PA State Participation in Liberty RadEx Randolph Easton PA BRP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Advisory Team for Environment, Food, and Health.
Advertisements

Site Characterization Instructional Goal: Upon completion of this topic the participant will better understand the need to identify and evaluate various.
From Flooding to Drought Barbara Watson Meteorologist-in-Charge National Weather Service Binghamton Forecast Office.
Radiological Assessment March 29, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems totaled more than 130 hours of flying – Flight operations were.
Response to a nuclear plant incident in Wisconsin How a nuclear power plant incident could affect your county October 14, 2009.
Emergency response organization (ERO)
NREP 2010 Practical Considerations for Setting Up a Community Reception Center Part 2 Setting up a Community Reception Center During the Empire 09 Radiological.
Overview of Developments: Environmental Protection Agency’s Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Bonnie Gitlin, Acting Director, Radiation Protection.
History  Three-Mile Island, Slow, nonconsistent decision- making -Uncoordinated Public Information -Loss of credibility with Government and the.
Missouri’s Response Radiation Emergency Callaway/Cooper Nuclear Plants Keith Henke Radiological Response Coordinator Bureau of Environmental Epidemiology.
A Partnership Dedicated to Radiation Protection Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. (CRCPD) The structure, working groups, and activities.
1 NGA Regional Bio-Terrorism Conference Boston, Massachusetts January 12-13, 2004.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 6, 2011.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 561 Emergency Response Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
Ivan P. Salati de Almeida Director of Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Brazilian Nuclear Energy National Commission- CNEN September 2012 Small Scale.
NNSA FRMAC/CM Program Manager
Page 1 DOE/NV/ Vision Service Partnership Lessons Learned from FRMAC Participation in Ingestion Pathway Exercises RaJah Mena Alexis Reed Presented.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 13, 2011.
Establishment of a Training Dosimetry Laboratory in Cairo University Dr. Hassan Fathy for NSPA.
Overview of Terrorism Research at the CDC Dixie E. Snider, M.D., MPH. Associate Director for Science Presented at 2003 Medical Research Summit March 6,
Roles and Responsibilities Local Agencies and Responders.
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
Environmental Health and Safety Radiation Control and Radiological Services.
Northwest Area Committee Meeting June 29, 2011 C. Terada, EPA Japan 2011 US National Radiation Monitoring.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
Greg Carter GoA Partnership Symposium. Format AENV role in emergency management AENV role in emergency management AENV role in the field AENV role in.
The role of the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) in a nuclear emergency Per Olov Nützmann Administrative Director Swedish Radiation Safety Authority.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
Radioactive Materials Awareness Radiation Safety Training.
Gaps & Useful Practices Los Angeles County Multi-Agency Radiological Response Plan (MARRP) Kathleen Kaufman Former Director, LA County Radiation Management.
1 NEED IN INTEGRAL APPROACH  Strategy and Politics in Decommissioning  Institutional and Legal aspects  Regulatory aspects  Economic aspects  Socio-Economic.
Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum Please read this before using presentation This presentation is based on content presented.
Environmental Protection in the United States Christopher Green U.S. Embassy July 13, 2006.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
First Responders Does Radiation Change the Response Thomas F. O’Connell Health Physics Society Midyear Meeting AAHP February 12, 2005 New Orleans, LA.
Dr. Charles W. Beadling Central Asia Regional Health Security Conference April 2012 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
EPA's Radiological and Nuclear Emergency Response Program June 18, 2009 Presented by: Ronald Fraass, Lab Director National Air and Radiation Environmental.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dr. Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water April 16, 2007 USGS: Water Resources Program.
Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Center (FRMAC)
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Module IX Basic Concepts for Emergency preparedness and Response for a nuclear accident or radiological.
11 IAEA 56 th General Conference Senior Regulators’ meeting The French doctrine for the management of the Post-Accident Nuclear Situation André-Claude.
Neil Muscatiello, M.S. New York State Department of Health March 23, 2011 Bridging the Gap: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Conference.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: ESTONIA.
Protective Action Guides for Radiological/Nuclear Incidents November 1, 2005 Craig Conklin Department of Homeland Security.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
Radiation Preparedness Regional Partnerships National Alliance for Radiation Readiness William F. Stephens MS, Manager - Tarrant County Advanced Practice.
Do Work Safely DOE Hanford Site Recovery Act Support to New Workers Ted Giltz Hanford Site Recovery Act Project Manager
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Dr. Abraham Gregorio de Rosa,Sp.Rad Radiologist in HNGV Dili, Timor Leste 2 Perspectives on regulatory models.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Kyrgyz Republic.
EPA Data Management Lessons Learned from TOPOFF II Region 10, Seattle May 2003.
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Site Control Instructional Goal The participant will see the need for a well-planned site control program and will experience some of the decision making.
Workshop Specialized in Exercises The Chernobyl Field Exercise Jakarta, Indonesia, June 2007 Peter Zombori Technical Officer.
1 EPA Region 4 Approach to a New Madrid Earthquake Response Art Smith Federal On-Scene Coordinator EPA Region 4 December 1, 2015.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RCA Project on Sustainability of Regional Radiation Protection Infrastructure Project Concepts and the Programme.
Summary of the Report, “Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Modeling” 22 September 2004 Walter.
HSPD-7 Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization and Protection: designates EPA as the sector-specific lead agency for critical water infrastructure.
Royal Canadian Navy Nuclear Vessel Visit Safety Program
Focus on Changes from the 1992 Manual Sara DeCair, US EPA April 2015
PAG Manual Revision Update and Next Steps
Transition To Keyhole, A Better Approach To Emergency Response Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Decontamination Preparedness and Assessment Strategy
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
Radiological Response Needs Self-Assessment Tool
Radiation & Nuclear Safety and Security Aspects in Lao PDR
Planning for Health Systems
Modeling Iodine Released During a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
2nd NUCLEAR REGULATORY INFORMATION CONFERENCE 16 – 18 May 2018
Region 13 and the Healthcare Coalition of Southwestern PA
Presentation transcript:

PA State Participation in Liberty RadEx Randolph Easton PA BRP

Liberty RadEx National Tier 2 Full-Scale Radiological Dispersion Device (RDD) Exercise Sponsored by EPA Philadelphia, PA – April 2010 RDD in Urban Environment Focus on Intermediate and Recovery Phase Activities

Liberty RadEx Timeframe Most Exercises Focus on First Hours or Days of Response (Emergency Phase) Liberty RadEx Will Focus on ‘Post-Emergency’ Phase Responsibilities and Coordination

Liberty RadEx Focus Unified Command (Fed., State, Local) Federal Support to State and Local Authorities NRF Exercise in Rad Assessment and Hazmat Response Public Involvement in Response Planning and Community Recovery

PA State Participation PA Dept. of Environmental Protection – Central Office Bureau of Radiation Protection – Southeast Regional Office (Norristown) Radiation Protection Emergency Response Waste Program Community Relations Legal Staff

PA Radiation Protection Missions Accident Assessment – PAG Evaluation Relocation, Food, Water – Integration with Federal Response – Technical Interface with State Decision Makers Field Monitoring – Environmental Monitoring and Sampling – Integration with FRMAC

Radiation Protection Staff Central Office – Health Physics – 22 – Nuclear Safety – 6 Southeast Regional Office (Norristown) – Health Physics – 15 Southcentral and Southwest Regional Offices (Harrisburg and Pittsburgh) – Health Physics Staff Each

PA Radiation Protection Assets Mobile Command Vehicles (R3V) Mobile Field Response Vehicles (F-150s)

PA Radiation Protection Assets Portable Radiation Monitoring Instruments Field Sampling Equipment Radiation Measurements Laboratory

Liberty RadEx Radiological Source 2300 Ci of Cs-137 (Cesium Chloride) 3000 lbs. Explosive Wind 8 mph from 220 Degrees Particle size 0.1 to 1000 microns

Liberty RadEx Exposure Rates

Liberty RadEx Relocation Area – EPA-400

Liberty RadEx Relocation Area – PA 1 st Year PAG

Liberty RadEx RDD Relocation Area Based on PA 1 st year PAG of 500 mrem Impacted Population – 61, 000 Impacted Area – 5.5 miles long by 1 mile wide ( city blocks) – Additional Buffer Zone needed 2,000,000 tons waste (100,000 truck loads at 20 tons per truck) (Based on ORD waste calculation tool developed for Liberty RadEx.

Liberty RadEx Agricultural Products Area of Concern - Ingestion

Liberty RadEx Ground Deposition Area

Exercise Issues and Challenges – Technical - PAGs State PAGs and Federal PAGs for First Year Relocation Differ – Federal (EPA-400) – 2 rem in first year – PA State – 500 mrem in first year Water PAGs – – DHS August 1, 2008 FR Notice - RDD and IND – 0.5 Rem Projected Dose in First Year. – New – Not used in exercise before.

Exercise Issues and Challenges – Technical - Contamination Contamination Levels – Where does one draw ‘the lines’ on contamination? – 500 mrem in First Year is about 8.3 uCi/sq. meter – 1 uCi/sq. meter = 22,000 dpm/100 sq. cm. Contamination Migration – Contamination moves due to weathering – Relocates and concentrates

Exercise Issues and Challenges – Technical - Cleanup Contamination Levels for Cleanup: – Site Specific – One oft cited number for removable contamination is: 1000 dpm/100 sq. cm. (or about 0.05 uCi/sq. meter)

Exercise Issues and Challenges – Technical – Exposure Control Radiation Exposure Control for Workers Entering Restricted Zone – Radiation Worker – 5 rem/year – Numerous Organizations Involved in Response – Differing Dosimetry – Differing Administrative Dose Limits

Exercise Issues and Challenges – Technical - PPE Level of PPE required Respiratory Protection – Air Sampling and Re-suspension Factor – Training and Physical – Equipment

PA State Issues and Challenges - Administrative Budget Issue – What level of funding can be approved, given PA’s budget issues. State Agencies – Reluctant to commit to participation due to uncertainty over budget and staffing.

Sources of Information on Large Scale Cs-137 Contamination Event Chernobyl – 1986 Goiania, Brazil

Questions? Thank you.