Peter Niblett WS-Notification Face-to-Face 12 Sep-15 Sep 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for Interface Extension Simplification Sanjiva Weerawarana September 21, 2003.
Advertisements

WS Choreography v.0-1 Overview This is work-in-progress David Burdett, Commerce One 18 June 2003.
WS-RF TCMay 2005 F2F 1 WS-RF Technical Committee May 2005 Face-to-face Agenda.
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
Peter Niblett William Vambenepe WS-Notification Face-to-Face May 2005.
Peter Niblett William Vambenepe WS-Notification Face-to-Face May 2005.
1 OASIS WS-Notification TC Inaugural F2F meeting Peter Niblett – convener.
XML Namespaces Andrey Smirnov CSCI 7818 September 21, 2000.
Professional Writing College of Public and Community Service University of Massachusetts Boston ©2012 William Holmes WRITING MINUTES 1.
OneM2M-MP Data_Model_Repository Establishing Data Model Repository for oneM2M Group Name: Method and Procedure Sub-commitee Source: WG3 chair.
Proposed TC Issues Process Martin Chapman. Purpose An issues driven process helps to 1.Untangle un-conflate problems 2.Narrow focus to solving particular.
Quality Information Framework (QIF) Design and Strategy Meeting June 12-14, 2012 Hilton Head Island Dimensional Metrology Standards Consortium (DMSC) 1.
Agenda Start up admin: roll call, approve agenda, appoint minute takers, approve last meeting minutes Review and approve latest draft of spec Issue discussion:
1 WS-Notification Overview Alan Weissberger NEC-Labs America GGF11 June 8, 2004.
1 Project Nexus Data Management Definition Workshop 18 th May 2009.
FIMS - Herndon Meeting Rev2 EBU-AMWA FIMS 7-9 November 2011.
Information breakout. Things what we did What is the difference between a registry and a catalog? What do we mean by naming? What does OGSA define? Using.
Session IV Chapter 9 – XML Schemas
1 TBG17 Progress Report TBG6 Meeting New Delhi Forum October 2 - 6, 2006.
Doc.: IEEE /1341r0 Submission September 2011 Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 1 JTC1 SC September Closing Report 22 Sept 2011 Authors: Meeting.
XML Patch Operations based on XPath selectors Jari Urpalainen IETF62 Minneapolis.
WS-RF TCMay 2005 F2F 1 WS-RF Technical Committee May 2005 Face-to-face Agenda.
July 27, 2009IETF NEA Meeting1 NEA Working Group IETF 75 Co-chairs: Steve Hanna
1 WS-Notification Overview Alan Weissberger NEC-Labs America GGF11 June 8, 2004.
BPEL F2F Jan 10 – 12, Proposed agenda Jan Administrative start up –attendance, quorum, minute takers –Review/accept minutes from previous.
Peter Niblett WS-Notification Face-to-Face 12 Sep-15 Sep 2005.
- Sponsored by UK MOD ISO edition 2 Rob Bodington, Phil Spiby.
Learning Objects Metadata IEEE P Learning Technology Standards Committee London, UK March 16, 2000 Chair: Wayne Hodgins.
FIMS Specification Group EBU-AMWA FIMS August 2011.
Validation Tool (VTool) PDS Management Council Meeting Washington, D.C. November 2006
MISMO Trimester Meeting June 4 - 7, 2012 Santa Ana, CA Extensions in 3.2 Greg Alvord RealEC June 4, 2012.
Working with XML Schemas ©NIITeXtensible Markup Language/Lesson 3/Slide 1 of 36 Objectives In this lesson, you will learn to: * Declare attributes in an.
HPD Updates By Eric Heflin, Co-Chair ITI PC CTO Texas Health Services Authority CTO/CIO The Sequoia Project.
FIMS Specification Group EBU-AMWA FIMS July 2011.
Bridge WG Status Report David Harrington Dan Romascanu This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use.
Abierman-netconf-mar07 1 NETCONF WG 68 th IETF Prague, CZ March 19, 2007.
Transaction Processing CS409 Application Services Even Semester 2007.
Doc.: IEEE /011 Submission January 2000 Al Petrick, ParkerVision TGd IEEE – TGd Jan 10 –15, 2000 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission March, 2004 Matthew Sherman, BAE Systems Slide 1 LMSC Policy and Procedures Update Date: March 18 th, 2005 Author:
Technical Steering Committee La Jolla, January 2003 Paul Kiel, HR-XML.
Doc.: IEEE /0648r5 Submission July 2007 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide TGn Editor Report July 2007 Date: Authors:
PRO/ARC and TST/PRO joint sessions at TP20 Group Name: oneM2M TP20 Source: Peter Niblett, IBM Meeting Date:
Agenda Start up admin: roll call, approve agenda, appoint minute takers, approve last meeting minutes Review and approve latest draft of spec Issue discussion:
© 2004 IBM Corporation WS-ResourceFramework Service Groups Tom Maguire.
Experience with XML Schema Ashok Malhotra Schema Usage  Mapping XML Schema and XML documents controlled by the Schema to object classes and instances.
1 SIPREC Recording Metadata Model for SRS (draft-ietf-siprec-metadata-01) June 23, 2011 Virtual Interim meeting Ram Mohan R On behalf of the team Team:
Note At the 2008/03/12 TC meeting the BPEL4People TC formally adopted the SCA TC issue process for issue resolution. The following slides document v3 of.
Doc.: IEEE /1054r1 Submission July 2011 Mark Hamilton, Polycom, Inc.Slide 1 ARC-agenda-report-minutes-july-2011 Date: Authors:
© 2005 Global Grid Forum The information contained herein is subject to change without notice Leading the pervasive adoption of grid computing for research.
Doc.: IEEE /030r0 Submission 19 January 2001 James P. K. Gilb, MobilianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Contents Major issue states and transitions Tools.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission Sept 2004 Tom Siep, TMS Assoicates, LLCSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Netconf Notifications Sharon Chisholm Hector Trevino IETF 67 November 2006.
Jun Tatemura NEC Laboratories Amercia GGF10, March 2004
XCON WG IETF-64 Meeting XCON Framework Overview & Issues
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
WS-Topics Peter Niblett OASIS TC Face/Face meeting
Specification on float equipment
WS-RX TC Process for Specification Development
NesCom PAR Review Period Comment Dialog
ARC-agenda-report-minutes-july-2011
QA Reviews Lecture # 6.
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 September 2013
Should WSRP Leverage WSN?
802.11F Meeting Report March 2002 Month 1998 doc.: IEEE /xxx
Agenda and minutes TGn PSMP ad hoc
IPP Job Storage 2.0: Fixing JPS2
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Ad Hoc LB124 Comment Resolution Status
IETF 87 DHC WG Berlin, Germany Thursday, 1 August, 2013
Revision TG November 2017 Orlando Meeting Agenda
Presentation transcript:

Peter Niblett WS-Notification Face-to-Face 12 Sep-15 Sep 2005

2 Agenda - 12 th September (UK times)  1:30 Opening Roll Call Scribes (4 half days) Approval of minutes from August 29th [1] Review agenda Meeting objectives  2:00 Action items review  2:25 Public Review Draft comments  2:30 Possible new issues BaseNotification "pending changes" [4] Level of WS-Addressing [5] Comments from Kirk Wilson on WS-Topics 1.3c [6] Inconsistent approaches to optionality of PullPoints [7] Possible reference to composition with XACML [8]  3:15 Break  3:30 Summary for new phone joiners  3:45 BrokeredNotification issue resolution WSN 3.24 Identifying a Registered Publisher WSN 2.60/3.25 Use of WS-Resource Access Pattern WSN 3.26 Mismatch between WS-Brokered and WS-BaseNotification Faults  4:45 BaseNotification issue resolution WSN 2.59 Use of PullPoints WSN 2.58 Lifetime of PullPoints  6:30 Adjourn

3 Agenda - 13 th September (UK times)  9:30 WS-Topic issue verification (UK attendees)  12:30 Lunch  1:30 Open the phone link Appointment of scribe Summary of morning session  1:45 Base/Brokered Notification issues Possible new issue on Pseudo-schema Issue 4.2 impact on WS-BaseN. Inconsistent approaches to optionality of PullPoints [7] 2.58/2.59 Final summary  2:15 Base and BrokeredNotification: PRD2 plans  2.30 Break  2.45 Resume WS-Topics review  3:30 Summary for new phone joiners  3:45 WS-NotificationPolicy  4:30 Primer  5:30 Adjourn

4 WS-Topics issues To be verified –4.2: source document for FullTopicPathExpressions (the topic set is different from a topic space and not fully specified) Verified OK –4.3: XPath 1.0 as an additional dialect for FullTopicPathExpression –4.5: Remove aliases –4.9: Specifying the Ad-hoc topic space is cumbersome –4.16: When are wildcards and aliases resolved? –4.20: SimpleTopicExpression type as xsd:token –4.22: Finality of TopicSpace –4.25: Remove references to specs that aren’t in standards orgs –4.26: Remove dependency on WSRF-RP –4.27: Remove default value for message types –AI85: Replace TopicPath by TopicExpression Further work required: –4.4: domain-specific extension to topic spaces (how can you extend if you don't have access to the domain name used by the initial topic space). –4.21: TopicSpace location attribute –4.23: Resolving XML Names in the TopicExpression content –4.24: Namespace prefix change may result into unbound QNames –4.28: Miscellaneous corrections

5 Meeting Objectives  Answer Public Review comments on WS- BaseNotification and WSBrokered Notification  Resolve open issues on those specifications  Plan PRD 2 for those specifications  Produce PRD1 for WS-Topics Issue verification Remaining issues  Agree approach to Primer and Policy specifications

6 Action Items AI 81 - Chairs to recruit editors for the primer AI 85 - WS-Topics editors to respond to questions raised in Kato- san's [2] regarding use of terms TopicPath, TopicExpression, TopicPathExpression, and the names of the related Faults. AI Dave C to create a new issue to take the additional Faults out of WS-BrokeredNotification and use the Faults that are specified in WS-BasedN. AI 129 – Issue 2.59 Pullpoints - David Hull to send out a rev of the spec to reflect the consensus reached during discussion on the call AI 130 – Peter N to send out an asking to clarify the questions and what is the expected scope of making a change to the current spec. AI 131 – Matt Roberts to do a refresh of his 3.24 proposal based on the discussion on August 29th AI David Hull to fix inconsistency in BaseN 6.4.1

7 “Pending changes”  WS-BaseNotification Line 725 should be Line 1981(and b-1.xsd)UnableToDestroyPullPointType type should be UnableToDestroyPullPointFaultType Line 1986(and b-1.xsd) UnableToDestroyPullPoint element should be UnableToDestroyPullPointFault Line 1987(and b-1.xsd) UnableToDestroyPullPointType type should be UnableToDestroyPullPointFaultType Line 2012(and b-1.xsd) UnableToCreatePullPointType type should be UnableToCreatePullPointFaultType Line 2017(and b-1.xsd) UnableToCreatePullPoint element should be UnableToCreatePullPointFault Line 2018(and b-1.xsd) UnableToCreatePullPointType type should be UnableToCreatePullPointFaultType Line 2538 (and bw-1.wsdl) UsubscribeRequest should be UnsubscribeRequest Line 2487 (and bw-1.wsdl) GetCurrentMessage operation should include MultipleTopicsSpecifiedFault Line 2507 (and bw-1.wsdl) UnableToDestroyPullPoint fault name should be UnableToDestroyPullPointFault Line 2508(and bw-1.wsdl) UnableToDestroyPullPoint message should be UnableToDestroyPullPointFault Line 2519 (and bw-1.wsdl) UnableToCreatePullPoint fault name should be UnableToCreatePullPointFault Line 2520(and bw-1.wsdl) UnableToCreatePullPoint message should be UnableToCreatePullPointFault  All of the fault types defined in WS-BaseNotification and WS-BrokeredNotification extend wsrf-bf:BaseFaultType. Some of these types, for example wsnt:UnacceptableInitialTerminationTimeFaultType, extend wsrf-bf:BaseFaultType with additional child elements. This causes a schema validation error (Unique Particle Attribution), because of the xsd:any included in the BaseFaultType definition.  It is anticipated that WS-BaseFaults will change the definition of BaseFaultType in order to remove this problem. In the interim, we suggest that implementers take a copy of the BaseFaultType definition and edit it to remove the xsd:any.