Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Environment, Safety and Health Steve Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting March 29, 2012.
Advertisements

DOE/NSF U.S. CMS Operations Program Review Closeout Report Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory March 10, 2015 Anadi Canepa, TRIUMF Anna Goussiou, University.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Procurement Dave Paveglio, Contract Administrator NSLS-II PAC Meeting May 25, 2007.
FACET: The Proposal Process with Q & A Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
SLAC Accelerator Research and Introduction to SAREC Tor Raubenheimer FACET Users Meeting August 29 th - 30 th, 2011.
FACET: A National User Facility Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
JCS e + /e - Source Development and E166 J. C. Sheppard, SLAC June 15, 2005.
LCLS Transition to Science DOE Status Review of the LUSI MIE Project LCLS NEH ARR John Arthur LCLS Experimental Facilities Division August 11, 2009 Welcome.
1 Roger Erickson 1 Coordination with Accelerator Systems NEH Accelerator Readiness Review Coordination with Accelerator Systems.
John N. Galayda LCLS FAC 20 April Linac Coherent Light Source Overview and Charge Facility Advisory Committee John.
February 19, 2008 FACET Review 1 Lab Overview and Future Onsite Facilities Persis S. Drell DirectorSLAC.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Project Management John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
Safety Oversight for SLAC Accelerator Department Operations
LCLS Transition to Science DOE Status Review of the LUSI MIE Project NEH status and XFD operations Hal Tompkins, John Arthur LCLS Experimental Facilities.
Performance Evaluations: PPA InterpretationsPage 1 Interpretations on Performance Evaluation Process D. MacFarlane June 4 th, 2009.
1 T. Fornek 1 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Thomas Fornek Project Manager June 17, 2009 LUSI X-Ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument.
LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Accelerator Overview John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
BESAC 29 July 2014 Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy.
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
Performance Assessment Assessment of Organizational Excellence NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations May 5-6, 2005.
Global Design Effort Americas Region Efforts and Resources Mike Harrison GDE.
DOE Annual Review of SLAC HEP Research Program June 14-16, 2005 SLAC Charge to Committee Issues Procedures.
Keith O. Hodgson SSRL Director Brief Update on the Linac Coherent Light Source - LCLS February 26, 2002 Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Undulator.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
CRYOMODULES High Beta Low Beta Approved by CERN Research Board in December 2009.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
RDR Report Writing Nan Phinney SLAC. 7/20/06 VLCW06 Global Design Effort 2 GLC Report Working model is the 2003 GLC Report ch 4-7
M. Reichanadter LCLS Project November 2008 FAC Meeting Slac National Accelerator Laboratory Report to the LCLS.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science 20 th Meeting of the IEA Large Tokamak ExCo, May th Meeting of the IEA Poloidal Divertor ExCo, May.
ARD All-Hands Tor Raubenheimer November 22 nd, 2010.
Norman McCubbin1 Report from the Collaboration MICE Project Board (CMPB) Norman McCubbin Director, Particle Physics Department MICE/UKNF Oversight Committee.
Jefferson Lab Update R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab HPS Meeting June 16, 2014.
End Station A Test Beam (ESTB) Carsten Hast and Mauro Pivi August 23 th 2012 Proposals, Procedures, Schedule.
FACET Update ARD Status Meeting Christine Clarke April 14 th 2011.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 International Linear Collider In August 2004 ICFA announced their technology selection for an ILC: 1.The.
1 FY09 PPA Budget Kick Off Rafael Alva Charlotte Chang Oct 22, 2008.
FACET User Support Carsten Hast Accelerator Research Division Test Facilities Department
AboutFACET What is FACET Current Research PUBLICATIONS NAVIGATE UP Dielectric Wakefields.
SLAC Accelerator Development Program Tor Raubenheimer OHEP Accelerator Development Review January 24-26, 2011.
SABER, “maybe” a new facility in the South Arc (South Arc Beam Experimental Region) End Station A (ESA) in 2007 ILC Test Beams in 2008 Test Beams beyond.
End Station A Test Beam (ESTB) Carsten Hast and Mauro Pivi August 23 th 2012 Proposals, Procedures, Schedule.
Budget, Installation plan, Resource Organizational Structure & New Law for Research Centers Avni AKSOY 7th IMAC Meeting of TARLA, IAT, 7 September 2015.
1 David Schultz 1 SLAC Self-Assessment Programs meeting ASO Requirements David Schultz LCLS Program Division Director SLAC National.
Experiment Readiness Review P. Rossi – Hall C Coll. Meeting Jan 21, 2016.
Argonne Accelerator Institute Activites Rod Gerig Argonne May 18, 2007 Presentation to the Fermilab-Argonne Directors’ Collaboration Meeting.
SLAC and ILC Jonathan Dorfan, Director LCFOA, SLAC May 1, 2006 Particle & Particle Astrophysics.
A. Herlert, CERN PH-IS ISOLDE scientific coordinator’s report INTC meeting, May 19, 2008 ISOLDE scientific coordinator’s report INTC meeting, May 19, 2008.
Proposal for the End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC John Jaros ALCPG09 Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann Institute of Science
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting
Jefferson Lab Overview
LCC L. Evans, Santander, 2nd June 2016
WP13: Access to Plasma Beam testing facilities
John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006
Experimental Facilities Planning
Injector Performance Requirements Conventional Facilities Update
LCLS Injector: Introduction D. H
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting
LINAC OPS Budget Review
SLAC Beam Test Facilities Overview (emphasis ESTB) Carsten Hast, SLAC
X-Ray Endstations Update
A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
Welcome and Proposed Multi-laboratory Management Strategy for LCLS Jonathan Dorfan, Director April 23, 2002 LCLS DOE Review, April 23, 2002 Jonathan.
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
John Arthur – LCLS Experimental Operations
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
LCLS Operation in 2009 Roger A. Erickson
Linac Coherent Light Source Transition to Operations 11 July 2007
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

2 FY13 run Nimble scheduling for FY13 run was a necessity SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko 5 months long commissioning/running Four beam configurations (some uncertainty in time to develop) Configurations were progressively more difficult Uncertain schedule for commissioning of the ionization laser Weeks

3 Beam time delivery by configuration Users requests and justifications will set time allocation for FY14 run SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

4 FY13 Run Time Distribution (total 3616 hrs.) Smaller fraction of “Scheduled off” (mainly laser installation) and “Machine studies” are expected in next run. Accelerator availability was ~85%. SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

5 Planning for FY14 run FY14 is expected to have much more user experimental time. Efficient use will be main challenge Two part run is planned for FY14: Sept.30-Dec.20: Two bunch PWFA in 1.5m oven, positrons testing Feb.2-Jun.30: Beam time shared between ~12 experiments LCLS II construction schedule is not finalized Weeks SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

Norbert Holtkamp, AD Director Robert Hettel, Deputy John Seeman, Deputy ESH/QA John Seabury Administrative Office Business Office Cindy Lowe Accelerator Operations & Safety R. Erickson Mechanical Eng. & Technical Support K. Fant Instrumen- tation & Controls T. Himel Accelerator Systems Division A. Brachmann RF Accelerator Research & Eng. Division M. Fazio Accelerator Research Division R. Hettel (acting) S0-20 Accelerator Laser Support Facilities & Rad. Physics 6 AD Organizational chart (FY13 restructuring) FACET Division V. Yakimenko FY13 restructuring of S0-20 Linac operations resulted in efficient FACET run SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

7 FACET and Test facilities division (FY14 restructuring) FACET and Test Facilities V. Yakimenko M. Hogan, Deputy Experimental Program M. Hogan Science at FACET M. Hogan Science at NLCTA E. Hemsing Science at ESTB C. Hast Science at ASTA TBD Test Facilities C. Hast User Coordination C. Clarke SLAC User Office C. Knotts FACET/ESTB User area C. Hast NLCTA/ASTA Operations TBD Technical Support TBD Controls TBD Linac Operations M. Sullivan Lasers B. White External Program Review Committee (SAREC) Safety J. Kenny Matrixed SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

8 Program Advisory Committee & User meetings Updates from six experiments that did use beam time in FY13 is expected. 12 new proposals are submitted in addition to already ongoing programs: 8 for FACET (one will be first tried at ESTB and one at NLCTA) 3 for NLCTA 1 for ASTA Detector R&D experiments at ESTB are reviewed by separate committee FACET time is oversubscribed SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

9 Charge to the Program Advisory Committee Evaluate the scientific merit and rate the technical risk of the NEW proposals for the SLAC Accelerator Test Facilities. Determine whether the new proposals would be appropriate at this time or in the future. Review existing R&D results at the SLAC Accelerator Test Facilities and which elements need further in-depth analysis (for example): Is the science unique and is the progress compelling? Is the program making effective use of facility and lab resources? Could the program be enhanced by expanding the collaboration? Comment on the synergy of the programs within and between the facilities. Are there opportunities SLAC should pursue? What would be needed to successfully realize these opportunities? SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

10 Schedule

11 Schedule SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko