THE MILITARY DECISION MAKING PROCESS (MDMP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tactical (Combat) Orders
Advertisements

Application of the Troop Leading Procedures
VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE NCO ACADEMY
Joint Operation Planning Process:
Operation Saber Strike, Fires Cell
Training Briefing Slide Format
TROOP LEADING PROCEDURES FM 7-8
TROOP LEADING PROCEDURES
Troop Leading Procedures
“Common Process for Developing Briefings for Major Decision Points” INSTRUCTIONS Provide Feedback via to: Lois Harper PEO C4I and Space
Distributed Battle Simulations Program East Region BOS Team MILITARY DECISION MAKING PROCESS MDMP.
OPORD Crosswalk.
Company Level Training Management Course
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
The Operations Process
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Marketing Research, Primary Data, Secondary Data, Qualitative Research, Quantitative.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Campaign Planning Process 29 March 2006 Step 7 – Prepare Operations Plan (OPLAN) / Operations Order (OPORD) & Assess UNCLASSIFIED.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
The Military Decision Making Process
The Staff Study Individual Requirement Introduction and Overview.
Troop Leading Procedures
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
Military Decision Making Process – Multinational (MDMP-M)
Crisis Action Planning Process پروسه پلان گذاری عملکرد بحران Situation Development Crisis Assessment COA Development COA Selection Execution Planning Execution.
1 Staff Officer Coordination USAMPS Captain’s Career Course.
1 The Military Decision- Making Process (MDMP). 2 MDMPAgenda MDMP Agenda 1. Module 1: MDMP Overview/Receipt of Mission/Mission Analysis PE # 1 – Cdr’s.
1 Module 1 Receipt Of Mission & Mission Analysis.
Military Decision-Making Process
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Comparison.
Welcome to the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP) Class. This is the last of the seven parts to the MDMP class. Review the instructions below before.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Welcome to the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP) Class. There are seven parts to the MDMP class. This class covers part 1, Receipt of Mission. Review.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
UNCLASSIFIED Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Operation Order UNCLASSIFIED ing.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 1 Course of Action Development (MDMP) 3 Mar 08 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Campaign Planning Process Guide / Brief Template
REF: FM 7-8 INFANTRY RIFLE PLATOON AND SQUAD MANUAL
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
MPAT SECRETARIAT Multinational Force Crisis Action Planning Overview COALITION/COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING.
Course of Action Comparison Purpose u Define course of action comparison and its role in the crisis action planning process u Discuss the associated task.
Staff (Running) Estimate
Crisis Action Planning (CAP) and The Commander’s Estimate Joint Pub 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations Joint Pup , Joint Task Force Planning Guidance.
TAC Mission Analysis. Oporder Format Situation – Higher Headquarters’ Mission and Intent (Citadel’s Mission Statement and Guide to LDP) Mission (Commandant’s.
Critical Facts & Assumptions
Major William B. Pittman 18 September 2015
Andy Wilson – Team Manager HR Education (School Teacher Appraisal) (England) Regulations 2012 A briefing for Heads and Governors.
Maj James Day 28 September Why do Mission Analysis? Purpose of MA Integrated planning MA in Army doctrine MA in Air Force doctrine Example: large-force.
MNF SOP Planning Options & Campaign Planning Process
Chapter 1: Foundations of Army JROTC and Getting Involved Lesson 9: Basic Command and Staff Principles Unit Basic Command and Staff Principles Citizenship.
MDMP-M Steps 6: Plans and Orders Development
Campaign Planning Process Step 4 – Campaign Formulation
Receipt of Mission (MDMP)
Religious Inputs/Outputs
The MDMP Process MDMP Inputs MDMP Outputs Step 1 MDMP Inputs Step 5
MILITARY DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN PEACE SUPPORT OPERATIONS
Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute The Army’s only organization for Peace and Stability Operations at the strategic and operational level.
Risk Assessment Matrix
1 REHEARSAL TYPES & TECHNIQUES. 2 Purpose of RehearsalsPurpose of Rehearsals Types of RehearsalsTypes of Rehearsals TechniquesTechniques Company Level.
TROOP LEADING PROCEDURES
PERFORMING AS ADA LNO.
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
TROOP LEADING PROCEDURES
REF: FM 7-8 INFANTRY RIFLE PLATOON AND SQUAD MANUAL
Course of Action Development
MDMP-M Step 4: Course of Action Comparison
MDMP-M Steps 6: Plans and Orders Development
Presentation transcript:

THE MILITARY DECISION MAKING PROCESS (MDMP)

PURPOSE Review MDMP Discuss TTP for conducting the MDMP in a “time-constrained” environment. Conduct a practical exercise using the MDMP in a “time-constrained” environment

BACKGROUND Deliberate Decision Making Process (DDMP) Abbreviated Accelerated Conventional Wisdom (FM 101-5) Don’t omit steps Anticipation, Organization, and Prior Preparation are the keys to success CDR decides how to accelerate process

MDMP STEPS Receipt of Mission Mission Analysis COA Development Warning Order (WARNO) Mission Analysis WARNO COA Development COA Analysis COA Comparison COA Approval Orders Production

TIME SAVING TECHNIQUES Increase Commander’s involvement Commander is more directive in his guidance Commander limits the number of COAs Maximize parallel planning

PLANNING CONTINUUM AVAILABLE PLANNING MORE TIME DRIVES LESS LESS LEVEL OF INVOLVEMENT MORE OF COMMANDER LESS DETAILS IN CDR’S MORE GUIDANCE MORE FLEXIBILITY/LATITUDE LESS OF STAFF MORE NUMBER OF COAs LESS DEVELOPED LEVEL OF MORE DETAIL/COORDINATION LESS IN OPORD

COMMANDER’S ROLE decides what adjustments to make should avoid changes to his guidance should consult with subordinate commanders should contact higher headquarters and advise them of his selected COA

STAFF’S ROLE Staff Estimates Use every opportunity to conduct parallel planning with higher headquarters

MISSION RECEIPT Does not change Commander decides if and how he wants to abbreviate the MDMP SEND WARNO

MISSION ANALYSIS Commander’s involvement is key IPB requires constant attention Staff conducts as formal a mission analysis briefing as time allows SEND WARNO

COMMANDER’S GUIDANCE Elements are the same More detailed and directive Keeps staff focused

COA DEVELOPMENT Increased Commander involvement Few (or one) COA Hasty Wargame When time is severely limited Commander may decide to develop one COA against enemy’s most likely COA Not using the enemy event templates is a poor technique

COA ANALYSIS 1 of 2 MUST conduct wargaming to ensure integration and synchronization Commander must always assess risk Staff should use box technique focusing on most critical event first, then as many as possible with allotted time Specifically define and limit evaluation criteria to four or five most important

COA ANALYSIS 2 of 2 Use of recorders is particularly important coordinating instructions sub-unit instructions synchronization information Portion of the OPORD is written When only one COA is developed, the analysis is used to verify, refine, synchronize and integrate the COA and to recommend modifications

COA COMPARISON Only one COA, not necessary Two or more, still necessary Limiting evaluation criteria

COA APPROVAL CDR has observed and participated, can make on-the-spot approval CDR has not participated or not made a decision, a decision briefing will still be required Once decision is made, SEND WARNO

ORDERS PRODUCTION WARNOs Wargame results SOPs synchronization matrix DST SOPs

QUESTIONS ?