RTF Subcommittee Meeting RTF Technical Support Needs for Small & Rural Utilities December 3,
Agenda Introductions Analysis process List of recommended utilities Draft interview guide Questions and subcommittee feedback Review project timeline and next steps 2
Analysis process 3 Identify Utilities of interest – Clean/prune data (remove misc. “non-utility” entities) – Small (<15 aMW) – Rural (LDD recipients) – Residential (> 60%) Location of Utilities of interest (pools and small rural residential) All these utilities fall within 150 aMW and 40,000 total customers
Utility Breakdowns 4 Utility CategoryPoolsPTRTotal Small Rural Small/rural51318 Residential Small/residential4913 Rural/residential9312 Small/rural/residential459 All Small Rural or Residential
Breakdown of Implemented Measures 5 Use of Lighting measures is a major source of savings in residential and commercial sectors. Also see significant savings in irrigation measures.
Utility Selection Criteria Small, rural, residential status Volume of savings Patterns of measure implementation of various utilities Climate Availability of adjacent conservation infrastructure Residential vs. commercial Renewables vs. measures 6
List of Proposed Utilities City of McCleary Wahkiakum Okanogan County Electric Coop City of Bonners Ferry Burley City of Milton Freewater Lincoln Blachly-Lane Ravalli Glacier 7 Harney Lane Fall River Mission Valley Kootenai Big Bend Mason PUD #3 Central Umatilla Raft River
Utility List Matrix See Excel file: Draft Utility List_Small-Rural Utils.xlsx 8
Recommended Washington Utilities 9 City of McCleary Wahkiakum Okanogan County Electric Coop Lincoln Kootenai Big Bend Mason PUD #3
10
Recommended Oregon Utilities 11 City of Milton Freewater Blachly-Lane Harney Lane Central Umatilla
12
Recommended Idaho Utilities 13 City of Bonners Ferry Burley Fall River Raft River
14
Recommended Montana Utilities 15 Lincoln Ravalli Glacier Mission Valley
16
Draft Interview Guide Objectives Focus on technical characteristics of conservation efforts: – Development of deemed measures – Technical specifications – Simplified M&V protocols Help identify program barriers faced by small/rural utilities (for RTF approved measures/protocols) Review measures implemented by the utility Discuss staff resources, incentives paid, and measures not reported to the PTR Develop list of measures the utility is interested in implementing Assess available conservation infrastructure 17
Draft Interview Guide See Word doc: Draft Interview Guide_Small-Rural Utilities.docx 18
Questions and Subcommittee Feedback 19
Project Timeline & Next Steps 20 October 27Subcommittee meeting to discuss revised schedule and overall approach to analyzing the measure data from the PTR and C&RD. October 29All data due to Ecotope (w/ exception of IDEA and maybe PNGC…) November 19Ecotope sends draft list of utilities and proposed interview questions to subcommittee for review December 2/3Subcommittee meeting – list of utilities finalized; discuss interview questions. December 6-10Ecotope to start scheduling interviews December 10Final interview questions December 13 – January 21 Utility interviews February 11Draft report due February 18Subcommittee to provide feedback on draft report February 21-25Subcommittee meeting – presentation on draft report March 1Presentation on draft report to full RTF March 18Final report due
Ecotope Contact: Poppy Storm, Project Manager th Avenue NE − Seattle, Washington, PH: (206) , FAX: (206)