1. Cohesion Policy focus on performance experiences of the Hungarian Presidency Dr. Györgyi Nyikos Deputy State Secretary for Development Affairs Ministry of National Development

2. Motto of the Hungarian Presidency: “Strong Europe” Means sustainable growth, employment and competitiveness All policies will have to do their own part Cohesion Policy works, but there are hidden resources to make use of Result orientation is decisive for the future of the Policy, therefore… Result-orientation was part of our overall objectives… Post-crisis EU, scarce resources Maximum value for public efforts needed, cost-efficiently →Emphasise importance, results and visibility of the Policy at political level …and our specific objectives 5 th Cohesion Report presents ideas to increase added value that need further discussion →Concentrate on key issues, enhance reaching a common interpretation, try to move from concept to practice and… →Help the timely publication of the legislative package Result-orientation in HU PRES strategy

3. Exploring the topic of effectiveness in future Cohesion Policy… Several aspects to be taken into account, e.g. Effectiveness of Cohesion Policy largely depends on the economic environment, which will be influenced by EU2020 →relation of Cohesion Policy to EU2020 will be crucial Cohesion Policy reduces disparities through financing investments →clear intervention logic (theory of change) will be necessary Cohesion Policy creates tailor-made solutions via multi-level governance and cross-sectoral nature →place-based, integrated approach key to the very operation of Cohesion Policy Result-orientation: a multifaceted issue - 1

4. Several questions to be addressed, e.g. What do we mean by result in Cohesion Policy? How is this result defined in the context of EU2020, how can CP and EU2020 be aligned to increase effectiveness? How to gain better knowledge of the results of our interventions? How to make sure in advance that interventions will be effective? Several obligations now: what needs to be changed and what needs to remain to make the overall system more effective? How can conditionalities and incentives best serve results in CP? →HU PRES discussed these in the context of COM proposals in the 5 th Cohesion Report Result-orientation: a multifaceted issue - 2

5. General Affairs Council, 21 Feb: political level Council Conclusions on the 5 th CR; orientation debate – effectiveness and performance orientation is a central topic to both Two “effectiveness” topics set as key topics of further Council work High Level Meeting, 31 March – 1 April: expert level 2 discussion papers, the topics “Result-oriented approach” and “Thematic concentration and flexibility” discussed Conclusions of the Meeting on the two topics SAWP key issue debates, March – May: expert level A meeting devoted to result-orientation as part of the debate on key issues Presidency note and outcome document prepared Informal Meeting of Ministers, 20 May: political level 2 issue notes, the topics “How to be more effective in achieving results” and ”How to contribute more effectively to EU2020” discussed Presidency Conclusions based on intervention of ministers and all previous documents Result-orientation in HU PRES events

6. Result-orientation of Cohesion Policy Strong political commitment to result-orientation – the question is how? Role of programming, evaluation/indicators, streamlined delivery system emphasised Conditionalities strongly linked with effectiveness of Cohesion Policy widely supported Success factors to be in place before expenditure is made Reforms in CSR’s: important but not to be set as conditionalities Unified system with only most important success factors as conditionalities Build on principles such as focus, flexibility, ownership, transparency, accountability, proportionality and simplification Scope for optional use of incentives at national, regional, OP level, but EU performance reserve mostly not favoured Main findings in result-orientation - 1

7. Thematic concentration as means of effectiveness For tangible results, focus on limited number of priority objectives Thematic concentration to be the tool of establishing the most effective connection between Cohesion Policy and EU2020 Thematic concentration of resources is only effective if it takes into account different contexts and… …recognises that different policy-mixes may be needed to deliver the same objectives… … and maintains the integrated nature of the Policy Main findings in result-orientation - 2 Territorial challenges Europe 2020 Sectoral needs Complex integrated development programs with multilevel and multisectoral implementation!

8. Conclusions To summarize… Strong and unanimous political commitment to enhance effectiveness and efficiency – example for other policy areas All improvements of the Policy shall serve this goal Efforts only successful if enhanced tools are aligned with the added values and main characteristics of Cohesion Policy (integrated, multi-level) Important tasks ahead… →Experiences and results shall be continuously evaluated and analyzed, decisions on the future shall be based on evidences →This approach to be used during the debate on the legislative package

9. Thank you for your attention! Dr. Györgyi Nyikos, Deputy State Secretary for Development Affairs Ministry of National Development