1. Collaborating to develop data exchange standards Stewart Robinson DECC UK NDR9 NDR 9 – Breakout session 1

2. Goal of session To see if there is any real enthusiasm for governments to cooperate on standards If there is : Establish a small working group Pick something simple to prototype

3. Oil companies Applications for : licences wells environment fields pipelines decommissioning etc Oil companies

4. Applications for : licences wells environment fields pipelines decommissioning etc Oil companies Grant consents Keep records

5. Oil companies Applications for : licences wells environment fields pipelines decommissioning etc Oil companies Grant consents Demand returns Monitor activity Keep records

6. Oil companies Applications for : licences wells environment fields pipelines decommissioning etc Oil companies Grant consents Demand returns Monitor activity Keep records Publish

7. DECC HSE MODDETR ENV GRANT CONSENT

8. DECC HSE MODDETR ENV Birds Nature GRANT CONSENT

9. DECC HSE MODDETR ENV Birds Nature Tom, Dick and Harry GRANT CONSENT

11. UK OIL PORTAL

12. Other Govt Depts Oil companies

13. Other Govt Depts Oil companies Document Management System

14. Other Govt Depts Oil companies Repository Document Management System

15. Other Govt Depts DEAL EEMS Web Sites Oil companies

16. Other Govt Depts DEAL EEMS Web Sites Oil companies Repository XML Document Management System XML

17. Drilling (WONS) Production reporting Environment Security of Supply Electricity incidents Energy returns Freedom of Information Stewardship Field approvals Decommissioning Licensing Produced Water

18. What does Portal technology do On line forms data entry Workflow Document generation Web services Data reporting User account management Security (digital signatures) www.foxopen.org Builds oil regulatory systems quickly and cheaply

19. CDA Oil companies Linking a Regulatory Body to an NDR Well numbering !! Spud Notification Web service WellheaderML Extend for : Seismic Surveys, Licensing, etc etc

20. Need a common language Standards for Basic well data (meta data) Seismic survey names Seismic line names Cataloguing Reference entities Well status Completion status

21. New PON9

22. Overview 1 2 3 4 5 9 12 PONs Standards Format Naming Well Seismic Pipeline etc Exchange VERSION CONTROL

23. Data exchange formats - Index Data typeData setFormatExchange standard Seismic Site surveyPdf Processing data Well Raw logsDLIS, LIS, LAS DeviationP7/2000WellpathML Hole dataWITSML (?)

24. hole / casing / liner details Data itemValues and notes Hole size Hole size in inches Drilled depth Measured depth to well datum of bottom of hole interval Casing size Outside diameter of casing in inches Casing MD Measured depth relative to well datum down to which casing applies Casing Show depth flag Y if casing MD refers to show depth N if casing MD refers to diameter cross-over point Liner size Liner top MD Liner bottom MD

26. WITSML Special Interest Group Members

27. What am I proposing Choose an appropriate SIMPLE data set we all collect as a trial –What do we ask for and what do we do with it –What causes problems: meta data, reference data Agree definitions Define an exchange format based on WITSML Work with oil companies to test Review and decide next step

28. Goals To see if there is any real enthusiasm for governments to cooperate on standards Decide whether the Energistics SIG format is a suitable one to work within Move to electronic working

29. Benefits Improve efficiency –Data entry by oil companies –Reduce data errors –STOP COLLECTING PAPER Improve data release Share costs Get up and running quicker by following early adopters

30. How would we do it Set up Energistics SIG All communication via the web