Setting the Standard for Service 1 Welcome to Northeast Georgia RESA’S Regional Data Dig.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Advertisements

Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
PORTFOLIO.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Georgia School Standards District Strategic Plan School Strategic Plan (SSP) Heavy focus on CRCT, ITBS, Perceptual Surveys Teacher Evaluation Instrument.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
1. What is it we want our students to learn?
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
SAISD Office for Professional Learning Advisory Board March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy 623 S. Pecos.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
The LEA Planning Cycle Application
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
Distributed Leadership for Mathematics Bringing Together District, School, & University Leadership to Support Highly Qualified Teachers University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D. IEP Training Module One Overview & Introduction to Data Collection.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
District Learning Day Facilitator Training Department of Professional Development and Teacher Support September 8-10, 2015.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
+ Linked Learning Certification Criteria and Process High School Principal and Leadership Team Institute August 18, 2011.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
A Mission of Restoration
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
November 8, 2010 Northeast Georgia RESA.  Welcome/Introductions  Housekeeping  Purpose of HS ELA Collaborative  Professional Learning Topics  Measuring.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
The School Effectiveness Framework
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Setting the Standard for Service 1 Analyze Root Causes Time Allotted: 2 Hours.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Fostering Geometric Thinking Facilitators’ Institute July 31 – August 4, 2006 EDC Newton, MA.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Welcome to the (ENTER YOUR SYSTEM/SCHOOL NAME) Data Dig 1.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
February 8, 2017.
Improving Student Outcomes for Schools At- Risk Presentation Template
Improving Student Outcomes for Schools At- Risk Presentation Template
“Laying Foundations for the Future!”
Resident Educator Program
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
Developing and sustaining a district and school literacy team
Introductions Introduction
Introduction Introduction
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Setting the Standard for Service 1 Welcome to Northeast Georgia RESA’S Regional Data Dig

Setting the Standard for Service 2 Purpose of the Regional Data Dig Standard A: The needs of systems and schools in the RESA service area are determined using an on-going data-based process that includes the use of both quantitative and qualitative data. –Element 1.1.A.1: The RESA analyzes state assessment data and other data (e.g. AYP reports, school and system report cards, SAT/ACT, NAEP) to identify student achievement levels and trends in systems and schools. –Element 1.1.A.2: The RESA analyzes state, system, and school data to identify factors affecting student achievement in areas such as curriculum, assessment, instruction, leadership, school culture, parent involvement, professional learning, and organization and planning, and current school improvement initiatives.

Setting the Standard for Service 3 Standard B: Services offered to systems and schools in the RESA service area are determined using both state- and locally-identified needs. –Element 1.1.B.1: The RESA prioritizes services to be offered to systems and schools based on the results of locally-administered needs assessments. –Element 1.1.B.2: The RESA develops a local action plan for delivering services to systems and schools based on the RESA Standards of Service; on the trends, causes, and factors identified in Standards A; and the needs identified in the locally-administered needs assessment. –Element 1.1.B.3: The RESA collaborates with the Department of Education and other support entities (e.g., GLRS, ETTC, GYSTC, SDFSC, colleges and universities) to plan and to coordinate services to address system and school needs. Standard C: A data-based decision making process is used to build capacity for improvement in systems and schools. –Element 1.1.C.1: The RESA provides assistance to systems and schools in analyzing state assessment data and other data (e.g. AYP reports, school and system report cards) to identify student achievement levels and trends.

Setting the Standard for Service 4 REGIONAL DATA DIG July 21, 2011 Agenda 8:30 – 9:20 General Session (Room A) Welcome, Purpose, Overview of the Day, and Use of Findings – Dr. Rhonda Hefner-Packer Data Types (Student Learning, Demographic, Perception, Process) – Beth McMickle Expected Products – Sallie Eckles Logistics and Introduction of Content Facilitators – Dr. Patti McWhorter 9:20 – 9:30Transition Time 9:30 – 12:00 Analyze Student Learning Data by Content Area Standardized Test Data Chart Findings Prioritize Findings 12:00 – 2:00Analyze Qualitative Data Demographic Data Perception Data Process Data 2:00 – 4:00Analyze Content Priorities Using Root Cause Analysis Adjournment upon Completion of Root Cause Analysis

Setting the Standard for Service 5 Analyze the Data using Bernhardt Framework Set Priorities Based on Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data Clarify the Problem – Root Cause Analysis Identify SMART Goals Select High-Impact, Research-Based Strategies Implement the RESA Action Plan Assess Results using Guskey Framework Revise the RESA Action Plan

Collect Different Types of Data DemographicPerception Student Learning Process Enrollment Ethnicity Gender Poverty Attendance Graduation Rate Surveys Administrator Teacher Student GAPSS Observations CRCT EOCT Writing GHSGT GAPSS Artifacts Observations Commendations Recommendations System Comprehensive LEA Improvement Plan (CLIP) Setting the Standard for Service 6

7 Analyze Data Patterns  Achievement data are foundational lens  All other data sources are filtered through the achievement data lens  Goal is to uncover patterns and relationships among data  Key question: What are priorities emerging from the data analysis?

Setting the Standard for Service 8 Root Cause Analysis Cause/Effect

RESA Action Plan Template

Guskey Framework Level 1What evidence exists to determine participants’ reactions to professional learning? Level 2What evidence exists to determine if participants have acquired the intended knowledge and skills? Level 3What evidence exists to demonstrate organizational support for implementation of professional learning? Level 4What evidence exists to demonstrate that participants are using knowledge and skills form professional learning? Level 5What evidence exists that professional learning has made an impact on student learning outcomes? Setting the Standard for Service 12

Setting the Standard for Service 13 Norms Participate in a positive manner with a goal of consensusParticipate in a positive manner with a goal of consensus Honor timeHonor time Stay focused with results in mindStay focused with results in mind Listen respectfully with possibilityListen respectfully with possibility Maintain confidentiality and be trustworthyMaintain confidentiality and be trustworthy Give and be open to honest feedbackGive and be open to honest feedback Commit to actionCommit to action Inform others if you are struggling to meet your commitmentsInform others if you are struggling to meet your commitments

Setting the Standard for Service 14 Logistics Room Assignments Reading and ELA – Room A Science – Room B Mathematics – Room C Social Studies – Technology Lab Working Lunch: Box lunches may be picked up in Room A at 11:30. Room A at 11:30.