Listening to Administrators: Learning about decisions and priorities National Center for Technology Innovation Tracy Gray, Ph.D., Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Ohio Valley Educational Service Center CIP expanded for Agency Improvement Planning September 8-9, 2011 CIP expanded for Agency Improvement Planning September.
PORTFOLIO.
District Roadmap Beginning Vision Statement Our vision is to be a model urban school district that values and celebrates diversity and is.
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
2013 Spring Meeting Size-Alike Session “Supporting Principals as Leaders of Learning”
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
PUT TITLE HERE Collaborating for Better IEPs Slide Deck No.4 Ministry of Education, 2009.
SHARING “SMALL” WINS Eleanor Hamilton EDU658/Instructional Leadership Kathy Zientek August 18, 2013.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP The Philadelphia Story The School District of Philadelphia’s CEO Region Gregory Shannon, Regional Superintendent Malika A.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Becoming a High Impact Board Susan Salter Director of Board Development Alabama Association of School Boards.
Teacher Leadership Initiative Trainings
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Curriculum & Alignment Institute Susan McCauley, Ph.D.
Thank you for joining us for Small Group Instruction The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
Technology Leadership
N.C.A. Quality Assurance Review Commendations and Recommendation Status Red Rock Day School January 27, 2011.
Family Involvement Parents as Partners. Beyond the Bake Sale: The Essential Guide to Family-School Partnerships Anne T. Henderson, Karen L. Mapp, Vivian.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California P-16 Council Recommendations The State’s Transformational.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
Made by: Mudassar Iqbal 1 INTEGRATION OF IT PLAN IN SCHOOL SYSTEM.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
Debra Brockway, Beth McGrath, Mercedes McKay Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Analysis of a Statewide K-12 Engineering Program:
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
© Copyright Wadhwani Foundation Principal and District Coordinator role.
EasyCBM ™ Collis L. Grisby.  The need that gave rise to this innovation involved the inability of school districts to stay within compliance with federal.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
H igh Expectations F amily Participation E xcellence in Instruction S uccess for Students A School-Wide Title 1 School.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Office of Service Quality
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
EasyCBM ™.  The need that gave rise to this innovation involved the inability of school districts to stay within compliance with federal regulations.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEPARTMENT OF TEACHING & LEARNING Subcommittee Process Map Guidelines for Effective Subcommittee Meetings SLC Subcommittee Member.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Snaptutorial ESE 697 Help Bcome Exceptional/ snaptutorial.com
Local Control Accountability Plan
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
New Prospect Elementary School
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
World’s Largest Educational Community
Presentation transcript:

Listening to Administrators: Learning about decisions and priorities National Center for Technology Innovation Tracy Gray, Ph.D., Director

2 NCTI: Fostering Collaboration  NCTI seeks to broaden and enrich the field by providing resources and promoting partnerships for the development of tools and applications by developers, manufacturers, producers, publishers and researchers.  Objectives:  To cultivate a collaborative network  To promote innovative products that reach the marketplace  To analyze needs, issues, trends, and promising technology innovation and transfer approaches

3 AbleNet  AbleNet provides solutions for classrooms and districts that help students with severe/profound to moderate disabilities achieve. Solutions: K-12 curriculums that have evidence based research to support implementation and progress monitoring Assistive technology that allows all students to participate in aligned curricular instruction and daily school activities Professional development supports that help create successful and engaging classroom experiences

4 Collaborative Research to Practice

5 Listening to Administrators  NCTI and AbleNet jointly designed the interview questions and market research approach  AbleNet leaders listened to over 50 administrators from various positions  Listened for priorities regarding assuring improvement for students with severe and moderate disabilities and acquiring assistive and learning technologies

6 Approach and Findings  NCTI analyzed interview data to identify common themes and concerns  NCTI produced recommendations to inform decision of industry leaders (marketing) administrators (purchasing) consumers

7 Outreach and Products  Outreach to Vendors – Educate vendors on administrators’ key concerns and vocabulary  Webinars – Disseminate information and engage in further discussion with vendors and administrators  Guide – Produce a practical guide to inform decision making and educate consumers

AbleNet asked: What keeps you up at night?

9 District Superintendents Answered:  Student progress (AYP)

10 District Superintendents Answered  Student progress (AYP)  Student safety

11 District Superintendents Answered  Student progress (AYP)  Student safety  Special education

12 District Superintendents Answered  Student progress (AYP)  Student safety  Special education  Facilities (budget, maintenance, adequacy)

13 District Superintendents Answered  Student progress (AYP)  Student safety  Special education  Facilities (budget, maintenance, adequacy)  Language minority students

14 Special Education Directors Answered  Special education students’ progress (AYP)

15 Special Education Directors Answered  Special education students’ progress (AYP)  Trend toward more involved needs (rise in autism, health needs)

16 Special Education Directors Answered  Special education students’ progress (AYP)  Trend toward more involved needs (rise in autism, health needs)  IDEA regulations and budgets: AT, IEP compliance, What’s the budget? “The biggest disappointment is investment in AT that never gets used.”

17 Special Education Directors Answered  Special education students’ progress (AYP)  Trend toward more involved needs (rise in autism, health needs)  IDEA regulations and budgets: AT, IEP compliance, What’s the budget? “The biggest disappointment is investment in AT that never gets used.”  Facilities (budget, maintenance, adequacy)

18 Special Education Directors Answered  AYP (by special education students)  Trend toward more involved needs (rise in autism, health needs)  IDEA regulations and budgets: AT, IEP compliance, What’s the budget? “The biggest disappointment is investment in AT that never gets used.”  Facilities (budget, maintenance, adequacy)  RTI – what will it mean for training and systems already in place

19 State AT Coordinators Answered  Deep utilization of technology

20 State AT Coordinators Answered  Deep utilization of technology  Collaboration in schools and communities

21 State AT Coordinators Answered  Deep utilization of technology  Collaboration in schools and communities  Access to and mastery of general curriculum and standards

22 State AT Coordinators Answered  Deep utilization of technology  Collaboration in schools and communities  Access to and mastery of general curriculum and standards  Teacher turnover and continued training needs

23 State AT Coordinators Answered  Deep utilization of technology  Collaboration in schools and communities  Access to and mastery of general curriculum and standards  Teacher turnover and continued training needs  Getting data that can inform decision making

Overlapping Concerns Different Perspectives

25 Overlapping Concerns AYP Facilities Special education Data

26 Different Perspectives People in different positions had different perspectives on the issues, in an increasingly granular focus.

27 Different Perspectives  From a Superintendent: “Data is a challenge: what is it telling me? How does it inform me? How can I make corrections earlier in the school year?”

28 Different Perspectives  From a Statewide AT Director: “Helping teachers become better teachers is critical and hard to maintain with turnover in teaching staff.”

29 Different Perspectives  From a Special Education Director “[I] am increasingly concerned with how the special education students are meeting general education requirements…”

30 Different Perspectives  From a building Principal “[I] look for evidence of wait time that paraprofessionals are using, how many children are involved in activities, etc.”

31 Recurring Critical Questions  How should purchasers make decisions?  How can researchers, industry leaders, administrators, teachers and parents contribute to the knowledge base?

32 Recurring Critical Questions How to inform decision making:  Need more data on student achievement with technology options  Need to demonstrate increased effectiveness when technology is well-integrated  Need to educate stakeholders about the levels of evidence required to support claims and purchases

Questions? Thoughts? Contact us at