April 29, 2011 Developing Effective Leaders: Principal Evaluation Systems CCSSO – National Summit on Educator Effectiveness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Advertisements

Elementary School Counselor
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Evaluating principal effectiveness Focal Point 2012.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Connecting Research to Actions Jennifer L. Curtis, Ed.D. K-12 Section Chief Mathematics Principal READY 2014.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
ASCA National Model: School Counselors Using Data
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Succession Planning Hosted By: John Nori NASSP Consultant.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Webcast October 11, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop Aligning Teacher Evaluation, Professional Development, Recruitment and Retention March 3, 2014.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Leadership training for supporting the implementation of the new KCF Training for improving governance, leaderships and school management in municipalities.
TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
Oregon’s Future Starts Here Superintendents’ vision for turning our good schools into great schools.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
LESSONS LEARNED IN PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEADERSHIP for CHSI 2 ND National High School Leadership Summit Archived Information.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
FACE Symposium Michele P Brooks M.Ed Assistant Superintendent, Office of Family & Student Engagement Boston Public Schools.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times Secondary Curriculum Leaders Tuesday, April 13.
Welcome Back to Day Two Q and A Professional Learning Communities SMART Goals Mission Statement for improving parent-school relations Book Study “ The.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Evaluation: An Opportunity to leverage learning at all levels School Board Presentation – May 22, 2013.
Sustainable Educator Evaluation and Compensation Supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund Improved educator performance = Increased student growth seec.nefec.org.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Principal Evaluation Update
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times
State Board of Education Progress Update
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Implementing Race to the Top
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Teacher Insight Survey 2019
The School development plan for Parents and Carers
Presentation transcript:

April 29, 2011 Developing Effective Leaders: Principal Evaluation Systems CCSSO – National Summit on Educator Effectiveness

Principal Effectiveness

Accurately Assessing Principal Effectiveness Student Achievement Outcomes Student assessment results and measures of college readiness Emphasize growth over attainment Teacher Effectiveness Growth in the percentage of teachers making “effective” gains in student achievement Improvement in the “differential retention” of teachers evaluated as effective Performance Standards  Focus on domains of leadership that have been shown to drive results for students  Fold in other elements (e.g., parent surveys) as data on the accomplishment of leadership actions

Guiding Principles for Use Of Student Outcomes  Focus more on growth than attainment  Value all students, not just those approaching proficiency  Set targets that close in-school or cross-school achievement gaps  Include “on track” to college non-test measures  Use multiple years of data for high stakes consequences  Ensure alignment to other state/LEA accountability systems for principals and schools

4 Teacher effectiveness Principal Effectiveness Teacher Effectiveness Student Outcomes The principal’s impact on teacher effectiveness is measured three ways: 1.The improvement of student outcomes 2.Increases in the percentage of teachers on staff who are effective or highly effective 3.Principal actions – The Retention of Effective and Highly Effective Teachers – Effective Managing and Counseling Out Low Performers – Rigorous Differentiated Performance Evaluations – Development of Teachers

Six Domains of Leadership Actions 1. Vision for Results and Equity 2. Planning and Operations 3. Culture (including families and community) 4. Learning and Teaching 5. Staff Development and Management 6. Personal Leadership and Growth New Leaders for New Schools: CONFIDENTIAL 5

Role of the Principal Manager Evaluation Implementation Principal Effectiveness Access to robust data streams Job design allows for frequency of school observation Significant investments in norming and strong tools/rubrics for evaluation Accountable for improving principal effectiveness and student outcomes Use evaluation information to drive supports and professional growth Implement rewards and consequences based on evaluations

Aligning All Leadership Policies Principal Standards and Evaluation Retention, Rewards, & Dismissal Principal Selection In-service PD Evaluation and Management Pre-Service Training Pipeline Development 7 Principal Autonomy Data and Support Systems

State Challenges  Evaluator training, especially for distributed/online delivery –Principal evaluation training is more than “video norming” –Designing robust examples of evidence, while avoiding “checklist” –Providing guidance and skills on student outcomes goal setting  “Principal manager” job design –Scope of management responsibility – number of schools, other responsibilities –Focus on principal development, not just accountability –Ability to see into human capital management at the school level