Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning and use of funding instruments
Advertisements

Theory-Based Evaluation:
1 Evaluating Communication Plans Cvetina Yocheva Evaluation Unit DG REGIO 02/12/2009.
Linking regions and central governments: Indicators for performance-based regional development policy 6 th EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF COHESION.
A NEW METRIC FOR A NEW COHESION POLICY by Fabrizio Barca * * Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance. Special Advisor to the European Commission. Perugia,
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.
Guidance document on ex-ante evaluation
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Draft guidance on monitoring and evaluation : Concepts and recommendations.
Performance Framework
A Fresh Look at the Intervention Logic of Structural Funds
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
Cohesion Policy focus on performance experiences of the Hungarian Presidency Dr. Györgyi Nyikos Deputy State Secretary for Development Affairs Ministry.
1 W ORKSHOP ON S TRATEGIC P ROGRAMMING, M ONITORING AND EVALUATION F OCUSING ON P ERFORMANCE AND RE SULTS Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Regional Policy Draft Implementing Act Consistent approach to determine the milestones and targets in the performance framework and to assess the attainment.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
V4 Expert Group V4 Expert Group Result Orientation Challenges – 17 June 2014 Budapest.
Reformed Partnership and Multi-Level Governance Ana Maria Dobre Political Administrator General Council Secretariat
VERONICA GAFFEY Acting Director – Policy Development DG FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Przyszłość polityki spójności V Raport Kohezyjny a wnioski z ewaluacji.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
1 Ex-ante evaluations of ESF operational programmes Budapest 26 th September 2013 Kamil Valica Unit A.3 Impact Assessment and Evaluation DG Employment,
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 Structural Funds Evaluation A VIEW FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Anna Burylo, DG Regional Policy, Evaluation.
1 International Conference Evaluation: Evidence-based Tools for Decision-making Future Cohesion Policy: Implications for Monitoring and Evaluation Budapest.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
1 Monitoring & evaluation 2013+: concepts and ideas (ERDF & CF) CMEF meeting, 17 th June 2011, Kai Stryczynski, DG REGIO Evaluation Unit.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION National evaluation conference Marielle Riché Evaluation unit, DG REGIO Bucharest, 18.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Regional Policy Results Indicators Findings of the Pilots Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit, DG for Regional Policy.
Results orientation: audit perspective Jiri Plecity, Head of Unit H1, Relations with Control Authorities, Legal Procedures, Audit of Direct Management.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation Common monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluation of rural development programs.
Indicators – intervention logic, differences ( vs programming period, ESF vs. ERDF) Piotr Wolski Marshall’s Office Zachodniopomorskie.
Project design – Activities and partnership CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February 2010 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Capturing the outcomes of the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes Follow up to ex post evaluation of INTERREG III Presentation Template Ieva Kalnina,
New Trends in Cohesion Policy Grincoh, Ljubljana 25 September 2014 Veronica Gaffey DG Regional & Urban Policy.
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
Follow up to ex post evaluation of INTERREG III
Workshop on Strategic Programming, Monitoring and evaluation Focusing on Performance and REsults Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Veronica Gaffey & Antonella Schulte-Braucks
Ex post evaluation of ERDF and Cohesion Fund
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
Performance Framework
Performance framework review and reserve
Ex-ante evaluation: major points and state of play
ETC reflected in the reports issued by the HLGS
Results Indicators Findings of the Pilots Veronica Gaffey
Operational Programmes Selected Impressions from Negotiations
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
Future of Cohesion Policy
PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Result Orientation of Interreg Programmes
Guidance document on ex ante evaluation
The Atlantic Forum Process and outcomes European Commission – DG MARE
Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit DG EMPL Ines Hartwig
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
DG REGIO Evaluation-Related Activities State of play
Presentation transcript:

Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013

Learning from the Past Ex Post Evaluation of :  We could quantify the activity (outputs) of Interreg, but not the impact  Policy objectives and programme strategies not specific or focused  Indicators and target setting not aligned with objectives Trying to capture the outcomes of programmes:  Pilot exercise run by Interact  Useful reflection process, BUT  Impossible to build a result orientation into a programme ex post… 2

Future Result Orientation 3 o An intervention logic that incorporates:  Selection of investment priorities and corresponding specific objectives – which relate to the needs of the territory to be addressed  Result indicator which captures the intended change for the territory/sector – baseline and target (qualitative or quantitative)  Output indicators which reflect the direct activities of the priority (common and programme specific), cumulative target values  Allocation of resources

A Performance Framework 4  Monitor that implementation is as planned  A subset of programme indicators  Financial & Output indicators & Key Implementation Steps  Milestones for 2018 and Targets for 2022  Must be unambiguous and milestones and targets realistic  Possible suspensions and corrections for non- achievement  Will NOT answer the impact question (what have been the effects of the policy?)

Regional Policy Difference: Results Orientation and Performance Framework? Interlinked but distinct:  Results orientation is wider and locates the programme in its context  Performance Framework is about efficient implementation of the programme 5

Regional Policy 6 Results Focus in Programme Design Guiding questions:  What do you want to change?  What indicator can capture this change?  What is the baseline (the situation before the programme)?  How will the outputs of the programme contribute to change? Results relate to change in the region/sector – not just for supported entities Regional Policy

7 Role of Result Indicators  Capture what you want to change  Should be close to policy – so that the policy may be reflected in the evolution of the result indicator  Targets quantitative or qualitative  Regular monitoring to prompt policy debate (not sanctions)  Selected by programmes – not imposed top down – recognising the different "journeys" to EU2020  Evaluation to disentangle the contribution of the policy to change from the influence of other factors (impact) Regional Policy

8 Role of Output Indicators Output Indicators:  Capture what the resources are spent on  Common & Programme Specific indicators  Baselines zero, Quantified cumulative targets  Rooted in an intervention logic - how should this amount of resources spent on these outputs contribute to change in result indicator? – to be assessed in ex ante evaluation Regional Policy

9 Common Output Indicators  Relate to the most frequently implemented actions  Provide aggregate information for communication purposes  46 indicators for ETC – 40 general and 6 ETC-specific  Should be complemented with programme specific output indicators when necessary  Avoid numbers of projects, or numbers of solutions/mechanisms/agreements – as in aggregate these are not meaningful Regional Policy

10 Challenges  Defining the specific objectives and associated result indicators – this requires choices to be made  Establishing the baseline and targets – qualitative or quantitative(the ex ante evaluation can help)  Understanding the intervention logic  Translating the result indicators into selection criteria to ensure projects will contribute to the results  Making sure that performance frameworks represent the priorities and that milestones and targets are fixed at an appropriate level Regional Policy

Reference documents - Guidance Monitoring and Evaluation for ERDF/CF Performance Framework & Reserve – being consulted Pilot Tests on Result Indicators Ex ante evaluation (ERDF, ESF, CF) e_en.cfm#1 11 Regional Policy

Thank you for your attention!