General Unit Meeting June 1 st 2015 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation and Pay for Performance Michigan Education Association Spring 2011.
... and what it means for teachers of non-tested subjects Johanna J. Siebert, Ph.D. NAfME Symposium on Assessment June 24-25, 2012.
BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation & APPR THE RUBRICS! A RTTT Conversation With the BTBOCES RTTT Team and local administrators July 20, 2011.
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Brief Overview of Governor Cuomo’s Proposals Affecting K through 12 Teachers in New York. (Full overview of proposals is at NYSUT.org website) New York.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
NYS Middle Level Liaisons Network As representatives of statewide middle level education, our purpose is to advocate for middle level needs, inform SED.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
BOCES Advisory Council for Curriculum & Instruction NYS Board of Regents Adjustment Options to Common Core Implementation Teresa Prendergast, Ed.D. Garden.
Michigan Tenure Law Update By Glenn Maleyko Director of Human Resources Dearborn Public Schools August 25th, 2011 General Administrators meeting.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
Dearborn Teacher Evaluation Program By Chris Sipperley, Glenn Maleyko, and the evaluation committee November 14th, 2011.
Staff Evaluation Data Reporting September 30, 2014.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
The Next Chapter of Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as described in the April 15th Draft Regulations.
Factoring Growth Models Into Administrator and Teacher Performance Evaluations -- a presentation for -- Henderson, Mercer, and Warren Counties Regional.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
APPR:§3012-d A Preview of the changes from :§3012-c Overview.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
FEH BOCES Student Learning Objectives 3012-c.
Educator Effectiveness Evaluation MERA Fall 2013 Conference November 25-26, 2013 Frankenmuth, Michigan.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
April 18, Where do we stand and what have we learned? Bring your present APPR plan. First, check in with the rule changes included in the budget.
Holland Central School District Opening Day September 3, 2013.
January 2016 Slides updated Emergency Action At their December 2015 meeting, the Board of Regents [again] took emergency action Introduced APPR.
Using the framework to ground decisions in the quality of teacher practice.
May Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.
Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 Instructional Collaboration Day II January 3, 2014.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
ELECTRONIC TEACHER AND PRINCIPAL EVALUATION SYSTEM eTPES Evaluation Updates and Requirements August/ September 2015.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
APPR Annual Professional Performance Review Legislation: 3012-d Board of Education Work Session November 9, 2015.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Evaluation of Teachers & Principals (APPR)
APPR Update School Year.
Teacher Evaluation Training
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
APPR Update School Year.
Valley Central School District
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR OVERVIEW
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Chief School Officers January 2019 State Updates.
Central Square School District and CSTA
Annual Professional Performance Review APPR
Presentation transcript:

General Unit Meeting June 1 st NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 1

Legislation Ed Law review What’s Next Legislatively? PAC Picket VOTE-COPE Committee Reports Looking Forward 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 2 General Unit Meeting Agenda

ED Law Review TENURE RE-REGISTRATION APPR 3020-A RECEIVERSHIP 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 3

Tenure Probationary period extended from 3 to 4 years Must have 3 Effective or Highly Effective ratings or more, need not be consecutive Cannot receive tenure with an Ineffective in the 4 th year Begins with new appointments as of July 1, 2015 A board can agree to offer a probationary teacher a 5 th year 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 4

Tenure Tenured teachers changing districts will now have a three year probationary period provided they did not receive an Ineffective in their last year at the prior school School boards will be able to terminate probationary teachers without regard to their APPR rating 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 5

Re-registration All teachers and teaching assistants will be required to re-register with SED every 5 years. They will also be required to provide name and address changes within 30 days If the teacher or teaching assistant willfully fails to register or provide the changes within 180 days, they may be brought up on part 83 charges There are no professional development requirements for teachers who hold a permanent certificate 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 6

Re-registration Professional certificate holders will need to re-register every 5 years and complete 100 hours of continuing education approved by SED This requirement is a reduction from the current 175 hour requirement The requirement for SED approval is new Level III teaching assistants will also need to complete 100 hours of approved continuing education This requirement is an increase from the current 75 hours The law does not give SED the authority to charge a fee for re-registration but they may charge a late fee 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 7

APPR New law applies beginning with evaluations Plans agreed to before April 1, 2015 remain in place until a new plan is agreed to by the district and local However new plans must be agreed to locally and approved by SED by November 15, 2015 or the district will receive no increase in state aid for the school year and thereafter until a new plan is in place Chancellor Tisch indicated the date may move to September 1, NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 8

APPR Two Categories 1. Student performance State growth Optional supplemental assessment 2. Observation Principal Independent evaluator Optional peer evaluator 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 9

APPR Student Performance Category – Grade 4-8 ELA and Math Teachers State-provided growth model Optional second assessment – All other teachers Student Learning Objectives (SLO) process Optional second assessment 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 10

APPR Optional Second Assessment must measure growth – Selected locally through collective bargaining – Second state-provided growth score on state created or administered test – Growth score based on a state designed supplemental assessment – State designed supplemental assessment may be a test designed by the state or purchased from another state, an institution of higher education or a commercial entity or previously designed or acquired local assessment with state modified growth targets or scoring bands – Achievement measures currently being used may be allowed as a supplemental assessment if approved by the Regents 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 11

APPR Student Performance Category – SED decisions Weights of the 2 subcomponents How teachers receive a rating of Highly Effective, Effective, Developing or Ineffective How to combine scores into one rating Parameters for growth targets The assessments to be used for SLOs and the second optional assessment Must incorporate testing reduction recommendations 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 12

APPR Observations Category – Required observations by a principal – Required observations by an impartial independent evaluator Can not be from the same school May be from another school in the district – Optional observations by a peer evaluator rated effective or highly effective 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 13

APPR Observations Category – SED decisions Weights of the subcomponents How teachers receive a rating of Highly Effective, Effective, Developing or Ineffective How to combine scores into one rating Minimum number of observations Frequency and duration of observations and any parameters therefor List of approved rubrics 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 14

APPR Rating Matrix 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 15

APPR Rating Rules – If a teacher is ineffective on the state growth subcomponent and it is the only student performance measure being used, the overall rating cannot be Effective or Highly Effective – If the option of a second assessment is selected – If the second student performance sub-component is a state provided growth measure (like a building score) and is Ineffective the teacher cannot receive a overall score greater than Developing – If a teacher is Ineffective on student performance subcomponents, when using any other measure than a state provided growth measure as the second optional student performance subcomponent, the overall rating must be ineffective – If a teacher is Ineffective on the Observation category, the overall rating cannot be Effective or Highly Effective 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 16

APPR Prohibited Elements – Evidence of student development and performance derived from lesson plans and student portfolios that is not part of an approved rubric – Parent and student surveys – Professional goal setting – Any district or regional assessment not approved by SED – Any growth or achievement target that does not meet minimum standards 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 17

APPR Collective Bargaining – Reduced from current law – Must bargain over whether to use a second student performance measure and which measure to use – Must bargain over how to implement the observation category including use of a peer reviewer 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 18

APPR Use of Results of APPR – A student may not have two ineffective teachers in a row but a district may request a waiver – If a teacher receives two consecutive Ineffective ratings the district may bring a 3020-a proceeding and the burden of proof shifts to the teacher with 90 days for the hearing – If a teacher receives three consecutive Ineffective ratings the district must bring a 3020-a and the only defense a teacher can use is fraud or mistaken identity with 30 days for the hearing 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 19

APPR SED has authority to determine if the following provisions of 3012-c continue or are modified – Evaluator training – TIPs – Appeals – Privacy 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 20

APPR NYSUT Legislative Strategy – Decouple APPR and State Aid – Clarify the inclusion of Achievement in Supplemental Assessments – Eliminate the Independent Evaluator – Change the expedited 3020-a for 3 Ineffective ratings to make it a district decision to bring charges and allow full defense by the teacher 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 21

3020-a General Applies to all cases brought after July 1, 2015 All cases decided by a single hearing officer Automatic loss of certification and employment where a teacher is convicted of a violent felony against a child Teachers accused of sexual or physical abuse of a student are suspended without pay after charges are brought by the board for 120 days with an expedited hearing within 60 days and a probable cause hearing within 10 days Witnesses under age 14 shown to be vulnerable can testify by closed circuit two way television Pre-hearing discovery includes teacher’s obligation to disclose 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 22

Test Confidentiality – A.7402, S passed Assembly – The Senate is sitting on this! APPR Changes: We MUST push this in the Senate – A.7303 passed Assembly – The Senate is sitting on this! Tax Credit: We DO NOT want this Bill passed – S.1976 has passed Senate 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 23 Current Legislation

2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 24 Political Action Com PICKET June 1 st -June5th 4:30-5:00 pm In Front of Sen. Nozzolio’s Office in Seneca Falls A Social Gathering And VOTE-COPE Fundraiser June 12th

WEA VOTE/COPE What the Heck is VOTE/COPE? – Voice of Teachers for Education (VOTE) and Committee on Political Education (COPE). Why am I being asked to donate? Realities – Triborough and Constitutional Convention Paint Night June 12 th September 2015

Teacher of the Year – New look and why? Negotiations – Will be starting soon 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 26 Committee Updates

Looking Forward 2015 NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 27 Different Times! Building a stronger infrastructure Political Action will continue