DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 A radio controlled aircraft (model) is controlled remotely by a hand held transmitter & receiver within the aircraft.  The.
Advertisements

Lecture 3: Take-off Performance
College of Engineering and Computer Science Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Wright State University Regular Class Aircraft SAE Aero.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Extremely Maneuverable UCAV
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck February 18, 2010.
SAE Aero Design Guidelines Rev A, 2013 Aero Design Oral Presentation Guidelines How to Deliver a Presentation The Judges will Notice.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
David Chandpen (Lead Engineer) Matthew Maberry Travis Cushman Benjamin Waller Zach Veilleux Joseph Travaglini.
U5AEA15 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES-II PREPARED BY Mr.S.Karthikeyan DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICALENGINEERING ASSISTANT PROFESSOR.
1 Design Group 2 Kat Donovan - Team Leader Andrew DeBerry Mike Kinder John Mack Jeff Newcamp Andrew Prisbell Nick Schumacher Conceptual Design for AME.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
The Barn Owls Chris “Mo” Baughman Kate Brennan Christine Izuo Dan Masse Joe “Sal” Salerno Paul Slaboch Michelle Smith.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
March 1, Aerodynamics 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe.
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 30 Turn Performance. “Turning” the tables…
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 33 GR3 Review. General strategy  Prior to class Review reading for lessons 23 – 32 Work / review problems #26 – 42 Review.
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 27 Gliding and Climbing Flight.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
MAE 4261: AIR-BREATHING ENGINES
Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: 1) What are the three flight situations in which a stall may occur? 2) In a turn.
Takeoff Performance Jet Aircraft Performance
Wright Flyer Competition Commemorating 100 years of powered flight.
Aero Design Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo
MAE 1202: AEROSPACE PRACTICUM Introduction to Aircraft Performance: Part 2 April 7, 2008 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute.
Wind Turbine Project Recap Wind Power & Blade Aerodynamics
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #9.
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Elements of Airplane Performance
Replicating the 1903 Wright Flyer
 Model airplanes are sized down models of an aircraft  The calculations are easy and the importance is given to building of the plane.
Introduction Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of A Non Planar C Wing using Experimental and Numerical Tools Mano Prakash R., Manoj Kumar B., Lakshmi Narayanan.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
Forces of Flight and Stability
Craig Kohring, Pat Tice, Sean Dineen, Mark Gasser James Pallardy, Katie Schipf, AJ Dayvie.
2015 SAE Aero East Design Team 2015 SAE Aero Design East Team Mid-Term Status Report (3/5/2015)
Propulsion PDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 11, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Preliminary Sizing PDR 26 September, 2000.
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
BASICS OF RC PLANE. Overview  What is RC Plane?  RC Planes’ Parts and their Role  How planes fly?  Concepts and Terminologies of RC Plane  Stability.
Miguel Jimenez Ricardo Lugo Carlos Rojas Advisor: Andres Tremante.
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
Bridget Fitzpatrick Patrick Dempsey Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #2 October 23, 2000.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
Theory of Flight All are demonstrated by the flight of the bird!
1 Chapter 6 Elements of Airplane Performance Prof. Galal Bahgat Salem Aerospace Dept. Cairo University.
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #9 May 10, 1999 We have looked at.. Airfoil aerodynamics (Chapter 8) Sources of Drag (Chapter 8, 11 and 12) –Look at the figures.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #10 May 14, 1999 TOPICS TO BE STUDIED Take-off and Landing Performance Introduction to Aircraft Stability and Control.
6.01 Aircraft Design and Construction References: FTGU pages 9-14, 27
Four Forces of Flight Lift Weight Thrust Drag
Team 5 Final Design Review
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
West Point Aviation Club Private Pilot Ground Instruction
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
FLIGHT MECHANICS BDA DR. ZAMRI BIN OMAR D
Weight and Balance Private Pilot Ground School
ME 423 Design Progress Nugget Chart
NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Presentation transcript:

DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

WEIGHT ESTIMATION TOTAL WEIGHT N

AERODYNAMIC DESIGN

Lift Calculation As the t/c ratio of the airfoil is less than 0.05 the classical theory of thin airfoils can be employed, by using this theory all the parameters other than drag is forecasted.

Drag Polar Induced Drag Estimation AR for a biplane = 4 b/c Span = 5 feet Chord length = 12 inches AR = 20 Gap = 9 inches CD i = 1/(  AR)*(1+  )CL 2 C Di = C L 2 profile Profile Drag Calculation C D wet /C f = (t/c) 3/2 +7 (t/c) 3 C Dp /C f = 60 (t/c  C L /5) 4 The drag polar of our model is C D = C L 2

Wing warp

Rolling moment for Both wings = 0.56 (k/c) sin  (l+ k cos  ) 2 Where c is the chord of the wing  is the angle of warp from the undisturbed configuration k is the length of wing warp

POWER PLANT SELECTION

specifications From drag calculations the power required 0.25 bHp Diameter of the propeller ( 2-blade propeller) 10 inches The diameter is determined from the thrust to be produced. The ground clearance was also taken into account while determining the diameter of the propeller.

STRUCTURAL DESIGN

WING FRONT SPAR The bending moment about X axis (M x ) = Nm The formula used, M xc =(M x -(M y *I xy /I yy )) /( 1-I xy ²/ (I xx *I yy )) =36.65 Nm M yc =(M y -(M x *I xy /I xx )) / (1-I xy ²/ (I xx *I yy )) = Nm The maximum stress on the front spar σ z = 32 MPa The maximum allowable bending stress for spruce wood = 41 MPa

WING REAR SPAR The maximum stress on the rear spar σ z = 40 MPa The maximum allowable bending stress for spruce wood = 41 MPa

ELEVATOR AND RUDDER SPARS ELEVATOR FRONT SPAR REAR SPAR RUDDER SPAR

Design of truss members Though the diameter of the truss members are different, for fabrication simplicity all the members are designed with diameter 5 mm.

PROPELLER SHAFT DESIGN The formula used to calculate the diameter of the shaft M e = (M +√(M²+T²)) / 2 = Nm T e = √(M²+T²) = Nm Maximum bending strength of the balsa wood σ b = *10^7 N/m τ = N/m² D moment =7.15 mm D torque =7.95 mm Therefore the required diameter for the propeller shafts = 8 mm

MATERIALS TO BE USED S.NOCOMPONENTMATERIAL 1WING SPARSSPRUCE 2OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS BALSA 3SKINREYNOLDS PLASTIC 4FUEL TANKPLASTIC

PERFORMANCE CALCULATION

INTRODUCTION The performance design covers the five major calculations which are listed below Steady level flight performance Climb performance Range & Endurance Take – Off & Landing Turn Performance

LEVEL FLIGHT PERFORMANCE Cruising Velocity = 4.7 m/s Stalling Velocity = 2.35 m/s (C Lmax = 2.04) V minD = 2.64 m/s D min = m/s P min = 6.09 W V minP = 2.06 m/s Range = km (for cruise condition) Endurance = 5 minutes 54 seconds

CLIMB PERFORMANCE R/C = Excess Power / Weight Excess Power = Power Available – Power Required Maximum rate of climb occurs at 6 m/s Velocity Power Available Power Required Excess Power R/C max Angle of Climb m/sWWW degree

Take – Off The take-off is curved up into 3 phases They are ground run, transition and initial climb upto 2 m and the same is repeated for landing Ground run V avg = 0.7 V LO (lift off velocity) = 0.84 V stall  r = 0.1 for grass land V LO = 2.82 m/s C LLO = 0.8 C Lmax Ground Run = 6.3 m Ground Run in transition = 2.1 m Ground Run in climb = 4.48 m Total take off distance = m Ground Run TransitionClimb

Landing & Turning performance Landing distance total = m Minimum turn radius = 0.4 m Corresponding time taken = 1.15 seconds V-n diagram is a plot between the velocity and load factor ( n = L/W) It gives the structural limit (max) of the aircraft and the highest and lowest possible velocity that can be reached by the aircraft The maximum load factor = 275/25 = 11

V-n DIAGRAM From the v-n diagram it is clear that n is maximum for the velocity of 8 m/s and the maximum velocity can be m/s for the n value less than 11

STABILITY ANALYSIS

LONGITUDINAL STATIC STABILITY

DIRECTIONAL STATIC STABILITY

CROSS COUPLING EFFECT

COST ESTIMATION

RADIO CONTROL COMPONENTS Engine throttle is controlled by servo motor. Four channel receiver set with 4 servo motors and connectors are used. The R/C unit weighs about 0.75 N. The R/C unit is placed just below the wing so that it reduces the bending moment caused by the lift.

POSITION OF SERVOS

POSITION OF RECEIVER

PROBLEMS We are amateur designers But we are confident that we can overcome this problem after taking part in this workshop Since the stability of the aircraft is at a high risk we feel that flying the aircraft safely would require a lot of training