1 Booster Collimator Overview Todd Sullivan Dean Still 6/24/2004 Collimator Design paper: “Commissioning of the Beam Collimation System at the Fermilab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 1 The Design of the Booster Collimators Larry Bartoszek BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 3/10/03.
Advertisements

Beam Therapy Equipment 2 Linear Accelerator Head.
First Operation of MI8 Collimation Bruce C. Brown All Experimenters Meeting 22 January 2007.
DS Quench TEST 2  MOTIVATION and METHOD: 1. Achieve 500kW on beam 1 – TCP7 collimators.(so far 500kW with beam 2 and 235kW over 1s with beam 1 were reached.
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
Critical beam losses during Commissioning & Initial Operation Guillaume Robert-Demolaize (CERN and Univ. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble) with R. Assmann, S.
Collimation MDs LHC Study Working Group Daniel Wollmann for the Collimation-Team, BLM-Team, Impedance-Team, … LHC Study Working Group,
Loss maps of RHIC Guillaume Robert-Demolaize, BNL CERN-GSI Meeting on Collective Effects, 2-3 October 2007 Beam losses, halo generation, and Collimation.
Collimation System for Beam Loss Localization with Slip Stacking Injection in the Fermilab Main Injector Bruce C. Brown Main Injector Department Accelerator.
Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Introduction to collimators Integration of BPM Mechanical design Electrical design Processing Simulations Results Conclusions & Outlook.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
Xiao-Yan Zhao Beam Instrumentation Group Accelerator Center, IHEP BEPCII Background Issues: Beam Loss Measurement.
Ralph Assmann What Do We Want To Measure (in 2009) R. Assmann S. Redaelli, V. Previtali CERN/BE discussed with W. Scandale CERN/EN26/3/2009CC09  See also.
16 house Quench Dec, 5, 2003 Dean Still Fermilab Tevatron Department 12/12/2003 Acknowledgments The data, analysis and conclusions presented come from.
RHIC Status: Startup Run 12 V. Schoefer RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 1/13/12.
LHC Collimation Project Integration into the control system Michel Jonker External Review of the LHC Collimation Project 1 July 2004.
Machine status – December 28  Machine status - overview  Blue ring: ramp development  Yellow ring: obstruction update  Set-up and ramp-up.
“Beam Losses” Christian Carli PSB H - Injection Review, 9 th November 2011 Several topics more or less related to beam losses, a study still somewhat at.
Predicting Residual Radiation using Beam Loss Data – Early Results Bruce C. Brown 10 March 2010 Main Injector/Recycler Group Meeting.
RAL Muon Beam Line Properties. ISIS 70 MeV H- injection Ring accelerates up to 800 MeV in about 10 ms 50 Hz cycle - Dual Harmonic System ~ 2 x 1.5 MHz;
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
Loss Limitations and Collimation Angelika Drees, R. Fliller, W. Fu The RHIC Collimation Sytem: history and overview RHIC Loss Limitations Operational limits.
Booster Acceptance, Apertures, and Alignment Kiyomi Seiya Proton Source WorkshopDecember 07, 2010.
The Stripping Foil Test Stand in the Linac4 Transfer Line
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS Injection and Extraction Systems Issues and Solutions by M. Plum for the SNS team and our BNL collaborators.
D. Still-FNAL/Tevatron HALO '03 Tevatron Collider II Halo Removal System Dean Still Fermilab Tevatron Department 5/21/2003 Motives for the Collider Run.
AP2 Line & Debuncher Studies Status Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source January 9, 2006 Many people involved with providing the hardware and software that.
Target tests 1 st – 2 nd Nov. Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th December 2006.
Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Delivery Because MiniBooNE is off.
LHC Crystal MD 22/09/2015 – LSWG #7 R. Rossi for the LHC Collimation team and the UA9 Collaboration.
HIE-ISOLDE diagnostic boxes Esteban D. Cantero CERN BE-BI-PM HIE-ISOLDE meeting for BE/BI 28 March 2014 The research leading to these results has received.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
ISIS Upgrade Modelling Dean Adams On behalf of STFC/ISIS C Warsop, B Jones, B Pine, R Williamson, H Smith, M Hughes, A McFarland, A Seville, I Gardner,
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Booster Losses Keith Gollwitzer PIP and MI 700 kW review January 2015.
ATLAS-ALFA as a beam instrument Sune Jakobsen (BE-BI-PM and PH-ADO) on behave of the ATLAS-ALFA community LS1 LBOC meeting
Booster collimation system: status and future Valery Kapin PIP-II Collaboration Meeting 9-10 November 2015.
Collimation Valery Kapin Workshop on Booster Performance and Enhancements November 2015.
High Intensity Booster Operations William Pellico PIP II collaboration Nov. 9 th 2015.
Setting BLM Limits in the Booster The Booster is now delivering all the protons needed by the collider program, and about 40% of the protons needed by.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
BOOSTER COLLIMATION AND SHIELDING Proton Source Workshop Fermilab December 7-8, 2010 Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab Accelerator Physics Center.
TEVATRON COLLIDER COLLIMATORS AND ABSORBERS Fermilab Materials for Collimators and Absorbers Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab Workshop on Materials for Collimators.
Measurements of Intense Proton Beams using Optical Transition Radiation Vic Scarpine, Fermilab TIPP 2011 Chicago, IL June 10, 2011.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Limitations to Total Booster Flux Total protons per batch: 4E12 with decent beam loss, 5E12 max. Average rep rate of the machine: –Injection bump magnets.
MI/RR Operation Status Ioanis Kourbanis August 21, 2014.
Collimation design considerations at CERN (with some applications to LHC) R. Bruce on behalf of the CERN LHC collimation project R. Bruce,
Monday 19 th March 07:33 Lost (another) beam in the squeeze, beyond 2 m, B2 hits 1/3 resonance. 08:30 Start (another) ramp  Try to correct coupling and.
Machine Protection Systems (MPS) Arden Warner, and Jim Steimel Project X Machine Advisory Committee March 18-19, 2013.
Maximum Credible Beam Loss in the Main Injector D. Capista January 26, 2012.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
CRYSTALS AS LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENT FOR LHC COLLIMATION
The TV Beam Observation system - BTV
T980 STATUS AND CHANGES FOR
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
Simulations of collimation losses at RHIC
Joint Meeting SPS Upgrade Study Group and SPS Task Force
Beam collimation for SPPC
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
Presentation transcript:

1 Booster Collimator Overview Todd Sullivan Dean Still 6/24/2004 Collimator Design paper: “Commissioning of the Beam Collimation System at the Fermilab Booster.” Drozhdin, Kasper, Lackey, Mokhov, Prebys, Syphers

2 Why do we have collimators? lTheir purpose is to clean up the beam halo and localize the proton losses particularly in shielded Booster periods Long 6 Long 7 and immediately downstream. lLower the losses around the rest of the machine, especially the RF cavities.

3 2-Stage Collimation lTwo primary collimators made up of copper foils and are moved close to the edge of the circulating beam after injection. lSecondaries H&V (3) are positioned to intercept most of the particles scattered from the foil

5-1 D 5-2 F 5-3 F 5-4 D 6-1 D 6-2 F 6-3 F 6-4 D 7-1 D 6A6B7A B:BLML05 B:BLM051 B:HORPCB:VERPC B:BLM061 B:BLM062 B:BLML06 B:BLMS06 B:BLML07 B:BLMS05 B:BLM052 B:BLM071 Long 7Long 6 B:S5PCH - upstream mini-straight of Period 5 B:S5PCV - downstream mini-straight of Period 5 6A - upstream end of Long 6 6B - downstream end of Long 6 7A – upstream end of Long 7 B:BLM072 Short 6Short 5

5 Long 6 Collimator L6A&B l Four Separate Degrees of Freedom:  Vertical  Horizontal  Yaw  Pitch l All four motorized with stepper motors. l One complete collimator with stand weighs 14.6 tons. l Four Separate Degrees of Freedom:  Vertical  Horizontal  Yaw  Pitch l All four motorized with stepper motors. l One complete collimator with stand weighs 14.6 tons.

6 Long 6 Collimator l Vertical Drives: l 170 Volt motor drive system, 900 RPM max speed l 4 10 ton screw jacks l ± 1.5 inches of travel l Vertical Drives: l 170 Volt motor drive system, 900 RPM max speed l 4 10 ton screw jacks l ± 1.5 inches of travel l Horizontal Drives: l 48 Volt motor drive, 900 RPM max l Single 5 ton jack l ± 1.5 inches of travel

7 Targets/Primary Foils Horizontal at S5Vertical at S5

8 Copper Target 0.3mm Copper sideCarbon side

9 Overview of New Software X0Xi N*  Front End OAC Application Fast Processing : Loss Monitor & Intensity Feedback. Global Orchestration: Employs states and collimator moving map. Configure/view, Initiate Process: Can use sequencer initiate scraping.

10 Booster Collimator Hardware l VME based. l BLM and B:CHG Inputs for feedback.

11 Collimator Controls Block Diagram

12 B110 Application Page

13 Controls from Booster Sequencer

14. Slow Loss Monitor Feedback Local BLM’s and B:CHG0 are sampled from event. Collimator moves under feedback and stops at loss limit. Protection for no beam movement and no beam in given time. Loss Limit

15 Fast Lost Monitor Feedback 1)Have to bump the beam into the collimator. Need hardware to process. Intend to bump on $1D. Collimator BLM 3 bump Bump box: Inputs 4 dipoles and scales 4 bumps output

16. Orbits at Collimators Collimator placement

17 Positioning the Collimators lPerform a collimator scan in small steps to detect beam edge (move into beam) lRetract to edge of beam lObserve beam intensities ($1D and $14) and losses lRepeat for remaining primary and secondary collimators

18. Collimator Loss Scans

19. Collimator Loss Scans

20. Effects of Collimators on Ring Losses Collimator being inserted Effects of Ring losses

21 Ring Loss difference for Collimators In and Out If > 0 increased loss If < 0 decreased loss If > 0 increased loss If < 0 decreased loss Collimator location

22 Rad Survey at week 7

23 Problems/On going Work l$1D cycles are difficult for BLM and BPMs to gather data consistently and accurately. lSNP have similar problems with $1Ds plotting beam intensity and BLMs. lHorizontal collimator movement has shown slippage. lStill need to assess and maximize collimator efficiency.

24 Orbit differences vs. 2 stage performance Vertical Collimator and VL6 Bump S5L6L7 Horizontal Collimator and HS5 Bump

25 Conclusion: lAre the collimators working – Yes at some level. lThe losses are being reduced around the ring. lHave seen radiation levels at certain locations decreasing and/or staying constant. lGaining operational experience with using the collimators.

26 Happy people make happy Collimating