Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court 6-7-051 You have been considering the case of Xiaohoung Yu, Plaintiff, vs. Vidasagar Mummaneni, as.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Civil & criminal law Civil Law.
Advertisements

CHAPTER 6 REVIEW Let the Games Begin
Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
Trial Procedures. Pleadings – papers filed with the beginning of a trial – establish the issues the court is being asked to decided Spell out allegations.
The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
ENG 3C1.  The Rule of Law is the “fundamental principle that society is governed by law that applies equally to all persons and that neither an individual.
+ The Criminal Trial Process. + The Charter Section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that a person charged with an offence is to be.
Chapter 18: Torts A Civil Wrong
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
Ch. 5-3 Civil Procedure.
16.1 Civil Cases.
Chapter 18 Torts.
Chapter 16 Lesson 1 Civil and Criminal Law.
Legal Issues Final Review. Multiple Choice What is the situation in which a lawyer sues another lawyer for a serious error that caused a client to lose.
Common Trial Procedures United States. Opening Statements.
Alaska Mock Trial Glossary of Terms. Laws Rules created by society to govern the behavior of people in society. Among other things, the laws are one formal.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Chapter 18.  Criminal Law: crime against the state  Civil Law: person commits a wrong, not always a violation of law  Plaintiff-the harmed individual,
Section 2.2.
Motion for Summary Judgment The Keys to Success. How does this work?  Summary judgments are governed by Rule 166(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
Civil Law in Action Wednesday 17 August Court hierarchy Review: What are the advantages of having a court hierarchy?
 1. Duty-The accused wrongdoer owed a duty of care to the injured person  2. Breach of Duty- the defendant’s conduct breached that duty  3. Causation-defendant’s.
Civil Law. You are a basketball star who was late for practice. You rushed out your door, tripped over your neighbor’s dog, and broke your wrist. You.
Section 2.2.
Civil litigation begins with pleadings: formal papers filed with the court by the plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff - the person bringing the lawsuit.
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
Unit 6 – Civil Law.
Civil Law Chapter 16 Section 1. Civil Cases Plaintiff claims to have suffered and seeks damages Plaintiff claims to have suffered and seeks damages Damages-
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
2Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Trial Procedures Section 2.2.
Procedure Procedure at Trial. 1) Court Clerk reads the charge Indictment - if vague - quashed (struck down)
Tort Law Summary. Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law It is a “wrong” which.
Chapter 5 The Court System
Chapter 4 Review. TEST NEXT CLASS PERIOD Make sure you study the 7 Steps in a civil case and the 9 steps in a criminal/jury trial.
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
Twelve Angry Men By: Reginald Rose. Discussion What is a jury? How is it chosen? What responsibility does an individual have to accept jury duty? How.
The Criminal Court System. The Court System Depending on the crime committed decides at what court the trial will be held. Depending on the crime committed.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases. Types of Civil Lawsuits In civil cases the plaintiff – the party bringing the lawsuit – claims to have suffered a loss and usually.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
Negligence. Homework 20.1 and 20.2 – read Chapter and 20.2 – read Chapter 20.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
American Court System Applied to Twelve Angry Men.
Brown: Legal Terminology, 5 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Legal Terminology Fifth Edition by Gordon.
Tort Law Negligence. Civil Actions What is a civil action? Definition of a civil action: “A noncriminal lawsuit, brought to enforce a right or redress.
Unit 2 Chapter 5 Legal Environments of Business (LEB)
Tort Law Summary. Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law It is a “wrong” which.
Social Science.  The main purpose of civil law is to settle disagreements fairly  People file lawsuits, or cases in which a court is asked to settle.
Civil Law Civil Law – is also considered private law as it is between individuals. It may also be called “Tort” Law, as a tort is a wrong committed against.
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Personal Injury Laws Objective: Discuss what damages are available to victims of torts Explain the various stages of a civil suit Bellwork: What are damages?
Negligence Tort law establishes standards for the care that people must show to one another. Negligence is the conduct that falls below this standard.
Trial Procedures Business Law Chapter 6. Trial Procedures Civil Cases are brought by individuals Civil Cases are brought by individuals Injured party.
Certain professionals, such as doctors, pilots, and plumbers, are held to the standards of reasonably skilled professionals in their field. Even minors.
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
ESSENTIAL QUESTION Why does conflict develop?
The Criminal Trial Process
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Civil Cases
Liability in negligence
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Civil Cases Chapter 16 Section 1.
OBJECTIONS.
Law Chapter 15 and 16.
Steps in a Trial.
Negligence Ms. Weigl.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases.
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court You have been considering the case of Xiaohoung Yu, Plaintiff, vs. Vidasagar Mummaneni, as Defendant, Civil Action No. 03-C

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Plaintiff filed this action here in the State Court of Gwinnett County in which she contends that she was injured due to the negligence of the Defendant.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Defendant filed an answer to the petition in which he denies that he is responsible for the damages sought by the Plaintiff.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court I have outlined to you briefly the written contentions of the parties as contained in the pleadings. The pleadings are not evidence; they are only claims or contentions of the parties.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Plaintiff has the burden of proof, which means that the plaintiff must prove whatever it takes to make out her case, except for any admissions by the defendant.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Plaintiff must prove her case by what is known as a preponderance of the evidence; that is, evidence upon the issues involved that, while not enough to wholly free the mind from a reasonable doubt,

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court is yet sufficient to incline a reasonable and impartial mind to one side of the issue rather than the other.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Evidence is the means by which any fact that is put in issue is established or disproved.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Evidence includes all the testimony of the witnesses and the exhibits admitted during the trial.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court It also includes any stipulations, which are facts agreed to by the lawyers.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Direct evidence is evidence that immediately points to the question at issue.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Circumstantial (or indirect) evidence is evidence that only tends to establish a fact; it must be such as to reasonably establish that fact rather than anything else.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court The comparative weight of circumstantial and direct evidence on any given issue is a question of fact for you to decide.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Direct evidence is the testimony of a witness who has seen or heard the facts to which the witness testifies and that, if believed, is sufficient to prove or establish these facts.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Circumstantial evidence is the testimony of a witness who has seen or heard the facts to which the witness testifies from which such facts, if believed,

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court you may find other facts to exist, that are reasonable and believable to you in the light of your experience.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court When circumstantial evidence is relied upon to establish a fact or theory, it must be such as to reasonably establish that fact or theory rather than anything else.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court The jury must determine the credibility of the witnesses. In deciding this, you may consider all the facts and circumstances of the case, including

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court the witnesses' manner of testifying, their intelligence, means and opportunity of knowing the facts to which they testify,

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court the nature of the facts to which they testify, the probability or improbability of their testimony,

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court their interest or lack of interest, and their personal credibility as you observe it.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Any conflicts in the evidence are to be reconciled wherever possible. All witnesses are presumed to speak the truth, and if possible, you should not attribute a false statement to any of them.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court If you find that you cannot reconcile conflicting evidence,

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court then you should believe the evidence that is most reasonable and believable to you and decide the case by the preponderance of the evidence as you find it to be.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court When witnesses appear and testify, they are presumed to speak the truth unless impeached in some manner provided by law.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court To impeach a witness means to discredit the witness or prove the witness unworthy of belief.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court A witness may be impeached a.by disproving the facts about which the witness testifies,

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court b. by proof of contradictory statements previously made by the witness about matters relevant to the testimony and to the case,

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court If it is sought to impeach a witness by proof of contradictory statements, proof of the general good character of the witness may also be shown. The effect of the evidence is to be determined by the jury.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court When a witness is successfully contradicted as to a material matter, the witness's credibility as to other matters shall be a question for the jury.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Because believability of witnesses is a matter to be determined by the jury, it is your duty to determine whether the effort to impeach a witness has been successful and whether the witness is to be believed.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court When a party has evidence that rejects (or disproves) a claim or charge made against the party and he/she fails to produce it, or having more certain and satisfactory evidence,

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court relies on that which is of a weaker and inferior nature, a presumption arises that the charge or claim is not well founded. This presumption may be rebutted, however.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court The case before you is a tort case in which the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the negligence of the defendant, if any, was a proximate cause of the injuries to the plaintiff.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Before a plaintiff can recover damages from a defendant in a case such as this, there must be injury to the plaintiff resulting from the defendant's negligence.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Proximate cause is that which, in the natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by other causes, produces an event and without which the event would not have occurred.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Proximate cause is that which is nearest in the order of responsible causes, as distinguished from remote, that which stands last in causation, not necessarily in time or place, but in causal relation.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Damages are given as pay or compensation for injury done.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court When one party is required to pay damages to another, the law seeks to ensure that the damages awarded are fair to both parties.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court If you believe from a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff is entitled to recover, you should award to the plaintiff such sums as you believe are reasonable and just in this case.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Damages are given as compensation for an injury done, and generally the injury is the measure when the damages are of a character to be estimated in money.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court If the injury is small or mitigating circumstances are strong, only nominal damages are given.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court What would be a proper amount of nominal damages is a question for you to decide under all the facts and circumstances of the case.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court In all cases, necessary expenses resulting from the injury are a legitimate item of damages.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court As to medical expenses, such as hospital, doctor, and medicine bills, the amount of the damage would be the reasonable value of such expense as was reasonably necessary.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Pain and suffering is a legal item of damages. The measure is the enlightened conscience of fair and impartial jurors.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Questions of whether, how much, and how long the plaintiff has suffered or will suffer are for you to decide.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Pain and suffering includes mental suffering, but mental suffering is not a legal item of damage unless there is physical suffering also.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Anxiety, shock, and worry are examples of what might be included under mental pain and suffering, and

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court loss of capacity to work or labor, separately from earnings, may be considered as an item causing mental suffering.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court If you find that the plaintiff's pain and suffering will continue into the future, you should award damages for such future pain and suffering as you believe the plaintiff will endure.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court In making such award, your standard should be your enlightened conscience as impartial jurors.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court No plaintiff may recover for injuries or disabilities that are not connected with the act or omissions of the defendant in this case.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court There can be no recovery for a particular plaintiff for any injury or disability that was not proximately caused by the incident in question.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court If you should find that, at the time of the incident, the plaintiff had any physical condition, ailment, or disease that was becoming apparent or was dormant, and

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court if you should find that the plaintiff received an injury as a result of the negligence of the defendant and

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court that the injury resulted in any aggravation of a condition already pending, then the plaintiff could recover damages for aggravation of the preexisting condition.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Should you find that defendant has been stubbornly litigious and has caused plaintiff unnecessary trouble and expense, you may award the plaintiff his expenses of

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court litigation, including reasonable attorney’s fees. If you find that a bona fide controversy exists as to defendant’s liability, then plaintiff would not be entitled to recover his

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court expenses of litigation and attorney’s fees. The mere failure to pay a claim without suit does not constitute bad faith.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court If you believe from a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff is entitled to recover damages,

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court you would find for the plaintiff and the form of your verdict would be, "We, the jury, find for plaintiff in the sum of (blank) dollars."

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Where I have used the word "blank," you would insert such sum in dollars and cents as you think the plaintiff is entitled to recover.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court If you do not think the plaintiff is entitled to recover based upon the evidence presented, you should find for the defendant, and

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court the form of your verdict would be, "We, the jury, find for the defendant.”

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Whatever your verdict in the case, it must be agreed to by each juror; it must be in writing, dated, and signed by your foreperson; and it must be returned and read in court.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court The court has prepared a verdict form for your use.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court I want to emphasize that anything the court did or said during the trial of this case was not intended to and did not intimate, hint, or suggest to you which of the parties should prevail in this case.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Whichever of the parties is entitled to a verdict is a matter entirely for you to determine, and whatever your verdict, it must be agreed upon by all of you.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court The court's interest in the matter is that the case be fairly presented according to law and that you--as honest, conscientious, impartial jurors--

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court consider the case as the court has instructed you and return a verdict that speaks the truth as you find the truth of the case to be.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Your verdict should be a true verdict based upon your opinion of the evidence according to the laws given you in this charge.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court You are not to show favor or sympathy to one party or the other. It is your duty to consider the facts objectively without favor, affection, or sympathy to either party.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Your verdict must be unanimous. One of your first duties in the jury room will be to select one of your number to act as foreperson,

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court who will preside over your deliberations and who will sign the verdict to which all twelve of you freely and voluntarily agree.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court You should start your deliberations with an open mind. Jurors should carefully consider all the evidence in the case and

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court deliberate with a view toward reaching a unanimous verdict consistent with your consciences and oaths as jurors. Avoid premature, fixed opinions.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Consult with one another and consider each other's views. Each of you must decide this case for yourself, but you should do so only after a discussion and consideration of the case with your fellow jurors.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court Do not hesitate to change an opinion if convinced that it is wrong. However, you should never surrender honest convictions or

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court opinions in order to be congenial or to reach a verdict solely because of the opinions of the other jurors.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court You may go now to the jury room, but do not begin your deliberations until I send you the pleadings, exhibits, and verdict form, which I will do shortly. Then you may begin your deliberations.

Yu v. Mummaneni Judge Randy Rich Gwinnett State Court