Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign & Innovation University of Maryland, University College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Advertisements

Orientation to EVALUATION PROCEDURES August, 2006.
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
SAP Jam Kickoff Meeting (your name here) April 11, 2013 © Copyright All rights reserved.
WMO Competency Standards: Development and Implementation Status
INITIATIVES & STRATEGIES
Hillyard – Vektr CQI ™ Continuous Quality Improvement Hillyard Inc. has partnered with Nuvek LLC, to gain hosting capabilities for a new and innovative.
V i s i o n ACCOMPLISHED ™ Portfolio Management Breakthroughs Shelley Gaddie President Project Corps Pacific Northwest Portfolio Management Roundtable.
1 Introduction to Workforce Planning and Development in State of Alaska Executive Branch Departments.
Program Management Overview (An Introduction)
SUMMER 2005 JUNE Preparing an Organizational Change Management Plan Org Change Management Activities by Project Phase.
Implementation Audit and Control Background Internal Audit Role Go-Live Criteria Audit Approach - Systems Audit Approach - People Summary Agenda.
INDUSTRIAL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Staff Compensation Program Update
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design
project management office(PMO)
Buffalo State College Internal Control Program Presented to: Buffalo State College Line Staff Delivered by: BSC IC Program & Department Managers.
Strategic Leadership by Executives
Lecture 3 Strategic Planning for IT Projects (Chapter 7)
Chapter 2 Strategic Training
LEARN. NETWORK. DISCOVER. | #QADexplore Implementing Business Process Management: Steps to Success WCUG – November 18, 2014.
SPAWAR HQ (General Fund) Navy ERP Implementation Lessons Learned – Comptroller View.
Kickoff Meeting Jam 11/18/2011 © Copyright All rights reserved.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
Deloitte Consulting SCOOPS Session September 2003.
Customized for the Seattle Area Software Quality Assurance Group Dave Brandes People Capability Maturity Model Services The Boeing Company July 19, 2001.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama © 2008 Thomson/South-Western All rights reserved. Henan University Professor Guifeng.
Matching PMBOK Section
A National Resource Working in the Public Interest © 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. KM at MITRE Jean Tatalias KM TEM, December 2007.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
Chapter 2: Global E-Business and Collaboration Dr. Andrew P. Ciganek, Ph.D.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
1 Professional Development Training – Enhancing the Delivery of Services Marcela E. Stanislaus facilitator Blackmon Roberts Group, Inc.
University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010.
Management Information Systems Foundations of Information Systems Ismiarta Aknuranda Informatika UB.
University of Wisconsin System HRS Project Update to ITC November 19, 2010.
APA DETROIT MARCH 2008 CHAPTER MEETING A New Look at Leading and Managing Payroll Martin Armstrong, CPP, MBA Harrah’s Entertainment Director of Payroll.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
Deloitte Consulting LLP SCOOPS Session September 2004.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
Strategically Managing the HRM Function McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
1 Confidential, unpublished property of CIGNA. Do not duplicate or distribute. Use and distribution limited solely to authorized personnel. (c) Copyright.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
IMPACT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EFFECTIVENESS OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION IN ALBANIA IMPACT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EFFECTIVENESS OF VOCATIONAL.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
The Value Driven Approach
School of Health Sciences Week 8! AHIMA Practice Briefs Healthcare Delivery & Information Management HI 125 Instructor: Alisa Hayes, MSA, RHIA, CCRC.
Division of Information Technology Chuck Shomper Vice Chancellor / Vice President September 5, 2003 We are IT Building the IT Community... Together.
“You haven’t been paid yet? Who are you? OR Feeling the PAIN of re- engineering the requisition process at Coppin State College.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Plug-In B2 Business Process (on OLC)
Student Affairs Assessment Council: Articulating our purpose “Position description” for membership Charge update Wednesday, August 21, 2013.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
A Guide for Management. Overview Benefits of entity-level controls Nature of entity-level controls Types of entity-level controls, control objectives,
Foundations of Information Systems in Business. System ® System  A system is an interrelated set of business procedures used within one business unit.
The Second Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress Presented by J. Glenn George Thursday, March 29, 2007 Day II – Track.
Chapter 8 Process Implementation Reference: Tan, A. (2007). Business Process Reengineering in Asia: A Practical Approach, Pearson Education, Singapore.
Introduction Complex and large SW. SW crises Expensive HW. Custom SW. Batch execution Structured programming Product SW.
IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Presenter: Kendell Rice, Ph.D. July 11, 2007.
Are Remuneration Processes Getting You Down? Alexandra Cass Rachel Symond
Project Management Processes for a Project Chapter 3 PMBOK® Fourth Edition.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.16-1 International Business Environments & Operations 15e Daniels ● Radebaugh ● Sullivan.
Welcome To University Shared Services
Cowlitz County, WA Accounting Function Review
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
© 2016, 2017 Change Healthcare Solutions, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Deloitte Consulting LLP SCOOPS Session
Presentation transcript:

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign & Innovation University of Maryland, University College November 21, 2003 USM Regional PeopleSoft Conference

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Introductions Presenters: Cynthia Kelly, Coppin State College Katharin Brink, Cedar Consulting Dennis Bortolus, Cedar Consulting Participants: please give name, institution, role and interest in Process Innovation.

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Objectives for Today Self Assessment of Business Process Redesign Review Thomas Davenport’s Process Innovation Model as applied to Coppin State Review Business Process Change Example in Office of Human Resources Coppin State Brainstorm Strategies for Ongoing Innovation Assessment and Adaptation

What is Process Innovation Process innovation combines adopting a process view of business functions with the application of new ideas and technology. Process innovation depends on the transfer of knowledge and information. Innovatio n

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. 5 Migrating to a new process requires understanding the current one. Recognizing problems in an existing process ensures that problems are not repeated in the new process. Analyzing current process reveals strategies for new process. Promoting individual and organizational learning strategies sustains process innovation. Keys to Process Innovation

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 Determine rationale for change Describe the process context Understand the current process Explore new ways of doing things Redesign process Steps in Innovation Change Process

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign: A Self Assessment Design and Development How was process reviewed and by whom, what policies were impacted; what criteria used for new design? Staffing and Training What was impact on role reassignment, role definition, job descriptions, training and professional development opportunities? Cross-functional Coordination How were cross functional decisions made, redundancies identified and eliminated; communications improved? Process and Report Management How does enhanced reporting inform ongoing process review; how are measurements used for continuous improvement?

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign: Coppin State Self Assessment Design and Development Key objective: eliminate time sheets and get personnel requisition on line. Created “as is” process flow documents. Included all staff members in analysis of each process No controlling assumptions affected design process. No policy changes required yet.

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign: Coppin State Self Assessment Staffing and Training No job reassignments were required, though there may need to be in the future. All training complete for scheduled roll out groups. New employees trained individually. No formal feedback mechanism established - have invited comments through . Benchmarks are qualitative, not quantitative: have all employees following the process and get through PS processes in a timely way.

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign: Coppin State Self Assessment Cross-functional Coordination Separate training provided for Payroll processes. Some training developed as need was identified. Not all redundant processes have been eliminated – still working on assuring reliable data. Checks and balanced occur in payroll processes, though some processes depend on data entry timing. New processes announced via . Web Time Entry not available outside network yet.

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign: Coppin State Self Assessment Process and Report Management Exception reporting process identifies continuing, repetitive errors and provides information to improve design and training. New time history report needs to be reviewed at mid management level. No performance metrics have been set.

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign: Outcomes and Benefits Time Entry Implementation has been complete to all FT employees ( and some contractual employees) since 7/2003. Reduced paper to distribute, collect and manage and file. Reduced manual labor. Better access from individual workstations.

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved Elimination or decrease in manual processes. 2.Coordination of processes across distances. 3.Change of process sequence; allow parallel processes. 4.Capturing process information to understand process better. 5.Improved analysis of information and decision making 6.Capture and distribute organization information 7.Monitoring process status. 8.Coordination of tasks and processes (cross functional). 9.Elimination of go betweens & multiple authorizations. Attributes of Innovative Processes

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Parallel processing Virtual linkages Simultaneous entry and review Transaction volume Document management Priority processing Transaction type More web information Improve IVR service Increase self-service Reduce access to files Multiple sites on campus Coordination with other departments Innovation Strategies Automation Geographic Process Sequence Tracking

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Process cycle times FAQs? Peak processing Customer profiles Innovation Strategies Integration Coordination of activities Policy and process alignment Scheduling and planning Reduce # of authorizations Eliminate double handling Create purposeful roles Go Betweens Information Management information Scheduling, staffing, process design Analysis Knowledge Knowledge Management Standard operating procedures Regulation and statutory changes

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Innovation Attribute Comparison N/A Go Betweens

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Focusing Redesign Energy Think time line – near term, long-term. Think cost – no/low cost, new resources or reallocated resources. Think capabilities: knowledge, expertise, experience, staff-power. Think priorities: must change, should change, could change. Think technology: have it, get it, use it.

Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Questions and Answers Thank you for your participation.