LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R LibQUAL+: A Measurement Tool for Special Libraries? Susan Scheiberg Assistant Director, Library RAND Corporation David Shumaker Manager, Information.
Advertisements

ENQA – QAA meeting 8-9 December 2005 Birmingham, UK 9 December, – Feedback from workshop groups.
Jacqui Dowd Introduction to LibQUAL+ University of Westminster 5 th February 2010 LibQUAL+ v LibQUAL Lite at the University of Glasgow.
The CeQuInt Assessment Frameworks Axel Aerden & Maria E. Weber.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year (4-year institutions) Salisbury University Project Description of Review Process of First College.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
Role of students in quality assurance UPQUAL- Kraków
Are you Using Technology to Assess Learning or Assessing Learning to Improve Technology? Marilee J. Bresciani, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Postsecondary.
EMERSION Industry Oriented Education Model - QA System Requirements Overview Dave Carroll EMERSION Local Leader for QA, DIT Project Team School of Computing.
Assessment with LibQUAL+ ™ at the University of Vermont Vermont Library Association College and Special Libraries Section Conference April 7, 2006 Selene.
LBC Online Survey Staff Training Session. Aim of the session To ensure library staff are: well informed about the Library Survey and their role in its.
HOW CAN YOU HELP EMU TOWARDS INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION BY EUA?
Being Proactive: An Organisational Approach to Managing Workplace Stress I/O Net Presentation by Dr Hillary Bennett Director, PsychAssessments.
School Library Media Center?
1 Assessments of the Environment in the European Quality of Life Perception Surveys Klaus Trutzel German KOSIS Association Urban Audit c/o Bureau for Statistics.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
of Research Libraries Assessing Library Performance: New Measures, Methods, and Models 24 th IATUL Conference 2-5 June 2003 Ankara,
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
Commitment plus INVESTORS IN PEOPLE In association with Business Link Surrey & Surrey County Council The Investors in People Standard New Version – New.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
EQUIS STUDENT SURVEY EFMD Quality Improvement System The EFMD Accreditation for International Business Schools Equis Core-Team,
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Chapter 9 Developing an Effective Knowledge Service
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results American Library Association (ALA) Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 14, 2008 Martha Kyrillidou, Director Statistics.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
Office of Process Simplification May 20, 2009 Planning an Improvement Project.
ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.
Being The Best We Can Self-evaluation workshop Key results for Victoria’s public library services.
UNESCO-CEPES 10 September 2002 Kauko Hämäläinen, Kirsi Mustonen and Karl Holm Standards, Criteria and Indicators in Programme Accreditation and Evaluation.
CEEMAN AccreditationCape Town, CEEMAN Accreditation IQA Dr.Virginijus Kundrotas.
WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY? CEENQA WORKSHOP FRIDAY, 23 MAY 2014 Hotel Sirius-Pristina.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Electronic Resource Use Unit 1.0: Introduction.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
We are all learners: changing a school culture Tanya Thompson and Keith Jackson St Andrews Middle School.
Modernisation of Statistics Production Stockholm November 2009 Summary and Conclusions New York 24 February 2010 Mats Wadman Deputy Director General Statistics.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
1 SUPPORTING PEDAGOGICAL CHANGE IN NMR SCHOOLS PROJECT Briefing of NMR secondary schools 11 February, 2010 Jean Russell, Graeme Jane, Graham Marshall.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Jacqui Dowd LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively University of Glasgow 24 th May 2010 LibQUAL+ & LibQUAL Lite at the University of Glasgow.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND EVALUATION Part 1: Quality Assurance 1.
National Library for Health pilot Cath McCafferty Mersey Care NHS Trust.
Facilitating UFE step-by-step: a process guide for evaluators Module 4: Steps 8-12 of UFE Checklist.
Judy Beachler, Cosumnes River College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College The Accreditation Team(s)
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
How to Turn Cultural Dissimilarity in Teams into Individual Learning? Dr Yves Guillaume.
MOTIVATION AND BEHAVIOUR Student’s Name: Institution: Date:
Continuous Quality Improvement Basics Created by Michigan’s Campaign to End Homelessness Statewide Training Workgroup 2010.
LibQUAL+ TM Library Survey LIBQUAL+ “ Only customers judge quality – all other measures are irrelevant”
Institutional development and evaluation 09. June 2016.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
Reading Radar Charts.
LibQUAL+® Survey Results
Modernisation of Statistics Production Stockholm November 2009
Presentation transcript:

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB

A European Business School anno 2006 must have An International profile Accreditation (EBSLG, AACSB, ECTS etc.) To achieve international accreditation, schools must demonstrate High international standards A significant level of internationalisation The needs of the corporate world must be well integrated into programmes, activities and processes Benchmarking against other universities Ensure and improve Quality Quality Assessment Business Schools

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB A Library quality assessment not yet a demand In nordic countries service evaluation, benchmarking is on the agenda Library and research facilities plays an important role as disseminator of research achievements Libqual enables the library to benchmark its service quality overtime, and in relation to other Business School libraries It increases the service level for accreditation of the business school Quality assessment will be a demand! Quality Assessment Business School Libraries

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB Foster a culture of excellence in providing library service Help libraries better understand user perceptions of library service quality Collect and interpret library user feedback systematically over time Provide libraries with comparable assessment information from peer institutions Identify best practices in library service Enhance library staff members' analytical skills for interpreting and acting on data LibQUAL – the general idea

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB LibQUAL – development

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB 22 questions Describes 3 dimensions Demographic questions Takes 10 minutes on average The box: More than 30% adds aditional comments Focus on the result Process is fast The survey is cheap Benchmarking Check LibQUAL – 22 & a box

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB 2004: 5 Libraries from fra 4 countries (London Business School, HEC, IMD, University of St. Gallen, Aarhus School of Business) 2006: 12 Libraries from 6 countries Benchmarking between Libraries Benchmarking over time LibQUAL – Europe

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB Benchmarking Service Dimension

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB Benchmarking Information Dimension

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB Benchmarking ”Place” Dimension

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB Benchmarking – Average result ASB 2006 Desired level: What’s most important to the user Minimum level Desired level How do we do?

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB Benchmarking – Average result ASB 2004

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB Central points on the result in 2006 compared to the result in 2004 Minimum expectations have risen significantly and there has been a minor rise on desired expectations. Although percieved better in 2006, the information dimension represent a serious problem since: ·Minimum expectations have risen significantly. ·Perceived level is nearly the same ·What will happen in 2008 ?? Benchmarking ASB

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB Central points on the comments in 2006 compared to the comments in 2004 Although we had many comments on the good library service, we had some serious negative comments in  There is clearly a huge confusion concerning our information resources. Benchmarking comments (the Box) ASB

LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB Central questions to the 2008 result: Will the discussion in our teams on the ”god service – bad service” issue pay off ? (Will we eliminate the negative comments – as we did in 2004). Will we be able to minimize the confusion concerning our information resources – and get a higher evaluation on the dimension ”Information Control”. Will the major changes in the library environment result in a better evaluation on ”Library as a Place” – even though the students don’t get more space? Benchmarking ASB