GEOSS Common Infrastructure Internal Structure and Standards Steven F. Browdy (IEEE)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topics discussed in ADC & UIC Re AIP Multiplicity of clearinghouses End-to-end discovery How to make the searches better Usability testing results Comments.
Advertisements

GEOSS ADC Architecture Workshop Break-out summaries: Initial Operating Capability (IOC) Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey February 5,
GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot Water Information Services with GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium.
Successful Implementations for SBAs using GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements George Percivall The Open Geospatial Consortium Jay Pearlman, IEEE Nadine.
AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) for the C4 Meeting Ivan B. DeLoatch, ADC Co-chair June 2008.
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 21, 2008.
Standards and Interoperability Forum: Status, Issues & Plans GEO Architecture and Data Committee Kyoto, Japan 9 February 2009 Siri-Jodha Singh Khalsa.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Infrastructure May 5, 2011.
Managing Interoperability for GEOSS - A Report from the SIF S.J. Khalsa, D. Actur, S. Nativi, S. Browdy, P. Eglitis.
ADC Meeting Summary Geneva, May 2008 Alessandro Annoni, JRC Jay Pearlman, IEEE Report to Capacity Building Committee May 22, 2008.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI): status and evolution EC Side Event - GEO Plenary IX Foz do Iguacu, November 2012 Mirko Albani Earth Observation.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
Slide # 1 Report to ADC AR Status Doug Nebert, POC U.S. Geological Survey.
GEOSS Community Portal Recommendations Team Report.
Best Practices Wiki Ruth Duerr NSIDC, IEEE Jay Pearlman, IEEE Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa, IEEE Report to GEO Committees February 2008.
Architecture Priorities. Why do stakeholders perceive that the architecture does not meet needs? Users are not seeing what they expect The interaction.
GEOSS Architecture Describes how components fit together for providing data and information that will be better …than the individual components or systems.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure: A practical tour Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey September 2008.
Report of the IOC Task Force on the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) Ivan DeLoatch, U.S. Geological Survey Alan Edwards, European Commission Co-chairs.
Architectural enhancements for GEOSS Douglas Nebert February 2011.
ADC Meeting ICEO Standards Working Group Steven F. Browdy, Co-Chair ADC Workshop Washington, D.C. September, 2007.
Best Practices Wiki Ruth Duerr NSIDC, IEEE Jay Pearlman, IEEE Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa, IEEE Report to ADC Committee May 21, 2008.
1 SIF Interoperability Assessment Presented by Steve Browdy.
GEO Architecture and Data Committee Architecture Workshop Hosted by the European Commission At the Joint Research Centre February 2008 DRAFT.
GEOSS Task AR-09-01b Architecture Implementation Pilot Phase 6 (AIP-6) Bart De Lathouwer Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) GEO-X Plenary, Geneva, Switzerland.
GEO Architecture and Data Committee Task AR Architecture Implementation Pilot George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task AR Point.
AIP-2 Kickoff Workshop End-to-end use case: Discovery, access, and use with variations Doug Nebert GEOSS AIP-2 Kickoff September 2008.
ENV proposal meeting, Geneva, Sep. 24, GCI Presentation Joost van Bemmelen, ESA
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs Siri Jodha S. Khalsa Steve Browdy.
WGISS-40, Harwell, Oxfordshire, UK, Sept. 28-Oct. 2, 2015 GEO/CWIC Interactions Ken McDonald/NOAA CWIC Session, WGISS–40 October 1, 2015.
W HAT IS I NTEROPERABILITY ? ( AND HOW DO WE MEASURE IT ?) INSPIRE Conference 2011 Edinburgh, UK.
GEOSS Interoperability Workshop November 12-13, Introduction to the SIF Steven F. Browdy, IEEE
® GEOSS AIP 5 Water SBA Update HDWG June 2012 Matt Austin NOAA Stefan Fuest KISTERS Jochen Schmidt NIWA.
1 Using the GEOSS Common Infrastructure in the Air Quality & Health SBA: Wildfire & Smoke Assessment Prepared by the GEOSS AIP-2 Air Quality & Health Working.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) & GCI-Coordination Team (GCI-CT) Ivan Petiteville, GCI-CT Co-chair GEO Architecture & Data Committee meeting Campos do.
GEO Standards and Interoperability Forum SIF First Organizational Meeting 27 July 2007 Barcelona, Spain.
ADC Portal & Clearinghouse GEO Architecture and Data Committee 2-3 March 2006 George Percivall OGC Chief Architect
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) R.Shibasaki (ADC, Japan)
1 ISO WAF Community Catalog Product Access Servers Registry Clearinghouse(s) GEO Portals Community Portals Users Client Apps GetCapabilities ISO
Standards and Interoperability Forum SIF Update and Status Steven F. Browdy, Chair.
The Process for Achieving Interoperability in GEOSS AGU Fall Meeting IN43C-08.
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 22, 2008.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Initial Operating Capability Directions and Discussion Presented to GEO ADC Geneva May
1 Using the GEOSS Common Infrastructure in the Air Quality & Health SBA: Wildfire & Smoke Assessment Prepared by the GEOSS AIP-2 Air Quality & Health Working.
Data Services Task Team WGISS-22 meeting Annapolis, the US, September 12th 2006 Shinobu Kawahito, JAXA/RESTEC.
Implementing GEOSS architecture with-and-for Users George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium Task lead AR-09-01B.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Access to Priority Earth Observations Data “ Sprint to Plenary” Group on Earth Observations Eighth Plenary Session - GEO-VIII.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOSSIW - November, 2008 GEOSS “Interoperability” Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
GEOSS Common Infrastructure: A Practical Tour Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey AIP-3 Kickoff March 2010.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOS - August, 2008 GEOSS Interoperability Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
GCI Overview Steve Browdy with input from Doug Nebert May 2012.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) The GEOSS Common Infrastructure allows Earth Observations users to search, access and use the data, information, tools.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Slides prepared by Alessandro Annoni, JRC Jay Pearlman, IEEE and GEO Secretariat.
GCI Architecture GEOSS Information System Meeting 20 September 2013, ESA/ESRIN (Frascati, Italy) M.Albani (ESA), D.Nebert (USGS/FGDC), S.Nativi (CNR)
OGC’s role in GEO: Results from the Architectural Implementation Pilot (AIP) George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task IN-05 Coordinator
Introduction to the GEOSS Registries: Components, Services, and Standards Doug Nebert U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee June 2007.
Page 1 CSISS Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems IIB and GCI Meeting CSR Architecture and Current Registration Status Prof. Liping Di Director.
ESA-FAO GEOPortal STATUS & PLANS
GEOSS Component and Service Registry (CSR)
Paul Eglitis [IEEE] and Siri Jodha S. Khalsa [IEEE]
The Architecture of GEOSS Dr
GEOSS Future Products Workshop Session 5 Introduction & Agenda
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 22, 2008.
Status Report on SIF to GEO ADC
AIP-5 Kick-off Workshop Summary 3-4 May 2012, UNEP, Geneva
GEOSS Future Products Workshop March 26-28, 2013 NOAA
GEOSS AIP-5 Data Sharing Working Group
Air Quality Data Systems and the GEOSS Architecture
Presentation transcript:

GEOSS Common Infrastructure Internal Structure and Standards Steven F. Browdy (IEEE)

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, GEO vs. GEOSS GEO: Group On Earth Observations –is the administrative body coordinating the international efforts to develop, maintain, and evolve the GEOSS –85 countries plus European Commission –61 participating organizations –4 committees (ADC, UIC, STC, CBC) GEOSS: Global Earth Observation System of Systems –Guided by 10-Year Implementation Plan ( ) –Not GEOCS (Global Earth Observation Collection of Systems)

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, System of Systems (SoS): A collection of dedicated systems that can have their resources and capabilities utilized to obtain a more complex 'meta-system' which results in value-added functionality non-existent with just the collection of the constituent systems. –Operationally independent –Managerially independent –Geographically dispersed –Emergent behavior

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, GEO vs. GEOSS GEO: Group On Earth Observations –is the administrative body coordinating the international efforts to develop, maintain, and evolve the GEOSS –85 countries plus European Commission –61 participating organizations –4 committees (ADC, UIC, STC, CBC) GEOSS: Global Earth Observation System of Systems –For GEOSS, the SoS approach is facilitated by the introduction, discovery, and use of standards

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, Primary GEOSS Use Case Publish–Find–Bind (PFB)

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) The GCI is the core architecture of the GEOSS It supports the overall architecture of the GEOSS It allows the PFB Use Case to be realized for multiple bindings, as well as single bindings: –Data aggregation and layering –Service chaining (workflows)

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, GCI Components The GCI is composed of 6 key functional components: –GEO Web Portal (GWP) –Clearinghouse (CL) –Components and Services Registry (CSR) –Standards and Interoperability Registry (SIR) –User Requirements Registry (URR) –Best Practices Wiki (BPW) The GCI is supported by three important activities: –GCI Coordination Team (GCI-CT) –Architecture and Implementation Pilot (AIP) –Standards and Interoperability Forum (SIF)

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, GCI Role

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, GEOSS Architecture

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, How does the GCI serve GEOSS? The GCI objective is to make it easier to discover and use the wealth of available Earth observation resources. The GEOSS Clearinghouse and the GCI registries operate as a searchable catalog with metadata about the diverse resources contributed to GEOSS. The GEO Portal is the GCI tool that helps users of GEOSS to discover and use its registered resources.

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, GWP and Clearinghouse The GWP is the main interface for GEOSS users. It interacts with the CL to provide the user with results of user-initiated searches for data and service discovery. The CL holds and finds the metadata for all registered GEOSS resources through harvesting and distributed search. It makes it available via service calls to all interested. –Deployed for pilot in the cloud (Amazon Web Services (EC2)) –Other GCI components could follow CL into the cloud. Until mid-2010, there were three GWPs and 3 CLs. –There were identified problems with uniform and consistent functionality from the technical point of view and the user’s point of view.

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, GWP1GWP2GWP3 CSR CL1CL2CL3 USER GCI “specified” configuration IOC phase Single CL / multiple GEO Web Portals: Selection process - step 1 GWP1GWP2GWP3 CSR CL USER GWP CSR CL USER Single CL / single GEO Web Portal. GCI configuration: operational phase

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, Clearinghouse Interfaces

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, Components and Services Registry The CSR allows for the registration of resources (components and services) that access and process data, or facilitate the access and processing of data. Components are associated with services. Services are associated with standards. Current number of records: –Components: 264 –Services: 163

GeoViQua Workshop February 18,

GeoViQua Workshop February 18,

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, Standards and Interoperability Registry The SIR allows for the registration of standards and special arrangements that support the interoperability goals for GEOSS. It is overseen and managed by the Standards and Interoperability Forum (SIF). Design based upon ISO Uses a taxonomy of standards categories to classify entries. Maintains history of entries with respect to promotion, retirement, and supersedence. Number of submitted records: –Standards: ~153 –Special Arrangements: ~21

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, SIR Metadata

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, SIR  CSR The SIR and CSR interoperate to allow sharing of SIR information and SIR registration. –The CSR hosts the SIR entry form, so that SIR registration can take place seamlessly during CSR registration. –The SIR shares the standards taxonomy with the CSR so that proper categorization of associated standards can be achieved. –The sharing of information between the CSR and SIR occurs in real-time, so that changes made at the SIR are immediately available at the CSR.

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, The Best Practices Wiki The BPW stores the final and evolving best and common practices that are used by communities and research activities. The wiki nature allows iterative development of these practices, allowing for feedback. There are plans being made to develop a Best Practices Registry to: –Store and manage finished practices –Interoperate with the GCI

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, The User Requirements Registry The URR will store the various: –GEOSS user types (supported by a user type taxonomy) –Observation parameters associated with user needs (supported by existing vocabularies/ontologies) The URR hopes to interoperate with the other GCI components, as necessary. The URR is still under development, but plans to be deployed in 2011.

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, The Standards and Interoperability Forum (SIF) The SIF provides advice, expertise and impartial guidance on issues relating to standards and interoperability for GEOSS. Primary function is to address issues related to failed interoperability when using registered standards and special arrangements. The SIF’s goal is to enable ever greater degrees of interoperability among GEOSS components through facilitation, technical analysis, advocacy and education. Structure of the SIF consists of a Core Team and Regional Teams: –The European SIF Regional Team is active and chaired by Stefano Nativi. Current activities: –GEOSS Interoperability Assessment –Standards Convergence –GEOSS Common Metadata Record

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, GCI-Coordination Team GEO established the GCI-CT to oversee the work of developing, implementing and operating the GCI. The first main responsibility of the GCI-CT was to design and oversee the process of selecting a single CL and GWP. Current work: –Implementation and deployment of the GEOSS Data- CORE, defined by the Data Sharing Task Force. –Defining the GCI enhancements and operations process. –Monitor the GCI operational status Use the GCI Consolidated Requirements

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, GCI Consolidated Requirements These requirements are meant to ensure the proper and successful operation of the GCI. There are two main categories of requirements: –Requirements that all GCI components must handle. –Requirements targeted to specific GCI components All requirements are either base or desirable, where base requirements must be satisfied. A sample of base requirements for all components: –Service availability –Content management via administrator interface –Component transferability –Software support and maintenance –Online user help facilities –Configuration Management –User feedback

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, Evolution of Architectural Focus GCI Provider Consumer Publish Find Bind GCI Consumer Publish Find Provider Bind Provider Register Broker/Mediator Provider Mediate Find SIF

GeoViQua Workshop February 18, What about Google ???