2009-2010 Semester 2 Situation analysis TESL 3240 Lecture 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some impressions from the school visits and the conference -No systematic report 1 st Some general wisdom 2 nd Key analysis questions of the project Conference.
Advertisements

Action Planning. After self evaluation: Action Planning 'Action Planning' is an activity designed to assist in achieving goals by recognising the tasks.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
4th Module: Information Systems Development and Implementation:
TKT Essentials Routes to excellence. TKT Essentials TKT Essentials course The TKT Essentials course provides a basic introduction to English language.
Management for sustainable education Don Passey, Senior Research Fellow, Co-Director, Centre for Technology Enhanced Learning, Department of Educational.
1 Improving School Leadership - Guidelines for Country Background Reports - Education and Training Policy Division Directorate of Education.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
Responsibilities of the Supervisor While supervisory responsibilities may vary from one program area to another, the following duties are typical among.
British Nutrition Foundation Conference Update from Learning Teaching Scotland (LTS) Liz Nicoll – Development Officer Health & Wellbeing September 2010.
5.3.1 Organisational and Institutional Analysis 1 Working with Stakeholders UPA Package 5, Module 3.
Curriculum Design 4 Situation analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Erin M 97/04/10.
Evaluating and Revising the Physical Education Instructional Program.
MSP course 2007 Phase 0 – Setting up Kumasi, Ghana 2008 Wageningen International.
Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly M Dora M.
Global Human Resource Management: Project Details
Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Learning Outcomes Are formulated by the academic staff, preferably involving student representatives in the.
Needs Analysis Instructor: Dr. Mavis Shang
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. The difference between a course, curriculum, and syllabus. 2.
21st Century Skills. The 21st century skills movement or global transformation The global landscape for learning is reshaping itself.
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
2015/8/30 Ch3 Needs analysis M Venus M Carl.
Project Citizen Center for Civic Education
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT PLANNING AND APPRAISAL SWOT ANALYSIS.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Nature and origin of language curriculum Semester 2 TESL 3240 Curriculum Development and Material Design Lecture 1.
Technology Leadership
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
Curriculum Review origins: The National Debate  Support for: – flexibility, breadth and balance – the comprehensive principle  Desire to address: –
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Peoria Unified World Languages and Immersion Programs Dr. Heather Cruz March 25, 2014.
II Human Resources Development. 2 Outline of the Presentation Steps of an HRD program Types of training Guidelines for HRD in rural areas.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Health Impact Assessment.
Technology Needs Assessment Presentation for Los Fresnos HS
Comprehensive Evaluation of Al-Quds Open University Kathleen Matheos, PhD Ramallah May 21, 2007.
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
INTRODUCTION Business enterprises cannot function in isolation Open systems interact with their environment Business enterprises exist in and are surrounded.
Edita Trečiokienė Grundtvig 3: Grants to Participate in Adult Education Training Activities The Quality of Training Activities applied for and possible.
Trans e-facilitator Project The 2-tier approach September 24 th.
How Much Do We know about Our Textbook? Zhang Lu.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
Learning4Life or Lifelong learning? Warren Goetzel, PhD GaETC – CTO Clinic Atlanta, GA 2013.
What is Creativity? “Creativity is a process which generates ideas that have value to the individual. It involves looking at familiar things with a fresh.
Mohammad Alipour Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Understanding Policy Contexts CEP:ELM, 2011 Mombasa.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Building Strong Library Associations | Library Associations in Society: An Overview DAY 1 Session 6 Analysis of Constraints and Opportunities (using SWOT)
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
LANCE ARMSTRONG FOUNDATION Founded in 1997 by Lance Armstrong Mission: To inspire and empower people affected by cancer Unity is strength. Knowledge is.
Sept. 16, Session #2 PED3106 : Agenda - Housekeeping: Hardcopy course outlines, Assignment 1 (8:30AM-8:45AM) - Complimen-tree, Inclusion in I/S Schools.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
NEEDS ANALYSIS.
Contribute to the development of a strategic plan.
LANGUAGE CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
© Copyright Showeet.com ORAL PRESENTATION Nº1 Subject: Curriculum Evaluation Date: May 11 th, 2018 Cycle: VI Topic: Unit 1: Evaluation and Innovation and.
Institute for English Language Education
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
PGCE PCE Mentoring Training
Presentation transcript:

Semester 2 Situation analysis TESL 3240 Lecture 3

What is situation analysis Situation analysis is an analysis of factors in the context of a planned or present curriculum, project that is made in order to assess their potential impact on the project.

These factors may be political, social, economic, or institutional. Situation analysis complements the information gathered during needs analysis. It is sometimes considered as a dimension of needs analysis, and can also be regarded as an aspect of evaluation.

Societal factors In examining the impact of societal factors on language teaching, therefore, the aim is to determine the impact of groups in the community or society at large on the program.

These groups include: Policy makers in government Educational and other government officials Employers The business community Politicians Tertiary education specialists Educational organisations Parents Citizens Students

In the case of projects of community or national scope, questions such as the following may be relevant: What current language teaching policies exist and how are they viewed? What are the underlying reasons for the project and who supports it?

What impact will it have on different sectors of society? What language teaching experience and tradition exist in the country?

How do members of the public view second languages and second language teaching? What are the views of relevant professionals such as academics and teacher trainers?

What do professional organizations such as teachers’ unions think of the project? What are the views of parents and students?

What are the views of employers and the business community?

Project factors The following project factors need to be considered: Who constitutes the project group and how are they selected? What are the management and other responsibilities of the team?

What community resources are available to support the innovations, such as radio, television, and the media?

How are goals and procedures determined? Who reviews the progress of the project and the performance of its members? What experience do members of the team have?

How do members of the team regard each other? What resources do they have available and what budget to acquire needed resources? What is the time frame of the project? Is it realistic, or is more or less time needed?

Institutional factors Institutional factors relate to the following kind of questions: 1.What leadership is available within the school to support change and to help teachers cope with change?

2.What are the school’s physical resources, including classroom facilities, media and other technological resources, and library resources? 3.What is the role of textbooks and other instructional materials?

4. What is staff morale like among English teachers? 5. What problems do teachers face and what is being done about them?

6. What administrative support is available within the school and what is communication like between teachers and the administrations? 7. What kind reputation does the institution have for delivering successful language program?

8. How committed is the institution to attaining excellence?

Teacher factors What kinds of teachers currently teach in the target schools or institutions? What is their typical background,training, experience, and motivation? How proficient are they in English?

What kinds of beliefs do the teachers typically hold concerning key issues in teaching? What teaching loads do teachers have and what resources do they make use of?

What are the typical teaching methods teachers use and believe in? To what extent are teachers open to change?

What opportunities do they have for retaining through in-service or other kinds of opportunities? What benefits are the proposed new syllabus, curriculum, or materials likely to offer teachers?

Learner factors What are learners’ past language learning experience? How motivated are the learners to learn English?

What are their expectations for the program? Are they a homogenous or heterogenous group?

What type of learning approach do they favour?(e.g.,teacher-led, student-focused, or small-group work)

What type of content do they prefer? What expectations do they have for the roles of teachers, learners, and instructional materials?

How much time can be they expected to put into the program? What learning resources will they typically have access to?

Adoption factors What advantages does the curriculum change offer? Is the innovation perceived to be more advantageous than current practices? How comparable is it? `Is the use of the innovation consistent with the existing beliefs, attitudes, organisation, and practices within a classroom or school?

Is the innovation very complicated and difficult to understand?

Has it been used and tested out in some schools before all schools are expected to use it? Have the features and benefits of the innovation been clearly communicated to teachers and institutions?

How clear and practical is it? Are the expectations of the innovation stated in ways which clearly show how it can be used in the classroom? (Morris 1994,109)

Profiling the factors identified in the situation analysis The goal of situation analysis is to identify key factors that might positively or negatively affect the implementation of a curriculum plan. This is sometimes known as a SWOT analysis because it involves an examination of ‘a language program’ internal strengths and weaknesses in addition to external opportunities and threats to the existence or successful operation of the language program

Summary Situation analysis thus serves to help identify potential obstacles to implementing a curriculum project and factors that need to be considered when planning the parameters of a project.

Discussion questions and activities 1.Discuss a language teaching context you are familiar with and list some of the most important factors that are likely to influence the success of the program.

1.How do societal factors influence or have an impact on a language program that you are familiar with? Which factors are negative and which are positive? How can negative factors be addressed?

2. How do societal factors influence or have an impact on a language program that you are familiar with? Which factors are negative and which are positive? How can negative factors be addressed?

3. Are you familiar with a situation in which a curriculum change was attempted(e.g.., the introduction of a new teaching approach, a new textbook, or a new program design) and met with difficulties? Could the problems have been avoided?

4. List the factors that you think are most crucial in a school or institution in creating a favorable context for curriculum change, such as when a new course or language program is being offered for the first time?

5. What groups in the community or society at large would be most relevant to consult in your country( or the country in which you work) in relation to planned changes in the English-or foreign language curriculum in public schools?

6. Have you worked as a member of a curriculum project team( as a material writer, course planner etc.)? Discuss your experience on the project and whether project factors has an impact on the dynamics and outcome of the project.

7. What can be done in circumstances where teachers and learners have different expectations and beliefs about the nature of a language course?

8. What support is provided for teachers in your teaching situation? How effective is the support provided? What other forms of support would you recommend?

9. Imagine that a new technology-based learning program is to be introduced into schools in your country or the country in which you work. The program employs print materials but also makes extensive use of CALL software, CD-ROMS, videos, and other electronic media. What factors might affect the reception of the program and how could any negative factors be addressed?

10. Examine the situation analysis profile in Appendix 1 and adapt it to make it applicable to a context for curriculum change (e.g., introduction of a new curriculum, new teaching methods, new textbooks, a new language program) that you are familiar with. Identify positive and negative factors in the situation that will affect the curriculum change.