NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stuart Kerachsky Acting Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 14, 2009 EMBARGOED until October 14, :00 a.m. E.D.T.
Advertisements

Dennis J. Kennedy NAEP State Coordinator West Virginia Department of Education.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 10, 2012.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.
The Gold Standard The Nation’s Report Card NAEP 2013.
Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,
The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.
Office of Assessment October 22, PSAT/SAT/NAEP  PSAT – Pre-Scholastic Aptitude Test  SAT – Scholastic Aptitude Test  NAEP – National Assessment.
Multnomah County Student Achievement Presented to the Leaders Roundtable November 25, 2008 Source: Oregon Department of Education, Dr. Patrick.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP in Delaware  NAEP Inclusion Policy NAEP 2013 reporting of inclusion goals  NAEP 2015 Delaware state context Delaware inclusion guidelines  Students.
NAEP 2012 Pre-Administration Workshop Bobbie Bable
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
The Nation’s Report Card 2009 Reading and Mathematics – Grade 12 National and State Results.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
NAEP 101 Mathematics October NAEP  What’s NAEP?  No Child Left Behind  Organization of NAEP  NAGB  NAEP Statute  NAEP Components  Why.
NAEP and International Assessments August 28, 2013 DAC Annual Meeting.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.
ELL SURVEY PART I Selected Excerpts Bilingual, Immigrant and Refugee Director’s Meeting Seattle, Washington Gabriela Uro and Alejandra Barrio May 2011.
NAEP 2014 Pre-Administration Workshop Bobbie Bable
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 24, 2011.
1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
0 Michele Sonnenfeld NAEP State Coordinator Florida Department of Education October 2006 Florida Association of Science Supervisors.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress: National and State-Level Science Results JANUARY 25, 2011.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
J. W. DOBBS ELEMENTARY DATA OVERVIEW FOURTH GRADE TEAM NOVEMBER 21, 2013.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Nicole Wagner Lam, Office of Data and Accountability Presentation to Boston School Committee.
NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS NAEP in South Dakota.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.
Program Evaluation and Impact Assessment: Internet-delivered, On-Demand Professional Development Participating Schools versus Their Respective Districts.
A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.
California Standards Tests (CSTs) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Grade 10 Census Report Data to inform the evaluation of the district’s.
NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
EMBARGOED UNTIL WEDNESDAY September 14, :00 AM NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL EMBARGO HAS EXPIRED.
2017 FSA Grade 3 English Language Arts
NAEP 2017 Campus Testing Coordinator (CTC) Training October 2016
2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
Hollydale Elementary Data Overview
NAEP and International Assessments
Information for Parents
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011

What is NAEP? The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is the largest continuing and nationally representative assessment of what our nation’s students know and can do in core subjects.

Measuring Achievement Across the Nation NAEP is a survey designed to produce national, state, and select urban district level results. – NAEP results are for populations of students, not for individual students nor schools. – Measures student performance nationally and reports changes over time. – Allows comparisons between states and the nation.

NAEP School and Student Selection NAEP uses a carefully designed sampling procedure for the assessment to be representative of the geographical, racial, ethnic, and socio-economic diversity of schools and students in the state.

NAEP Administration NAEP was administered over a six-week period. – For 2011: January 24 th – March 4 th In Vermont, students in grades 4 and 8 participate in the NAEP assessment. – Each student is only assessed in one subject area. – Students only take a small portion of the assessment – Accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and English language learners.

NAEP Results The results of NAEP are released as The Nation’s Report Card. The report card provides national, state, and district-level results, results for different demographic groups, inclusion information, and sample questions.

How NAEP Results Are Reported NAEP Results are reported in two formats – Average Scale Scores Numeric scale 0 − 500 on mathematics and reading assessments Scores cannot be compared across content areas – Achievement Levels Categorical scale Below Basic, Basic, Proficient, Advanced

Grade 4 Mathematics Results

Average Scale Scores Over Time NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

2011 Achievement Levels NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Percentages might not sum to 100 due to rounding.

Score Gap Comparison: NSLP Not Eligible and Eligible National PublicVermont NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

State Overall Performance

State and National Performance

Grade 8 Mathematics Results

Average Scale Scores Over Time NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

2011 Achievement Levels NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Percentages might not sum to 100 due to rounding.

Score Gap Comparison: NSLP Not Eligible and Eligible National PublicVermont NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

State Overall Performance

State and National Performance

Grade 4 Reading Results

Average Scale Scores Over Time NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

2011 Achievement Levels NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Percentages might not sum to 100 due to rounding.

Score Gap Comparison: NSLP Not Eligible and Eligible National PublicVermont NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

State Overall Performance

State and National Performance

Grade 8 Reading Results

Average Scale Scores Over Time NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

2011 Achievement Levels NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Percentages might not sum to 100 due to rounding.

Score Gap Comparison: NSLP Not Eligible and Eligible National PublicVermont NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

State Overall Performance

State and National Performance

For More Information About NAEP