Section 1: Why RTI Is So Important. How do we know RTI really works? 25-30 YEARS OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND USE IN THE CLASSROOM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Impact of RTI on Learning Disabilities Identification.
Advertisements

R T I Progress Monitoring Module 6 RI RTI Initiative 2007.
Pleasant Valley Parent Information Night. Connecticut Summit Message: We Have A Reading Problem In Connecticut Many entering K students do not have expected.
A NEW MODEL OF TIERED INTERVENTION REQUIRED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT AS OF JULY 1, PRESENTED BY JESS GRAYUM Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Mentoring in Ohio for Reading Excellence For 1 st – 4 th grade students with disabilities 30 mins. of instruction daily, 4 days/week One-on-one instruction.
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
SLD Body of Evidence and Eligibility Denver Public Schools, 2011.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
Zoomerang Slide Presentation. RTI Pre-Survey: Identify your building/level.
Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois at Chicago
Response to Intervention Big Ideas: Since its inception as a category, SLD has been characterized by severe discrepancy between ability/achievement. In.
A NEW APPROACH TO IDENTIFYING LEARNING DISABILITIES RTI: Academics.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
Response to Intervention RtI RtI is an instructional approach focused on the prevention of learning difficulties Agenda Overview of RtI From SST to RtI.
Assessment & Data Driven Instruction Session 1: What Data Do We Have? Session 2: What Does the Data Mean? Session 3: What Do We Do With It?
1 Student Goals and Motivation Accelerated Math  Best Practices.
Teaming for Success: Going from ALL to EACH. Option #2: Oregon Reading First’s PD series Training series is optional, if interested submit application.
One More Piece of the RTI Puzzle: Zones of Growth for Students Receiving Tier 2 Instructional Supports Hank Fien, Ph.D. Center for Teaching and Learning.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
0 Pep Talk: Kid President
RTI Grade Level Team Meetings Presented by April Kelley.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
RtI July 29, RtI Is… A General Education Data-Driven Process or System that Provides Instructional Intervention in Reading, Mathematics,
University of Rhode Island EDC 452. A process of:  Providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and  Using learning.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
 The national re-designation rate for Special Education students is 4% (USDOE, 1996)  Graduation rate of Special Education students is 57% (USDOE, 2001).
Constitutionally based court findings have set precedents for the rights of all students to be educated in the General Education classroom. “Least Restrictive.
The Urgent need to improve reading instruction and outcomes for our K-12 students Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Florida State University and Florida Center for.
Kenmore – Tonawanda Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK)
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
Evaluating Student Response to Instruction Using a 3-Tier RtI Progress Monitoring System John M. Hintze, Ph.D. University of Massachusetts National Center.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Tailoring Literacy Instruction to Special Education Populations Sylvia Linan-Thompson Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts The University.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
RtI True or False? T or F -With RtI, the learning and progress of all students is assessed. T or F - RtI is only about interventions. T or F - All students.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Module 3: Unit 3, Session 1 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 3, Session 1.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009.
Response to Intervention Establishing RTI Guidelines to Diagnose Learning Disabilities: What Schools Should Know Jim Wright.
Evaluation and Eligibility Using RTI Crook County School District February 26, 2010.
Earobics Closing the Literacy Gap Through Intervention Pre K - 3.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Data RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Severe Discrepancy vs. Response to Intervention. Severe Discrepancy Model of Eligibility Determination (1974 – present) This method is used for students.
RTI 2 Please write down three things you want to know before this session is done today.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) LEARNING DISABILITIES (LD) By: Julia Bjerke, Monica Fontana Crystal Schlosser, & Jessica Ringwelski.
THE DATA DRIVEN CLASSROOM Kim Baumgartner, M.A. Disability Services Coordinator for Mid Florida Community Services Head Start.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
Bixby North Elementary
Response to Intervention
Converging Research Chapter 11 Background Information:
Data-Based Leadership
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Response to Intervention
A NEW APPROACH TO IDENTIFYING LEARNING DISABILITIES
A NEW APPROACH TO IDENTIFYING LEARNING DISABILITIES
Student Progress Inspiring Learning.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
Presentation transcript:

Section 1: Why RTI Is So Important

How do we know RTI really works? YEARS OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND USE IN THE CLASSROOM

RESEARCH HAS SHOWN THAT IT WORKS WITH MANY STUDENTS WHO HAVE SEVERE READING DISABILITIES …

60 CHILDREN BETWEEN THE AGES OF 8 AND 10 RECEIVING SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR AN AVERAGE OF 16 MONTHS RECEIVED 67.5 HOURS OF ONE-ON-ONE INSTRUCTION, 2 HOURS PER DAY FOR 8 WEEKS PROGRESS WAS FOLLOWED FOR TWO YEARS AFTER INTERVENTION One study conducted in Florida during the mid 1990’s…

P-Pretest Pre Post 1 year 2 year LIPS EP Growth in Total Reading Skill Before, During, and Following Intensive Intervention Standard Score FLORIDA CENTER FOR READING RESEARCH (fcrr.org)

WE KNOW IT WORKS… AND IT HELPS US SOLVE A BIG PROBLEM.

Children enter school with widely discrepant language/literacy experiences... Literacy: 10,000 hours of exposure to print versus 10 Language: 2,153 words versus 616 words heard per hour Confidence Building: 32 affirmations/5 prohibitions per hour versus 5 affirmations/11 prohibitions per hour

Consequences of getting off to a slow start in reading… First Grade: Average number of words read per reading session Biemiller,

Fifth Grade Reading Practice… A student at the 10 th percentile reads about 60,000 words per year A student at the 50 th percentile reads about 900,000 words per year Average students receive about 15 times as much reading practice per year

12 Diagnosing Specific Learning Disabilities: cognitive and achievement tests substantial gap between higher IQ and lower achievement scores ‘severe discrepancy’ = Specific Learning Disability (SLD) “Test-Score Discrepancy Model” AND ANOTHER BIG PROBLEM…

Slow Learners who don’t exhibit a severe discrepancy but need lots of extra help and can’t get it (a.k.a., “DROP OUTS”) Up to half of the students identified as Learning Disabled in Reading really aren’t disabled. They started out behind and couldn’t catch up. Ineligible for SPED What we end up with…

Why is Progress Monitoring Important? How do we know if a student is making adequate progress? (In other words… 1.How well are they doing now? 2.How well should they be doing? 3.Are they making progress toward that goal?) ?

We can’t tell how they’re doing unless we know where they need to go.

We can’t help them reach their goal if we don’t monitor progress and “fine tune” our intervention. The RTI team must meet on a regular basis to make the intervention process effective. RTI team meets, reviews progress, and modifies intervention

With regular monitoring and changes to intervention, we make it possible for students to meet their goals. This is the only way the gap between low performers and average performers can be closed.