Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Seattle Center City Streetcar Workshop July 20, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Advertisements

D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
What Makes Streetcars Work? Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Seattle Center City Streetcar Workshop July 20, 2007.
11 Tunde Balvanyos, Ph.D. Bus Rapid Transit Coordinator, Pace APTA BRT May 2009.
South Coast Rail Project February 28, 2014 Stoughton Town Hall.
Freight Action Strategy for the Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor February 2003.
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
TYPES OF INTERSECTIONS OF ROAD AND DESIGN PARAMETERS OF INTERSECTION
DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT CORRIDORS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Texas A&M University Civil Engineering Department CVEN April 28, 2003 ADHARA CASTELBLANCO.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Ch. 7 1.
1 Salt Lake City Gateway Area Railroad Consolidation Project Grant G. Schultz, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE Assistant Professor Brigham Young University CE En 361.
Lec 31, Handout: Public passenger transport (objectives) Be familiar with mass transit classifications and characteristics Know how urban transport demands.
Lec 24: Ch1.(T&LD): Urban transportation planning vs. Site planning Review the transportation-land use cycle (Read examples in Ch.1 & compare the development.
North Corridor Commuter Rail The Case For Tax Increment Financing Mecklenburg County May 2007.
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS Chicago Area Rail Infrastructure 16,000 acres, twice the area of O’Hare 78 yards, including 21 intermodal (rail-truck)
VTA Light Rail System and Safety Enhancements MTC Railroad Crossing Seminar May, 21, 2008.
Meeting Agenda Introduction (20 minutes)  Project Definition  Complete Street Goals  Existing Conditions Summary Work Session (1 hour)  Mapping Exercise.
CHAPTERS 1 and 2 o Advantages of Railroad Concept o Problems Early On o Economics Common Goal o Development of the Country o Common Goal CE 433.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
URBAN LAND-USE.
Interchange Design Wes Mayberry Transportation Engineering Intern
Container Port Element City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services January 17, 2014.
CC – May 12, 2015 │ Comprehensive Plan Update City of Monroe COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITY OF MONROE.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Welcome. Challenges  Overcoming perceptions, some real, that  Gardner is not open for business  We aren’t consistent in the application of our codes.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Official Plan Zoning Bylaw Land Uses
Roosevelt Road: State to Columbus Public Meeting September 22, 2015.
Highway Functional Classification Chapter 16 Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
The Burnham Transportation Plan of Chicago: 100 Years Later CTS-IGERT Weekly Seminar April 23, 2009 Joseph DiJohn Urban Transportation Center.
CE 533 Introduction to Rail Transportation (4) Chapters 1 & 2 “Armstrong” Text.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
Criteria for Secondary to Primary System Transfers Robert W. Hofrichter Assistant Administrator Transportation and Mobility Planning Division.
July 13, 2010 Board of County Commission Transmittal Hearing.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
Chapter 191 Chapter 19: Elements of Intersection Design and Layout Make an initial sizing of the intersection Make an initial sizing of the intersection.
HCM 2010: FREEWAY FACILITIES PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
Complete Streets Training Module 4a – Understanding Context.
STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
The Future of North Attleborough. Land Use & Zoning Practices 1.Establish a balance 2.Promote Growth 3.Use creative zoning 4.Protect Resources.
Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures Cecil Selness, Director Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Statewide Transportation Planning Oklahoma DOT Planning Process Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan Statewide Freight Transportation Plan Arkansas.
1 CPA Request to expand the Oaks Mall Activity Center and change land use to Mixed Use 87 acres 8000 Block of W Newberry Rd.
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
Segment Crash Analysis
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Center City Connector 101.
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS Program Plan Development Roundtable December 13, 2016.
Alameda Corridor CEE 587 March 30, 2011
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS. ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS.
CE 533 Introduction to Rail Transportation (4)
Using CMFs in Planning for Virginia’s Project Funding Prioritization
Transportation Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Seattle Center City Streetcar Workshop July 20, 2007

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Transit Plan - Goal … Transit every 15 minutes … 18 hours a day … 7 days a week …

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Existing and Future Transit

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Seattle Candidate Streetcar Corridors All UVTN routes are initial candidates for streetcar service. Today: Criteria Evaluation Mapping Exercise

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Screening Criteria Grade Street Geometry Physical Barriers Possible Terminal Location Utilities Volume/Capacity Ratio Duplication of Service Transit-Supportive Land Uses Industrial Zoning

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Grade Grades inhibit streetcar operations 0% to 6% - acceptable 6% to 10% - if all other screening criteria are met > 10% - eliminated

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Street Geometry Interchanges Turning movements (<90° unacceptable) Weaving or curvature needs Exclusive right-of-way needs Transit priority needs (bridges, underpasses) Wheel noise

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Other Physical Barriers Low bridges or skyways –>14’ of vertical clearance –< 14’ of vertical clearance – fatal flaw Narrow streets –Lane widths narrower than 10 ft is a fatal flaw At-grade freight railroad crossing –Requires difficult approval process – fatal flaw

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Terminal Location Needs reasonable location to terminate and connect to other transit: –No strong connection to transit hub is treated as a fatal flaw

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Utilities Relocation of major utilities (water, storm or sanitary) may be too costly: –>6 ft from trackway –3-6 ft from trackway –<3 ft from trackway

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Speed and Reliability Traffic congestion inhibits successful streetcar –Corridor or segments with volume/lane ratios greater than the average plus one standard deviation is treated as a fatal flaw (unless exclusive ROW)

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Duplication of Service Corridors that directly compete for riders with existing or programmed LRT service should be eliminated.

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Land Use Types LowMediumHigh Airport GeneralCommercial Small ScaleCommercial General Golf CourseDowntown Secondary OfficeDowntown Edge Industrial GeneralOffice-Residential Medium DensityDowntown Entertainment Industrial LightMixed Use - Residential MediumDowntown Primary Office Institutional (E.g. Cemetery)Office / Convertible SpaceDowntown Retail Protected Open SpaceResidential Medium DensityLive Work Units ParksResidential High Density WaterMixed Use - Residential High RailwayMixed Use with Retail Residential Low DensityOffice- Residential High Retail Single StoryTransit Oriented Use Trolley Railway Vehicular Right-of-Way

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Land Use Types, cont’d “Low” transit-supportive land use: –Residential density < 10 units/acre –Industrial –Low-scale commercial development –No significant mixed-use development

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Industrial Zoning Streetcar garage needs to be located on track connected to main alignment: –No industrial zoning within ½ mile of corridor is treated as a fatal flaw.

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Summary Grade –0% to 6% - acceptable –6% to 10% - if all other screening criteria are met –> 10% - eliminated Street Geometry –Interchanges –Turning movements (<90° unacceptable) –Weaving or curvature needs –Exclusive right-of-way needs –Transit priority needs –Wheel noise Physical Barriers –Low bridges or skyways >14’ vertical clearance < 14’ vertical clearance –Lane widths narrower than 10 ft –At-grade freight railroad crossing Possible Terminal Location –No strong connection to transit hub is treated as a fatal flaw

Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Summary, Cont’d Utilities –>6 ft from trackway –3-6 ft from trackway –<3 ft from trackway Volume/Capacity Ratio –Volume/lane ratios greater than the average plus one standard deviation Duplication of Service –Corridors that directly compete for riders with existing or programmed LRT Transit-Supportive Land Uses –See list Industrial Zoning –No industrial zoning within ½ mile of corridor