“IP Universities” May 23 - 25, 2013 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY Sabancı University Zeynep Birsel, Manager, TTO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPA in Croatia Ministry of Science, Education and Sports Nataša Maršić, PhD.
Advertisements

1 Business Incubation at IIT Bombay- A journey Sushanto Mitra Chief Executive Officer Society for Innovation & Entrepreneurship Indian Institute of Technology.
U.S. Civilian Research & Development Foundation Peace and prosperity through science collaboration 1 Cathleen Campbell U.S. Civilian Research & Development.
Entrepreneurship and competitiveness for SMEs Dialogue between Brazil and the EU EU Enterprise and Innovation Initiatives Carl James.
Creation of Pilot IP Fund Liis Käosaar-Sasi Dorel Tamm.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Regions as the driving forces of European competitiveness: From theory to practice Interregional Seminar and Partnership Fair Enhancing university-business.
Martin Schuurmans Chair EIT The EIT Sustainable Growth and Competitiveness through Innovation.
“IP Universities” Istanbul,May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY ARTEV MANAGEMENT PLATFORMZeynep Birsel Manager, TTO Sabancı.
Connecting the Technopark to the Incubator Association of University Research Parks, 2012 © Harold Strong, AURP Immediate Past President Director of Discovery.
Analytical Summary: What have we learned? John Fielden World Bank Consultant.
Entrepreneurship youth
Academic Enterprise: Working with Business Tempus Study Visit, 1 May 2014 Laura Woods, Director of Academic Enterprise.
The Role of Incubators in SME growth. Business incubation started in the 50’s in Batavia, New York, As of 2013 there are more than 9000 incubators world.
'Activist Learning’ for social change: Synergies with enterprise education Zoe Robinson, Keele University Director of Education for Sustainability Senior.
Money Spinner YES Consultancy to Spin out Company Bruce Venning.
TTO Role in University / Corporate Partnership
Innovation, Colleges and Applied Research ACCC College and Institute Applied Research Symposium (February 12-13, 2004)
Private Equity and Agriculture: Challenges and Investment Opportunity in Africa October, 2010 Financing agriculture in Southern Africa Malawi SOUTHERN.
GATEWAY TO FINNISH EXPERTISE 1 Commercialization guidelines – NanoCom and ProNano results Dr. Eeva Viinikka, Business Director Programme Director of National.
Working across sectors Building collaborative eco-systems Lars Sundstrom SARTRE.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 23 to 25, 2013 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY Koç University Technology Transfer Office Ebru Tan, Director.
Mike Wright, Imperial College Business School © Imperial College Business School Barriers to technology transfer and policies 1 Presentation at Bologna,
Creating Entrepreneurship: entrepreneurship education for the creative industries David Clews Subject Centre Manager Higher Education Academy Art | Design.
Page 1 New Models for Commercialization Federal Partners in Technology Transfer June 18, 2009 A presentation by: Tom Corr Chief Executive Officer Accelerator.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Benefits of Research360 Catherine Pink Institutional Data.
1 Financing Innovative SMEs in Europe José Palacín Economic Cooperation and Integration Division United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Dubai International.
Polimi Case study: Procedures, tools, facts & Figures
Necessary conditions for effective technology transfer and commercialisation of intellectual property We value Talents, Technologies and Tolerance dr.
Expert Input : Review of Days 1 & 2 1. Forum Days 1 & 2 2 Overview of Days’ 1 & 2 Themes, Sessions, and Guiding Questions.
National Knowledge Commission Government of India Entrepreneurship National Knowledge Commission 19 th January, 2009 New Delhi.
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
1 The Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan: Main Conclusions and Recommendations.
Funding Structures some ideas for designing innovative funding instruments Brigitte Hatvan.
Policy options and recommendations José Palacín Chief, Innovative Policies Development UNECE Minsk, 19 June 2014.
(Dr. Peter Heil, ALTUS – Hungary)
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 23 to 25, 2013 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY Imperial Innovations Commercialisation and Investment.
IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Santiago, October 21 – 24, 2013.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
Technology Transfer and IP framework initiatives May 2011.
Steps to Advance The SUNY Research & Innovation Ecosystem Jeffrey Boyce Research Foundation of SUNY Office of the Executive Vice President SUNY Board of.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
Program VENCRO Ante Mamić Business Innovation Center of Croatia - BICRO.
Investors: 48 investors responded 36 headquartered in Ohio 113 investment professionals employed by Ohio HQ investors 34 investors reported 156 Ohio investments.
Commercialization of IP - National Perspective 1 © 2009 Nikola Radovanovic Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Serbia.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY Mr. Pedro Cartagena Technical Adviser SPTO. Madrid, Spain.
Establishing National Technology Development and Transfer Systems
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
Kuzeyhan Özdemir Director Bilkent TTO IPR Conference October 2015 Istanbul CBTT Turkish - perspective.
Technology transfer – The Hungarian experience Legal background Innovation Act: - Public R&D institutions are required to establish IP policy - IP created.
PIRE I & II Post-Award Activities OISE PO team working --To help make the projects succeed, --To help OISE and all of NSF learn more about the projects,
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
How to establish a successful IP Policy for Universities and Research Institutes Anton Habjanič, D.Sc. director of TechnoCenter at the UM ERF-FEMISE Expert.
TECHNOPOLIS OYJ Access to Customers, Capital and Partners Development Services.
Building IP Institutions, Reinforcing the Roles of IP Professionals and Other National Experts: The Singapore Experience Associate Prof Ng-Loy Wee Loon.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA SBIR/STTR A holistic Approach LK Kubendran, PhD, MBA Portfolio Executive Commercial Partnerships Programs.
Global Technology Transfer and Commercialization: Policies and Instruments Dr. Didier Kane The University of Texas at Austin (USA) IC² Institute – Global.
Fostering Valorisation of Publicly Funded Research Dr Pat Frain
Technology Transfer Office
Iyad Alzaharnah, PhD – Director Innovation Center
Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D
Research and Innovation Policy in Piedmont
Panel 8: Corporations and startups: universities bridging the gap
Center for Technology Transfer and Innovations
Entrepreneurship National Knowledge Commission 19th January, 2009 New Delhi Government of India.
Intellectual Property &Technology Transfer
Yelena Shevchenko Director of Strategic Planning and
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Elif KOŞOK TÜBİTAK TEYDEB Venture Capital Funding Group Executive Board Coordinator.
Presentation transcript:

“IP Universities” May , 2013 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY Sabancı University Zeynep Birsel, Manager, TTO

Mapping of TT ecosystem

© 2012, Clifford M. Gross, Ph. D. Tekcapital Ltd.  Scientists - main role: −Conduct research −Idea generation > products/svcs −Engage in entrepreneurial activity −Support commercialization  Public / private bodies – main role: −Develop funding schemes −Very early stage gap funding −Develop policies −Monitor −Law making  Investors – main role −Investment −Growth  TT structures / intermediaries −To ensure above stakeholders work towards successful commercialization! Mapping of TT ecosystem

TEYDEB 1513  Strengthening existing structures  Enabling new structures  2013 > Learning curve for Universities, intermediaries and TEYDEB  Challenge existing TTO definition, manage expectation on KPI s  Look into multiple models of TT −Technoparks −University TTO s −Regional TTOs −Thematic (bio, agri, …) focused TTOs −Collaborative / joint structures..?

Research Value Chain

1513 Structure for SU  Beneficiary : Research and Graduate Policies Research & Graduate Policies Directorate (1513 TTO) Project Development Office (Grants) Project Management Office Technology Transfer Office (Commercial Contracts & Licensing) Inovent (Incubator & Start ups) Enterprise Europe Network (EEN) (Tech transfer SMEs) Module 2: Grant Programs Support Module 3: Project Development, Contract management, Industry collaboration Module 4: IP Management Module 5: Entrepreneurship Module 1: Awareness, training, professional development activities

SU Key policy issues on commercialization processes  Collaboration −in research −in technology development −in professional networking  IP Management −Clear principles −Flexible structures −Value vs. benefit based negotiations > no single model −Maximum support for asset generation −Focus on −Asset management −Value extraction  Entrepreneurship −Technology based ventures / Academic entrepreneurship  Conflict −Disclosure / Tolerance / balance

Challenges & Opportunities  Extensive capacity and track record of successful research management −Numbers & sustainability  IP Portfolio −Generated 60 + faculty invetion disclosures −Secured 7 int’l patents Cum SPR > 100 M TL Active SPR > 50 M TL active projects 25% Industry (15% Ind funded) Growth 10 fold in the last 2 yrs 75 $ 150 reg 500 appl disc d/yr > 100 yrs! 200 d/yr > 10 T 0

Challenges & Opportunities The pull / push effects Expectations Role of TTO Get rich And now! Get involved as we like Motivation? Science or product Institutional structures 1513 TTO Model ? (why establish a TTO) Legal framework & public policy

Challenges & Opportunities Clear and visible support from the university for sustainability Financially Strategically Politically Investment in human resources Training Bringing in the right talent Building the ecosystem Two-way street Paradigm shift on the part of Universities as well as… The INDUSTRY! Thank you…