OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, 20121 UPSTATE FRESHWATER INSTITUTE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cypress Creek Basin Clean Rivers Program Nutrient Special Study Update Report – May 16, 2007 Roy Darville.
Advertisements

City of Edmonton Water Quality Monitoring Locations.
SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
Cass River Water Quality Monitoring Project Year Two Project Summary Prepared by: Environmental Science Solutions, LLC June 2014.
Module 6 Effluent Monitoring and Receiving Water Monitoring.
Phosphorus in Southern Cayuga Lake and Its Tributary Streams A Public Information Forum February 27, 6-8 PM, Tompkins County Library Purpose 1.Present.
Water Quality Tests.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Complexities of the Carters Lake TMDL Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech 26th Annual Alabama Water.
Modeling Fecal Coliform Bacteria Dynamics in Onondaga Lake CE Surface Water Quality Modeling Case History.
Report Generation and Issue
Questions to answer What is the overall modeling approach (after calibration and background scenarios)? What are the WLA assumptions? How will Avista’s.
Mark Petersen, Jen Muscha & Travis Mulliniks USDA-ARS Fort Keogh Livestock & Range Research Laboratory.
Confluence at the Confluence Chatfield Watershed Authority September 22, 2014.
Phase 1: Microbial Trackdown Study Onondaga Environmental Institute 102 W. Division St., 3 rd Fl. Syracuse, NY And Onondaga County Department of.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
Light, Secchi, Weather and Miscellaneous Comments Liz Ely, Ira Smith, and Margaret Soulman.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
SELF-HELP MONITORING — A WISCONSIN LAKE — Mary Jane Bumby Green Lake Green Lake County Wisconsin.
Measuring abiotic components  Objectives  To make an exhaustive list of abiotic factors  To discuss the ways they are measured  To critically appraise.
Water Monitoring. What/Why? Water testing Identifying water content Allows scientists to have a full understanding of what is affecting their stream or.
NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION, DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSPORT FROM THE EAST COAST CANALS TO BISCAYNE BAY AND WATER-QUALITY TRENDS AT SELECTED SITES IN SOUTH FLORIDA.
BACTERIAL CONCENTRATIONS IN BULL CREEK AUSTIN, TEXAS Patrick Sejkora.
Page 1 CONSULTANCY AND RESEARCH IN AQUACULTURE AND THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT A Company in the NIVA-group Methodology for Environmental monitoring of aquaculture.
Introduction to Modeling Unit V, Module 21A. Developed by: Hagley Updated: May 30, 2004 U5-m21a-s2 Module 21 Introduction to Modeling  This module has.
Interim Update: Preliminary Analyses of Excursions in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge August 18, 2009 Prepared by SFWMD and FDEP as part.
30-Day Running Geometric Means for the Upper Newport Bay Stations for The following graphs provide the 30-day running geometric means for the.
Figure 3. (lower panel) The cumulative flow excess or deficiency – how much each water year’s flow at Atascadero (measured in inches of runoff at Patterson)
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
Sentinel Lakes Program: Water quality monitoring and assessment Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division Minnesota.
Ken Lake Water Study 6/6/06 Conducted by Chris Sogn, Avanti High School Science Teacher David H., Avanti High School Multi-Talented Student.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Water Quality Short Course April 11, 2007 Lake and Reservoir Dynamics Dan Obrecht – UMC
Aquatic Life Selenium Standards Cottonwood Creek Drainage Cherry Creek Segment 4b Regulation 38 June 9, 2015.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
1 Briefing Materials Flow and Nitrogen Issues By: D.C. Water and Sewer Authority February 28, 2008 Blue Plains Regional Committee Presented to: District.
Chemical Assessment Most complicated, but easiest to do. Extreme natural variations What is normal?
Charlotte Harbor Environmental Center Water Quality Canal Sampling Gated access to harbor.
USGS Kansas Water Science Center
An assessment of water quality in tropical streams located in primary and secondary rainforest By Emily Schultz Supervisor: Cheryl Baduini.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
METHODS. Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity.
Long-term Monitoring of the Des Moines River Donna S. Lutz Des Moines River Water Quality Network Presented at the Des Moines Water Works January 28, 2008.
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
Chapter 3 Part 2. Do Now 1) What is a thermocline 2) How does the graph look? (where are the axis and how are they labeled?) 3) What information do we.
Kakanui Rachel Ozanne, Water Quality Scientist. Long-term (SOE) monitoring Water quality ~78 sites Monthly sampling.
Water Quality Natural & Controlled Environments. Monitoring natural environments Photo courtesy of Melissa Gutierrez.
Report Card Scoring Several options under consideration for scoring and aggregating data.
Figure 2. (upper) The cumulative flow excess or deficiency – how much each water year’s flow (measured in inches of runoff at Foster Park) varied from.
Our Case Study. Rationale for study The TMDL model assumes that there is no decrease in seepage during low flow conditions, basing its calculations on.
Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August
Watershed and water quality assessment of the Allen’s Creek watershed David A. Tomasko, Ph.D. Cheryl Propst, M.S. May 16, 2012.
Technical Committee Meeting October 6-7, 2015 Agenda Item #9.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
30-Day Running Geometric Means for the Dana Point Harbor Stations for The following graphs provide the 30-day running geometric means for the.
What is the System-Wide Monitoring Program (SWMP) and What Can It Do For You?
Skokomish River Fecal Coliform TMDL Attainment Monitoring in Washington State George Onwumere, Ph.D National Monitoring Conference, San Jose, California.
Charlotte Harbor Environmental Center Water Quality Canal Sampling for South Gulf Cove Prepared by Dr. Jon Hubertz
Potential Changes to Sections and 307.9: Standards Applicability and Attainment Gregg Easley TCEQ Water Quality Standards Team September 6, 2007.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
 Salinity: Salinity is the concentration of dissolved salts in the water and is an important element of a  habitat. Aquatic animals are adapted to living.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
To be responsible protectors of the environment Falling Creek Reservoir Volunteer Monitoring Data Summary 2003 Falling Creek Reservoir Preservation Society.
Sustainable Development Goal for Water: Indicator 6.3.2
Caddo Lake Nutrient Study Roy Darville - Caddo Lake Institute
Carolin Vorstius PhD Showcase Day, 29/03/2017
Mulberry River Watershed Management Plan
Lake Water Quality PLA Meeting August 17, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, UPSTATE FRESHWATER INSTITUTE

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, 20122

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, Summer average TP = 20 µg/L

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, minor bloom > 15 µg/L Summer average Chl-a = 6.5 µg/L

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, summer average = 2.0 meters

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, Nitrate – hypolimnetic composite Soluble reactive phosphorus – 15 meter sample

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, Percent of monthly geometric means <200 cfu/100ml

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,  Metro 001 Outfall was in full compliance with ammonia and phosphorus limits  Tributaries were largely in compliance with AWQS, with the following noteworthy exceptions:  Excursions of the standard for fecal coliform bacteria were widespread  Water quality standards for pH, ammonia, and nitrite were exceeded at Allied East Flume  Water quality conditions at South Deep met most standards, with the following exceptions:  Dissolved oxygen in the lower waters  Total dissolved solids  Nitrite (at 12 meters on 2 dates)  The standard for fecal coliform bacteria was exceeded at a single nearshore sampling site near the mouth of Onondaga Creek

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

Meteorological Conditions OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

Total Phosphorus and Chlorophyll-a Concentrations in the Upper Waters OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, Summer average = 21 µg/L (to date) Summer average = 5.2 µg/L (to date)

Compliance with SPDES Permit Limits OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

Secchi Disk Transparency OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, Summer average = 2.0 m (to date)

Dissolved Oxygen Patterns OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

Regulation of Sediment P Release by Nitrate OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, Assessing Compliance with the AWQS for Fecal Coliform Bacteria Percent of monthly geometric means <200 cfu/100ml (April-August 2012)

Assessing Compliance with the Swimming Safety Guidance Value (Secchi disk >4 ft. or 1.2 m) OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, April-August 2012

Time Series of Specific Conductance Values Versus 10-Year Average OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

Chloride and Total Dissolved Solids Concentrations in the Metro Effluent OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, Color Contours of Specific Conductance and Nitrate - Near the Metro Outfall

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, Color Contours of Specific Conductance and Nitrate - at South Deep

Recent Vertical Profiles at South Deep OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

Time Series of Fecal Coliform Counts in Onondaga Creek, OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,

Annual Average Fecal Coliform Counts - Onondaga Creek OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, Dry weather defined as less than 0.08 inches of rainfall over the preceding 60 hours

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,  Trend analysis is complicated by extreme temporal variability (>5 orders of magnitude), uneven intensity of sampling, and potential effects from multiple management actions (gray and green infrastructure projects)  A more rigorous analysis will be included in the 2012 AMP Report  data: Onondaga Creek, Harbor Brook, Ley Creek, Ninemile Creek  Conduct power analyses to establish realistic expectations  Consider trends other than monotonic trends (e.g., step changes)  Assess seasonal variations  Look at alternate thresholds for dry and wet weather conditions  Explore potential covariates (e.g., flow, temperature, phosphorus)

OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31,  Appropriate application of the AWQS for fecal coliform bacteria  Sampling frequency  Wet weather samples NYSDEC Water Quality Standard for Fecal Coliforms: “The monthly geometric mean, from a minimum of five examinations, shall not exceed 200 per 100 mL”