Evaluation Tools and Models Northern Plains CCC Program Comprehensive Cancer Control 2008 Annual Grantee Meetings May 14th, 2008 Atlanta, GA.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A Valuable Asset School districts put a valuable asset of the nation’s schools at risk when they ignore the health of their employees. WHY? BECAUSE… Actions.

Advertisements

Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.

Capacity Building.

Evaluation Capacity Building Identifying and Addressing the Fields Needs.

Restructuring the Cancer Programs and Task Force Workgroups.

Principles of Standards and Measures

The plan is done! Now what? Lessons learned from the Minnesota Cancer Alliance Jane Korn, MD, MPH, Director Minnesota CCC Program.

Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.

A Brief Description of Maine’s Program, Lessons Learned, and Resources 5/07.

The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.

Logic modeling.

ROADMAP FOR THE FUTURE Developing the Maine Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan

Katie Baker, MPH November 16 th A presentation to the China- ETSU Health Education Institute COMMUNITY COALITIONS AS A MODEL FOR COMMUNICATING HEALTH RISK.

Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.

Welcome to the Montana Cancer Control Coalition (MTCCC)

The National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP): Current Progress and Future Action Temeika L. Fairley, Epidemiologist Comprehensive Cancer Control.

“If you don’t know where you are going, how are you gonna’ know when you get there?” Yogi Berra Common Elements of Strong Program Evaluation THEORY OF.

Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.

Money: NPCC Community Grants Program Rosalina James, PhD.

FCS Program Focus Area – Healthy Eating/Active Lifestyles Dr. Virginie Zoumenou UMES/ Maryland Cooperative Extension 11/01/07.

1 Ben George – Poet, Al Zantua & David Little Raven – Drummers.

IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Refining Idea Maps Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt.

Performance Measurements Amrita Banerjee, Roberto Iturralde Mary McManus, Rebecca Pearson Lauren Rinebolt, María Ryan Shane Wasden.

IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Refining Idea Maps Diabetes Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt Knowlton,

ACIOP Post Award Orientation Webinar October 9, 2014.

Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Tallahassee Childhood Obesity Prevention (COPE) Coalition Logic Model Assumptions The community will be motivated to become agents of change. Obesity is.

Cancer Program Fewer Montanans experience late stage cancer. Fewer Montanans die of cancer. Metrics Biannual percent of Montanans who are up-to-date with.

Customer Focus Module Preview

Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.

FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.

BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.

Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.

REACHING YOUR PREVENTION OBJECTIVES: Supporting NLAAD June 28, 2012 Please call in for audio U.S. & Canada: Access Code:

Cara McNulty, MS Manager Office of Statewide Health Improvement Initiatives Julie Ring Director Local Public Health Association Statewide Health Improvement.

Partnering Together to Build A Mentally Healthy and Suicide Safer Ottawa: A Public Health Approach Benjamin Leikin, Mental Health Project Officer, Ottawa.

Must include a least one for each box below. Can add additional factors. These problems… School Performance Youth Delinquency Mental Health [Add Yours.

Must include a least one for each box below. Can add additional factors. These problems… School Performance Youth Delinquency Mental Health [Add Yours.

APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.

Nova Scotia Falls Prevention Update Preventing Falls Together Conference October 29, 2009 Suzanne Baker.

Preparing for the Main Event Using Logic Models as a Tool for Collaboratives Brenda M. Joly Leslie M. Beitsch August 6, 2008.

Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.

Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,

Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.

Pinellas Safe Start Evaluation Prepared by Sandra Ortega For the 2004 Cross-Site Meeting Baltimore, MD November 2004.

Implementing Adult Risk Factor Surveillance in Manitoba Case Studies ARFS Symposium January 26, 2011.

Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.

June 11, IOM, Reducing Suicide, 2002 Statement of Task w Assess the science base w Evaluate the status of prevention w Consider strategies for studying.

Strategic Communications: From the Plan to the Public September 27, 2006 Atlanta, GA.

CRCCP Workgroup Update: Grantee Survey Early Findings & Next Steps CPCRN Steering Committee Meeting March 22, 2012.

Julie R. Morales Butler Institute for Families University of Denver.

Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.

1 Comprehensive Cancer Control In Action. Presentation objectives… Better understand the role of the state comprehensive cancer control coalition Discuss.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.

Getting to Outcomes: How to do strategic planning with your CRP Theresa Costello National Resource Center for Child Protective Services May 25, 2007.

Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Control Program 3/10/2015 Program Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes Intermediate.

GENOMICSGENOMICS Chronic Disease Genomics Project Assessment and Response Genomic Team Meeting January 19, 2005.

INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.

1 Center Mission Statements SAMHSA ? CSAT Improving the Health of the Nation by Bringing Effective Alcohol and Drug Treatment to Every Community CMHS Caring.

Increased # of AI/AN receiving in- home environmental assessment and trigger reduction education and asthma self-management education Increased # of tribal.

Improving Impact Statements Using Survey Data 2016 Extension Conference Jeff Buckley, Jennifer Cantwell, January 14, 2016.

Primary Prevention Institute

How well are we addressing Asthma Disparities

Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs

Adding the Second Story: Building Evaluation Capacity in the Field

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHRONIC DISEASE DIRECTORS (NACDD)

Short term Medium term Long term

Celebrating 20 Years of Collaborating to Conquer Cancer

National Cancer Center

Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Tools and Models Northern Plains CCC Program Comprehensive Cancer Control 2008 Annual Grantee Meetings May 14th, 2008 Atlanta, GA

Northern Plains Comprehensive Cancer Control Program Logic Model InputsOutputs ParticipationActivities Outcomes - Impact Short TermMedium TermLong Term Funding – CDC and other resources Staff: ~2 full time Coalition and Partners Current data and research Conference calls and meetings with Coalition and partners Educate community Create Strategic Plan Improve cancer data Engage tribal community for support Tribal Leadership Health Professionals Cancer Organizations Cancer Survivors Tribal Health Workers Media State Cancer Programs Increased knowledge and awareness of cancer prevention and control Increased numbers of cancer activities in tribal communities 1-3 years4-6 years7-10 years Increased skills and capacity to address cancer Increase in cancer screening accessibility Change in risk factors for cancer Increased cancer treatment resources and support Increase in cancer survivor and caregiver support systems Increase in treatment follow-up Decreased Cancer Incidence Rates Decreased Cancer Mortality Rates Increase in Quality of Life for Cancer Patients Implement cancer control activities/interv entions Indian Health Service employees Cancer Researchers Increase in cancer screening rates Improved data and surveillance Increased support from key partners Improved cultural sensitivity/compe tency

Strategies Tracking Data of Coalition and Partnerships (meeting participation, agendas, rosters, etc.) Partnership Satisfaction and Needs Assessments Pre and Post Assessments Cancer Burden and Risk Factor Surveillance Evaluate absolutely every activity or intervention… –somehow….if we can…

Tools Audience Response System (ARS) Online Evaluation Database

Sample Question: What do you like most about this meeting? 1.Presentations from my peers and colleagues 2.Poster Session 3.Free candy and pens 4.Doing the chicken dance 5.I don’t know/I’m not sure

How we are using ARS? Short-term Outcome: Increased knowledge and awareness of cancer prevention and control –Cancer 101 Workshops –Education Conference –Community Colorectal Cancer Workshop –Family Caregiver Workshop

ARS Advantages Knowledge, Attitude, Belief, Satisfaction outcomes from workshops, meetings, etc. Efficient data collection, analysis, reporting Better response rate than paper surveys Mostly well-received in communities Can help facilitate group processes

ARS Disadvantages Cost….? Technology Portability (ARS unit and staff) –Community Grant Example Does not measure knowledge retention or outcome in behavior

Online Evaluation Database

Password protected system Upload ARS, tracking, evaluation data Automatically generate reports and summarize data Tabs for different inputs: Committees, Partnerships, Products, Dissemination, etc.

Online Evaluation Database Advantages Provides external consultants/partners access Easier to generate reports Uniform measures and comparison Partners information/data? »……at least we hope……

Online Evaluation Database Disadvantages Technology You only get what you put in… –Cancer Burden Data Time and resources to upload data and maintain site Appropriate data-sharing What will we miss?

Evaluation Plans Update and Revise Evaluation Plan Continue to improve use of ARS Tailor and begin using Online Database Northern Plains Cancer Data Improvement Initiative