Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Food Program & UST Program at Santa Clara County DEH By: Michelle Santos University of San Francisco December 5, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEM Drinking Water Program Water Resources Study Committee.
Advertisements

Food Facility Inspections Riverside County Environmental Health.
Business Law Objective 7.02 State and Local Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws.
Food Safety Award of Excellence A Recognition Program for Food Establishments Practicing Exemplary Food Handling Practices.
Department/Unit Safety Coordinator’s Seminar Enterprise Risk Services/Environmental Health & Safety Tuesday, December 3, 2013.
 Site Assessment and Mitigation Program Department of Environmental Health – County of San Diego.
Tennessee Solid Waste Program- Background The solid waste program within the DSWM regulates landfills and waste processing facilities in Tennessee. Solid.
California Department of Public Health Food and Drug Branch San Joaquin County All Hazards Workshop August 2008.
Active Managerial Control in Boulder County
Bay Area Air Quality Management District LEA CIWMB CONFERENCE August 2,
September is Food Safety Month Sacramento County Environmental Management Department.
1 MASSACHUSETTS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) PROGRAM Baseline Compliance Assessment 1 MassDEP 8/2/2011.
Environmental Health. What is Environmental Health? “Quality of life determined by physical, chemical, biological, social and psychosocial factors in.
Printed by Implementation of a Pilot Program to Address Reliability of Environmental Sanitation Inspections at Memphis and Shelby.
Printed by DEVELOPING A NON-PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA Scott A. Uhlich, MCP Georgia Department of Human.
Measuring Environmental Performance: Beyond the Beans – San Diego County’s EPIC Pilot Project 16 th ANNUAL CIHC CONFERENCE December 4, 2006 presented by:
BY: GROUP 2 Food Safety Regulations and Standards.
UAE Food Safety Crosses Borders Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health February 24, 2014.
1 Food and Dairy Safety Program Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection Legislative Audit Bureau July 2008.
Solano County Department of Environmental Management Environmental Health Services Division Hazardous Materials.
1 MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATION’S FOODSERVICE AND RETAIL FOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM.
Austin/Travis Co HHSD Mobile Vendor Presentation David Lurie, Director Shannon Jones, Assistant Director Public Health and Community Services Division.
Health Inspection Prepared by : Ibrahim H. Abdulrahman
Step 3: Focus Evaluation Design Luann C. D’Ambrosio, MEd.
Multnomah County Health Department ►Essential Services ►FDA Food Standards ►PACE Tools for Food Program Excellence Lila Wickham March 17, 2004 ♣
Maryland Farmers’ Market Conference: Food Safety Regulations February 28-29, 2012 Sherry Donovan-Morris, REHS/RS Section Head, Division of Facility &
Reducing the Threat of Fuel Release from the Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility A Unique Engineering Challenge.
Introduction to the Environmental Compliance Inspector.
Rule Change to NMAC Mary Lou LaCasse January 13, 2010.
“Proactive Public Protection: A Risk Based Approach” Derek J. Jakovich, J.D., M.B.A., M.H.A., Manager, Patient Quality Care Unit, Texas Department of State.
Restaurant Ranking Pro/Con David F. Ludwig, M.P.H., R.S. Maricopa County Environmental Health.
UPDATE ON OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES IN TEXAS TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT Susan Jablonski, P.E. Area Director.
Food and Drug Administration & Outbreaks
Important informations
Appleton Public Health Department Created by: Selina Lor, Samantha, Brian Jones, Kaitlin Squire.
P ROGRESS OF THE G UAM F OOD C ODE FDA Pacific Region Retail Food Seminar Helena, Montana September 22-24, 2015 Katherine Del Mundo Environmental Public.
Environmental Regulations. Learning Objectives TLW understand the history of environmental regulations TLW be able to describe key content of environmental.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
MassDEP Underground Storage Tank Program Program Requirements for Owners and Operators Winter 2015 Workshops 1.
Planning Department Prohibition on the Distribution of Plastic Carryout Bags and Establishment of a Charge on Paper Carryout Bags City Council October.
Mobile Food Service Providers Joanne Jarin, REHS San Mateo County Environmental Health.
CHAPTER 10 CONSUMER PROTECTION
Community Development Department ULDC CHAPTER 4 AMENDMENT to allow COTTAGE FOOD AS HOME OCCUPATION.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
City of Austin Environmental Health Services Division Proposed City Code Changes Presented by: David Lopez, Chief Environmental Health Officer Vince.
Chapter 13 Food Safety Regulations and Standards.
LEA Conference, October 18, CIWMB Proposed Compliance Strategy Lorraine Van Kekerix Division Chief Compliance Evaluation & Enforcement Division.
- Environmental health officers, also known as environmental or public health inspectors, prevent disease by enforcing health legislation and educating.
Lecture held on the Food Safety Conference March 2004 Dublin 1 Control Methods and Organisation of Official Controls in Hungary Dr. Peter A. BIACS,
Compliance and Investigations Division (CID). Proposed Rules  Official establishments, and retail stores that grind raw beef products, will keep records.
Overview of 3 rd Party Inspection Program for USTs.
Field Services and Compliance Bureau Joe Sanfilippo Supervisor Field Office 1 Air Quality Enforcement Coordinator.
Fort Worth Code Compliance Hotel/Motel Inspections Update Brandon Scott Bennett, Code Compliance Director May 12, 2009.
Chapter 13 Food Safety Regulations and Standards
Leon Wirschem, REHS/HMS County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division
Automatic Gauging Tank System: A Next Generation Tool for UST PROF. HÉCTOR CRUZADO ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROJECT MEM 6200-SP-15 JOSÉ J. ROSA ROSARIO STUDENT.
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
Several government agencies take leading roles in the prevention of foodborne illness in the U.S.
City of San Antonio Health Inspections Lean Six Sigma Consortium
Monterey County Agricultural Commissioner Pesticide Use Enforcement
“The Use of the National Public Health Performance Standards as a Tool to Evaluate Change in Capacity to Carry Out the Ten Essential Services ” Gerry Barron,
Food Safety Regulations and Standards
Instructor Notes It is very important to have a foodservice inspection program in place. It helps you evaluate whether you are meeting minimum sanitation.
Solano County Department of Environmental Management Environmental Health Services Division Hazardous Materials.
STEARNS COUNTY FOOD SAFETY INITIATIVE
Cupa violation Review BAESG Meeting May 20, 2019 Matthew Burge
Food and Nutrition Surveillance and Response in Emergencies
Foodborne Illness Risks in Iowa Agritourism
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Food Program & UST Program at Santa Clara County DEH By: Michelle Santos University of San Francisco December 5, 2013

Background Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division (SCC DEH HMCD)

Objectives 1) Clearly identify the goals of the programs within DEH 2) Identify methods and metrics for evaluating the effectiveness of DEH programs in meeting their goals 3) Gather and analyze data related to program effectiveness 4) Provide an Excel model that allows the DEH to evaluate current and future trends in program effectiveness

Programs Food Program (FP) UST Program -Part of the Consumer Protection Division -Recreational pools and spas, land use, drinking water, certified farmers markets, etc. -Specifically Food Safety -Grocery stores, liquor stores, bakeries, restaurants, mobile food facilities, etc. -conduct routine and follow-up inspections -investigate complaints and suspected foodborne illnesses -Carry out food recalls -Conduct multi-lingual food safety classes, -Conduct plan reviews for new and remodeled facilities -Issues permits.

Food Program * Major risk factor violations & Foodborne Illness Complaints Specific major risk factor violations that were most predictive of foodborne illness complaints

Food Program (cont’d.) 497,449 violations TOTAL 390 Foodborne Illness Investigations -15,088 Facilities 497,449 violations TOTAL 390 Foodborne Illness Investigations -15,088 Facilities 473,225 NOT linked to 014 investigation/s -14,792 Facilities 473,225 NOT linked to 014 investigation/s -14,792 Facilities 24,224 linked to 014 investigation/s -296 Facilities 24,224 linked to 014 investigation/s -296 Facilities 16,016 Major Violations -5,154 Facilities -11,439 Serial Numbers 16,016 Major Violations -5,154 Facilities -11,439 Serial Numbers 846 Major Violations without valid 014 within 6 months -223 Facilities -616 Serial Numbers 846 Major Violations without valid 014 within 6 months -223 Facilities -616 Serial Numbers 95 Major Violations w/ valid 014 within 6 months -53 Facilities -74 Serial Numbers 95 Major Violations w/ valid 014 within 6 months -53 Facilities -74 Serial Numbers

Data

Programs Food Program (FP) UST Program -Part of HMCD -Hazardous materials business plans, toxic gas storage, hazardous materials compliance, etc. -Specifically UST Program -Gas stations -conduct routine and follow-up inspections -Operating permit -Leak detection systems -Financial responsibility

UST Program Decrease in the number of leaks/spills and the duration of each case

UST Program (cont’d.) LOP data (FY ) -34 cases LOP data (FY ) -34 cases Count of substances released Ratio of cases completed to cases still open Average duration of each case

497,449 violations TOTAL -15,088 Facilities 497,449 violations TOTAL -15,088 Facilities 2, 463 Violations Under PE 2399 (Underground Storage Tanks) City Code Facility ID Year UST Program (cont’d.)

Conclusion Food Program Relevant data Allows inspectors to better focus their efforts to specific facilities Improve coding of violations No duplicates Include “major” UST Program Small data set Difficult to establish trends Possibly positive in showing that there weren’t a lot of cases Improvement within a few years

QUESTIONS?

References Staff of Santa Clara County HMCD Staff of Santa Clara County CPD Staff of San Diego County DEH CCDEH