WITSML Use Cases Calgary Workshop April 2004. Use Cases / Practical Implementations of WITSML Where are we now ? Different drivers in different Operators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborating to develop data exchange standards Stewart Robinson DECC UK NDR9 NDR 9 – Breakout session 1.
Advertisements

DRM P-CM Roadmap V5_MCS Change Control: Rolling updates for Taxonomy, Adjusting Training, Technology, DRM Process, Facilities 5. Design Change Controls.
SPE WITSML: Technology to Business (T2B) for the Oilfield J
Completion Object Overview June 2013 WITSML/PRODML Standards.
Evolution 1. WITSML Life Cycle Timeline Years Version 1.0 Version 1.1 Version 1.2 Version
WITSML Office Aggregrator
Global Real Time More Efficiency. More Possibilities and.
Overview 1. 2 WITSML Special Interest Group Members A set of Data Exchange and Web Services Standards First published in 2001 Version 1.4 due in Q3 50+
1 General Well Message Operations Report Real Time Wellbore Wellbore Geometry Risk Directional Drilling Systems Tubular / Bit Record BHA Run Fluids Systems.
Best Cost-Effective Technology Independent and Neutral Company 24/7 Worldwide Technical Support MARCH 2011 TECHNICAL UPDATE The independent.
Speaker Introduction John Shields Software Projects Manager, Baker Hughes, Aberdeen 30 years working for Baker Hughes 30 years working for Baker Hughes.
Schlumberger Update Nigel Deeks Real Time Technology Manager
Systems Analysis And Design © Systems Analysis And Design © V. Rajaraman MODULE 14 CASE TOOLS Learning Units 14.1 CASE tools and their importance 14.2.
Chapter 2 Introduction to Requirements Management
SPE Wellsite Information Transfer Standard Markup Language, WITSML, an Update M.A Kirkman, SPE, BP; M.E. Symmonds, SPE, Schlumberger; S.W. Harbinson,
The rSmart Group Kuali Days Successful Financial System Implementation Indianapolis April 11,
Today’s Agenda 9:00 Welcome Sheldon Harbinson, Landmark and Matthew Kirkman, BP 9:15 Overview & Update Alan Doniger, POSC 9:30 Oil Companies & IADC.
Wellsite Information Transfer Standard Markup Language, WITSML, an Introduction Alan Doniger, POSC November 2004.
Technical Team WITSML SIG Paris 16 May Technical Team Representatives mainly from service companies Energistics (Gary) keep a global issue list.
INTEQ Answers While Drilling SM John Shields Director of Software Baker Atlas/INTEQ Houston, TX.
Wellsite Information Transfer Standard Markup Language (WITSML), An Introduction and Update Alan Doniger, POSC April 2005.
GEOLOGY to your DESKTOP TM Chris Jacobson. Talk Topics Common historical data and workflows Mudlog object coverage for wellsite and operations geology.
WITSML at the Wellsite.
WITSML an update Calgary Workshop April Introduction Vision Reflection Motivation Achievements Activities Plans Expectations Alignment.
Baker Hughes & WITSML John Shields Software Projects Manager Baker Hughes Aberdeen.
Classification: Statoil internal Status: Draft
LAS To WITSML Conversion Utility Presented at POSC Regional SIG meeting Stavanger, June 2006 by POSC & Satyam Computer Services Ltd.
Principles of Information Systems, Sixth Edition Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
WITSML Meeting Houston, May 15, 2008 WITSML end to end implementation: Results and way forwards at Total Raphael Henri-Bally, Total Geosciences IT systems.
© Copyright 2005 POSC 2005 Standards Program Updates Alan Doniger, POSC November 2, th Annual Member Meeting & Conference.
U.S. Industry Interests in ITER Presented at the FPA Annual Meeting 19 November 2003 Bob Iotti.
 Copyright 2001 Perot Systems Europe. All rights reserved Systems Integration and EAI.
Energistics Asia South Region Meeting: (Drilling) WITSML SIG Update New Delhi, IndiaAlan Doniger 14 January 2007Chief Technology Officer Le M▲ridien New.
Shell Exploration & Production Copyright: Shell Exploration & Production Ltd. 6/5/2016 File Title Shell taking the next step with WITSML May 2008 Update.
WITSML Public Seminar and Vendor Exhibition: Welcome Alan Doniger, Energistics CTO May 28, 2009.
Welcome to the WITSML Public Seminar and Vendor Exhibition Paris, France 16 May 2007 Sponsored by Total.
This solution sees the WITSML server located in the company DMZ, which is probably in the same physical location as the operations offices (but may not.
WITSML Success & Progress David C. Johnson Product Manager (WITSML) Halliburton/Landmark.
© Copyright 2005 POSC POSC WITSML™ SIG Overview John Turvill, Paradigm November 2005 POSC AGM.
WITSML™ Drilling Standards Pemex 21 August 2008 Ciudad de México Alan Doniger, Energistics.
WITSML Technical Team Update Houston May Technical Team Responsible for technical content of WITSML standard XML Schemas XML Schemas Application.
Samit Sengupta Geologix Ltd.
CASE (Computer-Aided Software Engineering) Tools Software that is used to support software process activities. Provides software process support by:- –
© 2004 Weatherford. All rights reserved. Thomas Koithan Engineering Project Supervisor Software Development April 29, 2004 WITSML Approach © 2004 Weatherford.
Geology to your Desktop TM C. Jacobson Geologix. The Mudlog Object Lithology Accessories Lithology Attributes Lithology Descriptions Formation Tops Chronostratigraphy.
Using WITSML to deliver value in BP Presentation to public meeting 16 th May 2007 Dr Julian Pickering, Domain Lead Drilling & Completions BP Research.
Foundational Program Overview September  2004 Copyright RosettaNet. RosettaNet Foundational Programs Program Overview ProgramPhase InvestigateDesignImplement.
Baker Hughes & WITSML WITSML Conference – Houston, May 2005
Robert Aydelotte ExxonMobil - Upstream Technical Computing 13 May 2004 Standardizing Fluid Property Reporting.
GEO Software & Chris Jacobson
© 2007 Petrolink International WITSML vs WITS – at the Wellsite 16 th May, 2007.
WITSML SIG Area of Interest –the definition, movement, and storage of drilling data, information, and knowledge, especially the “right time” seamless flow.
1 Pioneer Investments Legal and Compliance System Assessment Weekly Status Update June 23, 2005.
e&pdct Using WITSML to deliver enhanced D&C performance in BP Presentation to public meeting 19/10/06 Julian Pickering, Domain Lead Drilling & Completions.
Strategy Summary Steering Committee. Discussion Discussion around and adoption –Sharing test results –Shorten deployment time –Build use cases.
© ChevronTexaco 2001 DOC ID ETC/Technical Computing Well Schematic & Completions WITSML SIG April 28-29,2004 Danny Bush.
1 Future Consideration for WITSML from Total Products should migrate to the same version of WITSML Need provisions for backup in case of system failure.
On the Rocks. Who am I and What do Geologix do? I am a Geologist Geologix make software and provide solutions for: – Wellsite Geologists – Operations.
PRODML Roadmap Energistics 2 nd Annual Standards Summit 2 November 07 Laurence Ormerod, Weatherford.
DSS SIG Area of Interest –the definition, movement, and storage of E&P data, information, and knowledge. –This group is essentially a cross-vendor, cross-product.
1 Options Clearing Corporation Encore Data Distribution Services April 22, 2004.
DSS SIG Area of Interest –the definition, movement, and storage of E&P data, information, and knowledge. –This group is essentially a cross-vendor, cross-product.
© Copyright 2006 POSC Integrated Operations (Production) SIG Meeting Alan Doniger, POSC May 12, 2006 Houston, Texas.
POSC WITSML™ Public Seminar and Exhibition
Computer Aided Software Engineering (CASE)
Mudlog Object - Pilot Samit Sengupta.
Julian Pickering, Domain Lead Drilling & Completions
Project Charter <Project Name>
Completion Object Overview
<WITSML/> on the Rocks
Presentation transcript:

WITSML Use Cases Calgary Workshop April 2004

Use Cases / Practical Implementations of WITSML Where are we now ? Different drivers in different Operators –In BP, still mainly driven by LWD data applications –About to pilot real time Torque and Drag applications (Available from service contractors for some years) but in an application independently of data acquisition contractors –Geographically in use in Norway, UK, Trinidad and Azerbaijan Still need to get contextual data flows up and running. Push into new areas ?

“Real Time” A successful, but limited implementation, focussed around LWD data, that does not change the principle of the way WITS data was used The challenge is to deepen the useage to include the static contextual data, far easier to handle with WITSML than was the case with WITS. Where do we want to be ? Instigating technical changes that will make the flow of data more automated, saving cost through removing duplication of data entry.

BP interest in applications of WITSML Operator to Government Service Contractor to Service Contractor Drilling Contractor to Operator Service Contractor to Operator Operator to Operator Application to Application

Operator to Government – Example: Filing of statutory documents relating to the well permitting process. – PON 9 etc. – Action – Work closely with DTI and other operators (MMS, NPD … ) in piloting a project.

Service Contractor to Service Contractor – Example: Sharing a BHA description at the rig between different service vendors – Action : Select project to pilot workflow on.

Drilling Contractor to Operator Example: Automation of transfer of electronic IADC report data. –Action: Engage custodians of IADC electronic report –Select data objects. –This is going to take effort and a strong case to reach implementation Continue to build a dialog with IADC and their applications community Select pilot where short term value can be demonstrated

Service Contractor to Operator Examples ; –WellpathML, –Geological data (Lith and text descriptions, contextual data, in addition to time based data) from Mud Logging company into Wellsite composite log package. Wellsite composite log package into corporate data store Action: Pilot workflow in real environment.

Operator to Operator Example: Daily drilling report object, ideally with contextual engineering data of value. Action: Agree scope and location of pilot

Application to Application Example: Migrating data from one application’s proprietary data format to another, using the WITSML API as the mapping tool. Action: Identify object and project Completion diagrams ?

Wednesday meeting Commercial drivers for deeper implementation Drilling reports –Engagement w IADC & CAODC for Drilling Contractor to Operator –Operator to Operator –Service Contractors reports, DD, LWD, Mud Log, Fluids –Drilling Contractor to Svc Contractor –Regulatory reporting Well Schematic & Completions Well Planning / WellPath ML Production data and DTS Mud Log data Extending WITSML to Database to Database transfer ?

Actions from wednesday Consolidate known industry public domain lithology dictionaries, in addition to Shell Operations Geology handbook, offered by Shell Supply to group relevant bibliography material where available Circulate enhanced PIDX nomenclature for completion components, to work toward a standard catalogue Noun, Verb, Modifiers, but keep intelligible eg Pump, Centrifugal, Electrical (ESP). Info from PIDX and ChevTex, others welcome

Process issues Formalise processes for version release approval Pilot a process to flow a suggested change into acceptance, using the changes needed to move WellPath ML into an integral part of WITSML Restate use cases as “Business Problem / Solution” statements Formalise a list of non technical issues on a bulletin board for members Slightly more formalise communications between steering committee, Tech teams and Use Cases

Co-operate ! BP keen to adjust our priorities for work with the WITSML community to foster co-operation Keen to see projects driven from bottom up, not top down

Process issues for use case teams Goals / Objectives Technical team involvement.