Secondary Literacy: A Systems Approach to Meeting the Needs of Your Students Presented by: Drew Braun, Ph.D., Director of Instruction Lori Smith, D.Ed.,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
West Virginia Department of Education. July 1, 2011 timeline for middle school implementation West Virginia Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Focus on Secondary Literacy Lori Rae Smith, D.Ed., Bethel School District Ginger Kowalko, M.S., Educational Consultant October 20, 2010.
Assessment, Screening and Progress Monitoring made Easy! a tool for every tier Darrell L. Lee, easyCBM Senior Account Manager.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
STAR Basics.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading Day 4: Instruction: Time, Scheduling & Grouping / Reading.
Overview Training Cohort B June 23, 2005 Open Court Rhonda Wolter Bethel School District Reading Coordinator.
What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
Early Grade Reading: Egypt Case Dr. Reda Abouserie First Deputy to Minister of Education Egypt All Children Reading by 2015: From Assessment to Action.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Intervention Placement Process: Finding the Right Fit Cadre 8 Training Feb 5, 2012.
Webinar 3 Core Instruction (Tier 1). Assessments: – Screening – Evaluating effectiveness of core instruction Research-based/Evidence-based Instructional.
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Section 3: Writing Goals and Planning Interventions through the Grouping Process. Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing.
Assessment, Screening and Progress Monitoring made Easy! a tool for every tier.
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Center for Reading Research 175 Peik Hall 159 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN Contacts: Kathrin Maki:
Utilizing AIMSweb to Inform Instruction June 25, 2012.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
Presented by Jan Hasbrouck, Ph.D. Using Findings from Effective Schools to Improve Student Achievement SAILS.
100 % Data Meetings 100% Data Meetings turn data into ACTION FOR ALL students.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
REWARDS In the Trenches Sycamore Elementary School K-5 School Enrollment: 335 and growing Free and Reduced Lunch Percentage: 27% 98% Caucasian.
Title I Parent Meeting Miami Elementary School
School-wide Data Analysis Oregon RtI Spring Conference May 9 th 2012.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.
Supporting Leadership of Effective Reading Programs Stephen M. Nettles, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
DIBELS Data: From Dabbling to Digging Interpreting data for instructional decision-making.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
Response to Intervention By Kristy Shinaver. What is Response to Intervention (RtI)?  A multi-tiered method of service delivery in which all students.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Digging Deeper with Screening Data: Creating Intervention Groups Gresham-Barlow School District September 8, 2011.
ELP Smart Goal Intervention Instruction ELP Inservice Feb 25/26 09.
Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading Coaches Conference Orlando, Florida August, 2004.
Response to Intervention Hofstra University October 21, 2014 Deborah Y. Smith, Ed.D. Principal, Connetquot Elementary School East Islip School District.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Reading Instruction: Alterable Variables Bethel School District 2009.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Literacy Assessments Literacy Workgroup Marcia Atwood Michelle Boutwell Sue Locke-Scott Rae Lynn McCarthy.
Building RTI Capacity Through the Lens of a Coach Curriculum and Instruction Department.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Extending an RTI Approach to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Language Arts/Reading & Math Curriculum Plan Kindergarten Through Sixth Grade School Year Involved Departments: Elementary Curriculum Federal.
DIBELS.
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System: RTI Assessment Julie Alonzo, Ph.D. & Gerald Tindal, Ph.D. July 2011.
Oregon Leadership Network Spring Institute April 9, 2008
RtI Strategies and Interventions
DIBELS: An Overview Kelli Anderson Early Intervention Specialist - ECC
Presentation transcript:

Secondary Literacy: A Systems Approach to Meeting the Needs of Your Students Presented by: Drew Braun, Ph.D., Director of Instruction Lori Smith, D.Ed., Director, Student Achievement Bethel School District Ginger Kowalko, M.S., Educational Consultant

Secondary Literacy Ideally, secondary literacy would focus solely on “... the core of reading: comprehension, learning while reading, reading in the content areas, and reading the service of secondary or higher education, of employability, of citizenship.” (Reading Next, p. 1)

“... as many as one out of every ten adolescents has serious difficulties in identifying words.” Curtis and Longo, 1999, Adolescents and Literacy: Reading for the 21 st Century, p. 8

4 SUPPORTS PRACTICES DATA Supports for Effective Implementation Data for Decision Making Practices for Student Success OUTCOMES Adapted From: Horner & Sugai

Video

6 SECONDARY LITERACY FRAMEWORK: A TWO PRONG APPROACH READING INSTRUCTION CONTENT LITERACY

7 Bethel School District Middle School Model Grouping Design Design Time Intensive Low Emerging/ Emerging Emerging/ Established Advanced Corrective Reading (Decoding A) Wilson Reading Program Language! Phonics for Reading Open Court Prentice Hall (adapted version) Reading Mastery Plus (V & VI) REWARDS (Between B2 & C) Corrective Reading (Decoding B1, B2 & C) Other Core program Open Court Prentice Hall (regular version) McDougal-Littell Glencoe REWARDS Plus Junior Great Books Novels (comprehension) (vocabulary) Fluency Decoding Short Words Phonemic Awareness (writing) Comprehension Vocabulary Fluency Decoding Long Words Writing Comprehension Vocabulary (fluency) (decoding) Writing Comprehension Vocabulary 90 – 120 mins 60 – 90 mins 45 – 60 mins

8 Bethel School District Middle School Model Grouping Design Design Time Intensive Low Emerging/ Emerging Emerging/ Established Advanced Corrective Reading (Decoding A) Wilson Reading Program Language! Phonics for Reading Open Court Prentice Hall (adapted version) Reading Mastery Plus (V & VI) REWARDS (Between B2 & C) Corrective Reading (Decoding B1, B2 & C) Other Core program Open Court Prentice Hall (regular version) McDougal-Littell Glencoe REWARDS Plus Junior Great Books Novels (comprehension) (vocabulary) Fluency Decoding Short Words Phonemic Awareness (writing) Comprehension Vocabulary Fluency Decoding Long Words Writing Comprehension Vocabulary (fluency) (decoding) Writing Comprehension Vocabulary 90 – 120 mins 60 – 90 mins 45 – 60 mins

9 Bethel School District Middle School Delivery Model Grouping Design Design Time Intensive Low Emerging/ Emerging Emerging/ Established Advanced Corrective Reading (Decoding A) Wilson Reading Program Language! Phonics for Reading Open Court Prentice Hall (adapted version) Reading Mastery Plus (V & VI) REWARDS (Between B2 & C) Corrective Reading (Decoding B1, B2 & C) Other Core program Open Court Prentice Hall (regular version) McDougal-Littell Glencoe REWARDS Plus Junior Great Books Novels (comprehension) (vocabulary) Fluency Decoding Short Words Phonemic Awareness (writing) Comprehension Vocabulary Fluency Decoding Long Words Writing Comprehension Vocabulary (fluency) (decoding) Writing Comprehension Vocabulary 90 – 120 mins 60 – 90 mins 45 – 60 mins

10 Bethel School District Middle School Model Grouping Design Design Time Intensive Low Emerging/ Emerging Emerging/ Established Advanced Corrective Reading (Decoding A) Wilson Reading Program Language! Phonics for Reading Open Court Prentice Hall (adapted version) Reading Mastery Plus (V & VI) REWARDS (Between B2 & C) Corrective Reading (Decoding B1, B2 & C) Other Core program Open Court Prentice Hall (regular version) McDougal-Littell Glencoe REWARDS Plus Junior Great Books Novels (comprehension) (vocabulary) Fluency Decoding Short Words Phonemic Awareness (writing) Comprehension Vocabulary Fluency Decoding Long Words Writing Comprehension Vocabulary (fluency) (decoding) Writing Comprehension Vocabulary 90 – 120 mins 60 – 90 mins 45 – 60 mins

11 Bethel School District Middle School Model Grouping Design Design Time Intensive Low Emerging/ Emerging Emerging/ Established Advanced

QUICK COMPARISON OF SELECTED READING ASSESSMENT TOOLS FeatureDIBELSEASY CBMAIMSWEBMAP Grade levelsK-6K-8 K-12 AdministrationIndividuallyIndividually & Group Computer Based -Adapted Measures  Letter Names  Initial Sounds  Phonemic Segmentation  Non-sense Word  Oral Reading Fluency (ORF)  PSF  Letter Sounds  Letter Names  Word Reading Fluency  Passage Reading Fluency (ORF)  Comprehension (grade level & above on ORF)  Letter Names  Initial Sounds  Phonemic Segmentation  Non-sense Word  Oral Reading Fluency (ORF)  MAZE Standardized Assessment similar to OAKS Benchmark Passages/Tests grade K-1 grade 1-8 grade grade K-1 1 grade 1-8 grade K-2 grade 2-12 Progress Monitoring 20 per grade level16-17 per grade level K-820 at grade 1 30 at grades 2-8 No – 3 times per year testing only ReportsYes Professional Development Online Resources & Publications OnlineOn-site or OnlineVendor provided CostDatabase $1 per student Measures Free Database $1 per student Measures Free Database $3-5 per student Measures $199 each K-1 & Gr 1-8 Contact Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA)

Reading Assessment Tool Considerations Cost Building or District Capacity Staff commitment Time (Group or Individual Administration) Link between Universal Screening and progress monitoring

Initial Grouping Rank students from low to high based on data “Chunk” students into categories of performance by fluency – below 10 th percentile – th percentile – th percentile – 50 th percentile and above (you could chunk this group more) Add other measures and considerations (comprehension scores, OAKS data, SWIS data, teacher judgment) Identify students on reading IEPs Identify students in need of placement tests

8th Grade Example Rank low to high Student Name EasyCBM (ORF) Ginger114 Lori116 Drew123 Rhonda126 Erika130 Monique132 Mindy136 Lisa136 Mike139 Daniel146 Tereasa150 Dianne151 Amanda178 Kim187 Charlotte205 Nola209 Deb215

16 EasyCBM Progress Monitoring Score Interpretations Guidelines Passage Reading Fluency 8 th Grade FallWinterSpring 10%ile %ile %ile %ile %ile

8th Grade Example “Chunk” by performance Student Name EasyCBM (ORF) Ginger114 Lori116 Drew123 Rhonda126 Erika130 Monique132 Mindy136 Lisa136 Mike139 Daniel146 Tereasa150 Dianne151 Amanda178 Kim187 Charlotte205 Nola209 Deb215 < 10th percentile 10-20th percentile 21-50th percentile > 50 th percentile

8th Grade Example Add other measures Student Name EasyCBM (ORF)OAKS ELA Ginger Lori Drew Rhonda Erika Monique Mindy Lisa Mike Daniel Tereasa Dianne Amanda Kim Charlotte Nola Deb215234

8th Grade Example Identify students w/IEPs Student Name EasyCBM (ORF)OAKS ELA Ginger Lori Drew Rhonda Erika Monique Mindy Lisa Mike Daniel Tereasa Dianne Amanda Kim Charlotte Nola Deb215234

20 Group Size Students with intensive needs receive instruction in smallest groups (4-12 students) Students with established reading skills receive instruction in the largest groups (35+ Students)

21 Flexible Grouping Changes in grouping are made based on student performance – How often Minimally after each universal screening

22 Bethel School District Middle School Model Grouping Design Design Time Intensive Low Emerging/ Emerging Emerging/ Established Advanced (comprehension) (vocabulary) Fluency Decoding Short Words Phonemic Awareness (writing) Comprehension Vocabulary Fluency Decoding Long Words Writing Comprehension Vocabulary (fluency) (decoding) Writing Comprehension Vocabulary

23 Bethel School District Middle School Model Grouping Design Design Time Intensive Low Emerging/ Emerging Emerging/ Established Advanced Corrective Reading (Decoding A) Wilson Reading Program Language! Phonics for Reading Open Court Prentice Hall (adapted version) Reading Mastery Plus (V & VI) REWARDS (Between B2 & C) Corrective Reading (Decoding B1, B2 & C) Other Core program Open Court Prentice Hall (regular version) McDougal-Littell Glencoe REWARDS Plus Junior Great Books Novels (comprehension) (vocabulary) Fluency Decoding Short Words Phonemic Awareness (writing) Comprehension Vocabulary Fluency Decoding Long Words Writing Comprehension Vocabulary (fluency) (decoding) Writing Comprehension Vocabulary

Resources for Curriculum Selection Florida Center for Reading Research Stupski Foundation

8th Grade Example Placement tests Student Name EasyCBM (ORF)OAKS ELA Ginger Lori Drew Rhonda Erika Monique Mindy Lisa Mike Daniel Tereasa Dianne Amanda Kim Charlotte Nola Deb Give placement tests

26 Bethel School District Middle School Model Grouping Design Design Time Intensive Low Emerging/ Emerging Emerging/ Established Advanced Corrective Reading (Decoding A) Wilson Reading Program Language! Phonics for Reading Open Court Prentice Hall (adapted version) Reading Mastery Plus (V & VI) REWARDS (Between B2 & C) Corrective Reading (Decoding B1, B2 & C) Other Core program Open Court Prentice Hall (regular version) McDougal-Littell Glencoe REWARDS Plus Junior Great Books Novels (comprehension) (vocabulary) Fluency Decoding Short Words Phonemic Awareness (writing) Comprehension Vocabulary Fluency Decoding Long Words Writing Comprehension Vocabulary (fluency) (decoding) Writing Comprehension Vocabulary 90 – 120 mins 60 – 90 mins 45 – 60 mins

Two/Three Periods of Reading Instruction Elective Class (Focus on Reading Skills or on Strategies) English/Language Arts Class (Focus and/or Extended Time) Content Classes/Reading Period Content Literacy Delivery Models

Cascade Middle School - Bethel SD Daily Schedule PERIODTIME 18:00 - 8:50 Reading Period 28:54 - 9:39 39: :28 410: :17 5A11: :06 (second lunch 12: :37) 5B11: :37 (first lunch 11: :48) 612:41 - 1:26 71:30 - 2:15

High School Scheduling Examples – Willamette High School, Bethel School District – Cottage Grove High School, Cottage Grove SD – Generic examples from around Oregon – Stupski Foundation suggestions

INTERVENTION TYPEPROCON Two periods of daily reading instruction for the most intensive students (those at or below the 10%ile) Provides additional time in reading instruction for the neediest students:  6 th grade, xx%  7 th grade, xx%  8 th grade, xx% May alter schedules/grouping of those students currently receiving special ed services. See possible “Cons” in cell below. At least one period of daily reading instruction, in addition to Language Arts, for at-risk students (those between the %ile) Provides additional time in direct reading instruction for needy students:  6 th grade, xx%  7 th grade, xx%  8 th grade, xx% Requires placement tests. May require purchase of curriculum. May add non-special ed students to groups:  6 th grade, xx students  7 th grade, xx students  8 th grade, xx students Content Literacy strategies for all students Meets the need for explicit comprehension and vocabulary instruction as recommended by research. Requires minimal professional development. Requires minimal amount of time for implementation by classroom teacher. Elective reading period for targeted groups of students (those between 21-50%ile) Provides reading instruction in addition to language arts for students in need:  6 th grade, xx%  7 th grade, xx%  8 th grade, xx% May need to eliminate one elective in order to add reading elective. May need to have several groups within elective period. May require professional development for teacher(s) delivering instruction. Homogeneously grouped reading period for all students in addition to their heterogeneously grouped language arts class Increases reading instructional time for all students without compromising instruction in language arts standards. May not be necessary for large percentage of students currently at grade level on EasyCBM measures:  6 th grade, xx% at gr. level  7 th grade, xx% at gr. level  8 th grade, xx% at gr. level Possible Reading Interventions Grades 6-8

31 TWO PRONG APPROACH READING INSTRUCTION CONTENT LITERACY

32 Bethel School District Middle School Model Grouping Design Design Time Intensive Low Emerging/ Emerging Emerging/ Established Advanced Corrective Reading (Decoding A) Wilson Reading Program Language! Phonics for Reading Open Court Prentice Hall (adapted version) Reading Mastery Plus (V & VI) REWARDS (Between B2 & C) Corrective Reading (Decoding B1, B2 & C) Other Core program Open Court Prentice Hall (regular version) McDougal-Littell Glencoe REWARDS Plus Junior Great Books Novels (comprehension) (vocabulary) Fluency Decoding Short Words Phonemic Awareness (writing) Comprehension Vocabulary Fluency Decoding Long Words Writing Comprehension Vocabulary (fluency) (decoding) Writing Comprehension Vocabulary 90 – 120 mins 60 – 90 mins 45 – 60 mins ACCESS

33 SECONDARY LITERACY FRAMEWORK: A TWO PRONG APPROACH READING INSTRUCTION CONTENT LITERACY

34

35

36 SUPPORTS PRACTICES DATA Supports for Effective Implementation Data for Decision Making Practices for Student Success OUTCOMES Adapted From: Horner & Sugai

Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework Implementation of the Oregon Literacy Framework District Support for Implementation of the Oregon Literacy Framework State-Level Initiatives to Support Districts/Schools in Implementation of the Oregon Literacy Framework 37

38 SUPPORTS PRACTICES DATA Supports for Effective Implementation Data for Decision Making Practices for Student Success OUTCOMES Adapted From: Horner & Sugai Assessment Goals Commitment Instruction Leadership Professional Development