Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network (GLRRIN) Phil Mankin Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Advertisements

Gulf of Mexico Coastal Storms Program Tracie Sempier Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Image: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Cooperative Science and Monitoring Initiative Status Update 2009 Great Lakes Regional Research & Information Network Chicago, IL November 3-4, 2009 John.
LAMP 101 Elizabeth LaPlante US Co-Chair, Superior Work Group US Environmental Protection Agency.
Felicia Barnett Ronald B. Landy USEPA Office of Research and Development Office of Science Policy Regional Science Program.
Using medicaid with HUD’s Homeless Assistance Programs
Lake Erie Millennium Network (LEMN) Binational Network - formed November 1998 Convening Organizations: F.T. Stone Lab -
NOAA West and West Coast Governors’ Agreement on Ocean Health PaCOOS Board Meeting May 16-17, 2007 PaCOOS Board Meeting May 16-17, 2007.
Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Lake Michigan Coordination Team Brian K. Miller – Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Jennifer Fackler – Illinois-Indiana.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Tom Armstrong Senior Advisor for Global Change Programs U.S. Geological Survey
Jerry L. Miller, Ph.D. Assistant Director for Ocean Sciences White House Office of Science and Technology Policy MARACOOS Washington, DC
November 11, 2009 Mid-Atlantic Forum: Sea Grant Method, Regional Activities, & Emerging Issues Troy Hartley VASG Director.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Why Now? Regional, State and Federal Interests in Our and Coasts Why Now? Regional, State and Federal Interests in Our Oceans and Coasts Krista Kamer Program.
Progress Towards a Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System for the Southeast (SEACOOS) Harvey Seim / University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University.
Wetland and Coastal Habitat Conservation and Restoration Long-term Alliance Partnership Goal Increase coordination among the Gulf States and local, federal,
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Dr. James R. Mahoney Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere Director, Climate Change Science Program.
November 7, 2008 Susan Ware Harris National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) NOAA Education, Training and Outreach.
International Workshop on Institutional Capacity Development in Transboundary Basins, November 2008, Bonn, Germany Governance and Institutional Arrangements.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.
HSRP Spring Meeting May 4, 2011 David M. Kennedy.
Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Lake Michigan Coordination Team Brian K. Miller – Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Anders Andren – Wisconsin.
The Great Lakes Aquatic Gap Analysis Project Overview Jana Stewart U.S. Geological Survey.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Facing Tomorrow’s Challenges USGS Science in the Coming Decade Dr. Mark Myers Director USGS.
Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network 2009 GLRRIN Regional Meeting 3-4 November 2009 Chicago Jeffrey M. Reutter, Ph.D.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Increasing the capacity of higher education in East Africa through the creation of a Consortium of African and United States Educators (CAUSE) in the focus.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network 2007 IAGLR Conference 29 May 2007 Jeffrey M. Reutter, Ph.D.
EPA’s Work Related to P2 and the Great Lakes Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Round Table Summer Conference August 2005.
GLRRIN and the Lake Erie Millennium Network (LEMN) 2 April 2013 Jeffrey M. Reutter, Ph.D.
GEOSS Great Lakes Testbed connection to Adaptive Management
Great Lakes Fisheries Leadership Institute Dr. Rochelle Sturtevant -- IAGLR June 25, 2003.
Marine Systems Knowledge Cooperative Convened by NOAA 1.
Public Participation and the Advisory Committee Process A Collaborative Partnership For Water Resources Toni M. Johnson, Chief Water Information Coordination.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
The West Coast Governors’ Agreement on Ocean Health Jessica Hamilton Keys Natural Resources Policy Advisor Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski Hydrographic.
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
Plan Development Workshop NOAA Coastal Services Center Charleston, SC November 2-5, 2009 Ocean and Coastal Mapping Integration Act.
A NOAA Cooperative Institute David R. Shaw, Director Northern Gulf Institute.
1 Developing a Regional Ocean Research and Information Plan in Support of Ecosystem-based Management for the New York Bight (Presentation to Stakeholders)
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
2 Capitol Hill Oceans Week Wonders of the Ocean World: Creating an Ocean Literate Society June 10, 2004 Richard D. West Rear Admiral, USN (Ret.) President.
Who We Are What I Do Great Lakes Commission. Great Lakes Basin.
Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean (MARCO) Presented to the 62 nd Annual Interstate Seafood Seminar Bob Connell New Jersey Department of Environmental.
Increasing Momentum in the Formation of State and Regional Monitoring Councils Linda Green, co-chair, Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup, National Water.
Developing an Ecosystems Science Strategy for the USGS and the Nation Gary Brewer and Ken Williams Ecosystem SSPT Co-Chairs U.S. Department of the Interior.
1 External Review of the NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Dr. Barbara Moore NOAA Coral Reef Conservation.
1 CILER Review – 2005 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Carl Richards Chair, CILER Review Committee Director, US EPA Mid-Continent Ecology.
Jeffrey M. Reutter, Director Ohio Sea Grant College Program US and Canadian Agencies LEMN New Investigator’s Meeting
1 An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century. 2 The U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy 16-member, independent, bi- partisan group 26 scientific advisors 16.
Lake Michigan Coastal Program Coastal 101 – 2007 Edition.
FGDC Coordination Group Meeting 11 May 2010 Roger L. Parsons, IWG-OCM Co-chair (NOAA) Ocean and Coastal Mapping Integration Act Congressional Reports Update.
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT Brendan P. Kelly Assistant Director for Polar Sciences Office of Science and Technology Policy
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
State Perspectives on Coastal and Ocean Management A Review of A Review of Coastal States Organization’s Recommendations to the US Commission on Ocean.
Supporting Community Participation in U.S. Arctic Ocean Governance Strengthening Institutions Strategies for Cooperative Management in the Marine Environment.
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
CONTEXT FOR THE REVIEW Gary Matlock, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Administrator for Programs and Administration (A) Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research.
1 NOAA STRATEGY FOR REVIEW OF THE REPORTS OF THE U.S. COMMISSION ON OCEAN POLICY and the PEW OCEANS COMMISSION Lee Dantzler, Deputy Chair NOAA Ocean Council.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Planning for a Team Science Evaluation ∞ NIEHS: Children’s Health Exposure Analysis.
The Ohio Clean Marinas Program Expansion
Great Lakes Wind Collaborative: Who We Are and What We Do
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT
Presentation transcript:

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network (GLRRIN) Phil Mankin Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Encourage the development of regional research and information plans for U.S. coastal, ocean and Great Lakes areas. To use Sea Grant ’ s university capabilities to facilitate discussions among the broad range of regional ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes stakeholders to help identify and prioritize critical resource management problems and associated research and information needs necessary for practical solutions. from the RFP Objective

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Encourage the development of regional research and information plans for U.S. coastal, ocean and Great Lakes areas. To use Sea Grant ’ s university capabilities to facilitate discussions among the broad range of regional ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes stakeholders to help identify and prioritize critical resource management problems and associated research and information needs necessary for practical solutions. from the RFP

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Plans should include: 1)a clear statement of the major regional ocean and coastal management issues, 2)an outline of existing scientific and informational resources, 3)an analysis of the information necessary to address the critical issues, and 4)a prioritized list of actions to be taken. In addition to addressing research needs, the plans should discuss how observational data and decision-support tools might be integrated with the research to best support the needs of the management community. Each plan will include a prioritized list of forecast products that would aid in the transition toward regional ecosystem-based management.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Plans should include: 1)a clear statement of the major regional ocean and coastal management issues, 2)an outline of existing scientific and informational resources, 3)an analysis of the information necessary to address the critical issues, and 4)a prioritized list of actions to be taken. In addition to addressing research needs, the plans should discuss how observational data and decision-support tools might be integrated with the research to best support the needs of the management community. Each plan will include a prioritized list of forecast products that would aid in the transition toward regional ecosystem-based management.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Plans should include: 1)a clear statement of the major regional ocean and coastal management issues, 2)an outline of existing scientific and informational resources, 3)an analysis of the information necessary to address the critical issues, and 4)a prioritized list of actions to be taken. In addition to addressing research needs, the plans should discuss how observational data and decision-support tools might be integrated with the research to best support the needs of the management community. Each plan will include a prioritized list of forecast products that would aid in the transition toward regional ecosystem-based management.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Plans should include: 1)a clear statement of the major regional ocean and coastal management issues, 2)an outline of existing scientific and informational resources, 3)an analysis of the information necessary to address the critical issues, and 4)a prioritized list of actions to be taken. In addition to addressing research needs, the plans should discuss how observational data and decision-support tools might be integrated with the research to best support the needs of the management community. Each plan will include a prioritized list of forecast products that would aid in the transition toward regional ecosystem-based management.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Plans should include: 1)a clear statement of the major regional ocean and coastal management issues, 2)an outline of existing scientific and informational resources, 3)an analysis of the information necessary to address the critical issues, and 4)a prioritized list of actions to be taken. In addition to addressing research needs, the plans should discuss how observational data and decision-support tools might be integrated with the research to best support the needs of the management community. Each plan will include a prioritized list of forecast products that would aid in the transition toward regional ecosystem-based management.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Plans should include: 1)a clear statement of the major regional ocean and coastal management issues, 2)an outline of existing scientific and informational resources, 3)an analysis of the information necessary to address the critical issues, and 4)a prioritized list of actions to be taken. In addition to addressing research needs, the plans should discuss how observational data and decision-support tools might be integrated with the research to best support the needs of the management community. Each plan will include a prioritized list of forecast products that would aid in the transition toward regional ecosystem-based management.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network The plan should take into account existing plans and ongoing planning efforts by various regional and local organizations. Where there is already substantial ongoing activity, the planning efforts should be designed to add value to those efforts, for example by expanding the scope of existing plans, or by establishing priorities among already identified needs.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network The plan should take into account existing plans and ongoing planning efforts by various regional and local organizations. Where there is already substantial ongoing activity, the planning efforts should be designed to add value to those efforts, for example by expanding the scope of existing plans, or by establishing priorities among already identified needs.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network GLRRIN Composition  US representatives from GLERL (NOAA), US EPA, USGS, USFWS, and USACE;  Canadian representatives from the Ontario ministries of the Environment and Natural Resources, the Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and the National Water Research Institute of Environment Canada;  Bi-national representatives from the International Joint Commission (through the Council of Great Lakes Research Managers—Harvey Shear, University of Toronto and Canadian Co-Chair of the Council has agreed to serve in this position), the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, the Great Lakes Commission ; Secretary of GLRRIN: Mark Burrows, Council Secretary of the Council of Great Lakes Research Managers, IJC will also serve as the Secretary of GLRRIN  representative from the Great Lakes Sea Grant Extension Network, the Great Lakes Sea Grant Communications Network, and the Great Lakes COSEE. the two academic and two agency members for each lake network

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Lake Superior Jeff Gunderson, Minnesota Sea Grant, Research Director Margo Shaw, Upper Lakes Environmental Research Network Jack Kelly, USEPA Research Division, Duluth Tom Pratt, Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Lake Michigan Anders Andren, University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Sea Grant Director Phil Mankin, University of Illinois, Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Interim Director Stephen Brandt, NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, (GLERL), Director Paul Horvatin, US EPA, Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO), Monitoring and Reporting Branch, Chief

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Lake Huron Don Scavia, University of Michigan, Michigan Sea Grant, Director G. Doug Haffner, University of Windsor Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research Leon Carl, US Geological Survey (USGS), Great Lakes Science Center, Director David McLeish, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Lake Erie Jeff Reutter, Ohio State University, Ohio Sea Grant and Stone Lab, Director Jan Ciborowski, University of Windsor, Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research Russell Kreis, USEPA, Grosse Ile, Director/Branch Chief Murray Charlton, Environment Canada

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Lake Ontario Jack Mattice, New York Sea Grant, Director Gary Sprules, University of Toronto Jim Johnson, USGS Bruce Morrison, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Overall Regional Network Team Academic Canadian—Jan Ciborowski, Univ. Windsor US—Jeff Reutter, Ohio State Univ. Agency Canadian—TBD US—Paul Horvatin, US EPA, GLNPO

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Alliance for the Great Lakes Chicago Wilderness Consortium Council of Great Lakes Governors Great Lake Fishery Trust Great Lakes Commission Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab Great Lakes Panel on Aquatic Nuisance Species Great Lakes Regional Collaboration Lake Michigan Lakewide Management Plan National Invasive Species Council University of Michigan: Land Policy Institute Examples of Organizations

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Water Quality Water Quantity Habitat Native Aquatic Species Land Use Education Economic Human Health Social Water Resources Management Pollution Ecosystem Examples of Topics

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network

Existing scientific and informational resources MI 986 IL-IN 1,129

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Each region will be expected to: 1)Establish a regional coordination group to oversee the planning and implementation of the research and information strategy; 2) Conduct a bottom-up needs assessment with broad user and stakeholder input; 3) Identify research and information gaps; 4) Develop a research and information plan for the region that prioritizes actions according to management-critical needs; 5) Develop coordination mechanisms to ensure the transfer of technology and information to the appropriate end users; and 6) Provide an ongoing platform for coordination, collaboration, and resource sharing among participants.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network GLRRIN Composition Education and Outreach: SG Communicators, Jill Jentes SG Extension, Jim Hurley GL COSEE, Steve Stewart Secretary: Mark Burrows, IJC

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Not everyone has a defined set of priorities or needs.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Questions?

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network

Objectives 1) To build upon the LEMN model and establish a voluntary, non-regulatory, binational structure for coordinating, communicating and collaborating (3 C’s) on research, education, and outreach efforts on each of the Great Lakes and an overall network for the entire region.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Objectives 2)To provide an ongoing platform (network) for coordination, collaboration, communication and resource sharing and assist the Council of Great Lakes Research Managers (IJC) in developing and implementing its Great Lakes Research Strategy.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Objectives 3) To assist and better coordinate academic research scientists and to enhance the interactions between academic and agency scientists as they all focus on Great Lakes research priorities.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Objectives 4) To provide a single point of contact for each lake to reach all research scientists on that lake 5) Build research capacity on each lake 6) Facilitate rapid response to RFPs 7) Develop research information network to support GLRC.

Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Objectives 8) Show how GL priorities and needs fit into Ocean Research Priorities Plan 9) Identify and clarify research priorities and issues and the science questions to address these priorities (not prioritize research) 10) Facilitate development of proposals to address above priorities and issues