DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
CITY OF MIAMI CITY OF MIAMI. Health District Traffic Study July 21, 2008 Miami Partnership.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
September 1, The DC Circulator at a Glance The service of the Circulator is not only to move people, but as a service to market the areas the.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Spokane Transportation Planning Partnerships August 23, 2013.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis. Background ■On March 6, 2014, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement between Escambia.
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS SYSTEM PLAN 2040
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
MTA Efforts to “Mind the Gaps” Michael J. Walk Director of Service Development Maryland Transit Administration 2015 Mobility Matters Conference | May 7,
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Educational Session 101 May 29, 2014.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
Effective Transportation Planning City of Seattle, WA.
VRE SYSTEM PLAN WEBINAR October 9, 2013 Christine Hoeffner, VRE Foster Nichols, Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Metrobus 30s Line Study Improving Your Customer’s Transit Experience Virginia Transit Association May 20,
1 Presented by Tom Harrington WMATA Office of Long-Range Planning TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Future Metrorail Capacity Needs.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Blueprint for Tomorrow Fairhope City Council February 9, 2008.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Planning For an Upper Valley Transportation Facility October 1 st, 2009 Howe Library, Hanover, NH Upper Valley Lake Sunapee Regional Planning Commission.
1 Presentation to TAC May 20, 2009 Priority Corridor Network (PCN) Evaluation Project Introduction.
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 STUDY SESSION R IDGEFIELD J UNCTION S UBAREA P LAN DRAFT NOVEMBER 2015.
Atlanta Regional Commission Tom Weyandt, Department Director Comprehensive Planning May 2008.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Board Transportation Committee December 1, 2015 Randy.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Planning for the Future: Superintendent’s Acceleration Agenda Phase II: Strengthening Operations Presentation to the Boston School Committee May 8, 2008.
Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update.
North Vancouver Recreation Commission Needs Assessment/Facility Plan Presentation to FONVCA.
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) Collier Area Transit February 8, 2012 Report Findings and Recommendation s.
T H E P O R T L A N D P L A N A Comprehensive Plan for Portland in 2040 September 2007.
The Concept for City Center – The Power of TOD TOD Advisory Committee Meeting 3 December 10, 2009 The Premier Place for a Premier City.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
City of Belmont Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting 11/4/2015.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Central Maryland Transit Development Plan
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
HRT Workshop: Transit Strategic Plan and Aug-Dec working items
Presentation transcript:

DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010

About the Circulator Brand/Core Values High quality service High-frequency 10 minute headways on entire span of service Comfortable Easy to use and understand System Five year-round routes: Georgetown-Union Station Convention Center – Waterfront Woodley Park – Adams Morgan Union Station – Navy Yard Rosslyn – Georgetown – Dupont Circle One seasonal route: Smithsonian - National Gallery of Art Vehicles foot low-floor vehicles foot low-floor vehicles

Evolution of the Circulator

Transit Development Plan Growing demand for service Need for comprehensive plan to guide future growth Ridership ( )

Transit Development Plan Goals Transparent decision-making & planning Define criteria to use in planning new service Create a framework for service expansion & improvements Develop usable, living plan for near- and long- term future Project Team DC Surface Transit DC Office of Planning DC Council WMATA National Park Service National Capital Planning Commission

Transit Development Plan Phase I: Public Input & Needs Assessment – Collect input from key stakeholders Rider survey, focus groups, Community Advisory Panel, interviews – Review previous planning efforts How does DC Circulator fit in with other transit plans & projects? Phase II: Strategic Goals & Objectives –Use Phase I findings to develop: Strategic goals to guide growth over the next ten years Specific, achievable objectives Performance measures to provide planning framework Phase III: Prioritize Future Growth – Identify corridors for expanded service over the next 5-10 years Based on criteria developed through public input –Develop potential routes for short-term implementation

Phase I State of Origin District of Columbia79% Maryland11% Virginia3% Other6% Age % % % % 66+3% Highest Education Level High School12% Some College/Tech22% College or Grad School61% Income <$20K25% $20-40K22% $40-60K21% $60-80K14% $80-100K7% $100K+12% Rider Profile

Phase I Trip Purpose Work57% Shopping/Dining42% Recreational/Cultural42% Personal Business27% Work-Related23% School13% Type of Trip 10+ blocks59% 5-10 blocks36% Daily41% Several Times/Week33% Weekdays & Weekend69% Weekdays Only26% Roundtrip65% One-Way35% Trip Profile

Phase I 500+ online survey responses What people like most about the Circulator: – Friendly, professional drivers – Frequency of service – Limited stops Top 3 recommendations: – Longer hours – More weekend service – Moving the stop at Union Station closer to Metrobus stop

Phase II: Goals & Objectives 1: Provide a high quality transit network that meets the Circulator’s core values. – High frequency, easy to understand 2: Support a transit-oriented lifestyle. – Serve multiple trip purposes, connect activity centers, add capacity to the transportation network, connect modes 3: Improve mobility within and access to and from the monumental core. – Offer transit options between monumental core, key visitor destination centers, and multi-use activity centers in the District 4: Support economic activity in existing and developing multi-use activity centers. 5: Maximize financial and operational return on investment.

Phase II Sample performance measures: – Number of Activity Centers Served – Existing One-Seat Ride End to End – Existing Transit Connections between Activity Centers – Variety of Land Uses at Activity Centers Served – Number of Direct Connections from the National Mall to Activity Centers

Phase III Identifying key activity centers Why connect activity centers? Potential for all day ridership Operational efficiency – can offer all- day 10 minute headways Support multiple trip purposes Connect visitors, workers, and residents to key destinations Support economic activity at existing and emerging centers throughout the District What is an activity center? Center City Action Agenda “Priority Places” Comprehensive Plan designations – Regional Centers – Existing and Enhanced/New Multi- Neighborhood Centers – Land Use Change Areas with timely and sizable change Built out by 2020, ≥ 1 million sq. ft., & a mix of uses – Main Street Mixed-Use Corridors Connected to another intense land use and/or a large, mixed-use, and all- hours center

Potential Activity Centers Size of stars: estimated population and employment by 2020 Large: 40,000 and above Medium: 20,000 to 39,999 Small: 5,000 to 19,999 Color of stars: Near-term: existing or by 2013 Mid-term: 2014 to 2016 Long-term: 2017 to 2020

Corridor Development Mapping exercise with Community Advisory Panel and Circulator Operations Committee Considering future Streetcar corridors … and corridors eliminated from Streetcar analysis and other express service

Corridor Development Screening potential corridors based on selected performance measures

Next Steps Public meetings to solicit input on selected corridors – Nov 6, 6-8 PM, MLK Library – Nov 13, 1:30-3:30 PM, Benning Library Phasing of selected corridors (3, 5, & 10 year phases) Route development for first phase corridors

Questions? Comments? Marti Reinfeld Aaron Overman