Using lab based projects for teaching & learning problem solving skills in large first year classes Manjula Sharma, John O'Byrne, Ian Cooper School of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
24-26 July 2006EE2006 Conference, Liverpool, UK1 Dr T. Laoui 1, John ODonoghue 2 University of Wolverhampton 1 School of Engineering and Built Environment.
Advertisements

Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
Welcome to Grade 8! Contact Information Phone: (902) ext Website:
MATLS 4Z06 Industrial Projects MSE Capstone Course Joey Kish (Coordinator) Monday, April 29, 2013.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Chemistry Section 04 Winter Semester 2015 Prof. Ian Burgess Office Number : Thorv. 256
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
ME 4054W Design Projects Spring Semester 2010 Course Logistics Prof. Brad Bohlmann January 19, 2010 U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA.
School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Preparing students for University: Recent initiatives in The School of Biomedical Sciences (SBMS)
General information CSE 230 : Introduction to Software Engineering
Programming 1 Feedback Session. The unit has improved my understanding of programming. 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree.
Enhancing the Quality of both Student Learning and Faculty Teaching through Assessment.
Introduction to SEG 5010 Hong Cheng 2009/10 Second Term.
IACT303 – INTI 2005 World Wide Networking Welcome and Introduction to Subject. Penney McFarlane The University of Wollongong.
INTRODUCTION TO PROPOSAL WRITING FOR DONOR FUND-RAISING Suraiya Buccas Senior Projects & Proposals Officer PRESENTED TO GAELIC WORKSHOP MAY 2010.
Integrating High Fidelity Simulation into Clinical Orientations INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center Nursing Education & Research.
Simulation Walk Through Seeing how a simulation could work on your course.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
BACK TO THE BASICS: Library Instruction Redux. BRENT HUSHER MELISSA MUTH FU ZHU0 University of Missouri–Kansas.
So What Can I Expect When I Serve on an NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team? A Primer for New Team Members.
EET 333 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT 2 nd Semester, 2014/2015 Session.
COMP 465W: Software Engineering Fall Components of the Course The three main components of this course are: The study of software engineering as.
Making Clickers Work for You Dr. Stephanie V. Chasteen & Dr. Steven Pollock Workshop developed.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Integrated Foundation Year Co-ordinator:Mr Ian McCrum Room 5B18, Telephone extension (028)
Staff and students working as partners in STEM and pedagogic research Dr Neil Williams, Anhar Khan, Faiz Aziz, Ari Abedhin and Aminur Rahman Faculty of.
Course Introduction Software Engineering
Proposal Development Sample Proposal Format Mahmoud K. El -Jafari College of Business and Economics Al-Quds University – Jerusalem April 11,2007.
WXGE 6103 Digital Image Processing Semester 2, Session 2013/2014.
'Learner Autonomy through the production of a public history resource' Emma Robertson.
THE PRACTICUM AND THE MASTER'S PAPER. April 11, 2014.
COMP 465W Software Engineering Fall Components of the Course The three main components of this course are: The study of software engineering as.
BIS3324 Group Assignment – Schedule, guideline & templates (2015-Jan Semester)
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Research & Technology Implementation TxDOT RTI OFFICE.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Semester 2: Lecture 0 Course Overview Prepared by: Dr. Lloyd Waller ©
©Dr I M Bradley Doing the project and other things.
Mentoring in the workplace Capability development through collaborative learning.
Performance and Development Teacher Librarian Network
Dr. Kelly Bruning 1. 2 If you have any trouble in seminar, please call Tech Support at: They can assist if you get “bumped” from the seminar.
16469 Low Energy Building Design 2010 Dr N J Kelly.
CMPGN3007 & CMPGN3008 BSc Project Dr T.A.Etchells BSc Project Tutor
CSE 1105 Week 1 CSE 1105 Course Title: Introduction to Computer Science & Engineering Classroom Lecture Times: Section 001 W 4:00 – 4:50, 202 NH Section.
BMFP 4513 Teaching & Learning Planning &Strategy 2011/2012 Team: Hasoloan Haery I.P. Dr. Zuriah Ebrahim Dr. Seri Rahayu.
Experiments with PER (Physics Education Research) Chris Meyer York Mills C. I.
College of Education Graduate Programs
Workshop #1: Introduction to Graduation Project Wednesday September 2 nd at 10 am Capstone Committee Department of Computer Science.
Alessio Peluso 1 Critical evaluation of the module ‘Introduction to Engineering Thermo Fluid Dynamics’ First Steps in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
ECE 4901 Computer and Electrical Engineering Design I John Chandy
1. October 25, 2011 Louis Everett & John Yu Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation October 26, 2011 Don Millard & John Yu Division.
AMS102 Elements in Statistics Prof. Kenny Ye Office: Math Phone: Office Hours: TuTh 3:30-4:30.
University of Warsaw. The quality of education assurance and enhancement system at the University of Warsaw.
Expectations for SLC 1.Show up ON TIME. You are given 2-3 weeks to make arrangements to be at school on your designated times. If you are late, we will.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Rank the following know-how levels from the lowest level to the highest remember (memorize and repeat facts as they are given in various sources) understand.
Final Challenge Approach to Robotics Education Angela A. Sodemann Arizona State University Keywords: robotics, hands-on, project- based.
Development of Technical Writing Skills During An Undergraduate Laboratory Course Bill Josephson Auburn University Keywords: ABET G, Individual Report.
Support National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) CARD/SPCU 1.
CURRICULUM AND ASSESSMENT POLICY STATEMENTS (CAPS) ORIENTATION 2012 Natural Sciences and Technology Section 2 Activities Presentation 1.
WELCOME TO OUR PROJECT DISSERTATION DEFENSE
Enhancement Expectations
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team?
Lab Roles and Lab Report
Presentation by Dr Sarah Robertson
Idaho Entrepreneur Challenge 2016
Electrical Engineering Tech. (A. A. S
Enhancement Key Points
Presentation transcript:

Using lab based projects for teaching & learning problem solving skills in large first year classes Manjula Sharma, John O'Byrne, Ian Cooper School of Physics

Abstract One of the skills that physics students are expected to develop is that of problem solving. In fact courses often have explicit aims of teaching students problem solving skills. Various strategies and approaches have been used to enhance the learning of problem solving skills. One successful strategy is the use of open-ended projects in the First Year Physics Laboratories. The projects have been done by approximately 800 students each year since In this poster we will describe the projects, their implementation and results of evaluation.

The projects The projects are run in second semester of first year in the physics laboratories. Students work in groups of six. The groups are formed in week 3. Each group submits an Initial Proposal in week 4. The Initial Proposals are checked to see if they are doable under the circumstances and returned to the group of students. Copies are kept for technical staff, tutors and the project coordinator.

Each group submits a Final Proposal in week 6. These are checked and returned in week 7. From weeks 2 to 6 the students are also doing laboratories on electricity and in week 7 they do a practice exam. The groups carry out the project work in weeks 9, 10, 11 and do a presentation in week 12. Each group hands in a report in week 13. The following schedule is printed on the inside cover of all mainstream student laboratory manuals.

The Initial Proposal The group needs to think about and write down a project title. The group provides a short description of the project such as the following.

The Final Proposal Students need to provide –A project title –A project summary –A list of equipment and resources and who is going to supply what –A one page description of the the project –A project timeline –What they hope to learn from the project –A list of references An example is shown below

An invitation To see more Initial Proposals, Final Proposals and Project Reports please come to the workshop on problem solving, from 2 to 5pm in lab 401, Fourth floor of Carslaw Building. We will discuss other similar strategies from engineering and veterinary science.

Implementation In the first few years a projects coordinator was appointed for one semester to organise and run the projects, assist technicians in gathering equipment and developing kits, and advice students and staff. A series of kits have now been produced for the popular projects In recent years the first year lab coordinator has the responsibility of organising and managing the projects.

Evaluations A survey was administered. The survey had open ended questions and 4 separate parts with statements that students had to rank. The four parts were Nature of Science, Physics concepts, Experiences, Skills The statements could be given ranks of strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree and strongly disagree. The results are shown below with the scales of agree, neutral and disagree. About 460 student responses were collected.

Nature of Science Doing a project has improved my skills of scientific reasoning {Agree 50%, Neutral 37%, Disagree 14%} As a result of doing a project, I have a better appreciation of what scientists do. {Agree 63%, Neutral 25%, Disagree 13%} As a result of doing a project, I have a better knowledge about the nature of science. {Agree 45%, Neutral 39%, Disagree 15%} As a result of doing a project, my attitude towards science has become more positive. {Agree 40%, Neutral 39%, Disagree 20%} While doing the project, I was forced to do more thinking about natural phenomena. {Agree 57%, Neutral 27%, Disagree 17%} I believe that scientific laws can be proven to be absolutely true.{Agree 31%, Neutral 37%, Disagree 32%}

Physics concepts As a result of doing a project, I have a deeper understanding of some physics principles {Agree 55%, Neutral 32%, Disagree 14%} As a result of doing a project, I have a better appreciation of what people with a physics background can do. {Agree 51%, Neutral 33%, Disagree 15%} As a result of doing a project, I am better equipped to learn physics knowledge and skills.{Agree 43%, Neutral 39%, Disagree 19%} Doing a project has changed my views of physics in a favourable way. {Agree 35%, Neutral 43%, Disagree 23%} Doing a project has helped me better appreciate the connection between the study of physics and the “real” world.{Agree 56%, Neutral 32%, Disagree 12%}

Experiences I learnt more from the project than from the formal physics experiments. {Agree 50%, Neutral 27%, Disagree 24%} The projects should be scrapped and replaced with formal experiments.{Agree 21%, Neutral 22%, Disagree 57%} The number of students working in each project team was satisfactory. {Agree 60%, Neutral 24%, Disagree 17%} I did more work while doing the project than for the formal experiments.{Agree 51%, Neutral 32%, Disagree 17%} The team received sufficient support from staff during the project.{Agree 61%, Neutral 27%, Disagree 12%} Projects provide an effective learning experience. {Agree 58%, Neutral 31%, Disagree 11%}

Skills As a result of doing the project, I am now better prepared for working as a team member.{Agree 60%, Neutral 26%, Disagree 14%} As a result of doing the project, I am better at self-directed study.{Agree 40%, Neutral 41%, Disagree 19%} Doing the project has made me a better problem solver.{Agree 37%, Neutral 46%, Disagree 17%} The project team members collectively had sufficient physics background to do the project successfully.{Agree 59%, Neutral 29%, Disagree 12%}

Conclusion Projects such as these do require more resources, especially in the first few years. 50 to 60% of students report desirable outcomes on the survey. 35 to 40% of students report that after doing the projects their attitude to science and physics has become more positive. Students do not recognise that projects foster problem solving skills.