1. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC LCLS Undulator Systems Review John N. Galayda, SLAC March 3, 2004  Project Description  Schedule  Long-Lead Procurements  Charge to Committee  Project Description  Schedule  Long-Lead Procurements  Charge to Committee

2. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC The World’s First Hard X-ray Laser

3. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC Capabilities Spectral coverage: 0.15-1.5 nm Peak Brightness: 10 33 Average Brightness: 3 x 10 22 Pulse duration: <230 fsec Pulse repetition rate: 120 Hz Photons/pulse: 10 12 To 0.5 Ǻ in 3 rd harmonic

4. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC Linac Coherent Light Source Project Description SLAC Linac Two Chicanes for bunch compression FFTB Tunnel Undulator Hall Near Hall Far Hall

5. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC Photon Beam Handling Systems X-ray Transport, Optics and Diagnostics Front end systems – attenuators, shutters, diagnostics Optics – the prerequisites for LCLS experiments X-ray Endstation Systems Hutches, Personnel Protection Computer facilities for experiments Laser for pump/probe experiments Detectors matched to LCLS requirements Systems for first experiments in A/M/O physics Linac Coherent Light Source

6. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC TransportUndulator Hall A Tunnel Hall B 3 Beams/mirror ExpansionTransportUndulator Hall A Tunnel Hall B 3 Beams/mirror Expansion Conventional Construction Room for 8 additional undulator lines

7. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC LCLS Organization Chief Engineer – Mark Reichanadter Chief Engineer – Mark Reichanadter US CMS Project Engineer US CMS Project Engineer Joins SLAC June 2003 Joins SLAC June 2003 LLNL-LCLS Project Director LLNL-LCLS Project Director Richard M. Bionta Richard M. Bionta ANL-LCLS Project Director ANL-LCLS Project Director Stephen V. Milton Stephen V. Milton LEUTL FEL accelerator research program at ANL-APS Chief Engineer – Mark Reichanadter Chief Engineer – Mark Reichanadter US CMS Project Engineer US CMS Project Engineer Joins SLAC June 2003 Joins SLAC June 2003 LLNL-LCLS Project Director LLNL-LCLS Project Director Richard M. Bionta Richard M. Bionta ANL-LCLS Project Director ANL-LCLS Project Director Stephen V. Milton Stephen V. Milton LEUTL FEL accelerator research program at ANL-APS

8. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC Estimated Cost, Revised Schedule $220M-$260M Total Estimated Cost range $265M-$315M Total Project Cost range FY2005Long-lead purchases for injector, undulator FY2006 Construction begins January 2008 FEL Commissioning begins September 2008 Construction complete $220M-$260M Total Estimated Cost range $265M-$315M Total Project Cost range FY2005Long-lead purchases for injector, undulator FY2006 Construction begins January 2008 FEL Commissioning begins September 2008 Construction complete 20022003200420052006FY2008FY2009 ConstructionOperation FY2001FY2002FY2003FY2004FY2005FY2006FY2007 CD-1CD-2a CD-2b CD-3a CD-3b CD-0 Title I Design Complete XFEL Commissioning CD-4

9. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC Recent Events Critical Decision 1 Approved10/2002 Guidance for Funding Profile Updated 1/2003 BES 20-year Roadmap Review2/2003 Environmental Assessment Approved3/2003 Authorization to spend PED funds3/2003 SC-81 Lehman/Carney Review5/2003 Critical Decision 2A Approved7/2003 Critical Decision 2B Approval5/2004 Critical Decision 3A Approval9/2004 Critical Decision 1 Approved10/2002 Guidance for Funding Profile Updated 1/2003 BES 20-year Roadmap Review2/2003 Environmental Assessment Approved3/2003 Authorization to spend PED funds3/2003 SC-81 Lehman/Carney Review5/2003 Critical Decision 2A Approved7/2003 Critical Decision 2B Approval5/2004 Critical Decision 3A Approval9/2004

10. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC FY2005 Long Lead Procurements ($K, as spent) To be reimbursed to TEC when Special Spares Funds are allocated. 28% Contingency (67% contingency on Superconducting wiggler & spare)

11. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC Long-Lead Procurements, FY2005 - Undulator Systems Undulator Hardware Magnet Blocs Magnet Poles Strongback Undulator Measurement System Final “shimming” of magnets at SLAC Undulator Hardware Magnet Blocs Magnet Poles Strongback Undulator Measurement System Final “shimming” of magnets at SLAC

12. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC LCLS Undulator Systems Review: Charge To review the LCLS undulator system and to provide advice on the overall system and the various subsystem designs and their suitability to meet the performance specifications, on the installation and commissioning plan, and on the overall project management of the LCLS undulator system. Commissioning: are the diagnostics “adequate” for commissioning and operations problems? Will we be able to troubleshoot the undulator systems, and rapidly identify out-of-tolerance subsystems? Gain vs. z is an excellent all-purpose tuning signal SASE gain at long wavelength should not be very difficult SASE gain at short wavelength – beam travels 50m before gain is evident To K or not to K? To rollaway or not to rollaway? Intra-undulator x-ray diagnostics are very challenging, not amenable to scheduling To review the LCLS undulator system and to provide advice on the overall system and the various subsystem designs and their suitability to meet the performance specifications, on the installation and commissioning plan, and on the overall project management of the LCLS undulator system. Commissioning: are the diagnostics “adequate” for commissioning and operations problems? Will we be able to troubleshoot the undulator systems, and rapidly identify out-of-tolerance subsystems? Gain vs. z is an excellent all-purpose tuning signal SASE gain at long wavelength should not be very difficult SASE gain at short wavelength – beam travels 50m before gain is evident To K or not to K? To rollaway or not to rollaway? Intra-undulator x-ray diagnostics are very challenging, not amenable to scheduling

13. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC LCLS Undulator Systems Review: Charge Review and evaluate the complete system design. Is the maturity of the design known to the level of detail to justify setting the cost and schedule performance baseline at this time? Identify any open design issues that should be addressed prior to setting the baseline. Is the management team adequately structured for completing the LCLS design? Are there adequate resources and of the correct skill type to meet the needs of the project? Is the project progressing adequately? Review and evaluate the complete system design. Is the maturity of the design known to the level of detail to justify setting the cost and schedule performance baseline at this time? Identify any open design issues that should be addressed prior to setting the baseline. Is the management team adequately structured for completing the LCLS design? Are there adequate resources and of the correct skill type to meet the needs of the project? Is the project progressing adequately?

14. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC LCLS Undulator Systems Review: Charge A written report of the committee’s findings, comments and recommendations is requested. Please highlight areas of risk and any questions requiring follow-up. This report will be very helpful in preparing for a DOE Performance Baseline review in April 2004. We thank the committee in advance for taking time out of their busy schedules to provide us with this important feedback on the LCLS Undulator Systems design. A written report of the committee’s findings, comments and recommendations is requested. Please highlight areas of risk and any questions requiring follow-up. This report will be very helpful in preparing for a DOE Performance Baseline review in April 2004. We thank the committee in advance for taking time out of their busy schedules to provide us with this important feedback on the LCLS Undulator Systems design.

15. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC End of Presentation

16. LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge galayda@slac.stanford.edu Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004 John Galayda, SLAC