BY CHANISE FIRST CONSTRUCTIVE. GENERAL Gain as much offense as possible to use to win the round Beware of holes in your case and try to cover them This.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LANCASTER UNIVERSITY DEBATING SOCIETY luds Advanced debating.
Advertisements

1st Proposition Speech 1.Statement of the Resolution 2.Definition of Essential Terms (should be clear to the average person) 3.Outline Arguments/Pillars.
By Mark Veeder-SCFI How to properly construct an AC and NC -Getting the most out of cross-ex -How to structure a rebuttal.
Anatomy of a debate Austin Layton.
Public Forum Debate The Rules in Brief. Pre-Debate Two people debate two people. One team flips a coin and the opposing team calls heads or tails. Whoever.
PICs….. In spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!.  Cp text  Net benefit  Must be competitive ◦ Uniquely beneficial ◦ Mutually exclusive.
AUDL Middle School Debate Team Tournament Handbook Debate Tournament Schedule Arrive at tournament & wait in cafeteria. Round 1 Round 2 Lunch Break in.
Unit 1 Survivor Review Work with your tribe on group challenges and compete against other tribes to score points. Who will outplay, outlast, outwit their.
Rebuttal By Chanise (My favorite speech). First Speaker Position Rebuttal You have the advantage of a full four minutes of attacking your opponents case.
Matt Gomez Ph.D in Theoretical Objections to Negative and Affirmative argumentation (Bingham Campus) SCFI 2011 THEORY.
The Value/Criterion Debate and Voters. Aaron Overheim.
 Debating the Case Mikaela Malsin, Univ. of Georgia DUDA 2012
Before We Start…  Debate functions on two basic levels: pre-fiat and post-fiat.  Pre-fiat: everything that really has not much to do with the case,
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.
Basic Debating Skills.
How to Debate Disadvantages. Selecting disadvantages to run  Be strategic in selecting them—a few things to remember—  Don’t run multiple disadvantages.
Observations By Chanise. Observation One Definitions.
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
Helping Your Child Cope With Stress Building Resiliency.
Today’s goals Evaluate the final class media project
SUMMARY AND FINAL FOCUS. Summary Basics  2 minute speech, after the rebuttals.  It’s a time to clear up for the judge what she should really be paying.
ReviewJeopardy Public Forum Research Logic Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Potpourri Argument Final Jeopardy.
FLOWING! (AND FILING BASICS). Filing basics Many new debaters lose debates because they have misplaced parts of their files. Following these simple rules.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Ian Ritchie.  The constructive is unique in that it is the only prewritten speech in PF, and as such allows you unlimited time to prep and refine your.
SPEECHES. WHAT IS A SPEECH? Writing for public speaking isn't so different from other types of writing.  ENGAGE THE AUDIENCE'S ATTENTION  CONVEY IDEAS.
REBUTTALS (the second speech for your team…) David Childree.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate RefutationRefutation. Step One: Briefly restate your opponent’s argument. The purpose of restating is to provide geographic marker.
Lincoln Douglas Debate RJ Pellicciotta, Cary Academy Dogwood Speech & Debate League.
A Brief Introduction to LD Jonathan Waters Grovetown High School.
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
How to debate By Ms. Moreno.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
Debating the case.
Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.
Sydney Apple Boston College 2015 Georgia Debate Institutes
Plan 1.Introducing the team 2.Case: Theme; actuality; importance Definitions Criteria Arguments + explanations + support/evidence (examples, statistics,
Public Forum Debate: Revised Slide Show 2008 champions recognized by Dr. Feeley and School Board, 4/15/2008.
SCFI 2011 SJK. Understand how to structure and write basic LD constructives Understand the basic components of contention-level argumentation Begin to.
How to Debate Disadvantages. DA Uniqueness: Status of a key issue in the SQ – Example: The economy is improving Link: how the plan disrupts the SQ – Example:
 4 th stock issue  Significance means that the issue addressed by the Affirmative team is a major force affecting a large group.  The penalty for not.
30 ways to get 30s SCFI 2011 How to get better speaks or die trying.
 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.
The Law of Averages. What does the law of average say? We know that, from the definition of probability, in the long run the frequency of some event will.
Prepared by Jason Hong, David Miko and the University of Calgary Debate Society.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate. Resolutions: The resolution is a statement with which one contestant must agree (affirm) and the other contestant must disagree.
Its about the plan – advantages/disadvantages/solving a problem Example: Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase.
Chapter 16,17,18 Negative Terms. Debate Terms-Negative Must directly clash with the affirmative Must directly clash with the affirmative Negative wins.
REFUTATION. CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IS JUSTIFIED BECAUSE OF THE GOOD IT CAN DO FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. DURING THE 1960’S, THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT DID.
BASICS OF BEING AFFIRMATIVE
Shouldn’t we have started with this?!?
Introduction to the Negative
Unit 1: Science, Technology and Engineering
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
LD Debate Study Information
Advanced Summary SPEECHES
Hegemony (Heg) Economic, military, and political influence a nation has. It’s America’s street cred Soft Power + Hard Power= Heg Amount of Soft + Amount.
What a debate case looks like…
Answering the CP Casey Parsons.
4 Step Refutation.
BY KENI SABATH FOR NO LIMITS DEBATE CAMP
Public Forum Debate (PF)
Debate What is Debate?.
Format Affirmative Constructive - 5 minutes
Public Forum Debate.
CX Purpose and Strategies
Topicality Casey Parsons.
Getting To Know Debate:
Constructing a Test We now know what makes a good question:
Presentation transcript:

BY CHANISE FIRST CONSTRUCTIVE

GENERAL Gain as much offense as possible to use to win the round Beware of holes in your case and try to cover them This is the only prewritten speech which has unlimited prep.

NOTES: ONLY PREWRITTEN SPEECH. This is unlimited prep time.

OBSERVATIONS 1.Definition 2.Framework 3.Any other points needed to be made pertaining to the resolution. Clarity that may be a future problem within the round.

Contentions

CLAIM WARRANT IMPACT Every contention should be structured the same way, claim warrant impact. It can include multiple CW! Or link several together. So what is a CW!?

CLAIM Claim: What you are telling the judge will happen or is currently happening. Ex: Terrorists hate the United States

WARRANT Warrant: A warrant is why the claim will happen. THIS IS NOT JUST A PIECE OF EVIDENCE SAYING IT WILL HAPPEN. This is an explanation of what in the world will make it happen or is causing it to happen. Ex: C: Terrorist hate the united states W: Because we invaded their land/ they have made threats against the US. They have attacked the US

IMPACT (! IS THE SIGN FOR IMPACT) Impact: What will happen as a result of your claim. Ex: C: Terrorist hate the united states W: Because we invaded their land/ they have made threats against the US. They have attacked the US !: Unless something changes it will happen again, they will attack us.

Try one of your own!!

VARSITY LEVEL- THREE CONTENTIONS First- General Stocked Second- General sounding but odd You want them to mishandle it Third- Odd idea that has a strong link but far off (Ex: Justify eugenics, stem cell, Africa, etc.)

FIRST CONTENTION General contention always heard: The Purpose: -Abundance of offense -Time skew, if they know how to answer it they are going to spend more time on it. Stock: Add statistic after statistic with analytics and logical links to give them far too much to answer

SECOND CONTENTION Sounding general but can be mishandled The Purpose: -Have better debates by forcing them to listen to the odd contention -If they don’t listen to the contention right they will simply pull up the block and answers they think they know but it isn’t. You will still have offense- in your second speech you can state “They seemed to mishandle/not understand this contention- what it means once again is…”

THIRD CONTENTION Odd idea *UNIQUE* that has a strong link but very far off from the norm. (Ex: Justify eugenics, stem cell, Africa, etc.) The Purpose: -Give you an advantage as they will not be prepared to debate it. -Most the contentions have been heard of before by being creative you will be rewarded. -Shock the other team, they will not know what hit them. -Force better debates. They will have to get specific destroying your links and impacts logically instead of making it another contention of competing evidence debates. * If you cannot come up with a good third contention like this I would recommend two general stocked contentions and then one mishandle