Gaussian plume model Distribution of pollutant concentration c in the flow field (velocity vector u ≡ u x, u y, u z ) in PBL can be generally.
Fluid Dynamics: Boundary Layers
Radionuclide dispersion modelling
Air Quality Modeling.
Environmental Modeling Steven I. Gordon Ohio Supercomputer Center June, 2004.
CHAPTER 5 Concentration Models: Diffusion Model.
1.1 General description - Sample dissolved in and transported by a mobile phase - Some components in sample interact more strongly with stationary phase.
Session 4, Unit 7 Plume Rise
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
Cases 1 through 10 above all depend on the specification of a value for the eddy diffusivity, K j. In general, K j changes with position, time, wind velocity,
Air Dispersion Primer Deposition begins when material reaches the ground Material from the lower stack reaches the ground before that of the taller stack.
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Presentation Slides for Chapter 3 of Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling 2 nd Edition Mark Z. Jacobson Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
CHROMATOGRAPHY Chromatography basically involves the separation of mixtures due to differences in the distribution coefficient.
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun.
Building Aware Flow and T&D Modeling Sensor Data Fusion NCAR/RAL March
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
Measurements in Fluid Mechanics 058:180:001 (ME:5180:0001) Time & Location: 2:30P - 3:20P MWF 218 MLH Office Hours: 4:00P – 5:00P MWF 223B-5 HL Instructor:
1 Atmospheric Dispersion (AD) Seinfeld & Pandis: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Nov 29, 2007 Matus Martini.
An ATD Model that Incorporates Uncertainty R. Ian Sykes Titan Research & Technology Div., Titan Corp. 50 Washington Road Princeton NJ OFCM Panel Session.
INTRODUCTION Many heat and mass transfer processes in column apparatuses may be described by the convection – diffusion equation with a volume reaction.
Air quality models DETERMINISTIC MODELS EULERIAN MODELS
Ch 4 Fluids in Motion.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
CTUIR Air Quality Modeling Case Study Theodore A. Haigh Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Environmental Science & Technology Program.
Consequence Analysis 2.2.

Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
Sverdrup, Stommel, and Munk Theories of the Gulf Stream
A revised formulation of the COSMO surface-to-atmosphere transfer scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.
Interfacing Model Components CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
1.1 General description - Sample dissolved in and transported by a mobile phase - Some components in sample interact more strongly with stationary phase.
Modeling of heat and mass transfer during gas adsorption by aerosol particles in air pollution plumes T. Elperin1, A. Fominykh1, I. Katra2, and B. Krasovitov1.
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Neutrally Buoyant Gas Dispersion Instructor: Dr. Simon Waldram
Monte Carlo methods 10/20/11.
TOXIC RELEASE & DISPERSION MODELS (PART 1) Prepared by;
Turbulence closure problem
Lecture Objectives Learn about particle dynamics modeling
Lecture no 13 &14 Kinetics & kinematics of fluid flow
Models of atmospheric chemistry
September 9 to 13, 2013; Reading, United Kingdom
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
Objective Reynolds Navier Stokes Equations (RANS) Numerical methods.
Objective Define Reynolds Navier Stokes Equations (RANS)
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun
Presentation transcript:

Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling

The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example

A More Realistic but Simple Approach Basic assumption: Time averaged concentration is proportional to source strength It is also inversely proportional to average wind speed It follows a distribution function that fits normal distribution (Gaussian function)

A More Realistic but Simple Approach Resulting dispersion equation

Eulerian Approach Fixed coordinate system Continuity equation of concentration c i Wind velocities u j consist of 2 components: Deterministic Stochastic

Eulerian Approach u’ j random  c i random  No precise solution Even determination of mean concentration runs into a closure problem

Eulerian Approach Additional assumptions/approximations Chemically inert (R i =0) K theory (or mixing-length theory)  Where K jk is the eddy diffusivity, and is function of location and time Molecular diffusion is negligible The atmosphere is incompressible Resulting semiempirical equation of atmospheric dispersion

Eulerian Approach Solutions An instantaneous source (puff)

Eulerian Approach A continuous source  Plume is comprised of many puffs each of whose concentration distribution is sharply peaked about its centroid at all travel distances  Slender plume approximation – the spread of each puff is small compared to the downwind distance it has traveled  Solution

Lagrangian Approach Concentration changes are described relative to the moving fluid. A single particle A single particle which is at location x’ at time t’ in a turbulent fluid. Follow the trajectory of the particle, i.e. its position at any later time. Probability that particle at time t will be in volume element of x 1 to x 1 +dx 1, x 2 to x 2 +dx 2, x 3 to x 3 +dx 3

Lagrangian Approach Ensemble of particles. Ensemble mean concentration

Lagrangian Approach Solutions Instantaneous point source of unit strength at its origin, mean flow only in x direction Continuous source

Eulerian vs. Lagrangian Eulerian Fixed coordinate Focus on the statistical properties of fluid velocities Eulerian statistics are readily measurable Directly applicable when there are chemical reactions Closure problem – no generally valid solutions Lagrangian Moving coordinate Focus on the statistical properties of the displacements of groups of particles No closure problem Difficult to accurately determine the required particle statistics Not directly applicable to problems involving nonlinear chemical reactions

Eulerian vs. Lagrangian Reconcile the solutions from the two approaches Instantaneous sources Continuous sources Limitation for both approaches Lack of exact solutions Solutions only for idealized stationary (steady state), homogeneous turbulence Rely on experimental validation

Physical Picture of Dispersion Dispersion of a puff under three turbulence condition Eddies < puff  Significant dilution Eddies > puff  Limited dilution Eddies ~ puff  Dispersed and distorted Molecular diffusion vs. atmospheric dispersion (eddy diffusion) Instantaneous vs. continuous Description of plume Time averaged concentrations for continuous sources

Gaussian Dispersion Model Same as Lagrangian solutions For an instantaneous sources (a puff) For a continuous source at a release height of H

Gaussian Dispersion Model Ground reflection Special cases Ground level receptor (z=0) Center line (y=0) Ground level source (H=0)

Gaussian Dispersion Model Maximum ground level concentration and its location Graphical solution Accuracy of the Gaussian dispersion model

Session 3, Unit 6 Dispersion Coefficients

Factors Affecting σ Wind velocity fluctuation Friction velocity u * Monin-Obukhov length L Coriolis parameter Mixing height Convective velocity scale Surface roughness

Pasquill-Gifford Curves Condense all above factors into 2 variables – stability class and downwind distance Charts Numeric formulas Averaging time 3-10 minutes EPA specifies 1 hour

Field Measurements Problem 7.8