Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Cohort Training, Phase II November 29 – 30, 2012.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework

Our Vision: To be the indispensable leaders, experts, and innovators who provide the skills and solutions learners need to successfully navigate a connected world. Our Mission: Empowering our customers to solve their most challenging problems that impact learning and quality of life.

Today’s Objectivesals A better understanding of the IU’s Differentiated Supervision Plan. A closer look at the Danielson Domains and how the framework can improve our professional practice. A discussion of how DS applies to guidance counselors in the Act 89 program

First Things First

Is this YOU?

Differentiated Supervision ●DS is designed to help us reflect on and improve our professional practice so that student learning is enhanced. ●DS creates alternate pathways for demonstrating professional growth.

Differentiated Supervision ●DS process collects evidence that informs the annual performance evaluation. ●Educator Effectiveness regulations require us to implement an evaluation system.

Working in education is complex. ➢ It is difficult to describe what we do everyday. ➢ FINALLY, a Professional Framework that defines what we do, and offers guidance to improve our professional practice. ➢ FINALLY, a Professional Framework that legitimizes the complex work associated with working in the field of education.

The 4 Domain Categories: Talk with a colleague and label each bucket. Label:___

Domain Focus— Adapted from Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Planning and Preparation Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities What a teacher knows and does in preparation for teaching. All aspects of teaching that lead to a culture for learning in the classroom. Professional responsibilities and behavior in and out of the classroom. What a teacher does to engage students in learning.

A Framework for Teaching Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on Teaching Maintaining Accurate Records Communicating with Families Contributing to the School and District Growing and Developing Professionally Showing Professionalism Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Engaging Students in Learning Using Assessment in Instruction Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Demonstrating Knowledge of Students Selecting Instruction Goals Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources Designing Coherent Instruction Assessing Student Learning Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Establishing a Culture for Learning Managing Classroom Procedures Managing Student Behavior Organizing Physical Space Off Stage On Stage

Who takes part in the Clinical Supervision Process? 1. All non-tenured professionals 2. Any tenured professionals in their first year of LIU employment 3. All tenured professionals every four years 4. Any tenured professional in their first year in a new program assignment (unless approved “exempt” by the Division Director) Clinical Supervision Process - Who Takes Part?

1.Prepare for Pre-Conference by reflecting on Domains 1 & 4 and completing the Pre-Conference form. 1.Participate in the Pre-Conference. Steps in Clinical Supervision Process

3.Observation – Evaluator collects evidence aligned to Domains 2 & 3. Evaluator gives form back to professional prior to post-conference. ➢ Professional can add evidence to the form that may have been overlooked by evaluator. Professional returns observation form to Evaluator with their additions. Steps in Clinical Supervision Process

4.Professional Self-Assessment – Using the Danielson rubric, professional completes self- assessment and submits to the evaluator. Steps in Clinical Supervision Process

5.Observer reviews Self-Assessment and marks only areas of agreement. Steps in Clinical Supervision Process

6. Post-Conference Discussion - Evaluator notes components of agreement and then invites professional to take the lead in discussing the other components. Components are collaboratively rated. Evaluator is the “rater of record” in the event of non-agreement. Evidence is the basis. Steps in Clinical Supervision Process

7. Observation Summary- Evaluator completes the Observation Summary. Steps in Clinical Supervision Process

8. Artifact collection and submission – During the observation process and outside of the observation process, educators may submit examples of evidence to support their performance level within the Danielson domains. Steps in Clinical Supervision Process

8. Artifact collection and submission – Evidence for Domains 2 & 3 will be collected through the observation process. ➢ Every professional will have an evidence folder in Teachscape where examples of evidence can be uploaded. ➢ It is the responsibility of the professional to collect examples of evidence, and the evaluator can add to the evidence collection throughout the clinical process. Steps in Clinical Supervision Process

9.Mid Year Conference and Rating - For all non-tenured staff, a mid-year rating will be completed by January 31, 2015 using the Teacher Rating form. Steps in Clinical Supervision Process

10. End of Year Conference – Supervisor will meet with the employee at the end of the year. Meeting could be done via virtual means, the telephone, or face to face. ➢ Supervisor will present end of year rating form. Steps in Clinical Supervision Process

Steps to Non-Clinical Process Who Qualifies? ➢ Tenured employee who has completed at least 3 years of satisfactory performance and have been employed for at least one year by the LIU.

Requirements for Non-Clinical Process (both Self-Directed and Team Plans) 1.Set goals, write and submit an Action Plan to supervisor by October 15, If asked to revise by supervisor, submit for approval no later than November 14, 2014.

Requirements for Non-Clinical Process 2.Collect, analyze and submit all data included in the data plan throughout the year. ➢ The professional is also responsible for submitting evidence to support performance levels in all four domains, even if all four domains are not represented in action plan. ➢ Only evidence for components NOT covered in the action plan need to be uploaded to Teachscape.

Requirements for Non-Clinical Process (both Self-Directed and Team Plans) 3. Seek prior approval to alter or modify action plan from supervisor. 4. Submit Mid-Year Reflection form by January 30, 2015 for feedback from supervisor.

Requirements for Non-Clinical Process (both Self-Directed and Team Plans) 5. Submit End of Year Refection form by May 1, 2015.

Requirements for Non-Clinical Process (both Self-Directed and Team Plans) 6. Conference with supervisor at the end of the year to report goal attainment with using examples of evidence that support goal attainment. Conference may be face to face, via phone, or other virtual means. ➢ Supervisor will present end of year rating form for instructional staff and counselors.

7.Professional may be asked to share his/her findings with colleagues in the program. Requirements for Non-Clinical Process (both Self-Directed and Team Plans)

8.Professional may continue with action plan for multiple years with supervisor approval as long as adequate progress is noted. Requirements for Non-Clinical Process (both Self-Directed and Team Plans)

FAQ Review ➢ In groups of 2-3, review the Frequently Asked Questions document. ➢ Record any additional questions.

Questions

OUR STUDENTS DESERVE OUR BEST! NOTHING BUT OUR BEST! SET HIGH EXPECTATIONS!

PLAN FOR DISTINGUISHED! SET HIGH EXPECTATIONS!!! OUR STUDENTS DESERVE YOUR BEST!

Our Vision: To be the indispensable leaders, experts, and innovators who provide the skills and solutions learners need to successfully navigate a connected world. Our Mission: Empowering our customers to solve their most challenging problems that impact learning and quality of life.