ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
PORTFOLIO.
Campus Improvement Plans
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
BENGKEL PERSEDIAAN AUDIT PEMATUHAN & OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
Malaysian Qualifications Agency
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Purpose of the Standards
What should be the basis of
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
 Supporting excellence in assessment  Encouraging professional development for individuals involved in assessment  Disseminating good practice  Proving.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Strategic, Annual Performance & Operational Planning Process
Diploma in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
PLACE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ENHANCEMENT OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF MAKERERE UNIVERSITY BY SAM LUBOGA ACTING DIRECTOR QUALITY ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE 9/23/20151.
SESSION 2 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.
Shaping Society APMR Briefing Zulkefli Bin Mansor Pusat Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Program Akademik Bahagian Hal Ehwal Akademik.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
Quality Assurance – European Standards and Guidelines.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
Edita Trečiokienė Grundtvig 3: Grants to Participate in Adult Education Training Activities The Quality of Training Activities applied for and possible.
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
1 ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT AREA 4, 5 AND 6 Prepared by: WAN ARIF BIN WAN AHMAD EXAM & RECORD DEPARTMENT ِ
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
SESSION 4 EVALUATING FOR FULL ACCREDITATION USING COPPA EVALUATION INSTRUMENT 1.
© 2008, Tod O' Dot Productions EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY – ENTERPRISE COOPERATION NETWORK Socrates Erasmus Programme Project No: Ref LLP
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education CAS Standards and Self- Assessment in Higher Education Tony Ellis, CAE Director of Education,
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Quality and Standards An introduction.
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
February 21-22, 2018.
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department

THE STANDARDS – Benchmarked and Enhanced GUIDELINES ON THE STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR THE NINE AREAS OF EVALUATION FOR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT 1. Vision, Mission, Educational Goals and Learning Outcomes 2. Curriculum Design and Delivery 3. Assessment of Students 4. Student Selection and Support Services 5. Academic Staff 6. Educational Resources 7. Programme Monitoring and Review 8. Leadership, Governance and Administration 9. Continual Quality Improvement 2

3 Standards that must be met and its compliance demonstrated are usually expressed as a ‘must’ Benchmarked Standards Standards that should be met as the institution strives to improve itself and usually expressed as a ‘should’ Enhanced Standards

Guides the higher education provider (HEP) in its academic planning and implementation and Produce graduates through : the provision of knowledge, skills, a quest for life long learning, and inculcation of values, and nurturing of the ability to analyze and solve problems and consideration of other relevant issues 4

5 HEP’S VISION,MISSI ON, EDUCATIONAL GOALS, & LEARNING OUTCOMES GOALS Must reflect the crucial elements of the processes and outcomes in line with national and global developments Must be approved by governing board Must be disseminated to its internal and external stakeholders Should encompass leadership qualities in areas of social responsibilities, research, ethical values, professionalism & knowledge creation Should demonstrate its planning & evaluation processes, progs, support services, financial & physical resources & administrative processes are adequate Must formulate educational goals consistent with it’s vision & mission

6

7

8

9

10 The Curriculum should encourage multi-disciplinary approaches to enhance personal development of students The needs analysis should involve external sources feedback Co-curricular activities should be there to enrich student experience The Curriculum should encourage multi-disciplinary approaches to enhance personal development of students The needs analysis should involve external sources feedback Co-curricular activities should be there to enrich student experience must have its defined process for curriculum establishment, review and evaluation The Programme must only be considered after a needs assessment has indicate d there is a need for them to be conducted must be considered only after resources to support it identified Aims and objectives of all programmes must be consistent with the HEP vision and mission The Programme Content, approach & T-L Methods must be appropriate, consistent, and support the achievement of programme learning outcomes Teaching-learning activities must be consistent with the curriculum must be a variety of T-L methods in order to achieve the eight domains of learning outcomes

11

12 The Students must : be provided with the most current written information of programme aims, out-line, learning outcomes and assessment methods The Programme must : have a coordinator and a team of appropriate academic staff have authority and established procedures for planning & monitoring be given adequate resources for implementation and evaluation for quality improvement The Programme Content & Delivery must be regularly reviewed and evaluated and its results utilised to assure quality (must involve external examiners – for MQF level 6 and abov e ) The Students The Programme Team The Programme

The Department must provide the student a conducive learning environment where scholarly and creative achievements are nurtured Innovations to teaching and learning should be continously developed, supported and evaluated and done in consultation with principal stakeholders and Review and evaluation involve external expertise nationally and internationally 13

The HEP must have linkages with all external stakeholders at the local, national, regional or global levels for the purpose of curriculum development - planning, implementation and review The Programme team should obtain feedback from employers for curriculum improvement, student placement, training and workplace exposure Students should be given the opportunity to develop linkages with external stakeholders 14

AREA 3 – ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS It is a crucial aspect of quality assurance and One of the most important measures to show the achievement of learning outcomes. 15

Assessment principles, methods and practices must be aligned with learning outcomes and programme content Assessment must be consistent with the levels defined in the MQF, 8 domains of learning outcomes and programme standards Assessment The link between assessment and learning outcomes should be reviewed periodically to ensure its effectiveness Assessment & Learning Outcomes Area 3.1- Relationship between Assessment and Learning 16

17 Frequency, methods, & criteria of student assessment must be documented and communicated to students on commencement of the programme Assessment must be summative and formative a variety of methods and tools must be used to assess learning outcomes Mechanisms must be there to ensure validity, reliability, consistency and fairness of assessment methods

18 Assessment System must be reviewed periodically Methods of Assessment should be comparable to international best practices Review of Assessment System should be done in consultation with external experts, both local and international

19 - must be communicated within reasonable time Student assessment results - must follow established procedures and regulations -changes must be communicated to students prior implementation Student assessment methods -must be there to ensure security of assessment documents and records Mechanisms - policies and practices must be publicised Grading, assessment and appeals

The department and its academic staff must have sufficient autonomy in management of student assessment Independent external scrutiny should be there to evaluate and improve the student assessment management – formal certification of the processes 20

21