Plant Responses To Land Mosaics EEES 4760/6760, University of Toledo Feb19, 2007 Reading: Chapter 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Habitat Use and Ecology of the Northern Flying Squirrel Todd M. Wilson USFS, PNW Research Station.
Advertisements

Rapid River Schools FOREST ECOLOGY “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land.” “A Sand County Almanac” Aldo Leopold
Habitat Fragmentation By Kaushik Mysorekar. Objective To enlighten the causes and consequences of habitat fragmentation followed by few recommendations.
Structure and Composition of Edges in Boreal Forest Qinglin Li.
Reserves and Density of Organic Carbon in Russian Forests Anatoly Utkin, Dmitry Zamolodchikov, Georgy Korovin and Olga Chestnykh 4. C phytomass and forest-forming.
Sustainable Landowner Options for Aspen Forests Charly Ray, Northern Ecosystem Services Jason Fischbach, UW-Extension June 8, 2013.
Introduction Methods Results and Conclusions References Acknowledgements Figures and Tables Table 1. Habitat suitability index for forests with different.
Bottomland Forest Ecosystem. Description Bottomland Forests are deciduous, or mixed deciduous /evergreen forests They form closed-canopy forests on riverine.
Understory plant responses to uneven-aged forestry alternatives in northern hardwood-conifer forests Kimberly J. Smith 1, William S. Keeton 1, Mark J.
Overstory and understory vegetation management to meet fire resilience and wildlife habitat objectives Eric Knapp, Becky Estes, and Carl Skinner U.S. Forest.
Examining fire spread patterns across a managed forest-land mosaic in northern Wisconsin, USA using a modeling approach Jacob LaCroix, Daolan Zheng, Soung-Ryoul.
Wildlife Management Principles. Goals What are some goals related to the management of wildlife habitats?
Scale What is scale? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? What are the correct scales to use? Scaling:  UP: bottom-up approach  Down: top-down.
Stand Structure and Ecological Restoration Charles W. Denton Ecological Restoration Institute John D. Bailey, Associate Professor of Forestry, Associate.
Duncan Lutes Systems for Environmental Management Bob Keane – USFS – Research Ecologist, P.I. Carl Key – USGS – Geographer John Caratti – SEM – Systems.
Scale & Scaling What is scale? What is scale? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? What are the correct.
Urban-to-rural gradients % change from noisy to quiet sites % song overlap with traffic noise R 2 = 0.4 p = More abundant in.
Thesis  Erin Harrington  Advisors  Bobbi Low  Phil Myers.
o What were we looking at? o The Pit Crew studied soil patterns throughout the landscape.
Impact of Southern Pine Beetle Outbreaks on Wildlife Habitat Suitability Maria D. Tchakerian 1, Robert N. Coulson 1, Jaehyung Yu 1, and Forrest Oliveria.
“Near term response of surface soil nitrogen cycling and pools to forest clearing and burning” Heather E. Erickson Recent soils research from the Teakettle.
Fall River Long-term Productivity Study : Predictions of Pre-harvest Biomass and Nutrient Pools K. Petersen, B. Strahm, C. Licata, B. Flaming, E. Sucre,
Giant Forest fire history. Vegetation, species composition plot data:  Compare pre-settlement composition estimates with current stand composition.
Introduction Subalpine meadows play a crucial role in species diversity, supporting many endangered species of plant and wildlife. Subalpine meadows play.
Elevation Distribution of Vaccinium Myrtillus in Spruce-Fir and Lodge Pole Forests. By: Nicholas Condello Schwinger 7/ 17/2013.
How we use and abuse our greatest natural resource.
Restoration of Compartment 46 to promote oak-hickory regeneration, shortleaf pine and native grasses in Sewanee, TN Johnson Jeffers and colleagues in FORS.
Using Birds to Guide Post-fire Management in the Plumas & Lassen National Forests Ryan D. Burnett, Nathaniel Seavy, and Diana Humple 4/21/2011.
Colorado Front Range Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Project : Initial Pre and Post-Treatment Stand Structure Analysis for the Pike and San.
Stream Networks and Riparian Zones Landscape Ecology (EEES 4760/6760) Basic terminology Stream Network · Structure · Function · Management Reading: Gregory,
John L. Willis, Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan Michael B. Walters, Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Introduction to the FIA Down Woody Materials Indicator 1st of 3 Part Training Series Christopher Woodall DWM National Indicator Advisor.
Managing Patch Edge Fuel Effects Fire Spread in a Fragmented Landscape By: Jacob J. LaCroix, Soung- Ryoul Ryu, Qinglin Li, Daolan Zheng, and Jiquan Chen.
Effect of retained trees on growth and structure of young Scots pine stands Juha Ruuska, Sauli Valkonen and Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute,
Coarse Woody Debris Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Randy G. Jensen Stephen R. Shifley Brian L. Brookshire.
Extension of the forest ecosystem simulation model FORECAST: incorporating mountain pine beetle, fire, climate change, and wildlife Hamish Kimmins, Kim.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
Edge Corridor (road) Patch Matrix LANDSCAPE MOSAIC.
Forest Ecology. What is forest ecology? Study of –Relationships between organisms and their environments –Interactions of organisms with one another –Patterns.
Stand initiation: South facing hillside, kept open by moisture limitations + repeated fires, Douglas-fir slowly invading (Kalamopsis.
Wavelet Analysis of Shannon Diversity (H’) 1500 Old Harvest Landing Sand Road- Mod. Use Sand Road- Light Use Clearing Access Road Resolution.
Forestry. Tree terms Saw log- 6-8 inches for soft wood, inches for hardwoods.
Variation in sources of wood and wood delivery to streams Tim Beechie NOAA Fisheries.
Comparing Three Great Lakes Research Projects By Mary Bresee.
Cases Studies: Importance of Scales in Ecological Investigations EEES 6760, University of Toledo January 28, 2009.
Landscape Management & Harvest Model A Case Studies from Chequamegon National Forest EEES4760/6760 April 15, 2009 HARVEST used to simulate different landscapes.
Special Lecture Stand Structural Diversity
Experimental gaps and biodiversity responses in the Vermont Forest Ecosystem Management Demonstration Project Bill Keeton Graduate student contributors:
The site specific variables that correlate with the distribution of the Pacific Golden Chanterelle, Cantharellus formosus Sarah E. Bergman and David L.
Landscape Management & Harvest Model A Case Studies from Chequamegon National Forest EEES4760/6760 April 20, 2009 HARVEST used to simulate different landscapes.
Welcome Chequamegon National Forest, Wisconsin and FARSITE Surface Fire Interactive By Jacob LaCroix, LEES Lab, UT ► Introduction Introduction ► Fire Spread.
Ecology & Management of Disturbed Landscapes Challenges and Opportunities Jiquan Chen Landscape Ecology & Ecosystem Science University of Toledo Apr 16,
Multiscale Climatic, Topographic, and Biotic Controls of Tree Invasion in a Sub-Alpine Parkland Landscape, Jefferson Park, Oregon Cascades, USA Harold.
Ecosystem Water Use: A Concept Linking Water and Carbon Fluxes Jiquan Chen Landscape Ecology & Ecosystem Science (LEES) Lab University of Toledo Feb. 21,
Forest Succession.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
René Alfaro, Jodi Axelson, Brad Hawkes, Lara vanAkker and Bill Riel
Jiquan Chen Kim Brosofske Asko Noormets Tom Crow Soung Ryu Many others
Wildlife Terms and Concepts
Predicting species distributions for New England invasives
Succession Chapter 4.3.
School of Forest Resources and Conservation
Shelterwood and clearcut
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
Patterns of Succession
Historical Context for Forest Management in New England
Forest vegetation responses to atmospheric depositions associated with oil sands mining operations Macdonald, S. Ellen1, Mark Fenn2, Mervyn Davies3 and.
SUCCESSION.
Kirk Hanson (360)
Angela Gee, US Forest Service July 22, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Plant Responses To Land Mosaics EEES 4760/6760, University of Toledo Feb19, 2007 Reading: Chapter 2

Highlights 1.Patches Level: Patches & AEI 2.Within Landscape: Movement Corridors, Matrix, etc. 3.Between Landscapes:

Chequamegon N.F. Land Mosaic Water (0.39%) Wetland (0.02%) Non-Vegetated / Recent Clearcut (4.03%) Herbs & Shrubs / Old Clearcut (18.93%) Young Hardwoods / Thickets (4.87%) Mature Hardwoods (31.31%) Jack Pine (5.44%) Red Pine (12.76%) Mixed Hardwood/Conifer (22.25%)

How do landscape structure and broad- scale disturbance regime influence plant species diversity and distribution across multiple scales?   Does harvesting mimic fire in its effects on plant diversity and/or composition?   Is plant species distribution or diversity related to particular structural features or broad-scale structural patterns?   Does plant diversity vary across scales and if so, how?

PB: fire SB: small-block clearcutting LB: large-block clearcutting POA: thinning Broad-Scale Manipulation of Landscape Structure

Multi-Scale Approach Patch Level Seven Patch Types (77 plots) Within Landscape Moquah Barrens Wildlife Management Area Among Landscapes northern Chequamegon National Forest (DFC eco-units)

Hardwood Jack Pine Pine Barrens Clearcut Young PineRed Pine Young Hardwood Major Patch Types

Patch-Level Measurements Overstory   dbh   height   age Understory   percent cover by species   duff depth (cm)   litter (% cover and depth, cm)   coarse woody debris (CWD, % cover) Soils   grab samples by horizon (4 pits per site)   horizons present   horizon depth Soil Lab Analysis   pH   moisture (%)   total organic matter (%)   total N (%)   total C (%) 5 m 20 m

Plant Diversity Shannon Index (H’) Richness Pine Barrens ClearcutY. PineJack PineRed Pine Y. Hardwood Hardwood Pine Barrens ClearcutY. PineJack PineRed Pine Y. Hardwood Hardwood a a abab abab abab abab b a a a a a a a

Species Composition

Variables Used in Regression Analysis Dependent Variables   Richness   Shannon Diversity Index (H’) Independent Variables   Litter cover, %   Litter depth, cm   Duff depth, cm   Coarse woody debris (CWD), %   pH of each horizon (A, E, B)   Organic matter content, % (A, E, B)   Soil moisture, % (A, E, B)   Total N content, % (A, E, B)   Total C content, % (A, E, B)   C/N ratio   Aspect/Slope Variable [ tan(slope)*cos(aspect-45), see Stage 1976 ] All variables were first standardized, then transformed as needed for non-normal distributions

Regression Results

PB: fire POA: thinning LB: large-block clearcuts SB: small-block clearcuts Landscape Level

Length: m n=600+ plots Plot size: 1x1 m Transect Measurements 5 m percent cover by species canopy cover (%) litter cover (%) litter depth (cm) cwd (%) duff depth (cm) species, dbh, % cover overstory trees patch type

Select Species Distributions OPB BOPBOPBPASPBCCYA2 H2 H1 JPOSPB MA YA Percent Cover Distance (m) Pteridium aquilinum Amelanchier arborea Hieracium aurantiacum Conyza canadensis Trientalis borealis Trifolium pratense

Transect Summary

Plant Species Functional Groups > association < association

Small-Block PinePine-Oak-Aspen Forest Large-Block Pine OakPine Barrens Landscape Level (Four Landscapes) Do differences among landscape-level disturbance regimes influence patterns of understory plant diversity or composition?

Landscape Structure and Plant Distribution

Cumulative Species Richness RRP MP TRP60RJP RP12 OCC RP7 OCC TRP60 CC MA BOPB OPB PA SPB CC YA2 H2 H1 JPO SPB OPB YA2 OC C OBCCOCCHHHF F2 JPO RP5 MP NC C POA RP15 ORP15 H2 MP F2 HHH H H F H2 C RP60 Distance (m) Number of Species Pine Barrens Large-Block PO Small-Block Pine POA Forest Old Harvest Landing Sand Road- Mod. Use Sand Road- Light Use Clearing Access Road ATV Trail Dry Streambed Grassy Roadside

Plant Distribution Along the Transect

Wavelet Analysis of Shannon Diversity (H’) 1500 Old Harvest Landing Sand Road- Mod. Use Sand Road- Light Use Clearing Access Road Resolution (m) OPBBOPBOPBPASPBCCYA2 H2 H1JPOSPB OPB MA YA Distance (m) H’ W. Var. Scale W E

Wavelet Analysis Comparison BOPBOPB PA SPB CC YA2 H2 H1 JPO SPB OPB MA YA2 OCC OBCCOCCHHHF F2 JPO RP5 MP NCC POA RP15 ORP Resolution (m) Distance (m) Pine Barrens POA Forest Small- Block Pine Large- Block PO MP F2 HH H H H H2 F C TRP60RJP RP12 RRP OCCRP7 RP60 OCC MP OCC TRP60 CC W E Old Harvest Landing Sand Road- Mod. Use Sand Road- Light Use Clearing Access Road ATV Trail Dry Streambed Grassy Roadside

Wavelet Variance of litter cover for the four study transects