2013-2014 1 st Interim Financial Report and LCFF Budget Update December 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LCFF Funding and LCAP Shift Overview District Advisory Committee (DAC) Meeting February 27, 2014.
Advertisements

LCFF & LCAP. Key Precepts of LCFF Based on specific considerations: Equity, additional resources for students with greater needs Low-income students English.
Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan A Basic Introduction Sacramento City Unified School District DELAC Meeting February 18,
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Lodi Unified School District Local Control Funding Formula Budget Revision Board of Education and Community Update.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES: · Paul De La Cerda ∙ Rose Koscielny · Judy Egan Umeck · David Powell · Chris TrunkeySUPERINTENDENT: Joan M. Lucid, ED.D. RESPECT | INTEGRITY.
Presented at the South Bay Union School District Budget Meeting September 27, 2014 By Lynette Kerr, Director of Fiscal Services South Bay Union School.
Governor’s Budget Proposal for Glendale Unified School District Board Of Education Meeting – February 3, 2015 Discussion Report No. 2 Robert McEntire,
Second Interim Report March 19, 2015
1 Governor’s Budget Proposal. Governor’s Budget Governor declares that deficit is erased Second budget in a decade without a projected deficit.
Local Control Funding Formula What it is and what it means to Larkspur-Corte Madera School District September, 2013.
Adopted Budget Walnut Valley Unified School District Board of Trustees June 19, 2013.
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) & Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Parent Advisory Committee Presentation April 4, 2014 With Information Provided.
Derk Garcia, Interim Chief Academic Officer. LCFF and LCAP Through the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) flexibility and Local Control Accountability.
Superior StandardsSuccessful Students 2013 – 14 Budget Update Charles E. McCully, Interim Superintendent Stefanie P. Phillips, Ed.D., Deputy Superintendent,
Walnut Valley Unified School District Board of Trustees December 11, First Interim Financial Report.
Russell Frank, Ph.D. Director II Assessment and Accountability Services Mike Barney Director II Instructional Services LCFF and LCAP Reshapes School Funding.
Twin Rivers Unified School District: Inspiring each student to extraordinary achievement every day! Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) UPDATE Presented.
1 West Contra Costa Unified School District December 17, First Interim Financial Report.
Local Control accountability Plan (LCAP) Parent Meeting.
Superior StandardsSuccessful Students Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Update Stefanie P. Phillips, Ed.D., Deputy Superintendent, Operations Tony.
Palm Springs Unified School District 2014/15 First Interim Report As of October 31, 2014.
Evergreen School District Budget Advisory Committee January 21, 2015 January 21, 2015 BAC1.
March 27, 2013 Budget Workshop. Overview of Governor’s Budget Local Control Funding Formula – a new education funding distribution model No schools will.
Los Angeles Unified School District Edgar Zazueta, Chief of Staff-External Affairs Valley Schools Task Force 1/29/14 Los Angeles Unified School District.
Governor’s Proposals for the State Budget and K-12 Education Presented to the TRUSD Board of Trustees January 29, 2013 Presented to the TRUSD Board.
Budget Presentation. PROCESS BOARD ROLE IN THE BUDGET PROCESS: Establish philosophy and set budget development and adoption policy Review, adopt and revised.
Plumas Lake Elementary School District Second Interim Presentation March 12, 2014.
Larkspur-Corte Madera School District Highlights of Governor Brown’s proposed state budget presented at School Services of California Governor’s.
LCAP Butte County Office of Education. STATE FUNDING $ per ADA Revenue Limit $ Categorical Programs $ K-3 CSR $
Prepared by: Shelley Stiles, Business Manager Presented to the Board: June 10, 2015 West Sonoma County Union High School District Proposed Budget.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES: Douglas A. Bryce · Paul De La Cerda ∙ Rose Koscielny · Judy Egan Umeck SUPERINTENDENT: Joan M. Lucid, ED.D. RESPECT | INTEGRITY | LEARNING.
We believe kids can….. Connecting is key….. Learning unlocks opportunities…..
LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA (LCFF) JANUARY 24, 2014 PRESENTED BY: RAUL A. PARUNGAO ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
LCFF and LCAPs Presented to the 4 th District PTA March 18, 2014.
May Revision 2013 Escalon Unified School District.
Presented by: Mr. Kurt Madden, Superintendent Mr. Walter J. Con, Asst. Superintendent – Business Services November 12 th,
1. *Unduplicated Pupil Percentage (UPP) must be above 55% 2 Necessary Small School Base Grant (by grade span) Grade Span Adjustment K Supplemental.
Basic Budget Assumptions All budget decisions are made after answering the question: “How does this impact student achievement?” The budget must.
LCFF The LCFF is the largest change to California’s school finance model in almost 40 years with a planned eight-year transition period, beginning in
Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Overview Understanding LCFF Accountability.
Building the Parent Voice
1 West Contra Costa Unified School District January 31, Second Interim Financial Report.
LCAP Local Control Accountability Plan Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Annual Update and Consultation with Parents January 28, 2016.
Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Overview Understanding LCFF Accountability.
June 19, ADOPTED BUDGET.  Governor’s January budget proposal  Governor’s May revision  PUHSD’s Budget  Built upon the May revision.
nd Interim. Budget Reduction Process.
East Whittier City School District 2016 Local Control and Accountability Plan LCAP Community Meeting #3 May 27, 2016.
N OVATO U NIFIED S CHOOL D ISTRICT October 15, 2013 Local Control Funding Formula.
Themes for the Governor’s Budget
Budget Santa Paula Unified School District
First Interim Report Reflects Financial Activity Through October 31, 2016 Budget as of October 31, 2016 Board must certify if the District – Will.
West Sonoma County Union High School District Proposed Budget
The Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan
Junction Elementary School District
Golden Plains Unified School District
Associate Superintendent,
RIM OF THE WORLD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
RESPECT | INTEGRITY | LEARNING | TEAMWORK | ENTHUSIASM
Adoption Budget with Estimated Actuals
Tina Douglas Assistant Superintendent, Business Services
Local Control Accountability Plan Input
Lodi Unified School District Proposed Budget
Rim of the world unified school district
Local Control Funding Formula
RIM OF THE WORLD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Day Budget Revision.
San Diego Convention Center CBO20 LCFF Budgeting and Planning
Bonita Unified School District
DELAC CESD District Office - LRC January 17, 2019
Presentation transcript:

st Interim Financial Report and LCFF Budget Update December 2013

 The most dramatic change the school finance system has seen since the creation of revenue limits and categorical programs in 1972  Moves California to a weighted student funding methodology  LCFF replaces revenue limits and most state categorical programs  Begins in , but provisions phase in over time  Estimated eight years to full implementation Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF)

 Accountability for all LCFF dollars is linked to a locally developed plan designed to achieve identified goals – the LCAP  Planning process is intended to be transparent and engage the school community  The LEA budget is explicitly linked to LCAP goals and activities  Annual review of progress and updating of the LCAP is required  Funds are not restricted in the categorical program sense, but –  Funds generated by eligible students are intended to be used to improve and increase services for those students  Accountability for demonstrating how funds are used to support student needs is explicitly required as part of the LCAP Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP)

 Revenue Limit (old system):  Unrestricted funds received through revenue limits with few, if any, spending restrictions  Restricted funds received through many categorical programs with varied spending requirements  LCFF:  Equal base grants per pupil for 4 grade spans that are the same for all students at all school districts and charter schools  Targeted supplemental funding based on fixed percentages of the base grant amounts per pupil  Differentiated funding based on only 3 pupil characteristics  Low Income - Free and Reduced Meal Program (FRMP)  English Learners (EL)  Foster Youth Revenue Limit vs. LCFF

Revenue Limit, based on historical amounts per student with many adjustments Categorical Funding for specific purposes with many rules LCFF Base Grant is the same for every local educational agency with adjustments based on grade level LCFF Supplemental provided to address needs of English Learners, low income, and foster youth Pre-LCFFLCFF Changes Made by LCFF

Free and Reduced Price Meals (FRPM) 6, % Foster Youth % English Language Learners (EL) 1, % LCFF Subgroups CALPADS Enrollment = 9,402

Free and Reduced Price Meals (FRPM) 6,513 Foster Youth 582 English Language Learners (EL) 1,603 EL/FRPM 1,406 Unduplicated Pupil Count Unduplicated FRPM/EL/Foster Youth Pupil Count = 6,710, or 71.3% EL only 197 FRPM only 4,525

LCFF Simplifies State Funding Per Student Base Amount Grade Level Demographics (Low income, English Learner, and/or Foster Youth) ADJUSTMENTS $

 The starting point (floor) for LCFF in is funding received in for:  Revenue limits (deficited)  More than 40 different categorical programs (deficited)  The amount of revenue received in is the basis for the 1 st year of implementation, but:  It loses its character – it is no longer restricted and unrestricted, revenue limit and categorical  It is simply the reference point for determining LCFF funding and progress toward the LCFF target entitlement in The LCFF Transition

 target entitlement calculation  Grade span per-pupil grants are increased annually by COLA LCFF Base Grant Entitlement Calculation FactorsK Base Grant per ADA$6,845$6,947$7,154$8, %$107$109$112$130 Base grants – $6,952$7,056$7,266$8,419

 target entitlement calculation  K-3 CSR and 9-12 Career-Technical Education (CTE) adjustments are additions to the base grant LCFF Adjustments FactorsK Base grants – $6,952$7,056$7,266$8,419 Adjustment percentage 10.4% CSR % CTE Adjustment amount$723--$219 Adjusted grant per ADA$7,675$7,056$7,266$8,638

 target entitlement calculation  Supplemental and concentration grant increases are calculated based on the percentage of total enrollment accounted for by English learners (EL), free and reduced-price meal (FRPM) program eligible students, and foster youth *District specific calculation based on 71.3% unduplicated pupil count LCFF Supplemental and Concentration FactorsK Adjusted grant per ADA$7,675$7,056$7,266$8,638 Supplemental*$1,095$1,006$1,036$1,232 Concentration*$626$576$593$705 Total LCFF Target per ADA $9,396$8,638$8,895$10,575

Total ADA1, , , Target per ADA$8,895$10,575 Net Base$9,843,207$81,797,202$91,640,409 Targeted Instructional Improvement Block Grant (TIIG) $203,227 Transportation$711,623 Total LCFF Target$92,555,259 LCFF Target

LCFF Target and Gap Funding LCFF Target Categorical Funding Revenue Limit LCFF Base Grant LCFF Supplemental LCFF “Gap” LCFF Supplemental LCFF Base Grant

LCFF Target$92,555,259$93,168,442$95,001,151 - Funding Floor$61,264,864$64,232,234$69,003,852 = Difference (Gap)$31,290,395$28,936,208$25,997,299 x Gap Funding Rate11.78%16.49%18.69% = Gap Funding$3,686,009$4,771,581$4,858,895 LCFF Entitlement (Floor + Gap Funding) $64,950,873$69,003,815$73,862,747 Per ADA Amount (funded) $7,346$7,903$8,459 LCFF Phase-In

 Adopted by the Board in June 2013  Built Upon May Revise  Based on Revenue Limit funding formula  Included 1.565% COLA  Equating to $841,985 in additional funding over  Included a reduced deficit factor from % in to % in  Equating to $2,260,220 in additional funding over  Of the $3,686,009 LCFF Gap Funding, $3,137,682 was already anticipated in the Adopted Budget  Leaving $548,327 in additional revenue for A Look Back to Adopted Budget

Unrestricted General Fund Summary Unaudited Actuals Adopted Budget st Interim Budget Projected Budget Projected Budget Beginning Balance6,686,3676,489,0709,124,6056,437,1376,207,732 Revenue Limit/LCFF Other Revenue Contributions Total Revenues 55,341,131 56,050,379 7,084,270 -7,717,076 55,417,573 64,200,007 2,452,385 -7,396,728 59,255,664 68,239,434 2,452,385 -8,477,532 62,214,287 73,080,785 2,452,385 -8,652,054 66,881,116 Expenditures52,902,89356,985,52961,943,13262,443,69263,955,141 Net Increase/(Decrease) to Ending Balance 2,438,238(1,567,956)(2,687,468)(229,405)2,925,975 Ending Balance9,124,6054,921,1146,437,1376,207,7329,133,707 3% Reserve/Assigned/ Non Spendable Balances 2,201,9142,956,1952,569,9332,514,8162,539,281 LCFF Reserve2,704,2276,095,364 Undesignated/ Unappropriated $449,062

LCFF Reserves School Services Dart Board Excerpt from RCOE Guidance Letter: If the percentages that are projected by the DOF are used, please assign as part of the ending fund balance the additional revenues generated until after the SBE adopts regulations governing the expenditure of supplemental and concentration grant funds. It is recommended that in the and projections that the additional funding is assigned as part of the ending fund balance until the district is in budget development for these years.