Decommissioned BCR Organic Media Characterization Standard Mine Superfund Site, Crested Butte, CO Neal Gallagher, Eric Blumenstein, Tom Rutkowski, John.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bench Scale Tests of Selenium Removal from Mine Waters Raymond J. Lovett* ShipShaper, LLP Morgantown, WV West Virginia Mine Drainage Task Force Symposium.
Advertisements

Copyright [insert date set by system] by [CH2M HILL Entity] Company Confidential Passive Treatment Systems for the Removal of Selenium: Selenium Removal.
June 5, 2013 Ten Years After: The Operation of the Luttrell Biochemical Reactor David J. Reisman Angela Frandsen, P.E. David T. Shanight, P.E. ASMR.
Metals in the Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Coal Creek, Crested Butte, CO Scarlett E. Graham July 10, 2006 University of Colorado at Boulder Environmental.
Removal of Cu(II) ions from aqueous solution effluent using Melamine-Formaldehyde-DTPA resin in a fixed-bed up-flow column By Ahmad Baraka Supervisors.
By Hung Nguyen Lime Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage at Leviathan Mine, California.
Wastewater Characteristics CE Importance of Characteristics The degree of treatment depends on: The degree of treatment depends on: Influent characteristics.
Acid Mine Drainage. Terms Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) –Water that is polluted from contact with mining activity Acid Rock Drainage (ARD) –Natural rock drainage.
Remediation of Acid Mine Drainage by Constructed Wetlands.
The Practical Application of Constructed Wetlands in the Philippines R.E. James, N. Callora, R. Inion, G. Tolentino.
Surface Water Geochemistry of Deckers Creek Basin Geology 399 Qingyun Sun.
Gorgas Wetlands Revitalization Alabama Power Company Environmental Affairs Field Services Gerson Pickett.
Passive Remediation of High Metal Loading, Net Acidic Mine Impacted Water Using Crab Shell Chitin as a Substrate Amendment Amanda K. Brown and Dr. Rachel.
Defending the Rights of Metals: How to Distinguish Naturally High Groundwater Concentrations from Site-Related Contamination Karen Thorbjornsen and Jonathan.
Aeration Approaches and Activated Iron Solids (AIS) for AMD Treatment By Jon Dietz, Ph.D. Environmental Engineering & Science Iron Oxide Technologies,
Economic recovery of zinc from Mining Influenced Water (MIW)
An Innovative, Precise Water Treatment Process that Can Meet or Exceed Most Discharge Requirements An Innovative, Precise Water Treatment Process that.
Wetlands for remediation of acid-mine drainage Alyssa Shiel.
Acid Mine Drainage: From Formation to Remediation CE Aquatic Chemistry Julie Giardina Dominike Merle.
. All rights reserved MAR Systems Inc.
Acid Mine Drainage. Terms Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) –Water that is polluted from contact with mining activity Acid Rock Drainage (ARD) –Natural rock drainage.
1 Abandoned Coal Mines: In-Situ Treatment of AMD with CCPs Jess W. Everett, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor Civil Engineering Rowan University.
Phosphorus Removal The most common method to remove phosphorus from a waste stream is chemical precipitation. The common precipitating cations are Ca,
An Introduction to Acid Mine Drainage by George Mitchell and Tim Craddock.
Surface Mining Remediation Utilizing Vertical Flow Wetlands and Engineered Soils Matthew Gloe, Christian Bongard, Gil Brown Biological Systems Engineering,
Geology, Mining, and Water Quality by Matthew A. Sares.
Ch-10 Hard and Soft Water Science 7th grade.
H-ESD : Environmental and Sustainable Development
Characterizing Storm Water Runoff from Natural Gas Well Sites in North-Central Texas Paul F. Hudak and David J. Wachal Department of Geography University.
Case Studies from Egypt
Biogeochemistry at the confluence of an ARD stream with a pristine mountain stream By: Austin Kaliher and Brian Gross.
Workshop #3: Preparing for unexpected outcomes at mine sites and means to control contamination Barbara A. Butler March 5, 2013 Mine Drainage Control and.
SPWSTAC 2006 From POU to Centralized Arsenic Treatment: A Small Water System Case Study 2006 NGWA Naturally Occurring Contaminants Conference J. Mitchell.
The Orange County Water District Riverbed Filtration Pilot Project Jason Keller 1, Michael Milczarek 1, Greg Woodside 2, Adam Hutchinson 2, Adam MP Canfield.
1 Waste Treatment, Chemical ENVE Why Treat Waste Have a RCRA Waste –TSDS –Treat instead of disposal, landfill –Treat before disposal Or treat in.
Formation and Treatment
Biochemical Reactors for Treating Mining- influenced Water.
Selenium Removal from Mine Waters
Seasonal Changes in Biogeochemistry of a Natural Wetland Receiving Drainage from an Abandoned Mine Diane McKnight and Eric August – University of Colorado.
Treatment and Pollution Control Technologies ENVM 644: New Technologies in Environmental Management Dr. Robert Beauchamp.
Evaluation of the removal of heavy metals using the Biosand Filter
C1a Rocks and Metals 2.2 Extracting Iron. Learning objectives Understand which metals can be extracted using carbon Understand which metals can be extracted.
LEWIS ENVIRONMENTAL Cost Effective Solutions For …. Today’s Problems UPGRADING AMD FOR FRACKING WHO’S LEWIS ENVIRONMENTAL… COMPANY HAS SEVERAL PATENTS.
April 3, 2012 Acid Mine Drainage Source Control Program Design Investigation Upper Tenmile Creek Mining Area Site Angela Frandsen, PE Helena, Montana.
Chemical Treatment Precipitation and Reduction/Oxidation (Section 9-4)
The Formation of Abandoned Mine Drainage The Definition and Causation of Abandoned Mine Drainage Lessons Prepared by Trout Unlimited With Funds from Pennsylvania.
Two Union Square Union Street, Suite 601 Seattle, WA (206) Field testing and modeling of in situ groundwater.
August 27, 2008 Treatment of Heavy Metals and Elimination of Sulfur with a Novel Sulfate Reducing Permeable Reactive Barrier Containing ZVI Dr. Jim Field.
SOME RECENT ADVANCES IN PASSIVE TREATMENT OF MINED DRAINAGE Arthur W. Rose Pennsylvania State University.
WTP Operator Training: Water Chemistry Missouri Water and Wastewater Conference Dr. John T. O’Connor, PE Tom O’Connor, PE.
By: Pimluck Kijjanapanich. I Introduction O Objectives S Scope of Study L Literature Review マスタ タイトルの書式設定 M Methodology マスタ タイトルの書式設定 R1R1 Results and.
Acid Deposition – the result of air pollutants combining with each other to produce acid precipitation or rainwater that has become acidic. Acid – pH lower.
Timothy K. Tsukamoto, Ph.D.
The Orange County Water District Riverbed Filtration Pilot Project Jason Keller 1, Michael Milczarek 1, Greg Woodside 2, Adam Hutchinson 2, Robert Rice.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
Titansorb ® Filter Media for Arsenic removal by Watch ® GmbH.
Professor: 莊順興 Presenter: 李謙詳 2016/01/04. * Unlike physical separation processes that merely concentrate or change the phase of hazardous wastes. * chemical.
Acid mine drainage Mateo Transueo. What causes it……... ► Acid mine drainage (AMD) is the drainage produced from mines containing sulfide minerals which.
Acid drainage is a persistent environmental problem in many mineralized areas, especially where mining has taken place. Not all drainage, however, is.
Paul Eger, Global Minerals /Sovereign Consulting Peggy Jones, Doug Green, American Peat Technology Igor Kolomitsyn, Natural Resources Research Institute.
Bench Scale Hexavalent Chromium Removal with a Biochemical Reactor Jim Gusek, P.E. - Sovereign Consulting Inc. Lee Josselyn, P.E. - Sovereign Consulting.
Do Now 1.Write the word equation for the reaction of calcium and water Calcium + water  calcium hydroxide + hydrogen 2.Write the word equation for the.
Lecture (6): Water pollution
Acid Mine Drainage (AMD)
Water quality characterization of the Pebble prospect area in Southwestern Alaska Comparison of PLP and independent science team scope, methods, and results.
* Metal in pickling waste (mg/L)
Water Quality in the Animas Watershed 1/24/18
TOXIC TRACE METALS IN SURFACEWATERS
Ecologically Effective Metals Adsorption Sorbster® Media Wastewater, leachates, ground water, process water, and ponds.
Increase in Ease of Oxidation
Presentation transcript:

Decommissioned BCR Organic Media Characterization Standard Mine Superfund Site, Crested Butte, CO Neal Gallagher, Eric Blumenstein, Tom Rutkowski, John DeAngelis (PWT) Presented by: Neal Gallagher

Overview Project Overview and Site Background Pilot BCR Operations Performance Summary Pilot BCR Decommissioning Substrate metals removal data TCLP & Paint Filter Substrate longevity estimates Discussion and Conclusions

Overview and Site Background Standard Mine Superfund Site Approximately 3 miles west of Crested Butte, Colorado (8,900 ft) Site elevation of 3,350 m (11,000 ft) Annual snowfall 10.2 – 17.8 m (400 – 700 in) Inactive hard rock mine Lead, zinc, silver, gold mined 1874 – 1966 Adit level 1 discharges to Elk Creek Influences Coal Creek, Crested Butte water supply COC’s: cadmium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, and zinc

Overview and Site Background

Passive treatment pilot study (1 gpm): Pilot Biochemical Reactor (BCR) constructed in 2007 Substrate composed of straw, woodchips, limestone Operational for approximately 5 years Project Goals: Test passive treatment performance at a high alpine, remote site Design and construct pilot system to treat the COCs Monitor the system year-round with remote monitoring equipment

Overview and Site Background Level 1 adit BCR Sampling shed APC

Pilot Operations and Performance Water Chemistry: BCR InfluentEffluentChronic Stream Standard Temp°C (°F)3.4 (38)3.2 (38)-- pHsu Cdmg/L Cumg/L Femg/L Pbmg/L Mnmg/L Znmg/L SO4mg/L

Pilot Operations and Performance Performance Summary 5 year operation Low detection limits allowed comparison to strict stream standards BCR performance: Consistently meeting acute stream standards: Cadmium, copper, iron, lead, zinc Consistently meeting chronic stream standards: Copper, lead, zinc Demonstrated removal of dissolved metals below 5 µg/L Cadmium, copper, and lead

Pilot BCR Decommissioning

Decommissioning Objectives: Identify metal precipitation zones in substrate Determine substrate disposal requirements (TCLP, Paint Filter) Estimate substrate longevity for full scale design

Pilot BCR Decommissioning

Expected Metals Precipitation Zones: 0”–1” below surface (BS) Orange iron hydroxide layer – oxide zone (Thomas 2002) 1”–8” BS Black sulfide zone – sulfate reduction unlikely here due to depressed pH. 8”–14” BS Gray aluminum zone – aluminum hydroxysulfates (Thomas 2002) 14”–30” BS Black sulfide zone Reference: Thomas, R.C Passive Treatment of Low pH, Ferric Iron-dominated Acid Rock Drainage. Doctoral Thesis. University of Georgia

Pilot BCR Decommissioning Columns 1-3 Average Total Metals Analysis, selected results: Average depth from top of substrate Cadmium, totalLead, total Copper, totalIron, total Manganese, totalZinc, total mg/kg 0" , ,260 8" , ,133 19" , " , Initial (top) lift expected to contain metal hydroxides, and metal sulfides Decommissioning tests were not designed to determine metals removal processes Metal Precipitation Results:

Pilot BCR Decommissioning Metal Precipitation Results:

Pilot BCR Decommissioning Metal Precipitation Results:

Pilot BCR Decommissioning Metal Precipitation Results:

Pilot BCR Decommissioning Metal Precipitation Results:

Pilot BCR Decommissioning Metal Precipitation Results:

Pilot BCR Decommissioning Metal Precipitation Results:

Pilot BCR Decommissioning Metal Precipitation Results:

Pilot BCR Decommissioning Metal Precipitation Results:

Pilot BCR Decommissioning Columns 1-3 Average TCLP Results: Sample ID Average depth from top of substrateArsenic, totalBarium, total Cadmium, total Chromium, totalLead, total Mercury, total Selenium, totalSilver, total mg/L RCRA Standard C1 27"0" < C1 23"4" < < C1 19"8" < < 0.013< C1 16"11"< < 0.002< < C1 13"14"< < < C1 8"19" < < C1 3"24" < 0.002< < C1 0"27" < < : RCRA standards, e-CFR Title 40 Part Toxicity characteristic. Paint Filter test results

BCR Substrate Longevity Two Methods for determining substrate longevity: Acidity buffering capacity (limestone longevity) Remaining carbon longevity 3 Methods for determining limestone dissolution: Performance data - Ca in vs Ca out Field measurement of substrate (mass CaCO 3 / mass dry substrate) Neutralization Potential as CaCO 3 2 Methods for carbon longevity: Sulfate reduction – 2 mol C per mol SO 4 Field measurement of substrate TOC

BCR Substrate Longevity Limestone dissolution (Calcium in vs Calcium out): 8.5 – 14 years of remaining life Carbon longevity (sulfide reduction): 8.0 – 18 years of remaining life Estimated BCR lifespan: 5 years operation = 13 – 19 years of operation

Conclusions Substrate metals precipitation: No defined reaction front observed Increased precipitation observed at initial substrate-water interface TCLP & Paint filter: Substrate is expected to be non-hazardous Substrate longevity: 13 – 19 year design life, aligns with typical 10 – 20 year life estimate BCR performance: Effluent Cd, Cu, Pb consistently below 5 µg/L Met acute/chronic stream standards for majority of COCs

Thank You! Contact: