WP2 -Standardization and Interoperability Christoph Waldmann MARUM, Bremen Participants: UniAbdn, IFREMER, INFN, UPC, dBScale, SEND OFFSHORE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOSS ADC Architecture Workshop Break-out summaries: Initial Operating Capability (IOC) Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey February 5,
Advertisements

GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot Water Information Services with GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium.
© GEO Secretariat Agenda Item 3. GEO UPDATE. © GEO Secretariat Membership 67 members and 43 Participating Organisations – New Members:Latvia, Moldova,
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs
Standards and Interoperability Forum: Status, Issues & Plans GEO Architecture and Data Committee Kyoto, Japan 9 February 2009 Siri-Jodha Singh Khalsa.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
Alan Edwards European Commission 5 th GEO Project Workshop London, UK 8-9 February 2011 * The views expressed in these slides may not in any circumstances.
Side 1 Mat.-nat. Fak. søndag, 20. juli 2014 Norwegian participation in EMSO - European Multidisciplinary Seafloor Observation UoT J. Mienert Det matematisk–
Slide # 1 Report to ADC AR Status Doug Nebert, POC U.S. Geological Survey.
Work Package 3 PROCEDURAL HARMONISATION FixO3 General Assembly 14 – 16 October 2014, Heraklion-CRETE George Petihakis, HCMR.
Interoperability Principles in the Global Earth Observations System of Systems (GEOSS) Presented 13 March 2006 at eGY in Boulder, CO by: Eliot Christian,
Work Package 2 / 3 TECHNOLOGIAL & PROCEDURAL HARMONISATION FixO3 General Assembly 14 th to the 16 th October 2014, Heraklion-CRETE Marc Nogueras, Universitat.
OOI CI S&A workshop 1/27/2011 PUCK protocol update Tom O’Reilly 1/27/2011.
How GEO works  Coordinating activities of Members and Participating Organisations  Supporting the development of capabilities for Observations, Processing.
Ocean Data Interoperability Platform (ODIP) ODIP Background and Prototype 1 development EGU 2014 – ESSI 2.5 Session – Vienna – Austria – 1 st May 2014.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda Item: 15 Chu ISHIDA(JAXA) on behalf of Rick Lawford, GEO Water CoP leader GEO Water.
Eric Delory European Seas Observatory Network Haga clic para modificar el estilo de subtítulo del patrón GEOSS Iteroper- ability Sensors.
EuroMarine Integration of European Marine Research Networks of Excellence General Assembly, Bremen (DE) January 18-19, 2012.
Luis Bermudez Southeastern Universities Research Association Carlos Rueda Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Moving Beyond the 10,000 Ways That Don't.
The Preparatory Phase Proposal a first draft to be discussed.
Report of the IOC Task Force on the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) Ivan DeLoatch, U.S. Geological Survey Alan Edwards, European Commission Co-chairs.
ADC Meeting ICEO Standards Working Group Steven F. Browdy, Co-Chair ADC Workshop Washington, D.C. September, 2007.
Best Practices Wiki Ruth Duerr NSIDC, IEEE Report to GEO Committees September, 2008.
Helen Glaves (NERC- BGS), Dick Schaap (MARIS), Robert Arko (LDEO) and Roger Proctor (IMOS)
1 ID-03 Science and Technology in GEOSS C1 Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation Hans-Peter Plag IEEE.
WP 9 (former Task 1b of WP 1): Data infrastructure Robert Huber UNI-HB Esonet 2nd all regions workshop, Paris
Update on WP4 and Tsunami Use Case CoopEUS annual meeting, Helsinki, September 29 – October 3, 2014 L. Beranzoli (INGV/EMSO Interim Office) M.M.R. Best.
Sophie Sergent Ifremer European Affairs Department / MariFish WP7 ERANET MariFish COORDINATION OF EUROPEAN MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH Presentation of MariFish.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
DA Sensor Web Enablement for In-Situ Observing Network Facilitation.
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs Siri Jodha S. Khalsa Steve Browdy.
IODE Ocean Data Portal – from data access to integration platform Sergey Belov, Tobias Spears, Nikolai Mikhailov International Oceanographic Data and Information.
Linking Tasks, Data, and Architecture Doug Nebert AR-09-01A May 2010.
WGISS-39, Tsukuba, Japan, May 11-15, 2015 GEO Community Portals Ken McDonald/NOAA CWIC Session, WGISS–39 May 13, 2015.
OOI CyberInfrastructure Workshop: Ocean Observation Programs Preparation Phone Meeting May 5, 2008 Alan Chave, Michael Meisinger OOI CI System Engineering.
Interoperable marine monitoring systems Toma Daniel Mihai Technical University of Catalonia Mentor: Tom O’Reilly MBARI 2010.
Suggestions for the GEOSS Workplan C. Waldmann and R. Huber MARUM, Germany.
MEDIN Work Plan for By March 2011 MEDIN will be 3 years into the original 5 year development plan started in Would normally ask for continued.
GEOSS Interoperability Workshop November 12-13, Introduction to the SIF Steven F. Browdy, IEEE
Initial Operating Capability Task Force (IOCTF) Status Briefing September 21, 2008.
ADC Portal & Clearinghouse GEO Architecture and Data Committee 2-3 March 2006 George Percivall OGC Chief Architect
SAON Data Policy, activities, services, and deliveries Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, 29 April 2013, Vancouver, Canada,
Opening Remarks Christoph Waldmann Center of Marine Environmental Sciences, MARUM Bremen, Germany.
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH Research DG European Commission Support for research infrastructures within GROWTH.
Architecture Task AR Status Presented to the July Meeting of the GEO and Architecture and Data Committee Dr. Thomas C. Adang AR Point.
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 22, 2008.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Initial Operating Capability Directions and Discussion Presented to GEO ADC Geneva May
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Implementing GEOSS architecture with-and-for Users George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium Task lead AR-09-01B.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOSSIW - November, 2008 GEOSS “Interoperability” Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
March 26-28, GEOSS Future Products Workshop Session 6 - Eye on Earth Steven F. Browdy OMS Tech, Inc. IEEE.
1 Geospatial Standards for Canada Proposed blueprint for Jean Brodeur and Cindy Mitchell.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOS - August, 2008 GEOSS Interoperability Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
5th Workshop on "SMART Cable Systems: Latest Developments and Designing the Wet Demonstrator Project" ( Dubai, UAE, April 2016) Jean-François Rolin.
QA4EO in 10 Minutes! A presentation to the 10 th GHRSST Science Team Meeting.
GEO ADC Co-Chair meeting USGS, Reston, Dec Slide # 1 AR Interface implementations for GEOSS George Percivall
CEOS Working Group on Information System and Services (WGISS) Data Access Infrastructure and Interoperability Standards Andrew Mitchell - NASA Goddard.
Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) developments for fixed monitoring platforms and research vessels By Dick M.A. Schaap – SeaDataNet Technical Coordinator with.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
Ocean Innovations 08, St Johns, NFL, Canada
Supporting quality devices
Task 2.6 Eric Delory PLOCAN
Work Package 2 TECHNOLOGICAL HARMONISATION Reporting period
Strategy for standardization of LIDO in ESONET
O3YellowPages “Open Ocean Observatories Yellow Pages – O3YP”-
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
World Cover 2017 Conference
GEOSS Future Products Workshop March 26-28, 2013 NOAA
Introduction to the WMO/OGC Hydrology Domain Working Group
Bird of Feather Session
Presentation transcript:

WP2 -Standardization and Interoperability Christoph Waldmann MARUM, Bremen Participants: UniAbdn, IFREMER, INFN, UPC, dBScale, SEND OFFSHORE Kiel University All Regions Workshop, Paris, Oct 5-7,09

OUTLINE Rationale for Standardization Scope of the workpackage on standardization Implementation of tasks

RATIONALE Why Standardization? It is essential for  System building  Sharing infrastructures and platforms  Integrating different systems  Enabling the transition from experimental to operational phase Concerns  Will it constraint the versatility/flexibility?  Will the integration be easier or more complex?

BACKGROUND Differences Operational versus Research (Parisot, OceanObs09)

RATIONALE Visions Instruments can be freely interchanged between observatories worldwide Instruments are calibrated according to agreed upon standard procedures Data quality can be checked and specified Data are described with a standard format and vocabulary Deployment, maintenance and service can be carried out by different groups

BACKGROUND Visions have to be broken down into tasks How efficient does it have to be? How broad is the range of applicability? What is the present capability?

BACKGROUND CONSTRAINTS The existing systems are an eclectic mix of what individuals and groups have brought to the table. Unlikely to change. As technology constantly changes, operators of observatory systems must be prepared to re-evaluate constantly Wunsch OceanObs09

BACKGROUND Addressing different Levels and domains Data interoperabilityData quality Standardization Service/MaintenanceIntervention

Workpackage 2- Tasks a.Sensors and Scientific packages b.Quality assurance / quality control c.Underwater intervention d.Sharing testing facilities e.Contribution to GEOSS standardization and implementation activities f.Organization of the second Best Practices Workshop g.Organization of equipment tests on cabled sites

IMPLEMENTATION Forming task teams on standards Review and test existing standards Set up links to international initiatives Active involvement in GEOSS activities

Sensor registry Plug‘n’Work sensor Sensor Registry (Sensor ML) registration dissemination Archiving, curation & control Feature Catalogue (ISO 19110) ESONET Portal Data & Services automated sensors and/or related facilites manual Instrument specifications sensor controls CO MU NITIES

Sensor Registry Users Data presentation and application layer IEEE 1451 Network Capable Processor SensorML Internet SensorML O&M GEOSSUDDI (WSDL) Ocean instruments and data ontologies SensorML O&M Ocean Observatory Owners SWE Services and Catalog 27/05/ Encapsulation- Web Services Sensor + A/D + TEDS IEEE1451 TIM OCEAN Sensor + A/D + TEDS IEEE1451 TIM SHORESIDE UW-Node OGC

OGC Interoperability Experiment Based on Web services

PUBLICATION Evaluation of MBARI PUCK protocol for interoperable ocean observatories Joaquin del Rio 1, Tom O'Reilly 2, Kent Headley 2, Duane Edgington 2, Dan Toma 1, Jesper Zedlitz 7, Frank Johnson 3, Greg Johnson 3, Eric Davis 4, Klaus Schleisiek 5, Neil Cater 4, Reo Phillips 6, Eric Delory 8, Christoph Waldman 9 1 SARTI, Technical University of Catalonia, 2 MBARI, 3 RBR, 4 Fisheries and Marine Institute of Memorial University of Newfoundland, 5 SEND, 6 AXYS, 7 Kiel University, 8 dBScale, 9 MARUM STANDARD EVALUATION

Come up with a framework document for all standard related documentation 1. Subcontractor/Manufacturer Equipment 2. Design and Technology Reviews 3. Reliability Engineering 4. High Level Test Plan 5. Risk Analysis 6. Documentation Control 7. Data flagging model QUALITY PLAN

Review of common or shared procedures Review offshore standard evaluation and define a recommendation for marine science observatory intervention Design recommendations for training, simulation and testing – Underwater intervention on scientific permanent observatories – Draft document in progress – Standards and recommended practices for underwater intervention and structures interfaces in the Offshore industry UNDERWATER INTERVENTION

To organise the sharing of sea going equipments and testing facilities To launch common practices To set up a data base of land based testing facilities and promote the shared use of them To promote the constitution of teams on specific subjects for sharing technical and methodological expertise in view of developing common practices SHARING TESTING FACILITIES

Contribution to GEOSS standardisation and implementation activities WebPortal Registries  Services  Standards  Best Practices  Requirements Clearinghouse GEOSS Common Infrastructure

Contributing with data and concepts Use of GEO progress in regard to standardization and interoperability aspects Participation in GEOSS workshops and contribution to working groups created by GEOSS supporting organizations Dissemination of GEOSS concepts within ESONET and other workshops Contribution to GEOSS standardisation and implementation activities

Session on EGU General Assembly, April 2010 Towards establishing permanent infrastructures for ocean observations: instrumentation, measurement strategies and methods for ocean observatories Convener: C. Waldmann, MARUM Co-Conveners: I. Puillat-Felix, IFREMER L. Beranzoli, INGV R. Stephen, WHOI DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES

MARTECH Workshop Nov 09, Barcelona Demonstration of smart sensor concepts DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES

GEOSS Workshop XXVII Understanding the Integrated Ocean Observation Systems, including Sub-surface Sensors DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES

GEOSS Workshop XXVII - Conclusions DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES GEO should help with the formulation of an ocean community of practice GEO should support intergovernmental formalization of interoperability and coordination of an operational mission for ocean observations. This could include coordinated funding GEO support is requested for Identification and coordination of societal benefits from ocean data.

Main Workshop Themes Generic Instrumentation Biochemical and acoustic sensors Infrastructure Stand- alone and cabled observatories Standardisation and Interoperability Data processing, smart sensors, and underwater intervention 2 nd BEST PRACTICES WORKSHOP

Organization of equipment tests on cabled sites with training activities Tests of observatory equipments will be organised to teach and demonstrate the use of equipments dedicated to long term immersion for real time measurements to demonstrate the procedures of measurements, underwater interventions etc Equipment tests on cabled sites

Establish an international standard implementation committee for ocean observatories? Food for thoughts

Anne Holford, Aberdeen University IFREMER Yves Auffret, Jean- Francois Drogou, Jerome Blandin, Jean Marvaldi Antoni Manuel, Joaquin Del Rio, UPC Eric Delory, dbScale Klaus Schleisiek, SEND Offshore Jesper Zedlitz, Kiel University Mario Musumeci, INFN Robert Huber, Uwe Schindler, Christoph Waldmann, MARUM Tom O’Reilly, MBARI, USA Standardization Group