Idaho Instructional Management System Idaho State Department of Education August 2, 2011.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Goals of Workshop District Education Technology Plan Goals 8 goals aligned to State/National Education Technology Plans Strategies to meet challenges.

Advertisements

Page 1 Service Organization Overview October, 2006 Oakland Unified School District Redesign Oakland Unified School District.

“The Primary Goal of the Cleveland Metropolitan School District is to become a premier school district in the United States of America.” The Cleveland.

LUSD 21st Century Technology PresentationPage 1 21 st Century Technology in the Classroom A Presentation to the Board of Education Prepared by Facilities.

From Old Forge School District to Altoona, from the School District of Philadelphia to Tioga County – all across this great Commonwealth, school districts.

ISEE Phase 2 Idaho State Department of Education August 2, 2011 Instructional Management System.

John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.

7 Accountability Getting clear about what you want to accomplish with technology How will you measure its use? How will you communicate its effects?

Pinellas - TNTP Project ESE Advisory Meeting September 17, 2014.

Local Mentor Plan South Brunswick Schools September 2005 South Brunswick Schools September 2005.

Apangea Learning State of Idaho Annual Superintendent’s Meeting Rob Austin, Vice President of Sales & Services Glen Zollman, Idaho Account Manager.

Background 2Achieve | 2013 Closing the Expectations Gap  This is the eighth year that Achieve has surveyed all 50 states and reported on state progress.

Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,

USHCA Overview Urban Schools Human Capital Academy April 2013.

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Enhancing Education through Technology Grant: Improving Instruction Through Regional Data Initiatives.

Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.

VERONA PUBLIC SCHOOLS STRATEGIC PLAN REVIEW & ANNUAL GOAL SETTING JULY 2015 VERONA PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

Currituck County Schools “READY, Set, Go-ing to be a Great year!” Convocation

Students Come First Big Picture.

Measuring Child Outcomes Kentucky and Massachusetts Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Meeting Baltimore August 27, 2007.

Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.

Principal Professional Development September 26, SUSD Common Core PD 2013.

PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.

The Portfolio Strategy What is the “portfolio strategy?” Why are some school systems attracted to it? Is the portfolio strategy improving student achievement?

Race To The Top (RttT) MSDE Division of Accountability and Assessment Data Systems (DAADS) Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation Three Years in a Row.

DSCYF CCSS Implementation Plan August 19 th & 20 th, 2015.

1:1 Computing Initiative RttT Fidelity Check Spring 2013.

Write To Learn Stephanie Needham J Glenn Edwards Elementary/ Lee County Schools April 25, A Race to the Top Initiative.

Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.

Secondary Teacher Education and Professional Training (STEP T) for English Language Learners (ELLs) National Professional Development Program 2007:

Ranada Smith Lamar University Conroe ISD Technology Plan

Lawrence M. Paska, Ph.D. Coordinator of Technology Policy Educational Design and Technology Updates.

Scaling Integration: A Vision for Collaboration across the SLV BOCES Curtis Garcia.

Educator Effectiveness Evaluation MERA Fall 2013 Conference November 25-26, 2013 Frankenmuth, Michigan.

Administrator Technology Interview STaR Chart Survey Jason Wiertel Integrating Technology Across the Curriculum.

Region 6 Fall Meeting Concord, North Carolina November 24, 2014.

Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Project MAX Maximizing Access and Learning Managing and Sustaining.

Presented to: [District] Staff DATE RECOGNIZING EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]

The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.

Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.

The Infrastructure The Curriculum Technology Champions Technology Instruction The Vision…The Goals.

Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.

Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.

By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.

Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.

SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.

THEN NOW  Historic approach had been to pull groups of teachers together for whole group/single topic discussions. ◦ District level determination.

UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.

Solution-tree.com. How Effective PLCs Can Create Transformative Momentum Wylie ISD Kerry Gain, Director of Secondary Curriculum Joei Shermer, Director.

Created By: Erin McAlister Christiana Elder Sherene Mayner Freddie Martinez.

Turning Around Chronically Low- Performing Schools Nelson Colbert, Science Instructional Specialist Richmond Public Schools Richmond, VA.

Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.

1 Where does our IMS fit in? Aligning Data Tools to User Needs Researchers Ease of Use Timeliness AnnualDaily Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular De-identified,

KIDS GRANT. The Grant Department of Education Technology Innovation Challenge Grant Classroom technology integration Key Instructional Design Strategies.

ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.

Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.

State Board of Education Presentation November 17, 2015.

Advanced Classroom Technology State funding for implementing technology Professional development for 21 st Century Classrooms One-to-One Mobile Devices.

Public School Forum August 2015 Board Meeting Jeni Corn Friday Institute for Educational Innovation, NC State University Prepared for the NC State Board.

CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.

Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.

Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.

Welcome to Home Base You can also re-emphasize that all of these benefits can be found using one login all in one place, saving teachers more time to focus.

District of Innovation Update: International School Development

RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE

Vision for Personalized Learning

Measuring College and Career Readiness

For: AP Solis Middle School Donna ISD, Texas By: Kari Knisely

Welcome to the NJTSS Early Reading Project!

Presentation transcript:

Idaho Instructional Management System Idaho State Department of Education August 2, 2011

Idaho Instructional Management System What is an Instructional Management System? Helps educators maximize planning and instructional time. Provides access to information that identifies instructional needs (down to the student level) Can be used to create formative assessments and real time student outcome data Aligns content standards, instructional resources, digital content and formative assessments Has the reporting capability that allows for data driven decisions

Idaho Instructional Management System Helping Teachers, Administrators & Students Helping teachers, administrators, and parents use technology to improve student achievement. Offering tools to maximize instructors’ time. Setting goals and providing access to reports, materials, and resources aligned to goals. High-lighting student achievement for teachers and administrators

Idaho Instructional Management System Mastery reporting, differentiation & item analysis

Idaho Instructional Management System Funding Classroom technology Wireless to high schools Digital Content (yrs 3+) Administrator PD Teacher PD Support Schoolnet software suite District grants Teacher incentives Data leads Digital content (yrs 1,2) Infrastructure Schoolnet deployment is being funding by a federal grant and the J. A. and Kathryn Albertson Foundation SCF will fund system maintenance in year four and beyond

Idaho Instructional Management System Why Best fit across state stakeholders, by role and district size – Advisory Group recommendation Compared to other vendors Most complete and easy to use solution District may purchase other systems ?

Idaho Instructional Management System Schoolnet Deployment Strategy Baseline: Enhance Statewide Schoolnet functionality Pilots: Refine deployment plan through pilot group Measuring Success: Establish metrics Grants: Focus subsequent resources on those districts with the capacity and commitment to adopt Schoolnet

Idaho Instructional Management System Statewide Schoolnet-Baseline Spring ISAT results Standards-deconstructed Key Performance Indicators Digital Content Blended online/in-person PD approach Fall 2011

Idaho Instructional Management System Pilots Five districts Schoolnet IMS – Online assessment management/delivery – Online instructional materials – Student data reporting Live professional development/training Fall 2011

Idaho Instructional Management System Planned Pilot Outcomes Develop and share promising practices Create online assessment items for sharing between Idaho districts Collect feedback to refine adoption and deployment strategies

Idaho Instructional Management System Grant Based Cohorts Cohorts developed through grant application process – Readiness to support deployment and training – Commitment and capacity – Classroom technology – ISEE data loads Selections in Spring 2012

Idaho Instructional Management System Results from Systems Approach

Idaho Instructional Management System Districts Using Schoolnet Northside ISD (TX) Virginia Beach City Public Schools (VA) Corpus Christi SD (TX) Denver SD (CO) Colorado Springs SD (CO) Harlandale ISD (TX) Inglewood SD (CA) Baltimore City (MD) McKinney SD (TX) Newark SD (NJ) Austin ISD (TX) Atlanta Public Schools (GA) Philadelphia SD (PN) Chicago SD (IL) Manassas SD (VA) Wichita Public Schools (KS) Dekalb ISD (GA) Guiderland Central SD (NY) Dallas ISD (TX) Columbus Public Schools (OH) Albemarle County Public Schools (VA) Goose Creek ISD (TX)

Idaho Instructional Management System Next Steps Fall 2011-Enhanced statewide system – Standards, digital content – Online PD Fall 2011-Pilot district deployment – System access Curriculum management, assessments, reporting May 2012-Second cohort of system announced