Integrating sustainable charcoal production into community-based forest management Elida Fundi Tanzania Forest Conservation Group 27 th May 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cities and Green Growth OECD Green Cities Programme
Advertisements

Refreshed Strategies to Address the Dimensions of Sustainability and Effective Delivery Biodiversity Land Degradation Climate Change Chemicals International.
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Climate change initiatives Capacity Challenges.
GEF PROJECT TEMPLATES ANDGUIDELINES George Manful (PhD) Senior Task Manager, Climate Change UNEP UNFCCC Asia and Pacific Regional Workshop on Preparing.
Biodiversity Land Degradation Climate Change Chemicals International Waters Sustainable Forest Management Sustainable Cities Food Security Fisheries Forests.
Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
Co-benefits Initiative Zambian Experience
“Selling (exporting) and buying (importing) of tropical timber among countries at agreed prices” Tropical Forests: International Trade.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – multilateral REDD-plus financing program GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
Self-declarations Assumed law enforcement “Business As Usual” scenario Stakeholder conflicts with forestry Products from unspecified or controversial sources.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
Co-management of Forest Resources in Malawi. High incidence of poverty and food insecurity: – Increasing demand for land and forest resources – High dependence.
Isaac Malugu- Forest Programme Coordinator14 th May 2014 Tanzania Country Office.
Uma Tenure and Regulatory Reforms: Lessons and Future Steps in Asia September
MINISTRY OF TOURISM, ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Forest Monitoring For REDD “A Case of The Integrated Land-use Assessment (ILUA) - Zambia” Presented.
READINESS TO IMPLEMENTATION Lessons and Experiences from Zambia Presented by: Deuteronomy Kasaro National REDD+ Coordinator 7th November,
FORESTRY AND BEEKEEPING SUB SECTOR. achievements, challenges and priorities.
Wednesday 2and September 2009REDD Workshop - Oasis, Morogoro 31st-3rd Sept'09 1 Payment for Environmental Services (PES) and REDD Prof Kassim Kulindwa.
Offsetting Carbon Emissions through Community-based Conservation Forests - Biodiversity - Community Tanzania Marc Baker Co-ordinator - Carbon Tanzania.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – multilateral REDD-plus financing program GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 25 – 27 October 2011 Nairobi, Kenya.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
Presentation by Alfred N. Gichu Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness.
Indonesia: Transparency in the Forestry sector Fred Stolle World Resources Institute Forest Team.
Understanding REDD+ Actions United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to address greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and degradation.
Civil Society Engagement in Environmental Policy Processes 2014 Inter-Parliamentary Hearing on Exemplary Forest Policies in Africa September 30 th to 3.
AFREPREN/FWD Summary of the UPEA II Research Findings By Stephen Karekezi, John Kimani and Oscar Onguru.
Bhola Bhattarai General Secretary, FECOFUN 25 September, 2009 Bangkok Community Perspective in REDD Mechanism.
Understanding the Legal Mandates for DRRM and LCCA planning.
Batyr Ballyev, Head, Environment Protection Department, the Ministry of Nature Protection of Turkmenistan Climate Change-Related Priorities & Needs.
Tanzania AB supply chain update Presentation to Annual AB meeting Kumasi, 11 th Nov 2008
Policy options and recommendations José Palacín Chief, Innovative Policies Development UNECE Minsk, 19 June 2014.
IUCN, WBCSD, Sep 2007 Markets for Ecosystem Services: New Challenges and Opportunities for Business and the Environment.
The BioTrade Initiative: sustainable trade of biodiversity products & services Lorena Jaramillo – Economic Affairs Officer.
PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT ON REDD+ IN VIETNAM, CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE Prepared by Vu Thanh Nam Vietnam administration of Forestry (VNFOREST)
20 February 2009 Tanzania Natural Resource Forum Carbon-Forestry Working Group 1 Conceptual and Practical Challenges in the Operationalization of REDD.
The Roadmap to REDD Implementation in Tanzania: Potential Challenges and Opportunities Pius Z. Yanda, Emma T. Liwenga & Claude G. Mung’ong’o Institute.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
Rosemary Vargas-Lundius Senior Research Coordinator Office of Strategy and Knowledge Management, IFAD CARITAS WORKING GROUP MEETING FOR ANTI-POVERTY CAMPAIGN.
FARM Africa/SOS Sahel Ethiopia Strengthening Sustainable livelihoods and Forest Management Over view of the program April 6, 2013 Bahir dar.
Bringing finance to rural people – Macedonia’s case Efimija Dimovska Istanbul, October 2010 Macedonian Bank for Development Promotion Agricultural Credit.
TANZANIA - Participatory District Agriculture Development Plan for Sustainable Development UNEP Initiative on Capacity Building for Integrated Assessment.
By Cassian Sianga Forest Governance Learning Group – Coordinator Liberia - Monrovia, 7-8 October 2015 “Participatory Forest Management; an NGO perspective.
Kiichiro Fukasaku Development Centre
Revisions Proposed to the CIS Plan by the Global Office Misha V. Belkindas Budapest, July 3-4, 2013.
Propose Strategic Objective and Strategy in the National REDD+ Strategy Version 4.
AU/UNIDO/Brazil High-Level Seminar on Biofuel.  Policies are required to reflect the country’s development vision for the sector  Required to establish.
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
Nigel Hannam and David Phillips Parish Conference – 11th September 2013 Balancing Development.
DRAFT INNER MELBOURNE ACTION PLAN Presented by Elissa McElroy IMAP Executive Officer January 2016.
UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries FAO-UNDP-UNEP April 2008.
Poverty - Environment Linkages Uganda’s Case By D.N Byarugaba Commissioner for Forestry.
Information Needs for Sustainable Forests Management Nguyen Tuong Van Forest Sector Support Partnership 17 th of March 2010, Hanoi.
INITIATIVES RELATED TO FORESTS AND REDD+ IN NORTH WESTERN PROVINCE June 2011.
Corruption Risk Assessment for REDD+ : Kenya’s experience Geneva, Switzerland 8 December 2013.
Breakout Group Presentations – Day 4 Land Use Dialogue in the Ihemi Cluster, Southern Tanzania 31 October – 4 November Iringa, Tanzania.
NATIONAL FORESTRY AUTHORITY
Natural Resource Management Programmes
Overview of the international climate policy & finance framework and the building of the REDD+ mechanism Josep A. Garí Africa Advisor, UN-REDD Programme.
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness Activities
Lessons and Experiences from Zambia National REDD+ Coordinator
Building Efficiency Accelerator
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Will present results from a combination of market related studies, trials and demonstration sites, grower adoption surveys Example of tea! EXPERIENCES.
Rural Partnerships between Small Farmers and Private Sector
Forest and Landscape Restoration (FLR)
Presentation transcript:

Integrating sustainable charcoal production into community-based forest management Elida Fundi Tanzania Forest Conservation Group 27 th May 2015

Tanzania’s annual deforestation rate is approximately 1.16 %. Uncontrolled charcoal production is a major driver of deforestation and forest degradation particulary in weak managed gvt forest reserve

BUT agriculture is by far the most widespread driver of deforestation If woodlands on village land are going to compete with agriculture as a land use, they need to bring more tangible benefits to communities.

Demand for charcoal in Tanzania is projected to increase over the next 20 years due to rapid urbanisation and population growth

With funding from the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, the Tanzania Forest Conservation Group in partnership with MJUMITA, TaTEDO and Kilosa District Council developed a project to test an alternative charcoal value chain. The project aimed to transform charcoal from being a driver of deforestation to incentivising sustainable forest management in such a way as to improve rural livelihoods and increase resilience to climate change.

Transforming Tanzania’s Charcoal Sector: Project Hypothesis / Theory of Change The charcoal value chain can be transformed to: Incentivise sustainable forest management; Reduce deforestation; Improve rural livelihoods; Increase resilience to climate change.

TTCS Project Goal Delivering sustainable development and benefits to rural communities in Tanzania through enhanced environmental sustainability from better biomass harvesting and through more efficient production technologies and biomass energy-friendly energy sector policies.

Outcome 1 - Sustainable charcoal Commercially viable and pro-poor value chains established for legal and sustainably sourced charcoal by applying the making markets work for the poor approach (M4P)’ Outcome 2 – Biomass Energy-related Research, Knowledge Management and Governance Credible data and analysis communicated through coordinated advocacy leading to more biomass-friendly governance of Tanzania’s energy sector. TTCS Project Outcomes

The TTCS is being implemented in 10 villages in Kilosa District in Morogoro. The villages are situated in between Mikumi National Park to the East and the Rubeho Mountains to the west. They were selected because they have significant areas of woodland. Four of the villages have also been part of TFCG and MJUMITA’s REDD+ project financed by Norway and so also provide an opportunity to learn about how sustainable charcoal production can be combined with REDD+.

10 villages in Kilosa District Morogoro Region TTCS Project Location

Step 1. Conduct village land use planning and establish village land forest reserves Results in Kilosa 8 villages with village land use plans and village land forest reserves covering 59,958 ha The MJUMITA Sustainable Charcoal Model = woodland = Village land forest reserves

Step 2. Integrate charcoal forest management units in the Village Forest Reserves i.e. areas designated for sustainable charcoal production Results in Kilosa 6,040 ha of woodland designated for sustainable charcoal production ~ 10% of the VFRs

The harvesting cycle is 24 years. This is based on ecological research on miombo woodlands and aims to harvest at the point that the annual increment in biomass is at its highest. Each FMU is divided into 24 coupes. One coupe is harvested each year.

Step 3. Map out coupes within each FMU and assess stock

The village natural resource committees have been trained to assess the available biomass within a coupe. With this information, the annual charcoal quota is calculated; and this then provides the ceiling for harvesting permits. Care is taken not to harvest valuable timber trees; or trees on steep slopes. The project is experimenting with different ways of balancing rapid regeneration with minimising risks to the environment.

A requirement for producing charcoal in the coupes, is that the producers use improved basic earth kilns. These can improve efficiency by up to 42 %. The project has trained over 500 producers to use the improved kilns and over 400 have joined the producer groups authorised to operate within the reserves.

FMUs managed to allow regeneration over a 24 yr harvesting cycle. Regeneration is based on coppicing. -70 to 100 % of harvested stumps in wet miombo woodland will coppice; -faster than growing from seed as root stock is already well-developed. Model is not applicable in high biodiversity Coastal and Eastern Arc Mountain forests.

Step 4. Establish good governance for the reserves Permits issued based on annual harvesting quota for that year’s coupe Transparent procedures for issuing permits and record- keeping Fees retained by the villages By-laws enforced rigorously 8 villages in Kilosa operating the permitting system successfully Training on financial management and record keeping

Step 6. Producers sell their charcoal to transporters. Step 7. Transporters demonstrate that the charcoal has been sourced legally from a sustainably managed VFR for exemption from TFS royalties at natural resources check-points along the highway by showing: -Transport permit -Production license

The charcoal produced in the reserves has sold well; and the villages have earned fees from issuing permits that have generated a revenue of almost US$ 100,000. Some villages have adopted a fee of 14,400 per bag i.e. the same rate as is charged by the government. Whilst others have adopted a lower fee. The district and Municipality are also paid TZS 1000 – 2000 per bag. Transporters mention that buyers appreciate the high quality of the charcoal that comes from the improved kilns.

Revenue distribution in the 8 villages

Revenue from fees pays for forest management and community development projects Community development projects are agreed in village assembly meetings Construction of medical officer house at Ihombwe Village Purchasing solar-powered lightning system for the Ihombwe dispensary Motorbike for patrol teams and VNRCs

Project villages are an island of legal, sustainable production in a sea of illegal / informal production. -Production from the 8 villages is ~ 0.1 % of the ~ 1.3 million tonnes / yr of charcoal consumed in urban areas. -Almost all charcoal is being produced without considering the available stock; and without investment to ensure regeneration of the stock post-harvesting. Where permits are issued for harvesting, there is minimal monitoring to ensure that producers and transporters comply with the terms of the permits. This free-for-all undermines sustainable charcoal. Challenges and barriers

Is there a contradiction in TFS’s responsibility to promote CBFM; and its dependence on revenue derived from permits for harvesting in village land? -TFS earned 49 % of its revenue from unreserved forests on village land and from Central Government Forest Reserves and yet TFS spent ten times more on plantations than on natural forest management in 2013/14 Challenges and barriers

Absence of a clear, consistent national policy or strategy on charcoal and other forms of biomass energy More effort is needed to manage charcoal production and monitor the origin of charcoal being traded. Agricultural strategies promoting the conversion of forests to agriculture result in the conversion of valuable forests and woodland into marginal agriculture; need for a policy shift. Challenges and barriers

Experiences from Kilosa show that a formalised, sustainable charcoal value chain: -is competitive even in the current market; -can deliver significant revenues for community development; -can incentivise and enable communities to manage large areas of woodland and forest on village land. Opportunities and enabling factors

With 15 – 20 million ha of woodland on village land; of which 2.3 million ha are already in >800 village land forest reserves, there is significant potential to scale up; Managing natural woodland for charcoal production is a more cost-effective and pro-poor approach to sustainable charcoal production than creating new tree plantations; Sustainable charcoal production can diversify rural livelihoods and thereby increase resilience to climate change. Opportunities and enabling factors

Scale up sustainable charcoal production by introducing the model in villages in other districts – high potential areas include Morogoro, Coast and Tanga Regions; Facilitate stakeholder collaboration to identify gaps / contradictions in policy and policy implementation in order to create a more supportive policy framework; Support more rigorous law enforcement to reduce the flow of illegal and unsustainable charcoal. Way forward - TTCS Phase II

TFCG, MJUMITA and SDC are seeking opportunities for collaboration and partnership with a view to scaling up the MJUMITA sustainable charcoal model. Contact: for more Way forward - TTCS Phase II

Asanteni