1 By Jim McCormick-Barger DOE, WTP Lead Construction Inspector Quality Challenges with the Construction of the First Large Nuclear Facility in the Past.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HEAT TRACING SPECIALIST
Advertisements

WTP Supplier Qualification Process April 19, 2005 Bechtel National, Inc. U.S. Department of Energy.
RELIABLE SUPPLIERS Supply Chain Management and Procurement policies in place Supply Chain Management and Procurement policies in place Register all suppliers.
1 EM Update and Perspective David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop April 3, 2012.
Industry's Role in Promoting Best Practices A Collaborative Approach to Food Safety Global Food Safety Policy Forum Washington DC September 16, 2011.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC Process for Approved Supplier Selection and Evaluation ASME NQA (and Addenda through 2007), Part I.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
Fire Protection Upgrades at New Brunswick Laboratory Lessons Learned on an ASME NQA-1 Design Build Project Alexander C. Smith, PE.
Supplier SQM Participation. 2 | MDT Confidential What is SQM? Stands for Supplier Quality Managment –Formally referred to as SPACE and SPICE Is a system.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Gerald Whitney Operating Experience Program Coordinator Presented May 5, 2010 DOE OEC Workshop - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory "Lessons from the.
Laboratory Personnel Dr/Ehsan Moahmen Rizk.
THE PROJECT TEAM TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT TEAM TRADITIONAL TEAM ORGANIZATION AND VARIATIONS THE OWNER’S TEAM THE DESIGN.
SLAC ES&H Overview Craig Ferguson March Operating Model ES&H Mission Critical Issues Challenges Path forward Topics October 2008.
Office of River Protection 2014 Hanford ORP Site Status Report Glen Clark, WRPS 2014 ASP Workshop September, 2014 Albuquerque, NM Glen Clark, WRPS.
Mike Scharfenstein CF Breakout - 12 November 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 ES&H Status of Construction and Technical.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
Capability Maturity Model
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Engineering Standards Working Group Annual Meeting June 24-25, 2002 DOE Nevada Support Facility June 2002 Joe B Stringer, PE Framatome ANP DE&S.
The Challenges and Lessons Learned Related to the Qualification, Selection and Monitoring of Site Contractors Tom Mudge 31st Energy & Environmental Conference.
1 Building and Maintaining Information Systems. 2 Opening Case: Yahoo! Store Allows small businesses to create their own online store – No programming.
ISM Workshop 1 Independent Oversight Perspectives Michael A. Kilpatrick Deputy Director Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance.
N By: Md Rezaul Huda Reza n
Introduction to Construction General Permit Inspections.
1 “Lessons Learned - Construction of the National Enrichment Facility” Stephen Cowne Director, Quality & Regulatory Affairs Louisiana Energy Services (LES)
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Construction Management Status Steve Sawch Assistant Director for Construction Management NSLS-II Conventional Facilities.
Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.
ISO OPERATIONAL CONTROL
Fraud Awareness Conference FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION Corey Walker Office of Program Management Sound Transit Steel Casing Product Substitution Review.
ISMS Best Practices Workshop Initial Steps to Integrate HPI into ISMS Continuous Improvement CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. September 12-13, 2006.
Avoiding Noncompliance Lori F. Hirsch Managing Counsel July 10, 2013 a.
1 Attributes of a Successful Nuclear Construction Project – A Regulator’s Perspective Victor M. McCree Deputy Regional Administrator for Operations U.S.
Ethiopian SACCO Supervision & Regulation
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
A company owned and operated by Cavendish Fluor Partnership Limited on behalf of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.
2007 ISM Workshop Session E-1 Panel Discussion on Best Practices and Lessons Learned Frank McCoy/Bill Webb.
Integrating ISMS Safety Concepts and Tools into the Design of CH2M HILL’s Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System September 12-13, 2006.
Office of River Protection 2015 Hanford ORP Site Status Report
2 William P. McNally Assistant Administrator for Procurement NASA Procurement Tenets August 4, 2008 NCMA Conference.
11 Presented by: Kevin Smith, Manager September 29, 2015 ORP’s Path to Reinvigorating Technology Development DOE National Cleanup Workshop EM Technology.
National Cleanup Workshop Managing Large Capital Projects Ken Picha Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tank Waste and Nuclear Material.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Using ISMS Principles and Functions in Developing an ARRA Readiness Review Process Presented by Linda K. Rogers Assessments & Readiness Programs Manager.
1 Construction of Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) Charting the Course for Major EM Successes in September 29, 2015 Frank.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
© 2012 Rolls-Royce plc The information in this document is the property of Rolls-Royce plc and may not be copied or communicated to a third party, or used.
1 2001: WTP Construction Began. 2 WTP in 2015 Pretreatment Facility High-Level Waste Facility Low-Activity Waste Facility Analytical Lab.
Bechtel National Inc. 1 Engineering Maintains Quality by Using Error Precursors Presented September 12, 2006 DOE Integrated Safety Management Best Practices.
Integrating EM QA Performance Metrics with Performance Analysis Processes August 26, 2009 Robert Hinds, Manager, Quality Assurance Engineering & Greg Peterson,
1 SWE 513: Software Engineering People II. 2 Future Experience What will you be doing one year from now? Ten years from now?
Bechtel National Inc. 1 Using Human Performance Analysis to Eliminate Errors Presented September 13, 2006 DOE Integrated Safety Management Best Practices.
November 15, 2007 The “ABC” of Effective Field Monitoring & Supervision November 15, 2007.
Waste Treatment Plant Project Innovation in Design The ISM Process at the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant John Hinckley August, 2009.
1 City of Shelby Wastewater Treatment Division Becomes State’s Second Public Agency to Implement a Certified Environmental Management System CERTIFICATION.
OTC Pres Project Del P5 12/08 Page 1 Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Jeff Gower, State Construction.
The Challenge of Getting What You Asked For Integrated Safety Management Summit Knoxville TN August 24-27, 2009 Presented By: Patrice McEahern HNF
Cost effective while providing customer focused solutions.
JLAB Pressure Systems Considerations Ed Daly. Outline Introduction Federal Law - 10CFR851 Compliance JLAB Pressure Systems Program –Complies with 10CFR851,
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Company Introduction & Overview
Grant Administration and Compliance ________________ Oklahoma Municipal League Conference Steve Traina, Program Director Institute for Building Technology.
INDOT Storm Water Management
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
Capability Maturity Model
Capability Maturity Model
Presentation transcript:

1 By Jim McCormick-Barger DOE, WTP Lead Construction Inspector Quality Challenges with the Construction of the First Large Nuclear Facility in the Past 10 Years

The Cleanup Challenge 53 million gallons radioactive waste 149 single-shell tanks built from double-shell tanks built from (67 presumed to have leaked)

Vitrification offers the best solution for immobilizing Hanford’s high-level radioactive waste and preventing an environmental catastrophe. The Solution: Immobilize the Waste in Glass Advantages: Proven technology – used overseas and at other DOE sites Sturdy waste form – impervious to the environment Disadvantage: Expensive – requires large facilities constructed to nuclear standards

Pretreatment Building HLW Vitrification Building LAW Vitrification Building Analytical Laboratory Hanford’s Waste Treatment Plant will be the world’s largest chemical- radioactive waste treatment plant WTP: The Cornerstone of Hanford Cleanup Pretreatment (PT) Facility Low Activity Waste (LAW) Vitrification Facility High Level Waste (HLW) Vitrification Facility Analytical Laboratory Balance of Facilities

Waste Treatment Plant Pretreatment Facility High-Level Waste Facility Low-Activity Waste Facility Lab

Challenges with Constructing New Nuclear Facilities Finding and/or developing experienced staff with “Nuclear” culture Ensuring adequate design and construction programs Finding and/or developing suppliers and sub-contractors with adequately implemented NQA-1 programs Specifying appropriate NDE during fabrication

WTP Challenges Early Design issues Installation acceptance issues Sub-Contractor and Supplier quality program problems Material quality problems

Staffing Challenges Loss of our nuclear experienced workforce Failure to rigorously follow procedures, and lack of robust programs or attention to detail “Business as usual” is not acceptable Management, staff, and craft must develop and foster a “Nuclear” culture

Nuclear Culture Enhancements Senior Management - communicate expectations and commitment to quality Training; detailed, emphasizing strict procedure compliance Knowledge of important-to-safety and authorization basis requirements Strict supervisor oversight of staff work with performance feedback process

Design and Construction Program Improvements Track unverified assumptions and design inputs; emphasize robust checking Document control must integrate field work with computer databases Standardize inspecting, accepting, and controlling completed work Centralize weld rod control programs

NDE during Fabrication Understand and fully implement NDE requirements NDE can drive quality −Tanks nozzle welds −50% rejection rate

Quality Oversight of Sub-Contractor Sub-contractors often lack NQA-1 implementation experience Requires substantial quality oversight to ensure success Conditional release for work often necessary

Supplier Challenges Many NQA-1 qualified suppliers required to support $1 billion procurement Domestic supplier capacity has substantially declined Foreign supplier QA programs generally don’t meet NQA-1 requirements

Current Supplier NQA Capabilities 60 % 128

Supplier Quality Issues QA efforts to qualify suppliers has been substantial: –QA Plan review –Onsite QA review of facilities –Periodic to full-time onsite presence Issues Identified due to lack of rigorous implementation of QA programs

Supplier Quality Issues WTP supplier quality issues to date have included failure to: –Acknowledge business-as-usual will not work –Implement their QA programs –Read, Comprehend, and implement requirements –Implement changes per requirements –Communicate requirements through organization –Flow-down requirements to supply chain

Actions to address Supplier Quality Issues Supplier Quality Oversight budget increased from $2 to $30 million Provided quality expectation road show Even with enhanced oversight, procurement problems have resulted in material delays and rework

Supplier Quality Lessons Learned Plan for early and continued quality oversight of suppliers Plan and budget for additional resources to address supplier quality Plan for overseas procurement adding even more cost to ensure quality

Supplier Quality Lessons Learned Plan for increased Commercial grade material supplier oversight Make procurement design documents understandable Ensure NDE requirements are accurately specified Verify welding programs meet requirements

Conclusion Nuclear construction presents special challenges: −Developing staff with a nuclear culture −Implementing robust quality programs −Nurturing and overseeing sub-contractor quality programs −Finding and overseeing qualified suppliers −Specifying and verifying appropriate NDE

WTP Progress Progress as of July 2005  Moved 1,555,900 cubic yards of soil  Placed 149,400 cubic yards of concrete  Installed 30,000 tons of rebar  Installed 5,417,600 pounds of embeds  Installed 172,000 feet of pipe  Installed 323,100 feet of electrical raceway  Installed 334,064 pounds of HVAC ductwork  Installed 5,500 tons of structural steel