1 A Review: State Economic Development Programs Legislative Audit Bureau April 2007.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Recognition by ENQA of the results of national reviews Peter Williams President, ENQA.

Advertisements

Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.

1 Single Audit Legislative Audit Bureau September 2009.

1 Voter Registration Elections Board Legislative Audit Bureau October 2005.

Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.

Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.

Types of Cost Sharing Mandatory: When the sponsor stipulates that cost sharing or matching funds are required as a condition of receiving an award. Specifically.

Joe White (608) Wayne Chase (608) WisDOT Materials Management Section 1.

1 Contract Sunshine Act Report Legislative Audit Bureau October 13, 2011.

1 Emergency Management Legislative Audit Bureau September 2010.

TAX Yuliana Revyuk, KPMG in Ukraine Investment in Ukraine: Certain key tax issues.

1 A Review of State Economic Development Programs Legislative Audit Bureau August 2006.

1 Air Management Programs Legislative Audit Bureau May 2004.

1 Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation Legislative Audit Bureau May 9, 2013.

Legislative Audit Bureau September 10, 2013 Supervised Release Placements and Expenditures Report

1 Personnel Policies and Practices Wisconsin Technical College System Legislative Audit Bureau May 2007.

1 Personnel Policies and Practices, University of Wisconsin System Legislative Audit Bureau November 2006.

1 Wetland Regulatory Programs Department of Natural Resources Legislative Audit Bureau July 2007.

1 FoodShare Wisconsin (reports 12-3 and 12-8) Legislative Audit Bureau August 2012.

The Role of Parliament in approving the budget World Bank Institute’s Parliamentary Staff Training Program.

Florida Atlantic University Overview of Operating Budget Process Presentation to the Florida Atlantic University Foundation, Inc. Board of Directors February.

1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.

Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.

1 Developing A Quality Assurance Program For The US Census Bureau’s Business Register David. D. Chapman US CENSUS BUREAU 1.

1 Food and Dairy Safety Program Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection Legislative Audit Bureau July 2008.

SAFETY AUDIT. 2.1 Definition of audit. Critical systematic inspection of an organization‘s activities in order to minimize losses due to accidents.

Montgomery County 2012 Charter Commission April 18, 2012 Meeting.

1 Wisconsin Works (W-2) Program Legislative Audit Bureau April 2005.

April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.

1 Children At Risk Program Legislative Audit Bureau April 2005.

Overview of the Mississippi Legislature’s Efforts to Revitalize Performance Budgeting June 11, 2015.

MENA-OECD Investment Programme Draft Policy Considerations on Incentives Working Group 3 Meeting Cairo, Egypt 6-7 September 2006.

Department of Water Affairs (DWA) and Water Trading entity (WTE) Predetermined Objectives – 2013/14 March 2013.

Motion Picture Competitiveness Program Proposed Final Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee December 1, 2010 Stacia Hollar, JLARC Staff.

1 Use of Tobacco Control Board Funds Legislative Audit Bureau April 2003.

Grant Management Dawn Jenkins, Senior Accountant, City of Peoria Dawn Jenkins, Senior Accountant, City of Peoria Janeen Gaskins, Grants Administrator,

Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing

Measuring Performance in Maryland Managing for Results – Est. in 1997, housed at Dept. of Budget and Management StateStat – Est. in 2007, housed in Office.

Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)

Kids Talk Legislative Briefing Family Engagement in Ohio December 8, 2011 Angela Sausser Short Ohio Family and Children First.

The California Performance Review: A Prescription for Change Established by Executive Order S-5-04 To Create the First 21 st Century Government in America.

Senate Bill 329 The Healthy Oregon Act 2007 Jeanene Smith Administrator Office for Oregon Health Policy and Research SCI Coverage Institute September 26,

PP 500 Public Administration and Management Unit Seven Seminar Dr. Bruce Bordner Kaplan University.

Evaluation of Washington’s Economic Development System WEDA Winter Conference February 12, 2013 Spencer Cohen Senior Policy Advisor Washington Economic.

Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Statistical Project Monitoring Section A 1.

State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives October 8 - 9, 2014 Boise, Idaho.

1 Information Technology Projects Legislative Audit Bureau October 2007.

Civil society and public expenditure What can parliament gain from opening the budget process to public participation? Rick Stapenhurst Governance Team.

Evaluation of Budget Process for Information Technology Projects Proposed Final Report February 16, 2006 Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee Karen.

ICASA and USSASA Predetermined Objectives – 2013/14 March 2013 Portfolio committee.

1 Information Technology Projects Legislative Audit Bureau May 2007.

The Infrastructure of Social Sciences: CNSTAT and CPOP and the Building of the Federal Statistical System Margo Anderson Distinguished Professor, History.

AUDIT COMMITTEES’ PERSPECTIVE ON PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND INSIGHTS INTO THEIR OVERSIGHT ROLE.

1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau March 2007.

Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.

Recommendations on Monitoring and Tracking Quantity and Quality of Climate Expenditure, Accountability and Transparency Group 5.

Investing in the Environment1 Investing in the Environment 2001 Performance Audit 3rd Follow-Up Report June 16, 2004 Eric Thomas Joint Legislative Audit.

Developmental Education ACAO meeting October, 2011.

OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY The Legislative Sunset Review Process Larry Novey Chief Legislative Analyst, OPPAGA The Florida.

Continuous Improvement in the Education Unit: Closing the Loop of Assessment Assessment Day Christopher Cratsley Nancy Murray Ann M. Hogan January 19,

Campus Budget Conversation April 28, Enrollment Source: Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning, Budget Office.

NDS Accounting Forum The Regulatory Horizon 20 May 2010 Professor David Gilchrist Not-for-profit Initiative, School of Business, Fremantle University of.

Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.

Stockton Event Center Audit Recommendations and City Response

Audit Guideline on Delivering the 2030 Agenda through Environmental Audit WGEA’s Work Plan Goal 1 - Developing guidance materials available.

PP 650 Public Policy Analysis Unit Eight Seminar Dr

5 April 2016 Briefing to the Higher Education Portfolio Committee on review of the draft APPs.

PEMPAL, Moscow, October 2016 Natalia Pilets Deputy Head,

الوحدة 20 مهارات التواصل مع الآخرين

Presentation transcript:

1 A Review: State Economic Development Programs Legislative Audit Bureau April 2007

2 Scope of Effort u We identified 152 economic development programs u Eight state agencies are involved in administering these programs u The Department of Commerce is the lead agency for economic development

3 Expenditures

4 Key Findings u Identification of duplicative and outdated programs u Every part of Wisconsin was included in at least one type of development zone u Agencies report expected, rather than actual program outcomes u Individual project results are not consistently verified, compiled, and reported

5 Recommendations u Confirm duplicative and outdated programs u Improve tracking and reporting of actual results and long-term success u Improve tracking of tax credits claimed u Review CAPCO program u Identify economic development liaisons and programs at UW and WTCS campuses u Report to Committee by February 15, 2007

6 Items for the Legislature u Specify criteria for designation of future development zones u Establish clear, measurable goals to improve coordination u Reduce the number of programs by consolidating similar programs and eliminating inactive programs u Consolidate reporting requirements for state agencies u Improve transparency by making information more readily available to the public

7 A Review: State Economic Development Programs Legislative Audit Bureau April 2007