AA-mid Strategy to proceed to SRR & next steps AuthorAndrew Faulkner AA dCoDR: 23 November 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chunyi Peng, Guobin Shen, Yongguang Zhang, Yanlin Li, Kun Tan BeepBeep: A High Accuracy Acoustic Ranging System using COTS Mobile Devices.
Advertisements

Update on Measurements and Simulations at Cambridge: SKALA element + LNA Eloy de Lera Acedo Nima Razavi Ghods Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge.
ASTRON / Photonics p1. Photonics and AA station design Peter Maat – ASTRON Photonics and AA station design Peter Maat – ASTRON.
Monitoring, Control & Reporting. The nature of control Develop a structured plan - the “baseline” for control Monitor the plan Assess current and forecast.
System designAA Consortium - BolognaOctober 2012 AA Consortium AA System configuration options 23 October 2012.
AAVP Workshop December 2010 SKA 1 AA-low design. AAVP Workshop December 2010 SKA 1 AA-low design SKA 1 AA-low is a major System: >10x LOFAR sensitivity.
BDT Radio – 2b – CMV 2009/10/09 Basic Detection Techniques 2b (2009/10/09): Focal Plane Arrays Case study: WSRT System overview Receiver and.
Addressing software engineering issues in student software projects across different curricula Dušanka Bošković Computing and Informatics Bachelor Programme.
1 Introduction to System Engineering G. Nacouzi ME 155B.
Marco de Vos Summary, Conclusions & ActionsAAVP 2010 Summary, Conclusions and Actions Marco de Vos
Signal Processing for Aperture Arrays. AAVS1 256 antenna elements distributed over –4 stations –64 elements each.
WCMS RESPONSIVE REDEVELOPMENT Project Introduction – Web Dev Rev June 5, 2015 Jonathan Woodcock.
Dec 2010 AAVP Cambridge workshop AAVP AAVS1/2-low demonstrators Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate.
The Quality Improvement Model
AA-mid demonstrator Dion Kant AAVP – 10 December 2010, Cambridge, UK.
Name1 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects: building a system Laurens Bakker.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
AAVP meeting Cambridge December 2010 Technology Trade –offs: Mid band Array and Elements Prof. A. K. Brown 1 1 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering.
Annie Griffith December 2007 December 2007 Gemini OSU - UKLC Update.
Section 11.1 Identify customer requirements Recommend appropriate network topologies Gather data about existing equipment and software Section 11.2 Demonstrate.
Work Package 6: Performance Specification Ian McCrea.
AA-Low Technical Progress Meeting, October 2012, Medicina, Italy AAVS0 & AAVS0.5: System Design and Test Plan Nima Razavi-Ghods Eloy de Lera Acedo.
1 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition.
1 © 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Ultra High-speed Telecommunication Requirements for the SKA Peter Elford Business Development.
Why is software engineering worth studying?  Demand for software is growing dramatically  Software costs are growing per system  Many projects have.
DVA Series Work Flow P. Dewdney Apr 15, SPDO DVP Work Flow 2 DVA-1 CPG.
SKA Introduction Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate Andrew Faulkner, Andre Gunst, Peter Hall.
Yazd University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Course Title: Advanced Software Engineering By: Mohammad Ali Zare Chahooki The Project.
Andrew Faulkner1 Technology Readiness Levels 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon Technology Readiness Levels TRLs Andrew Faulkner.
CRISP & SKA WP19 Status. Overview Staffing SKA Preconstruction phase Tiered Data Delivery Infrastructure Prototype deployment.
System Architecture of Sensor Network Processors Alan Pilecki.
Applied Software Project Management
AAs in PEP Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate. PEP Project Execution Plan for the pre construction phase of the SKA Consortium to be formed AA-low ready for construction.
SKA System Design Kobus Cloete 9 December 2010 AAVP Workshop "Exploring the Universe with the world's largest radio telescope"
CASS, Marsfield Phil Diamond 4 October 2011 SKA Pre-Construction Phase: Where we are, and what we’re trying to achieve ?
Andrew Faulkner 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 SKADS Benchmark Scenario Andrew Faulkner.
System designAA Consortium - BolognaOctober 2012 AA Consortium The path to AAVS1 22 October 2012.
2-PAD Digital Beamformer Chris Shenton11 th October PAD Digital Beamformer Chris Shenton 11 th October 2007.
AAVS processing: Uniboard implementation. UNIBOARD Jive led FP7 project UniBoard, high integration density >> processing / m3
AAVS 0.5: An Overview Peter Hall ICRAR/Curtin, Bologna, October 22, 2012.
O. García-Pérez (FG-IGN) 1FIDA3 Wide Field Astronomy and Technologies for the SKA, Limelette, 4-6 November 2009 FIDA3: A Novel Active Array for the Mid-SKA.
Vidya Bharathi Institute of Technology
Project roles and responsibilities
AAMID 2015 SKA Engineering Meeting Mid Frequency Aperture Array MID-FREQUENCY APERTURE ARRAY The AAMID consortium: Mid Frequency Aperture Array Wim van.
Andrew Faulkner1 DS4 Deliverables 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon DS4 Deliverables Andrew Faulkner.
Mapping of FM and HD Radio Coverage Brian Casey, Leandro Franca, and Thomas Shanks March 9, 2009.
Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy 1 ASTRON is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) SKA AA-Mid Progress Meeting Johan.
SKA1-low: Cost Considerations AAVP Meeting, ASTRON 14 December, 2011 Tim Colegate, Peter Hall (ICRAR/Curtin) Andre Gunst (SPDO/ASTRON)
Keith Grainge Calibration issuesAA-low Technical Progress meeting Calibration Issues Keith Grainge.
Array Multiplier Haibin Wang Qiong Wu. Outlines Background & Motivation Principles Implementation & Simulation Advantages & Disadvantages Conclusions.
Why is software engineering worth studying?
NLW DAMS Implementation
Mid Frequency Aperture Arrays
Signal Processing for Aperture Arrays
DAG CH 3 Figure 11: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 17: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 23: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Wall Fixed Displays
DAG CH 3 Figure 13: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 19: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 18: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 28: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Aperture Array Station Processing
Technical Foundations & Enabling Technologies – DS4
DAG CH 3 Figure 15: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 21: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 27: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 22: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP Acknowledgements: J. Steckert
DAG CH 3 Figure 25: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Presentation transcript:

AA-mid Strategy to proceed to SRR & next steps AuthorAndrew Faulkner AA dCoDR: 23 November 2011

General AAVS Schedule AA-mid Individual tile demonstratorsAAVS02011 Single array performance demonstratorAAVS12013 multi-array interferometer performance demonstratorAAVS22016 SKA 1 capable costed design2016 AA systemAA-low and AA-mid AA-CoDR2011 SKA 2 technology roadmap & costed system design2014 AA-mid SRRnot yet fixed but will be 1Q2013 The work will be affected by the WBS being undertaken and the SoW for SKA PEP

Digital processing architectures AAVS0 –EMBRACE processing AAVS1 – use similar processors to AA-low deployment –UNIBOARD per AA-low AAVS1 AAVS2 – Updated for current programmable devices –UNIBOARDx per AA-low AAVS2 SKA 2 Deployment…. –Upgraded to the then current generation devices

Decisions, decisions.... Front-end –Element typeVivaldi or ORA –Element pitchFrequency range and performance –LNASingle ended or differential Signal processing –BeamformingSplit analogue/digital –Data rates e.g.Tile to Station Processor Physical –TilesSplit or contiguous –Station processingLocation etc.

Principal design option decisions AA-mid element selectionQ –Vivaldi or ORA –Take forward viable designs through AAVS1 –Decision prior to AAVS2 PRR Processing ArchitectureQ & 2015 –AAVS0 & 1: not critical for processing hardware –Choose actual devices as late as possible –Decision after AAVS2, for build decision on SKA implementation

Critical design aspects 1. An acceptable cost level 2. An acceptable power level 3. Reduction of the system noise temperature 4. Scalability 5. Calibrateability 6. A verified performance for radio astronomy A lot of focus on: Cost & Power A lot of focus on: Cost & Power

Summary AA-mid finalising specifications: DRM, system SRR AA-mid on an SKA 2 timescale Progressive development through AAVS0-2 Options and selection available Progression over many years leading to SKA