From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

Waiver Day May 15, Today’s presentation would not be possible without the hard work of the Evaluation Committee and Mad River staff. ◦ Cristi Fields.
BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
Peninsula School District
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
SMART Goals.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
What should be the basis of
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda: PARCC vs Marzano Configuration Discussion Marzano Moving Forward: Administrator/Supervisor/Teacher.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
South Dakota’s Teacher Effectiveness Model February 20, 2015 Presented by Dr. Sally Crowser and John Swanson, TIE.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Professional Performance Process OPD 864 – Writing the Mid-Year and Summative Evaluation Report Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.
SLG Goals: Reflecting on the First Attempt Oregon Collaboration Grant Statewide Grantee Meeting November 21, 2013.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
BANKED DAY #8 REFLECTION AND REVISION December 13, 2016.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
STUDENT GROWTH OBJECTIVES
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013

 Understand the “Big Picture” of the OTES Evaluation System  Review additional legislative changes to OTES

- It is 7 step process beginning with a self assessment and ending with a final summative rating.

Value-Added District Approved Vendor Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

 Step 1: Self Assessment  Step 2: Creating a Growth Plan  Step 3: Pre-Conference  Step 4: Observation  Step 5: Post-Conference  Step 6: Walkthroughs/Informal Evaluations  Step 7: The Final Summative Rating

 Record evidence of strengths and areas for growth in each of the 7 Standards for the Teaching Profession.  Identify two priorities for the upcoming year by placing check marks in the far-right column.  Use these two priority areas for writing your Professional Growth Plan.  May want to use this form during first pre- conference with evaluator to finalize selection of growth goals.

 Using the two priorities from the Self- Assessment or input from your evaluator, write two goals.  Use Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric to select focus and wording.  Determine Evidence Indicators for each goal, as well as areas for professional growth.  Will be used to inform your holistic Teacher Performance rating.

 S pecific  M easurable  A ttainable  R elevant  T imely

 Collaborative Learning: ◦ By March 2014, I will develop, teach, and evaluate 6 collaborative learning lessons, and share them with my grade-level team for feedback.  Parent Communication: ◦ By April 2014, I will make at least 5 positive contacts with my 10 lowest-performing students’ families, and will update my evaluator on their progress.

 Goal Statement: Differentiation ◦ By April 2014, I will provide evidence of matching strategies, materials, and pacing to individual student needs in each of my science units of instruction.  Evidence Indicators: ◦ Pre-assessment data of students in each unit; Inventory of individual student learning styles; Plans of differentiated lessons with samples of strategies, materials and pacing  Date: ◦ September 27, 2013; January 21, 2014  Areas for Professional Growth: ◦ Differentiated instruction books and websites; Collegial visit to Mrs. X’s room to observe differentiation; Team meetings to discuss student needs

 Step 1: Self Assessment  Step 2: Creating a Growth Plan  Step 3: Pre-Conference  Step 4: Observation  Step 5: Post-Conference  Step 6: Walkthroughs/Informal Evaluations  Step 7: The Final Summative Rating

 Review questions and consider how they could be answered based on your upcoming observation.  Not every question will be asked, these are just suggested questions.  Your pre-conference will be used to inform your Teacher Performance rating.  At pre-conference you will also discuss Professional Growth Goals and Student Growth Measures.

 Every teacher will have 2 formal observations.  The observations will be for an instructional period of no less than 30 minutes. ◦ Observation 1- Between September and November 15 th ◦ Observation 2- Between December and February 15 th  The OTES rubric is the focus of the observation.

 Review the criteria and consider how they will be addressed in your upcoming observation.  Evaluator will use these criteria and collect evidence during your observation to inform a holistic ranking.  These criteria are the basis for both formal and informal observations.  Your ratings on these criteria will be used to inform your Teacher Performance rating.

1. Focus of Learning 2. Assessment Data 3. Prior Content Knowledge/Sequence/Connections 4. Knowledge of Students 5. Lesson Delivery 6. Differentiation 7. Resources 8. Classroom Environment 9. Assessment of Student Learning 10. Professional Responsibilities

 Goal is to reflect on the outcomes of the lesson.  Teachers should be prepared to discuss with evaluator: ◦ Strengths of the lesson ◦ Areas for refinement or improvement

 Step 1: Self Assessment  Step 2: Creating a Growth Plan  Step 3: Pre-Conference  Step 4: Observation  Step 5: Post-Conference  Step 6: Walkthroughs/Informal Evaluations  Step 7: The Final Summative Rating

 Fits into the Holistic Approach to Evaluation  Everyone will have a minimum of 2 walkthroughs no more than 4  Walkthroughs should be about10-15 minutes.  Walkthroughs can be conducted anytime except for the three days before winter break and any day after the final summative rating.  The teacher will receive feedback within 5 school days

 Step 1: Self Assessment  Step 2: Creating a Growth Plan  Step 3: Pre-Conference  Step 4: Observation  Step 5: Post-Conference  Step 6: Walkthroughs/Informal Evaluations  Step 7: The Final Summative Rating

 Professional Growth Plan  1 st round of the Observation Process  1st Walkthroughs  Instruction

 2 nd round of the Observation Process  Walkthroughs  Instruction

 Walkthroughs  Finalize Professional Growth Plan  Final Summative Rating

  Search for OTES  Search SLOs for how to write them for non-core subject areas