1 National Stream and River Assessment Monitoring Design Anthony R. Olsen 1, David V. Peck 1, Steven G. Paulsen 1, John L. Stoddard 1, and Susan Holdsworth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.
Advertisements

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Native Trout Program Monitoring of Bull Trout Populations in the Columbia Plateau Province using the EMAP Protocol.
BPA Christina Luzier USFWS
Designs for estimating variability structure and implications for detecting watershed restoration effectiveness David P. Larsen –Western Ecology Division,
Dan McKenzie ORD Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon Sept. 10, 2004 Dan McKenzie ORD Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon Sept. 10, 2004 Increasing.
Integrated State-Federal Partnership for Aquatic Resource Monitoring in the United States Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.
A spatial design for monitoring the health of a large-scale freshwater system Melissa Dobbie, Charis Burridge (CMIS) and Bill Senior (Qld Environment and.
An Assessment of the Impact of Two Distinct Survey Design Modifications on Health Insurance Coverage Estimates in a National Health Care Survey Steven.
Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:
Update: National Assessment of Fish Habitats Climate Change and Fish Habitat Meeting, Denver, CO, October 19-20, 2009 Dana Infante 1, Peter Esselman 1,2,
Idaho’s Experience with Random Design using NHD Intermittent streams and other considerations Mary Anne Nelson, Michael McIntyre, Michael Edmondson, Glen.
Monty Porter - Streams/Rivers Monitoring Coordinator Jason Childress – Biological Team Leader Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) Water Quality Programs.
Wetlands Assessment Virginia Engle, USEPA National Water Quality Monitoring Council March 20, 2007.
# 1 METADATA: A LEGACY FOR OUR GRANDCHILDREN N. Scott Urquhart STARMAP Program Director Department of Statistics Colorado State University.
Moving from 1:100K NHD to 1:24K Resolution: Case Studies Paul Andrews (presenter), Peter Ilieve, Ken Gilland, Bill Cooter (RTI International) Bill Kramer,
Minnesota’s Depressional Wetland Condition Assessment (a.k.a. ‘Status & Trends of Wetland Quality in Minnesota’) John Genet 6 th Annual Minnesota Wetlands.
Robust sampling of natural resources using a GIS implementation of GRTS David Theobald Natural Resource Ecology Lab Dept of Recreation & Tourism Colorado.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
PAGE # 1 A PROGRAM IN STATISTICAL SURVEY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS FOR AQUATIC RESOURCES STARMAP: THE PROGRAM AT COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY SPACE-TIME AQUATIC.
PAGE # 1 NWQMC NWQMC December 11, 2002 SELECTION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING SITES and CSU’s STARMAP by N. Scott Urquhart Department of Statistics Colorado.
PAGE # 1 Presented by Stacey Hancock Advised by Scott Urquhart Colorado State University Developing Learning Materials for Surface Water Monitoring.
Example For simplicity, assume Z i |F i are independent. Let the relative frame size of the incomplete frame as well as the expected cost vary. Relative.
Developing GIS indicators and metrics David Theobald Natural Resource Ecology Lab Colorado State University.
Statistical Methods Descriptive Statistics Inferential Statistics Collecting and describing data. Making decisions based on sample data.
"Developing statistically-valid and -defensible frameworks to assess status and trends of ecosystem condition at national scales" "Developing statistically-valid.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
Probability Sampling.
StudyArea: The study area (Figure 1) encompasses 11,726 km2 (4527 mi2) within the Appalachian coalfields of southern est Virginia. The dominant land cover.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWAMP Today Emilie L. Reyes November 29, 2007.
ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition
Spatial Survey Designs Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541) Web Page:
Extending the National Hydrography Dataset: A Spatial Framework for Water Resources Applications in West Virginia Jackie Strager Natural Resource Analysis.
US EPA Update Advisory Committee on Water Information Michael Shapiro, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA Office of Water.
Georeferencing Water Quality Assessments to NHDPlus Catchments A New Approach to Evaluating and Measuring Progress in Surface Water Quality DWANE YOUNG,
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
1 GIS in Hydrology Watershed management Definitions Algorithms Watershed delineation Automatically delineating watersheds Flow length Raster to vector.
1 The National Rivers and Streams Survey – An Overview and Results.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Mercury Concentrations in Stream Fish Throughout 12 Western States in the USA Alan Herlihy and Robert Hughes Dept. of Fisheries & Wildlife, Oregon State.
Watershed delineation and data preparation for groundwater modeling using GIS in the Savannah River Site GIS term project presentation November 25, 2003.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
South Carolina Surface Water Monitoring: Different Designs for Different Objectives Presented by David Chestnut.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
The concept of a Master Sample: Lower Columbia Example An Update Phil Larsen Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission c/o USEPA 200 SW 35 th St. Corvallis,
PENNSYLVANIA’S APPLICATION OF PROBABILITY-BASED SAMPLING FOR STATEWIDE SURFACE WATER ASSESSMENTS presented by TONY SHAW 5 th National Monitoring Conference.
Spatial Survey Designs for Aquatic Resource Monitoring Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen Western Ecology Division US Environmental Protection Agency Corvallis, Oregon.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Western Colorado vs. Eastern Colorado Where does your water go? Constance L. Danner 29 November 2005.
Ranking Stressors: Prevalence & Relative Risk Based on work by John Van Sickle US EPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.
The concept of a Master Sample: Lower Columbia Example Phil Larsen Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission c/o USEPA 200 SW 35 th St. Corvallis, OR.
1 Defining Least-Impacted Reference Condition for the National Wadeable Streams Assessment Alan Alan Herlihy (Oregon State University), John Stoddard (U.S.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Seasonal and elevational variation of surface water  18 O and  2 H in the Willamette River basin J. Renée Brooks 1, Parker J. Wigington 1, Jr., Carol.
Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon Voice: (541) Generalized Random Tessellation.
SPARROW: A Model Designed for Use With Monitoring Networks Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, and Richard B. Alexander US Geological Survey, Reston,
Using GIS to aid in Modeling the Susquehanna River Basin Presented by Monica Wedo December 5, 2000.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.
Section 5. Chesapeake Bay Network Generation CB watershed –~ 64,000 square miles –~ 166,000 square kilometers Constructed 3 models Version I –ERF1, ~1300.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
National Hydro Data Programs
Commonwealth of Virginia Flow-Ecology
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
Presentation transcript:

1 National Stream and River Assessment Monitoring Design Anthony R. Olsen 1, David V. Peck 1, Steven G. Paulsen 1, John L. Stoddard 1, and Susan Holdsworth 2 1 Western Ecology Division, USEPA, Corvallis, OR 2 Office of Water, USEPA, Washington, DC

2 Overview of Presentation National Wadeable Stream Assessment 12- State EMAP West Stream and River Survey design WSA Survey Design –36-State WSA-east Survey Design –12-State WSA-west Survey Design Estimating extent of stream and river resource

3 Wadeable Stream Assessment Design Approach Two independent designs are basis for WSA design –Existing survey design from EMAP West Stream and River Assessment for 12 western states –New survey design for 36 eastern states for wadeable streams Factors in two study designs that must be considered when combining information from two studies –Different but overlapping stream and river populations –Different subsets of RF3 (NHD) as basis for design –Different but compatible design requirements

4 WSA Regions WSA West WSA East

6 EMAP West: Target Populations for Streams and Rivers Definition: Perennial means flowing water during index period Perennial condition study –All stream and river channels in 12 western states: wadeable and boatable –Exclude Columbia, Snake, Missouri, and Colorado rivers Perennial/Non-perennial extent (length) study –All RF3 stream and river channels in 12 western states –Defined channel present –Natural and constructed channels

7 EMAP West: Survey Design Objectives Estimates by State, EPA Region, and Study Region –Extent (total length) of perennial and non-perennial streams and rivers –Condition of perennial streams and rivers Estimates for each special study area –Extent (total length) of perennial streams and rivers –Condition of perennial streams and rivers Condition estimates –X% of perennial stream km in study region have condition Y

8 EMAP West: Sample Frame RF3 GIS coverage of 1:100,000 stream and river traces –NHD with Strahler order not available in 1999 –Added class of large rivers (watersheds < 5,000 sq mi) Factors used in survey design –RF3 codes identifying perennial and non-perennial –Strahler order –Omernik ecoregion –Mountainous/humid and arid ecoregions –State and special study area boundaries

9 RF3 Stream Length

10 EMAP West Survey Design: Perennial Condition Study Stratify by 12 states and restrict to RF3 Perennial Coded Spatially balanced survey design for linear network within each stratum Unequal probability categories based on –Mountainous/humid vs Arid ecoregions –Strahler Categories: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd, 4 th +, and Large Rivers Intensification in special study regions Panels: 4 years Sample size: –50 per state –Intensive studies varies from 50 to 160 Oversample: 100%

11 EMAP West Survey Design: Perennial/Non-Perennial Extent Study Stratify by RF3 perennial and non-perennial codes RF3 perennial code stratum: Use Perennial Condition Study survey design RF3 Non-Perennial coded stratum –Stratify by 12 states –Spatially balanced survey design for linear network –Unequal probability categories based on Mountainous/humid vs Arid ecoregions Strahler Categories: 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd + –Sample size: 100 per state: total 1200

13 Locations: Sites Evaluated RF3 Nonperennial StratumRF3 Perennial Stratum

EMAP West Sites sampled

15 Frame SourceRF3 Frame Size Evaluated Perennial Evaluated Non-Perennial Evaluated Non-Target Perennial RF3 Coded Perennial 390,609275,707 ±8,807 Included in non- target perennial 114,901 ± 7,982 RF3 Coded NonPerennial 1,017,92870,569 ±13, ,087 ±38,962 29,272 ±11,249 Total1,408,537346,276 ±16, ,173 ±13,571 EMAP West Stream/River Length (miles)

16 WSA Regions WSA West Design WSA East Design wadeable streams from EMAP West perennial survey

17 WSA East Survey Design Spatially-balanced unequal probability site selection Unequal probability categories based on –Omernik ecorgions: combinations of level 2 –USEPA regions –Strahler order categories: 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd &higher Expected sample size 500 sites Additional sites selected to be used when initial sites can not be sampled –Not wadeable stream –landowner denies access or physically inaccessible

WSA Wadeable Sites Sampled

19 NHD (RF3) Perennial-Coded Stream and River Length 1st through 5th order streams comprise 96% of total estimated length in the NHD. 1st through 5th order systems form the basis for the sample frame for WSA East. All orders form the basis for the sample frame for WSA West

20 Estimates of Wadeable Stream Extent Based on office and field evaluation of sites in sample. In each region, percentages are percent of NHD length in the region

21 WSA Estimated Wadeable Perennial Stream Length that can be Sampled