9/20/12 BR- Who are the 3 Argument Brothers (from yesterday) Today: How to Argue (Part 1) MIKVA!!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.
Advertisements

Welcome to Dave Penner’s Presentation on Inductive Reasoning!
Moral Reasoning   What is moral reasoning? Moral reasoning is ordinary critical reasoning or critical thinking applied to moral arguments.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
The Persuasive Process
Logos Formal Logic.
The Three Appeals of Argument
EC350 Introduction January 19, Course Website
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Moral Reasoning   What is moral reasoning? Moral reasoning is ordinary critical reasoning or critical thinking applied to moral arguments.
How to sway the audience
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Basic Argumentation.
You will be working with your elbow partner…decide right now who will be Partner A and who will be Partner B.
How We’re Persuaded ETHOS = LOGOS = PATHOS =
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
Logic is the study of the principles of correct reasoning associated with the formation and analysis of arguments.
Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.
Logic Propaganda – Persuasive Devices
English 100 Tuesday, On a sheet of paper, write about the following prompt… you will keep this in your notebook: “I don’t regret the things I’ve.
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
Type of Rhetorical Appeals Logos, Ethos, and Pathos.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
Three Modes of Persuasion Qualitative/Quantitative September 2011 Rhetoric: Communication Techniques.
Terms of Logic and Types of Argument AP English Language and Composition.
Logic in Everyday Life.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
10/20/09 BR- Who are the three “brothers” of Argument? Today: Constructing A Logical Argument – Deductive and Inductive Reasoning -Hand in “facts” -MIKVA.
Argumentative Appeals/ Methods of Persuasion Speech Unit English 10A.
Argument Language is a form of motivated action. Argument as Discourse It’s important to understand that for the purposes of this class, Argument means.
Review from Yesterday…. Rhetoric vs. Dialectic Deduction : conclusion is necessitated by, or reached from the previously stated facts (premises). Remember.
Ethos, Pathos and Logos the art of rhetoric. Rhetoric 0 Rhetoric (n) - the art of speaking or writing effectively (Webster's Definition). 0 According.
10/21/09 BR- Identify the (1)premises and the (2)conclusion in the following deductive argument. Is it valid or invalid? All fish need gills to breath.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
Do Now  What does logos appeal to in an advertisement?  Give three examples.
{ Methods of Persuasion Speech class.  The audience perceives the speaker as having high credibility  The audience is won over by the speaker’s evidence.
Comp 2 Winter.  Logos, or the appeal to reason, relies on logic or reason. Logos often depends on the use of inductive or deductive reasoning. Reasoning.
Understanding the Persuasive Techniques in Developing Arguments How a speech can soothe and inspire a grieving population.
09/17/07 BR- What is “logic?” What does it mean to make a logical argument? Today: Logic and How to Argue (Part 1)
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
Critical Thinking  A key academic skill  Required for successful study.
TOK: A Quick Review 1/9.
The Academic Argument.
09/17/08 BR- Identify the premises and the conclusion in the following deductive argument. Is it valid or invalid? All fish need gills to breath water.
3 Types of Arguments: Ethos- Establishing a reason to listen or believe the speaker. E.g., “that guy is wearing a tie so he must know what he’s saying.”
Deductive and Inductive REASONING
10/28/09 BR- What is the most important factor in winning an argument
Chapter 7.24: Persuasive Speaking
The Ontological Argument
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
The Rational Appeal Sydney Czurak Mariah Felt.
The Ontological Argument
The Art of Persuasion Aristotle’s Eros, Pathos, and Logos
Rhetorical Appeals.
An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument
Logical Fallacies.
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Syllogisms and Enthymemes.

ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
S.M.E.L.L. Method For argument analysis.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
13 September 2018 YOUR ARGUMENT'S BEST FRIEND
Presentation transcript:

9/20/12 BR- Who are the 3 Argument Brothers (from yesterday) Today: How to Argue (Part 1) MIKVA!!

Examples of Arguments  Look at the two examples of arguments  How are they the same? Different?  KEEP THESE AND USE THEM!  Look at the two examples of arguments  How are they the same? Different?  KEEP THESE AND USE THEM!

Most people say, “ I like to argue.” or that they are good at arguing. But what do they mean?

What makes this person’s argument different..

From this persons?

Most of the time when people argue they use poor logic, false reasoning or rely on emotion to “win” an argument. In this class we will try to learn to argue using logic and reason to reach a point of truth or understanding.

Important Question: What is the difference between perception and reality?

What do we think or wish is there

What is there in reality.

Much of our world operates on perception and non-reality in order to affect reality. This is illogical. Understanding how to view the world logically is incredibly liberating, frightening, and empowering. Much of our world operates on perception and non-reality in order to affect reality. This is illogical. Understanding how to view the world logically is incredibly liberating, frightening, and empowering.

Ask yourself: What do I know for sure? What do I know because someone told me about it? How do I know what I know? How would my world change if what I was told was wrong? How much control of my life do I have? What do I know for sure? What do I know because someone told me about it? How do I know what I know? How would my world change if what I was told was wrong? How much control of my life do I have?

What do you know about..

3 Types of Arguments: Ethos- Establishing a reason to listen or believe the speaker. E.g., “that guy is wearing a tie so he must know what he’s saying.” Pathos- appealing to the emotions of people, using emotional language or creating emotional responses in the audience. E.g., “If you don’t agree with me you must hate America.” Logos- logical reasoning (see next)

Logic- from Classical Greek λόγος (logos), originally meaning the word, or what is spoken, (but coming to mean thought or reason) is most often said to be the study of criteria for the evaluation of arguments to determine if they are fallacious or valid. - Logical argumentation uses reason and solid evidence or data.

 In this class you may use pathos and ethos in your speaking but argumentation without logos(logic) is not effective.  How many times have you seen an argument where the winner is determined by: who can yell the loudest and longest, or who can intimidate the other person (physically or by other means)  People use pathos and ethos very effectively in irrational arguments. Irrational arguments seldom produce truth.  In this class you may use pathos and ethos in your speaking but argumentation without logos(logic) is not effective.  How many times have you seen an argument where the winner is determined by: who can yell the loudest and longest, or who can intimidate the other person (physically or by other means)  People use pathos and ethos very effectively in irrational arguments. Irrational arguments seldom produce truth.

Making A Logical Argument 1st, we need to understand some terms. Premise: a fact or statement assumed to be true. E.g., Socrates is a man. Valid Argument: if the premises are true then the conclusion is true. Invalid Argument: if the premises are true but conclusions may not be true.

Deductive reasoning: reasoning in which the conclusion is necessitated by, or reached from, previously known facts. If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. All P are Q A is P Therefore, A is Q

Examples of Valid Deductive Reasoning Since Socrates is a man,and since all men are mortal,Socrates is mortal. Since the picture is above the desk,and since the desk is above the floor,the picture is above the floor. Since an eagle is a bird,and since all birds have wings,an eagle has wings. If all parts are true the argument is said to be Sound.

Examples of Invalid Deductive Reasoning A truly left wing politician does not tolerate animal cruelty. G. Houseman thinks hitting a dog is wrong. G. Houseman is a truly left wing politician. Every criminal opposes the government. Everyone in the opposition party opposes the government; therefore, everyone in the opposition party is a criminal.

Inductive Reasoning More open than deductive reasoning. It is based on what can be observed and using those observations to make a general conclusion. It is not as solid as deductive(closed) reasoning. Inductive(open) reasoning is divided into strong and weak inductions or induction.

Examples of Strong Induction Reasoning All the crows I’ve seen are black therefore all crows are black. Most healthy dogs I’ve seen have 4 legs therefore all healthy dogs have 4 legs

Examples of Weak Inductive Reasoning I always hang pictures on nails therefore all pictures hang from nails. Teenagers are given many speeding tickets therefore all teenagers speed. An inductive argument is said to be cogent (good) if the conclusion is probable.

In General- Deductive Reasoning is black and white. Inductive Reasoning is shades of grey. Both can be good or logical ways to argue.

Assignment 1. Write an explanation for the following terms: Ethos, Pathos, Logos(logic), premise, valid, invalid, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, sound, cogent 2. Give 2 examples of both valid and invalid deductive reasoning. 3. Give 2 examples of both strong and weak inductive reasoning. You can draw a picture if it helps!

Vocabulary Journal #2 9/17-21  Ethos, Pathos, Logos, Premise, Valid, Invalid, Deductive Reasoning, Sound Argument, Inductive Reasoning, Cogent Inductive Reasoning