USEPA Region 2 Vapor Intrusion Study Cayuga Groundwater Contamination Site March 4, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Battlement Mesa Health Impact Assessment and Exposure/Health Study Stakeholders Meeting Roxana Witter, MD, MSPH John Adgate, PhD, MSPH Lee Newman, MD,
Advertisements

VAPOR INTRUSION: AN INTRODUCTION OHIO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE JENNIFER MILLER NOVEMBER 7, 2012.
Case Study of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion at a Dry Cleaner Site Amy Goldberg Day AEHS Annual East Coast Conference on Soils, Sediments.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
Further Site Investigation Sutton Walls Former Landfill
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Environmental Testing at Immaculate Heart of Mary (IHM) Week of April 21, 2014 Presented by Ohio EPA and Summit County Public Health.
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
EBC Seminar The IAQ/Mold Assessment – Getting it Right! – Controlling Your Risk Next Speaker Rosemary McCafferty Haley & Aldrich, Inc.
Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Vapor Intrusion Workgroup July 29,
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Strategy and Modeling Developments
Revised TCE Fact Sheet (a.k.a. “Status Update”) Q&A’s & Template IH Notice Form March 27, 2014 Paul W. Locke MassDEP Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (617)
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
FSA Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Model Presentation to Scottsdale Citizens Group March 19, 1999.
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
Of Massachusetts Department ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Soil Vapor Intrusion... A Decade of Regulatory Requirements & Experiences Paul W. Locke MA DEP Bureau.
Overview of USGS Groundwater Quality Assessment Activities and Related Data in Alabama 2011 Alabama Water Resources Conference September 9, 2011, Perdido.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS WAITING TO EXHALE – OR HOW TO MANUEVER THROUGH THE INDOOR AIR MAZE Vapor Intrusion Pathway By: Lisa Campe, MPH, LSP.
John N. Dougherty, PG Lisa Campbell, PG EPA Region 2, New York City
Predicting Vapor Intrusion Risks in the Presence of Soil Heterogeneities and Anthropogenic Preferential Pathways Brown University Ozgur Bozkurt, Kelly.
Vapor Intrusion and Environmental Liability Learning From Past Mistakes EDR Insight Webinar, February 12, 2013 Presented by: Joseph Maternowski Hessian.
A Database of Vapor Intrusion Characteristics of Industrial Buildings: Are They Different than Single Family Residences? Christopher Lutes, Keri Hallberg,
Background and lessons learned Managers Meeting February 13, 2014.
Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop A Study of Vapor Intrusion Modeling in the Context of EPA’s Guidance The 20 th Annual International Conference on Soils,
Site Activities Update Park – Euclid RP Group Community Advisory Board Meeting January 16, 2013.
Discerning Background Sources from Vapor Intrusion Jeffrey Kurtz, Ph.D. and David Folkes, PE EnviroGroup Limited Denver Boston Albuquerque Seattle Colorado.
Statistical Evaluation of Attenuation Factors at Lowry Air Force Base, CO Helen E. Dawson, PHD Regional Superfund Hydrogeologist US EPA Region VIII Denver,
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site August 20, 2013.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
Carousel Tract Environmental Remediation Project Update by Expert Panel to Regional Board July 11, 2013.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
GORE, GORE-TEX and designs are trademarks of W. L. Gore & Associates © 2007 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. 1 Environmental Investigations Using Versatile,
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site February 19, 2013.
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Updates VAP CP Training October 27, 2015 Audrey Rush Ohio EPA DERR
NFA Letter Template: Tips and Hints to Reduce Comments CP Annual Training October 27, 2015 Sydney Poole – DERR.
Biological & Research Programs. Overview Status Future Direction.
Groundwater Protection Project Greg Robison Project Manager Ed Sullivan Consulting Engineer June 23, 2008.
Feasibility Study Workplan Park – Euclid RP Group Community Advisory Board Meeting May 23, 2013.
FAIR Meeting April 6, Groundwater Results – Fall 2003 Benzene ND 1,000 ug/L Product.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
By Ben Bentkowski, P.G. Scientific Support Section, R4 Superfund Presented at the March 29, 2016 Air & Waste Management Association Regulatory Update Conference.
Vapor Study Informational Meeting General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Van Cleve Recreation Center November 12, 2013 Minnesota Department of Health.
Brownfields 2004, “Light or Heavy Starch: Cleaning the Cleaners” September 2004 Presented by Matt Shurtliff Roosevelt Towne Apartments.
The World of AUL Presentation by: Atul Pandey, P.E. PANDEY Environmental, LLC 2016 Ohio Brownfield Conference April 7, 2016.
The Indoor Inhalation Exposure Route Heather Nifong Illinois EPA May 5, 2008.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
What’s the Problem: The Vapor Intrusion Issue Brownfields 2008 Heavy Starch: Cleaning the Dry Cleaners Detroit, MI May 5, 2008 Presented by: Henry Schuver,
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
General Principles for Hydrocarbon Vapor Intrusion
Overview Why are we here? I.e., what drives all of this interest?
East Hennepin Avenue Site
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Sean Anderson, P.Eng., QPESA Steve Russell, B.Sc., QPRA
Jay Peters Gina M. Plantz Richard J. Rago
Using the HAPSITE® as a Vapor Intrusion Investigation Tool
At facilities with subsurface contamination, what other chemicals may your workers be breathing? Matt Raithel.
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL SITE PUBLIC MEETING December 6, 2016
Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations: Volatilization Criteria
Hold Your Breath—Ohio EPA’s TCE Initiative
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
VI Issues: Lessons Learned
Presentation transcript:

USEPA Region 2 Vapor Intrusion Study Cayuga Groundwater Contamination Site March 4, 2009

Site Background 2001 to Present – EPA Field Study –Installed 23 Multi-level monitoring wells –Seven Rounds of groundwater sampling (>500 groundwater samples) –Quarterly water level measurement and geophysics support from USGS –Surface water/sediment samples (Owasco Outlet, Crane Brook, Union Springs)

Site Background (cont’d) Cayuga County DOH – Multiple rounds of residential well sampling (>600 samples) Remedial report and risk evaluations in progress

Monitoring Wells

Site Overview

Ongoing Field Study Efforts Additional field work under NYSDEC/EPA: –Additional monitoring wells –Additional groundwater sampling – Geophysical survey –Hydraulic testing

Vapor Intrusion Study EPA field study indicates that chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs) are present in groundwater CVOC-contaminated groundwater extends from West Genesee St. to Union Springs CVOCs in groundwater can form vapors that migrate in the subsurface Potential exists for vapors to enter buildings Vapor sampling is being conducted to determine if vapors are present in buildings

Vapor Sampling Locations Selection of locations based on existing data: –Location of CVOCs in groundwater –Location of CVOCs in surface water –Residential well data –Human health risk evaluation –Geologic/Hydrogeologic factors Depth to contaminated groundwater (<100 feet) Degree of bedrock fracturing Presence of clean groundwater above contaminated zones

Vapor Sampling Locations (cont’d) Three areas identified that meet initial criteria: –South of West Genesee Street –Pinckney Road/Overbrook Drive Area –Union Springs

South of West Genesee Street Insert Figure 1

Pinckney/Overbrook Area (east) Insert Figure 2

Pinckney Road (West)

Union Springs Area (south) Insert Figure 3

Union Springs Area (north)

Residential Vapor Intrusion Sampling Procedures Presented by: Gary Newhart – EPA

Vapor Pathway into Buildings Vadose Zone Groundwater Contamination Interior space Subslab soil gas intruding into interior space Ambient air Ventilation

Key Questions for Vapor Intrusion Impacts 1. 1.Does groundwater or soil contamination exist? - -Yes, in this case, so we move to the next step 2. 2.Does subsurface gas contamination exist above guidelines? - -Answered through collection of subslab soil gas 3.If subsurface gas does exist above guidelines, is it entering the interior space? - -Answered through collection of indoor air samples 4.If gas contamination exists in the residence, are the concentrations elevated and related to contamination -Answered by comparing results to health-based guidelines and conducting lifestyle and ambient investigation

Monitoring and Sampling Strategy 1. 1.Initial Sampling - Subslab Location + Ambient (outdoor) 2. Subsequent SUMMA Canister Sampling - Subslab Location - Basement Location - First Floor Location

Indoor Air and Sub-Slab Soil Gas Activities

Drilling

Placement and Cementing of the Probe

Connection of the 3-Way Valve

Vapor Sampling Apparatus

Vapor Mitigation System

What is a VI Matrix and how is it developed? Chemical-specific Considers potential health effects from long- term exposures for residents including children and adults –Exposure Frequency of 24 hours/day and 350 days/year –Exposure Duration is 30 years Has comparison values for subslab soil gas and indoor air

Sub-slab Soil Gas Concentration Indoor Air Concentration (ug/m 3 ) (1) No ActionNo Action(2) InvestigateInvestigate(3) InvestigateInvestigate (4) MonitorMonitor (5) Monitor or Pursue RemediationMonitor or Pursue Remediation (6) Investigate or Pursue RemediationInvestigate or Pursue Remediation (7) Monitor or Pursue RemediationMonitor or Pursue Remediation (8) Pursue_ Remediation or MonitorPursue_ Remediation or Monitor (9) Pursue RemediationPursue Remediation Vapor Intrusion Matrix for a Carcinogenic Chemical Step 1. Does the subslab concentration exceed x ug/m3? No = Vapor intrusion investigation is over for this building Yes = Consider indoor air sampling Step 2. Evaluate subslab and indoor air concentrations.

Sub-slab Soil Gas Concentration Indoor Air Concentration (ug/m 3 ) (1) No ActionNo Action(2) InvestigateInvestigate (3) Monitor/ RemediateMonitor(4) RemediateRemediate Vapor Intrusion Matrix for a Non-Carcinogenic Chemical Step 1. Does the subslab concentration exceed x ug/m3? No = Vapor intrusion investigation is over for this building Yes = Consider indoor air sampling Step 2. Evaluate subslab and indoor air concentrations.

VI Decisions VI Profile – Subslab – Indoor/Basement – Indoor/First Floor Living Space – Ambient Concentrations Confounding Internal Sources Confounding External Sources

Key Points in VI Decisions Decision to remediate is not based on one piece of information Complexity and uncertainty is associated with the fate and transport mechanism of vapors Multiple lines of evidence are used in the decision making Rely on “VI Team” to ensure consistency in decisions within EPA Region 2

Contact Information USEPA Remedial Project Manager - Isabel Rodrigues – (212) USEPA Community Involvement Coordinator– Mike Basile - (716) New York State DOH – Krista Anders – (518) New York State DEC – Kevin Kelley – (315) Cayuga County DOH – Eileen O’Conner (315)