Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In-Situ Remediation at Silver Lake Region 4 Hazardous Materials Geo/Bridge/Environmental Unit.
Advertisements

Home with an Underground Heating Oil Tank (UST) Solutions for your Leaking Heating Oil Tank.
Home Heating Oil Tank Presentation by Greg Babcock Universal Applicators, Inc. Version
By Chris Ford and James Hughes ( ) ( )
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Environmental Protection Commission Overview Vision: Environmental Excellence in a Changing World.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
AHMET UCANOK JOHN E. ELVIS Pump and Treat of Contaminated Groundwater at the United Chrome Superfund Site Corvallis, Oregon.
Biodegradation and Natural Attenuation
1 Brave New World Emerging Tools for NAPL Remediation Jim Cummings Technology Innovation Office/USEPA Chicago, Illinois Dec 2002.
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
B EMIDJI C RUDE O IL S PILL Darren Cartwright Stephen Toone.
“GAS MART” petroleum facility in Florida By: Ernest Twum-Barimah Zhengzhong Fang (John) Zhengzhong Fang (John)
Clean-up at BP Paulsboro New Jersey (USA) Roxane Fisher and Mark Ferguson.
Green Remediation An Overview of the State of the Practice
Fate and Transport of Chemicals A Presentation by Terrie Boguski Technical Outreach Services for Communities (TOSC) Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Hazardous.
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Sean Bushart- EPRI Karen Kim- EPRI NRC RIC Conference-
Employee Presentation p 1
1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
Scott Surovchak Rocky Flats Site Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Cleanup and Remedy Implementation at the Rocky.
LOGO Feasibility Test of Applying Complex Remediation Technology for Diesel Contamination in Soil and Groundwater 2012 International Conference on Environmental.
Prioritize Contaminated Sites With a Known Release and a Pathway That Poses the Greatest Threat of Exposure  Pathways to surface water Freshwater wetlands,
Solid Waste Laws. Federal Legislation RCRA (1976)- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) CERCLA (1980) –The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
RBES Guiding Principles The Department will comply with the requirements of the nation’s environmental laws and regulations. However, the requirement to.
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Institutional Controls Featuring the Pinellas Site Jack Craig U.S. Department of Energy Office of.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site August 20, 2013.
Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda April 25, 2013, MassDEP, One Winter Street Boston.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Pesticides Using Shallow Soil Mixing The world’s leading sustainability consultancy.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
The Contaminated Sites Cleanup Process (18 AAC 75)
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
1 Monitored Natural Attenuation. 2 Natural Attenuation CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF ENHANCED ATTENUATION NATURAL ATTENUATION PROCESSES Physical Attenuation.
HANNAH WALKER RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
Greener Cleanups in the Region 10 PCB Program Michelle, Mullin R10 PCB Coordinator Clu-In Webinar November 17, 2015.
Fractured Rock Sites –Challenges and Significance for the Superfund Program EPA Fractured Rock Workshop John Prince EPA Region 2 Remedy Selection/Design.
Evaluating the Practicality of LNAPL Recovery Jeff Lane, P.G. November 17, 2015 International Petroleum Environmental Conference (IPEC) IPEC 22 Contact.
Environmental Regulation.  Complex set of laws  Constantly changing  Cover: Release, treatment, storage and disposal of Hazardous materials Into air,
Feasibility Study Workplan Park – Euclid RP Group Community Advisory Board Meeting May 23, 2013.
Release Reporting. How Do I Know If I Have a Leak in My UST System? 1. Unusual operating conditions; such as, erratic behavior of the dispensing pump.
GO C3Analyze and Evaluate Mechanisms Affecting the Distribution of Potentially Harmful Substances within an Environment. Transport of Materials Through.
Long-Term Management of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater – Iwilei District, Honolulu April 16, 2015.
1 Groundwater Pollution GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation.
Green Remediation through Optimization Douglas Sutton, PhD, PE Tetra Tech GEO April 4, 2011.
Groundwater Pollution
Melissa Boggs California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Office of Spill Prevention and Response.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
Omaha Riverfront Redevelopment Project Brownfields 2004 C. Dale Jacobson, P.E., DEE.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Dry Cleaning and the Environment
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Cover Slide TCEQ logo.
General Principles for Hydrocarbon Vapor Intrusion
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Timothy Veatch, Section Chief
Environmental Risk Management & Economic Development
Branch Organization Chuck Mueller, Branch Chief
A&WMA Regulatory Conference Symposium UST Risk Based Corrective Action
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
the path less traveled Termination of Post Closure Care
Presentation transcript:

Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Quality Counsel Petroleum Tank Release Fund Subcommittee Meeting June 4, 2008

Agenda Science of a Petroleum Cleanup Monitored Natural Attenuation –Science Behind MNA –Implementation Issues Risk - Based Corrective Action Long-Term Monitoring

Science Behind Petroleum Release Cleanup

GROUNDWATER PRODUCT SMEAR ZONE DISSOLVED CONTAMINATION EXPANDING PLUME FLOATING FREE PRODUCT

GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATIONS BELOW DEQ-7 STANDARDS CONCENTRATIONS EXCEED DEQ-7 STANDARDS ,000 mg/kg (parts per million) µg/liter (parts per billion)

GROUNDWATER PRODUCT SMEAR ZONE DISSOLVED CONTAMINATION CLEAN FILL TANK SYSTEM REMOVED FLOATING FREE PRODUCT

GROUNDWATER PRODUCT SMEAR ZONE DISSOLVED CONTAMINATION CLEAN FILL STEADY STATE STABLE OR SHRINKING TANK SYSTEM REMOVED FLOATING FREE PRODUCT CONTAMINATED SOIL CONTINUES TO LEACH INTO GROUNDWATER

GROUNDWATER PRODUCT SMEAR ZONE DISSOLVED CONTAMINATION CLEAN FILL STEADY STATE STABLE OR SHRINKING TANK SYSTEM REMOVED Sorption Diffusion Dispersion Volatilization Bio-degradation Natural Attenuation Mechanisms

GROUNDWATER PRODUCT SMEAR ZONE DISSOLVED CONTAMINATION CLEAN FILL STEADY STATE STABLE OR SHRINKING TANK SYSTEM REMOVED FLOATING FREE PRODUCT

GROUNDWATER PRODUCT SMEAR ZONE DISSOLVED CONTAMINATION CLEAN FILL SOURCE REMOVAL (EXCAVATION) PLUME SHRINKS BACK FLOATING FREE PRODUCT

GROUNDWATER PRODUCT SMEAR ZONE DISSOLVED CONTAMINATION CLEAN FILL SOURCE REMOVAL (EXCAVATION) NEW “STEADY STATE” (SLOW SHRINK BACK) FLOATING FREE PRODUCT

GROUNDWATER PRODUCT SMEAR ZONE DISSOLVED CONTAMINATION BELOW DEQ-7 STANDARDS CLEAN FILL SOURCE REMOVAL (EXCAVATION)

GROUNDWATER PRODUCT SMEAR ZONE DISSOLVED CONTAMINATION BELOW DEQ-7 STANDARDS CLEAN FILL SOURCE REMOVAL (EXCAVATION) SITE CLOSED

Natural Attenuation A reduction in the concentration and mass of a substance in groundwater, due to naturally occurring physical, chemical, and biological processes without human intervention or enhancement.

Monitored Natural Attenuation Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) The reliance on natural attenuation processes (within the context of a carefully controlled and monitored site cleanup approach) to achieve site-specific remediation objectives within a time frame that is reasonable compared to other more active methods.

GROUNDWATER CLEAN FILL MONITORINGWELLS

MNA Implementation Issues

U.S. Environmental Projection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Guidance P, April 21, 1999 Use of Monitored Natural Attenuation at Superfund, RCRA Corrective Action, and Underground Storage Tank Sites

Not a Presumptive Remedy Thorough Site Characterization Source Control Remove Free Product Performance Monitoring Contingency Remedies Reasonable Timeframe Compared to other methods Institutional Controls Implementation Issues

Other Issues Vapor Intrusion Utility Impacts Risks to Construction Workers

VAPORS EMINATING FROM DISSOLVED AND FREE PRODUCT BURIED WATER LINE PERMEATION OF PIPE PERMEATION OF PIPE MIGRATION ALONG TRENCH MIGRATION ALONG TRENCH CONSTRUCTION WORKER VAPORINTRUSION

MNA Wrap-Up MNA is not applicable where human receptors are at risk. Source removal is critical. Long-term monitoring will likely be required after source removal. Source area soils cannot always be fully removed. Closure requires DEQ-7 Standards.

Minimal Source Removal Very long cleanup time up to 100 years or more… in tight clay-type soils. Significant Source Removal Reduced cleanup time down to 10 years … in tight clay-type soils. Low – Permeability Clay Soil Low – Permeability Clay Soil NATURAL ATTENUATION PROCESSES EXIST AT ALL SITES MNA can be used as a stand-alone cleanup strategy, but is typically combined with other technologies (source removal).

MNA Questions? (RISK - BASED CORRECTIVE ACTION DISCUSSION -- NEXT)

Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA)

GROUNDWATER BURRIED WATER LINE DRINKING WATER POTENTIAL HUMAN RECEPTORS VAPORS GROUNDWATER IS AN ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTOR

GROUNDWATER DISSOLVED CONTAMINATION BELOW DEQ-7 STANDARDS MONTANA RBCA ADDRESSES GROUNDWATER AS A RECEPTOR

Long-Term Monitoring A method of managing release sites remaining above cleanup standards for a long period of time. LTM generally follows MNA protocols

Long-Term Monitoring A site-specific monitoring schedule selected by DEQ where groundwater is sampled on a frequency of 1 to 3 years, that ensures the plume is stable and shrinking and there is minimal risk to potential receptors.

Long-Term Monitoring Typically implemented following active cleanup Dissolved groundwater plume fully defined Low risk to all Current and Potential Receptors Establish Attenuation Curve (shrinking plume) Reduce Monitoring (least expensive option)

GROUNDWATER CLEAN FILL MONITORINGWELLS

Long-Term Monitoring 4414 Total Release Sites 2708 Release Sites Closed 1706 Releases Sites Open 134 Release Sites Still in LTM 89Annual Schedule 24 Every 2 years 3Every 3 years 18Other Schedule 14Monitoring 1 well 14Monitoring 2 wells

CONCLUSIONS Source removal is critical. Source area soils cannot always be removed. Closure requires DEQ-7 Standards. Long-term monitoring will likely be required at sites with tight soil, even after source removal. Reduced monitoring protects human health and the public while limiting ongoing costs.

Questions?